高心墙堆石坝渗透破坏时变风险分析

周福雄, 赵勋礼, 刘宏伟, 卢祥, 裴亮, 陈辰

长江科学院院报 ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (9) : 167-173.

PDF(9366 KB)
PDF(9366 KB)
长江科学院院报 ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (9) : 167-173. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20240703
工程安全与灾害防治

高心墙堆石坝渗透破坏时变风险分析

作者信息 +

Time-varying Risk Analysis of Seepage Failure in High Core-wall Rockfill Dams

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

高心墙堆石坝赋存地质与环境复杂,防渗结构渗透破坏引发的结构故障甚至溃坝现象时有发生,合理评估大坝渗透破坏风险十分关键。针对高心墙堆石坝渗透系数时变规律不清晰、渗透破坏时变风险模型刻画难度大的问题,基于有限元模拟和原观数据,构建了高心墙堆石坝与地基渗透系数反演代理模型,提出了渗透系数的时变规律及表征函数;基于渗透系数时变规律和Monte-Carlo法,构建了高心墙堆石坝渗透破坏时变风险分析模型,并以瀑布沟大坝为案例进行了验证。结果表明:瀑布沟大坝坝与地基渗透系数反演的平均相对误差为0.4%,精度较高,且心墙与覆盖层的渗透系数均呈递增趋稳的时变规律;大坝渗透破坏时变可靠指标β在4.33~5.37之间,β值均大于目标可靠指标,表明该工程渗透破坏风险低,与工程实际相符。

Abstract

[Objective] The material composition of high core rockfill dams is complex. Under the influence of hydraulic loading, temperature, and other complex environmental factors during long-term service, the permeability coefficients of these materials inherently exhibit time-varying characteristics, significantly influencing seepage stability and overall dam safety. This study aims to address the limitations of existing research, which predominantly focuses on static parameter inversion or non-time-varying risk assessment, and lacks systematic consideration of the time-varying patterns of material parameters and the influence of long-term operation. [Methods] A time-varying risk analysis method for seepage failure in high core rockfill dams was proposed, integrating data decomposition, finite element simulation, time-varying parameter inversion, and failure risk analysis. First, based on multi-year measured seepage pressure data of the dam, empirical mode decomposition was used to extract the periodic and trend components. Combined with orthogonal experiments and response surface methodology, an inverse surrogate model for the permeability coefficients of the high core rockfill dam and its foundation was constructed. Subsequently, through optimization using a genetic algorithm, this study investigated and revealed the time-varying patterns and characterization functions of permeability coefficients. Finally, based on the time-varying patterns of permeability coefficients and the Monte Carlo method, a time-varying risk analysis model for seepage failure in high core rockfill dams was established to achieve the dynamic risk assessment of seepage failure in the dam structure. [Results] This method was applied to the Pubugou Dam project. The results showed that the relative error of permeability coefficient inversion for both the dam and foundation was less than 2%, with an average relative error of 0.4%. Seepage field simulations based on the inverted parameters showed that the distribution of seepage pressure inside the dam followed the rising and falling trend of the reservoir water level and was consistent with the patterns observed in the measured seepage pressure data. This conformed to the typical seepage field distribution patterns of high core rockfill dams, indicating a high level of inversion accuracy. Furthermore, the permeability coefficients of both the core wall and the overburden layer showed time-varying patterns of gradual increase and stabilization. Reliability analysis of seepage failure in the dam and its foundation indicated that the reliability indicator (β) of the dam consistently exceeded the design target value during the operational period, suggesting that the overall risk of seepage failure was low. Additionally, the reliability indicator for seepage failure in the dam and its foundation exhibited periodic fluctuations with changes in the reservoir water level, showing a generally negative correlation between the reliability indicator and reservoir water levels and a positive correlation between failure probabilities and water levels. This was generally consistent with the seepage characteristics and patterns of dam structures under different water level conditions, validating the applicability of the proposed time-varying risk analysis model. The results confirmed that the reliability indicator for seepage failure of the Pubugou Dam complied with regulatory requirements. [Conclusions] The method developed in this study integrates time-varying parameter inversion, modeling of time-varying patterns, failure path search, surrogate model construction, and time-varying risk analysis. By dynamically identifying and updating time-varying parameters in real time, it enables accurate simulation of seepage failure processes and full lifecycle monitoring of risk evolution, thereby enhancing the timeliness and accuracy of safety risk assessments for high dam structures.

关键词

高心墙堆石坝 / 渗透系数 / 反演 / 时变规律 / 渗透破坏风险

Key words

high core-wall rockfill dam / permeability coefficient / inversion / time-varying patterns / seepage failure risk

引用本文

导出引用
周福雄, 赵勋礼, 刘宏伟, . 高心墙堆石坝渗透破坏时变风险分析[J]. 长江科学院院报. 2025, 42(9): 167-173 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20240703
ZHOU Fu-xiong, ZHAO Xun-li, LIU Hong-wei, et al. Time-varying Risk Analysis of Seepage Failure in High Core-wall Rockfill Dams[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2025, 42(9): 167-173 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20240703
中图分类号: TV642.2 (碾压混凝土坝)   

参考文献

[1]
汝乃华, 牛运光. 大坝事故与安全·土石坝[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2001.
(RU Nai-hua, NIU Yun-guang. Embankment Dam Incidents and Safety of Large Dams[M]. Beijing: China Water & Power Press, 2001. (in Chinese))
[2]
尹川, 吴震宇, 王媛, 等. 土质心墙堆石坝非饱和渗流参数反演[J]. 水利规划与设计. 2021(8):130-136.
(YIN Chuan, WU Zhen-yu, WANG Yuan, et al. Inversion of Unsaturated Seepage Parameters of Soil Core Rockfill Dam[J]. Water Resources Planning and Design, 2021(8):130-136. (in Chinese))
[3]
沈宇扬, 沈振中, 李佳杰, 等. 基于思维进化算法优化BP神经网络的渗透参数反演研究[J]. 水电能源科学, 2020, 38(2):102-105,121.
(SHEN Yu-yang, SHEN Zhen-zhong, LI Jia-jie, et al. Research on Inversion of Permeability Parameters Based on BP Neural Network Optimized by Mind Evolutionary Algorithm[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2020, 38(2):102-105,121. (in Chinese))
[4]
CHEN C, ZHANG L. Hydro-mechanical Behaviour of Soil Experiencing Seepage Erosion under Cyclic Hydraulic Gradient[J]. Géotechnique, 2023, 73(2): 115-127.
[5]
余红玲, 王晓玲, 王成, 等. 贝叶斯框架下大坝渗流参数反演组合代理模型研究[J]. 水利学报, 2022, 53(3): 306-315, 324.
(YU Hong-ling, WANG Xiao-ling, WANG Cheng, et al. Research on Ensemble Surrogate Models of Dam Seepage Parameters Inversion under Bayesian Framework[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2022, 53(3): 306-315, 324. (in Chinese))
[6]
徐丽, 沈振中. 基于ELM-GA的复杂土石坝渗透系数反演模型及其应用[J]. 水电能源科学, 2021, 39(9): 86-90.
(XU Li, SHEN Zhen-zhong. Inversion Model of Permeability Coefficient for Complex Earth-rock Dam Based on ELM-GA[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2021, 39(9): 86-90. (in Chinese))
[7]
SONG J, YUAN S, XU Z, et al. Fast Inversion Method for Seepage Parameters of Core Earth-rock Dam Based on LHS-SSA-MKELM Fusion Surrogate Model[J]. Structures, 2023, 55: 160-168.
[8]
NAN S, REN J, MA Z, et al. Inversion of the Seepage Parameters of Earth/Rockfill Dams Considering the Coupling Effect of Seepage and Thermal Transfer[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2024, 165: 105882.
[9]
LI J, CHEN C, WU Z, et al. Multi-source Data-driven Unsaturated Seepage Parameter Inversion: Application to a High Core Rockfill Dam[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2023, 617: 129171.
[10]
XU L Q, LI L. Inversion Analysis of Seepage Parameters Based on Improved Shuffled Frog Leaping Algorithm[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering,Doi:10.1155/2021/6536294.
[11]
LI H, SHEN Z, SUN Y, et al. A New Approach for Seepage Parameters Inversion Analysis Using Improved Whale Optimization Algorithm and Support Vector Regression[J]. Applied Sciences, 2023, 13(18): 10479.
[12]
胡冉, 陈益峰, 李典庆, 等. 心墙堆石坝渗透稳定可靠性分析的随机响应面法[J]. 岩土力学, 2012, 33(4):1051-1060.
(HU Ran, CHEN Yi-feng, LI Dian-qing, et al. Reliability Analysis of Seepage Stability of Core-wall Rockfill Dam Based on Stochastic Response Surface Method[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2012, 33(4): 1051-1060. (in Chinese))
[13]
欧斌, 傅蜀燕, 林志祥, 等. 基于土料参数时变特性的土石坝渗透破坏概率动态分析方法[J]. 水利水电科技进展, 2019, 39(4): 64-68.
(OU Bin, FU Shu-yan, LIN Zhi-xiang, et al. Dynamic Analysis Method for Seepage Failure Probability of Earth-rock Dams Based on Time-varying Characteristics of Soil Parameters[J]. Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources, 2019, 39(4): 64-68. (in Chinese))
[14]
袁艳玲, 郭琴琴, 周正军, 等. 考虑参数相关的高心墙堆石坝材料参数反分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2017, 38(增刊1): 463-470.
(YUAN Yan-ling, GUO Qin-qin, ZHOU Zheng-jun, et al. Back Analysis of Material Parameters of High Core Rockfill Dam Considering Parameters Correlation[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2017, 38(Supp.1): 463-470. (in Chinese))
[15]
甘珩佚. 高面板堆石坝原观性态与结构安全可靠度分析[D]. 成都: 四川大学, 2022.
(GAN Heng-yi. Original Behavior Analysis and Structural Safety Reliability Analysis of High Concrete Face Rockfill Dam[D]. Chengdu: Sichuan University, 2022. (in Chinese))
[16]
成晓炜. 岩质边坡锚固工程时变可靠性分析模型及可靠度计算方法[D]. 长沙: 湖南大学, 2010.
(CHENG Xiao-wei. Time-varying Reliability Analysis Model and Reliability Calculation Method of Rock Slope Anchorage Engineering[D]. Changsha: Hunan University, 2010. (in Chinese))
[17]
中国电建集团成都勘测设计研究院有限公司. 瀑布沟水电站大坝防渗体系设计报告[R]. 成都: 中国电建集团成都勘测设计研究院有限公司, 2010.
(China Power Construction Group Chengdu Survey Design and Research Institute Co.,Ltd. Design Report on the Anti-seepage System for the Dam of Pubugou Hydropower Station[R]. Chengdu: China Power Construction Group Chengdu Survey Design and Research Institute Co.,Ltd, 2010. (in Chinese))
[18]
LU X, CHEN C, LI Z, et al. Bayesian Network Safety Risk Analysis for the Dam-Foundation System Using Monte Carlo Simulation[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2022, 126: 109229.
[19]
PEI L, CHEN C, HE K, et al. System Reliability of a Gravity Dam-foundation System Using Bayesian Networks[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2022, 218:108178.

基金

国家自然科学基金项目(52309162)

编辑: 罗玉兰
PDF(9366 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/