PDF(6917 KB)
PDF(6917 KB)
PDF(6917 KB)
淮河中游典型分汊河道水沙特性及分水分沙规律
Water-Sediment Characteristics and Flow-Sediment Diversion Patterns in Typical Bifurcated Channels in the Middle Reaches of Huaihe River
为明确淮河中游典型分汊河道水沙特性变化及分水分沙规律,采用累积距平、M-K分析法、R/S分析法和Morlet小波分析法等方法,研究了分汊河道濛洼段1985—2020年来水来沙特性,探讨了水沙条件突变及变化趋势的驱动因素,基于水沙关系曲线分析了水沙协同关系与输沙能力的变化,定量给出了濛洼段各汊分流比和含沙量比。结果表明:王家坝站(总)年径流量总体未呈明显增减趋势,含沙量则表现出明显的减小趋势,未来一段时间继续呈减小趋势,在1995年左右发生突变,水库拦沙、农业种植改变下垫面及水土保持措施是含沙量减小的主要驱动因素;来沙系数呈减少趋势,外界影响系数a值逐渐减少,输沙特性拟合系数b值逐渐增大;濛河分流比与本段总来流基本呈正相关,随着流量增加,濛河分流的权重也逐渐升高,6 000 m3/s流量级以下分流能力略有萎缩,6 000 m3/s流量级可以与淮河干流平分上游来流,各汊点河道的含沙量比值近似等于各河道的水流挟沙力比值。以上结果为淮河中游水沙数值模拟中分汊河道含沙量计算模式提供理论支撑,为淮河中游河道整治采用长距离疏浚方案提供科学依据。
[Objective] Current research on water-sediment characteristics of the Huaihe River mainstream mainly focuses on single channels, while studies on water-sediment characteristics, relationships, and diversion patterns in its bifurcated channels are limited. This study selects the typical bifurcated section from Wangjiaba to Nanzhaoji (hereinafter referred to as “Mengwa section”) in the middle reaches of the Huaihe River, aiming to clarify the variations in water-sediment characteristics and diversion patterns of typical bifurcated channels. [Methods] A combination of cumulative anomaly analysis, Mann-Kendall (M-K) trend test, R/S analysis, and Morlet wavelet analysis was used to study the water-sediment inflow characteristics of the bifurcated channels in the Mengwa section from 1985 to 2020. The driving factors of abrupt changes and variation trends in water and sediment conditions were explored. The water-sediment coordination relationships and sediment transport capacity variations were evaluated using water-sediment relationship curves, and quantitative ratios of flow and sediment diversion across bifurcated channels of the Mengwa section were provided. [Results] The annual runoff at Wangjiaba station (total) showed no significant increasing or decreasing trend, while the sediment concentration displayed a pronounced decreasing trend, stabilizing below 0.15 kg/m3 after 2010 and continuing to decrease in the future. An abrupt change occurred around 1995. Sediment retention by reservoirs, agricultural land use changes altering underlying surfaces, and soil and water conservation measures were the primary driving factors of sediment concentration reduction. The sediment coefficient showed a decreasing trend, with external influence coefficient “a” gradually decreasing and sediment transport fitting coefficient “b” gradually increasing. This indicated a continuous reduction in sediment inflow intensity and an enhancement of the channel’s sediment transport capacity, promoting channel scouring. Meanwhile, the main channel cross-section exhibited sustained expansion, indicating an ongoing erosional state in this river section. The flow diversion ratio of the Menghe River was generally positively correlated with total flow in this section. At 2 000 m3/s (low-to-medium flow level), the main channel on the Huaihe River’s southern branch served as the primary flow passage. As the flow increased, the weight diverted through the Meng River progressively rose. Below the flow level of 6 000m3/s, its diversion capacity slightly declined, while at 6 000m3/s, the flow achieved equitable flow diversion with the mainstream of the Huaihe River. The sediment concentration ratios of each bifurcated channel were approximately equal to the ratios of their respective flow sediment transport capacity. [Conclusion] These findings provide theoretical support for sediment concentration calculation models in bifurcated channels during numerical simulations of water and sediment dynamics in the middle reaches of the Huaihe River, while offering a scientific basis for adopting long-distance dredging schemes in the river’s channel regulation strategies.
分汊河道 / 水沙特征 / 驱动因素 / 水沙关系 / 分水分沙规律 / 淮河中游
bifurcated channel / water-sediment characteristics / driving factors / water-sediment relationship / flow-sediment diversion patterns / middle reach of Huaihe River
| [1] |
刘玉年, 何华松, 虞邦义. 淮河中游河道特性与整治研究[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2012.
(
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
虞邦义, 吕列民, 杨兴菊, 等. 淮河中游洪水出路与河道治理研究进展[J]. 泥沙研究, 2021, 46(5):74-80.
(
|
| [4] |
虞邦义, 袁先江, 蒋尚明, 等. 江淮系统治水的实践与探索: 安徽省·水利部淮河水利委员会水利科学研究院建院70周年成就回顾[J]. 水利学报, 2022, 53(5): 515-529.
(
|
| [5] |
虞邦义, 郁玉锁. 淮河干流鲁台子至吴家渡河段输沙平衡分析[J]. 南昌大学学报(工科版), 2009, 31(2): 162-166.
(
|
| [6] |
张辉, 虞邦义, 倪晋, 等. 近66 a来淮河干流水沙变化特征分析[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2020, 37(3):6-11.
为了分析淮河干流水沙变化特征,选定吴家渡水文站为代表性水文站,采用累积距平、M-K分析法、R/S分析法和Morlet小波分析法等方法,对吴家渡站1950—2015年水沙实测资料进行分析,研究淮河干流近66 a来水沙序列变化趋势、突变点及周期特征,并深入分析水沙条件突变及变化趋势的真实原因。结果显示:整体上淮河干流年径流量未呈现明显的增加或减小的趋势,但淮河干流来沙量则表现出明显的减少趋势,2000年后来沙量趋于稳定;淮河干流来沙变化具有较明显的阶段性特征,整体上呈现出多、少2个阶段的变化过程,发生突变的年份在1980—1984年之间,未来一段时间来沙量整体呈现减小的趋势;水库拦沙、农业种植改变下垫面、人工采砂及航道整治与河道疏浚的作用是导致淮河干流含沙量持续减小的原因;径流量第1—第3主周期分别为18,8,2 a,并且在未来短时间内将继续保持枯水期;输沙量整体上保持减少的趋势,第1—第4主周期分别为7,17,25,2 a,含沙量的第1和第2主周期分别为23,6 a,并且在未来短时间内将继续保持少沙期。研究成果可为淮河流域水资源管理与河道治理开发利用提供理论依据。
(
The trends of water and sediment, abrupt change point, and periodic features of mainstream Huaihe River in the recent 66 years were examined via cumulative anomaly, M-K test, R/S analysis and wavelet analysis. The observed water and sediment data during 1950-2015 at Wujiadu hydrological station, a typical station, was analyzed. The real causes of abrupt changes and change trends were researched in depth as well. In general, the annual runoff of mainstream Huaihe River did not undergo obvious increase or decrease; yet the incoming sediment displayed a remarkable declining trend until 2000, after which the incoming sediment tended to be stable. The fluctuation of incoming sediment experienced two stages from large to small incoming, with the abrupt change happening during 1980-1984. Such decrement trend will last in the near future. The causes of such decrement of incoming sediment lie in reservoir blocking, agricultural plantation, artificial sand mining, navigation channel regulation, and river channel dredging. What’s more, the first, second, and third dominant periods of runoff are 18 a, 8 a, and 2 a, respectively; and in the near future low flow will continue; on the other hand, sediment discharge remained declining in general, with the dominant periods of 7 a, 17 a, 25 a, and 2 a; sediment concentration will also remain small in the near future, with its dominant periods of 23 a and 6 a. The research findings offer theoretical basis for the water resource management and channel exploitation of Huaihe River Basin.
|
| [7] |
王振龙, 陈玺, 郝振纯, 等. 淮河干流径流量长期变化趋势及周期分析[J]. 水文, 2011, 31(6):79-85.
(
|
| [8] |
史红玲, 胡春宏, 王延贵, 等. 淮河流域水沙变化趋势及其成因分析[J]. 水利学报, 2012, 43(5): 571-579.
(
|
| [9] |
毛世民, 许浒. 含沙量趋减的淮河水沙关系修正及河道整治方向的探讨[J]. 水利学报, 2015, 46(3):373-378.
(
|
| [10] |
倪晋, 虞邦义, 张辉, 等. 水沙变化情势下淮河干流治理方向探讨[J]. 水利规划与设计, 2019(4): 4-5, 18.
(
|
| [11] |
周贺, 虞邦义, 倪晋. 淮河干流鲁台子站水沙关系分析[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2014, 31(12):7-10,48.
水沙关系研究是河道治理研究中的重要基础性内容。鲁台子水文站是淮河中游主要控制站,研究鲁台子水沙关系对于揭示淮河中游河床演变规律及河道治理有重要作用。基于张瑞瑾挟沙能力公式和曼宁公式,通过对淮河干流鲁台子至峡山口河段坡降流量关系及河相关系、河道糙率等的分析,推导出鲁台子输沙平衡、冲刷、淤积状态下的挟沙能力公式。采用1990—2007年实测输沙量对公式进行验证。经验证,建立的挟沙力概化公式基本反映了鲁台子站的水沙关系。
(
|
| [12] |
马莉. 淮河淮南段分汊型河道污染物迁移规律研究[J]. 人民长江, 2014, 45(12):19-22.
(
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
丁君松, 丘凤莲. 汊道分流分沙计算[J]. 泥沙研究, 1981(1):58-64,57.
(
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |