PDF(7862 KB)
PDF(7862 KB)
PDF(7862 KB)
基于多种混合模型的中长期水文预报研究
Mid-Long Term Hydrological Forecasting Based on Multiple Hybrid Models
[Objective] Improving the prediction accuracy of medium- and long-term hydrological forecast is of great significance for water resources scheduling, flood control and drought relief, and agricultural production. This study aims to select reliable, efficient, and practical hybrid machine learning models to improve forecasting performance for highly irregular, complex nonlinear, and multi-scale variable medium- and long-term hydrological forecasts, providing new approaches for enhancing hydrological forecast accuracy in changing environments. [Methods] To improve the accuracy of hydrological forecasts, based on the measured monthly runoff series at Wanxian Station in the Three Gorges Reservoir area, the mutual information method was used to screen forecasting factors. Then, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) models optimized by the Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA), Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm (GOA), and Sparrow Search Algorithm (SSA) were established. Combined with Time-Varying Filtered Empirical Mode Decomposition (TVF-EMD), Complementary Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition (CEEMDAN), and Variational Mode Decomposition (VMD), multiple hybrid prediction models were established. Their prediction performance was evaluated using five indicators: mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and correlation coefficient (R). [Results] The forecast factor scheme selected by the mutual information method provided optimal model input, with a lag of 15 months achieving the maximum mutual information value and minimum MASE, representing the best input configuration. Among the three single machine learning models, LSTM and SVM outperformed BP, with LSTM and SVM showing similar performance. LSTM was preferred due to its sensitivity to temporal sequences, enabling better handling of nonlinear runoff prediction, and was thus used in coupling with different methods for runoff forecasting. The hybrid models following the “decompose-reconstruct” strategy outperformed single LSTM models: the VMD-LSTM model improved the NSE of the test set by 0.12 compared with the single LSTM model, exceeding CEEMDAN-LSTM and TVF-EMD-LSTM. Further integration with robust optimization algorithms enhanced accuracy: the VMD-SSA-LSTM model outperformed VMD-LSTM, VMD-GOA-LSTM, and VMD-WOA-LSTM, showing superior adaptability, generalization, and overall predictive performance. [Conclusions] Machine learning models provide effective runoff forecasting methods for regions with limited hydrological and meteorological data. The approach of combining forecasting factor screening, data preprocessing, and integrating robust optimization algorithms with the model can further improve the accuracy of a single hydrological forecasting model. The established VMD-SSA-LSTM model achieved test period performance of MAE=32.65, RMSE=43.44, NSE=0.95, MAPE=12.9%, and R=0.98, representing the highest accuracy among compared models. This model meets practical production and daily life requirements and can provide a reference for water resource management and industrial and agricultural production in the studied basin.
中长期水文预报 / 互信息 / 麻雀搜索算法 / 变分模态分解 / 三峡库区
medium- and long-term hydrological forecast / mutual information / sparrow search algorithm / variational mode decomposition / Three Gorges Reservoir area
| [1] |
孙周亮, 刘艳丽, 张建云, 等. 中长期径流预报研究进展与展望[J]. 水资源保护, 2023, 39(2):136-144,223.
(
|
| [2] |
吴海江, 粟晓玲, 祁继霞, 等. Vine Copula与贝叶斯模型平均结合的月径流预测及应用[J]. 农业工程学报, 2022, 38(24): 73-82.
(
|
| [3] |
王庆杰. 基于特征选择和时频分析的径流预测机器学习模型研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2022.
(
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
梁文翔, 骆震, 陈伏龙, 等. 基于CMIP6多模式集合的内陆河径流模拟及预估[J]. 地学前缘, 2024, 31(6):450-461.
随着全球气候变化和人类活动的影响,以冰川融雪为主要补给来源的内陆河径流序列发生了明显变化,预测未来气候变化下内陆河流域径流变化对区域水灾害防治和水资源合理利用具有重大意义。构建分解—模拟—优化—重构模型与多模式集合平均(MME)的8种GCMs数据耦合,预测分析玛纳斯河流域2024—2030年在不同气候情景下的径流响应特征。结果表明:Model.VLE模型在径流模拟阶段R<sup>2</sup>>0.86且TPE<0.28,其模拟误差最小、稳定性最优;历史时期GCMs数据经过空间降尺度、偏差矫正和Model.VLE模型耦合的径流模拟效果最优,能够为径流预测提供可靠结果;玛纳斯河流域未来(2024—2030年)径流来水偏丰较历史时期(2000—2014年)有显著增加趋势,未来年径流变化与未来气温和降水相关,3种气候情景下未来(2024—2030年)径流无显著差异。
(
|
| [9] |
梁浩, 黄生志, 孟二浩, 等. 基于多种混合模型的径流预测研究[J]. 水利学报, 2020, 51(1):112-125.
(
|
| [10] |
The accurate prediction of monthly runoff in the lower reaches of the Yellow River is crucial for the rational utilization of regional water resources, optimal allocation, and flood prevention. This study proposes a VMD-SSA-BiLSTM coupled model for monthly runoff volume prediction, which combines the advantages of Variational Modal Decomposition (VMD) for signal decomposition and preprocessing, Sparrow Search Algorithm (SSA) for BiLSTM model parameter optimization, and Bi-directional Long and Short-Term Memory Neural Network (BiLSTM) for exploiting the bi-directional linkage and advanced characteristics of the runoff process. The proposed model was applied to predict monthly runoff at GaoCun hydrological station in the lower Yellow River. The results demonstrate that the VMD-SSA-BiLSTM model outperforms both the BiLSTM model and the VMD-BiLSTM model in terms of prediction accuracy during both the training and validation periods. The Root-mean-square deviation of VMD-SSA-BiLSTM model is 30.6601, which is 242.5124 and 39.9835 lower compared to the BiLSTM model and the VMD-BiLSTM model respectively; the mean absolute percentage error is 5.6832%, which is 35.5937% and 6.3856% lower compared to the other two models, respectively; the mean absolute error was 19.8992, which decreased by 136.7288 and 25.7274 respectively; the square of the correlation coefficient (R) is 0.93775, which increases by 0.53059 and 0.14739 respectively; the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient was 0.9886, which increased by 0.4994 and 0.1122 respectively. In conclusion, the proposed VMD-SSA-BiLSTM model, utilizing the sparrow search algorithm and bidirectional long and short-term memory neural network, enhances the smoothness of the monthly runoff series and improves the accuracy of point predictions. This model holds promise for the effective prediction of monthly runoff in the lower Yellow River.© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.
|
| [11] |
梁晓鑫, 崔东文. 基于WPD-AGTO-DELM模型的年径流时间序列预测[J]. 三峡大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 44(5):14-20.
(
|
| [12] |
周育琳, 穆振侠, 彭亮, 等. 基于互信息与神经网络的天山西部山区融雪径流中长期水文预报[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2018, 35(8): 17-21.
为提高天山西部山区融雪径流的预报精度,更好地指导所在区域的工农业生产发展,针对影响预报精度的关键问题(预报因子的选择),基于互信息法、相关系数法、主成分分析法对研究区的预报因子进行优选,采用RBF神经网络以及组合小波BP神经网络模型进行径流预报研究,并进行不同方案的比较。结果表明:①互信息法优选出的预报因子作为模型输入可以提高预报精度;②采用不同优选预报因子作为RBF神经网络以及组合小波BP神经网络模型的输入变量,结果表明RBF神经网络模型的预测精度要好于组合小波BP神经网络模型;③以相对误差作为评价模型精确度的标准,预测效果最好的是基于互信息方法挑选出的预报因子作为RBF神经模型输入数据的模型预测结果。
(
The aim of this research is to improve the accuracy of forecasting snowmelt runoff in the mountainous areas of western Tianshan Mountains, and to better support the development of industrial and agricultural production in the study area. The predictor, which is a key issue affecting forecast accuracy, are optimized and selected by using mutual information, correlation coefficient method, and principal component analysis method. The selected predictors are taken as input factors in RBF neural network model and combinatorial wavelet BP neural network model for comparison. Results suggest that: 1) optimized predictors selected by the mutual information method could improve forecast accuracy; 2) according to forecast results under different scenarios, the results of RBF neural network model is superior to those of combinatorial wavelet BP neural network model; 3) with relative error as the standard of accuracy evaluation, RBF neural network model with input factors selected by mutual information method could produce the optimum forecast result.
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
GB/T 22482—2008,水文情报预报规范[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2009.
(GB/T 22482—2008,Standard for Hydrological Information and Hydrological Forecasting[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2009. (in Chinese))
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
王宣宣, 刘欢, 胡鹏, 等. 基于水量平衡原理和Budyko假设的强人类活动干扰下西辽河流域径流衰减归因分析[J]. 水资源保护, 2024, 40(6): 165-172.
(
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
罗潇远, 刘杰, 杨斌, 等. 基于改进鱼鹰优化算法与VMD-LSTM的超短期风电功率预测[J]. 太阳能学报, 2025, 46(3):652-660.
(
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |