PDF(13001 KB)
PDF(13001 KB)
PDF(13001 KB)
糙率对长距离输水管线水力特性的影响及应对措施
Influence of Roughness Coefficient on Hydraulic Characteristics of Long-distance Water Conveyance Pipelines and Countermeasures
长距离输水管道在运行初期管线糙率一般较小,运行一定年限后糙率逐渐增大,糙率大小直接影响工程输水能力和运行安全,开展糙率对稳定运行工况和过渡过程中管线水力特性的影响研究,并提出应对糙率变化的措施是保证工程长久高效运行的必要条件。以引绰济辽工程有压管线段206 km长的PCCP管为例,采用一维特征线法分析糙率变化对管线输水能力和过渡过程中水力特性的影响。研究表明:在稳定运行工况下当管线糙率偏大,管线引用流量减小,管线沿程水头损失增加,阀前管道压力减小,而阀后管道压力增大;在过渡过程中随糙率增大,水锤波传播的摩阻增大,管线压力与调压室水位极值均发生一定变化,工程设计时需考虑一定压力富裕度;采用改变管线阀门开度的方式应对管线糙率变化带来的风险,既能保证工程引用流量,又能将管线压力控制在安全范围之内。研究成果可为长距离输水管线糙率变化应对措施提供参考。
[Objective] In the early stage operation of long-distance water conveyance pipelines, the actual roughness coefficient is generally lower than the design value. After years of operation, factors such as erosion, sedimentation, and the growth of aquatic organisms cause the roughness coefficient to gradually increase, which directly affects the water conveyance capacity and operational safety of the project. This study systematically investigates the influence of roughness coefficient variations on the hydraulic characteristics of complex water conveyance pipelines under both stable operation and transient process. [Methods] The 206 km-long pressurized PCCP pipeline section of Chuo’er River to Xiliao River Diversion Project was taken as a case study (with surge protection measures of impedance-type surge tanks and flow and pressure regulating valves). The one-dimensional method of characteristics was used to analyze the influence of roughness coefficient variations on hydraulic characteristics during stable operation and transient process. Operational risks were evaluated, and strategies to address roughness uncertainty were proposed from the perspective of operational scheduling. [Results] Under stable operating conditions, when pipeline roughness coefficient was relatively high, the reference flow rate decreased, posing a risk of failing to meet the design flow rate. Additionally, the head loss along the pipeline increased, while the flow rate decreased. When the opening degree of the flow and pressure regulating valve at the mid-section of the main pipeline remained unchanged, the head drop at the valve location diminished accordingly. This resulted in decreased pressure on the main pipeline upstream of the flow and pressure regulating valve and increased pressure downstream, necessitating special attention to the influence of pipeline pressure variations. During the transient process, the water hammer waves generated by pipeline pressure fluctuations superimposed with the mass waves caused by water level fluctuations in the surge tank. After the valve was closed, the fluctuations propagated independently in the upstream and downstream sections of pipelines and gradually attenuated. With increasing roughness coefficients, the frictional damping of the water hammer waves increased, leading to reduced amplitude of head fluctuations before and after the valve, decreased magnitude of surge tank water level fluctuations, and lower stabilized water levels. Therefore, an adequate pressure margin should be considered in engineering design. It was possible to address the uncertainty caused by roughness coefficient variations by adjusting the opening degree of the flow and pressure regulating valve on the mid-section of main pipeline and terminal valves on branch pipelines, thereby ensuring the design flow rate. However, after the valve operation mode was adjusted, the pipeline pressure became dependent on the roughness coefficients and valve opening degree, making it necessary to verify in advance whether the pressure along the entire pipeline met the water hammer protection requirements. [Conclusions] In the design of long-distance water conveyance pipelines, the influence of pipeline roughness coefficient on both flow rate and hydraulic characteristics must be considered, and the upper and lower limits of roughness coefficient variations should be reasonably predicted. The upper limit is used to ensure the water conveyance capacity during long-term operation, while the lower limit is used to cope with the relatively large residual head in the early stage of operation. The findings of this study serve as a references for addressing roughness coefficient uncertainty in the design of long-distance water conveyance pipelines.
长距离输水管线 / 糙率 / 水锤防护 / 过渡过程 / 过流能力 / 水力特性
long-distance water conveyance pipelines / roughness coefficient / water hammer protection / transient process / flow capacity / hydraulic characteristics
| [1] |
于景洋, 袁一星, 李文秋, 等. 大口径PCCP管道沿程水头损失计算探讨[J]. 给水排水, 2009, 45(7):108-110.
(
|
| [2] |
王勇, 赵金箫, 丁文浩, 等. 管道糙率对火电厂冷却水系统过渡过程水力特性的影响[J]. 能源研究与利用, 2022(5):8-11,46.
(
|
| [3] |
郭永鑫, 郭新蕾, 杨鹏志, 等. 管道水力摩阻系数的敏感性分析[J]. 水利学报, 2019, 50(8): 1021-1028.
(
|
| [4] |
杨永民, 潘志权, 陈小丹, 等. 防护淡水壳菜涂料性能分析及工程实践[J]. 新型建筑材料, 2021, 48(11): 77-81.
(
|
| [5] |
胡普年. 盘道岭隧洞除险加固工程糙率原型观测及过流能力分析[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2019, 36(4): 67-70, 76.
盘道岭隧洞为长距离无压隧洞(长15.723 km),因地层岩性复杂、地质条件恶劣,出现了裂缝、表面混凝土剥蚀、地下水外渗等安全隐患。于2013年9月实施了除险加固,在洞壁套衬了最小衬砌厚度为0.25 m的钢筋混凝土,减小了隧洞过水断面。加固后隧洞表面较原隧洞光滑,糙率有所减小。隧洞过流能力能否满足设计要求,糙率是关键,常规计算及试验难以满足精度要求,为此进行了原型观测。介绍了糙率原型观测的理论依据、观测手段及方法,并对各段观测糙率的合理性及泄流能力进行了分析。观测分析表明:疙瘩沟矩形明渠段、隧洞进口未加固段、隧洞进口加固段和隧洞出口加固段的糙率分别为0.013 07,0.015 49,0.011 16,0.010 52,结合观测断面内的水位测定值,分析得出盘道岭隧洞经除险加固后过流能力满足设计要求。观测成果可为类似引调水工程优化设计、节约工程投资提供科学依据。
(
Hidden dangers such as cracks, surface concrete denudation and groundwater infiltration appeared on Pandaoling tunnel, a long-distance pressure-free tunnel with a length of 15.723 km due to the complex lithology and severe geological conditions. In September 2013, the tunnel was reinforced with lining of a minimum thickness of 0.25 m which reduced the tunnel’s overflow section. The reinforcement also reduced the roughness of tunnel surface which is a key factor determining whether the overflow capacity meets design requirement. Conventional calculation and test of roughness could hardly meet accuracy requirements. In view of this, prototype observation was conducted. The theoretical basis, observation approaches and methods of prototype observation are introduced in this paper, and the rationality of observed roughness and discharge capacity of tunnel sections are analyzed. The roughness of rectangular open section, tunnel entrance without reinforcement, tunnel entrance with reinforcement, and tunnel outlet with reinforcement is 0.013 07, 0.015 49, 0.011 16, 0.010 52, respectively. According to the measured water level in the observation section, the overflow capacity of the Pandaoling tunnel after reinforcement meets design requirements.
|
| [6] |
吕宏兴, 路泽生, 栾维功, 等. 引洮供水一期工程总干渠糙率原型观测(2): 糙率原型观测结果及经济效益[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2010, 27(2):37-41.
引洮供水一期工程为甘肃省大型长距离输水工程,为了给工程优化设计提供依据,糙率原型观测研究选择在引水流量、工程类型与引洮工程相近的引大总干渠30A隧洞和盘道岭隧洞及东二干渠U形渡槽和弧底梯形明渠进行。隧洞试验段流量与水位采用自动监测系统进行,原型观测结果为:30A隧洞预制钢筋混凝土管片衬砌圆形断面实测平均糙率0.012 627,盘道岭隧洞三心圆拱直墙平底板矩形断面实测平均糙率0.011 55;圆拱直墙反底拱断面实测平均糙率0.011 521。林坪沟钢筋混凝土U形渡槽实测平均糙率为0.011 93;林坪沟混凝土预制板衬砌弧底梯形明渠实测平均糙率为0.013 69。糙率原型观测结果均小于工程设计规范值。
(
|
| [7] |
冯艳, 张钦, 瞿方乐. 城市深层隧洞输水系统水力过渡过程特性分析[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2023, 42(增刊1): 170-174.
(
|
| [8] |
刘进, 王东黎, 杨进新. 南水北调中线PCCP管道的摩阻损失计算分析[J]. 南水北调与水利科技, 2008, 6(1):231-234.
(
|
| [9] |
田世炀, 彭新民, 李东丽, 等. 预应力钢筋混凝土管输水阻力测试分析[J]. 水利水电技术, 2005, 36(10):77-80.
(
|
| [10] |
袁前盛, 徐运海. 人口径混凝土管水力摩阻的试验研究[J]. 人民黄河, 1995, 17(7):29-30.
(
|
| [11] |
郑双凌, 马吉明, 南春子, 等. 预应力钢筒混凝土管(PCCP)的阻力系数与粗糙度研究[J]. 水力发电学报, 2012, 31(3): 126-130.
(
|
| [12] |
陈万敏. 山区输水工程管材选择探讨[J]. 珠江水运, 2013(9): 68-69.
(
|
| [13] |
俸荣伟. 浅谈长距离供水工程管材的选择[J]. 广西城镇建设, 2021(3): 32-34.
(
|
| [14] |
王晨澍. 球墨铸铁管在邢清干渠工程中的设计与应用[J]. 河北水利, 2019(2): 32, 47.
(
|
| [15] |
范勇锋. 强腐蚀条件下高压力输水管道工程管材的应用比选[J]. 吉林水利, 2017(5): 57-62.
(
|
| [16] |
马俊青. 球墨铸铁管在南水北调供水配套工程中的应用[J]. 中华建设, 2016(6): 158-159.
(
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |