全国水资源分区尺度水系连通性评价

徐志成, 唐贤琪, 王敏, 刘尚武, 丁兵, 闫霞, 柴朝晖

长江科学院院报 ›› 2024, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (10) : 40-47.

PDF(8594 KB)
PDF(8594 KB)
长江科学院院报 ›› 2024, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (10) : 40-47. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20240687
水资源

全国水资源分区尺度水系连通性评价

作者信息 +

Evaluation of River System Connectivity on Scales of Water Resource Zones in China

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

水系连通性与水资源调配、水旱灾害防御、水生态环境保护和修复等水安全保障问题密切相关。针对当前全国范围水系连通性评价研究相对较少,区域间水系连通性横向对比不足,从水系连通基本内涵出发,在水资源分区尺度,选择数量、结构和水力特征及对应的评价指标,结合层次分析法和熵权法,构建了水系连通性评价体系,绘制了全国一级和三级水资源分区水系连通性空间分布图。结果表明,水系连通性总体自东南向西北逐渐递减,按照0.07~0.38、0.39~0.50、0.51~0.78划分低、中、高三类,水系连通性低值主要位于西北内陆干旱区、中值主要位于丘陵区域、高值主要位于长江中下游和淮河流域平原河网区。研究成果将有助于促进流域、区域水系连通系统规划与建设。

Abstract

River system connectivity (RSC) is closely related with water security issues, including water resources allocation, flood and drought management, and the protection and restoration of aquatic ecosystems. Currently, there is a lack of comprehensive studies evaluating RSC at a national level, and few comparisons were conducted among different water resource zones. To address this gap, an RSC evaluation system is established by employing hierarchical analysis and the entropy weight method. The evaluation indices reflect the quantitative, structural, and hydraulic characteristics in line with the fundamental connotation of RSC. The spatial distribution map of RSC values on different scales (first-grade and third-grade national water resource zoning) is plotted. Results indicate that RSC values decline progressively from southeastern to northwestern China, categorizing into low (0.07-0.38), medium (0.39-0.50), and high (0.51-0.78) levels. Low RSC values primarily occur in the arid inland areas of northwest China, while medium values are found in hilly regions, and high values are concentrated in the plain river networks of the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze and Huaihe River basins. This study contributes to enhancing RSC planning and development at both regional and catchment scales.

关键词

水系连通性 / 水系连通性评价体系 / 水资源分区尺度 / 全国范围 / 水力特征

Key words

river system connectivity / evaluation system of river system connectivity / scales of water resource zones / China / hydraulic characteristics

引用本文

导出引用
徐志成, 唐贤琪, 王敏, . 全国水资源分区尺度水系连通性评价[J]. 长江科学院院报. 2024, 41(10): 40-47 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20240687
XU Zhi-cheng, TANG Xian-qi, WANG Min, et al. Evaluation of River System Connectivity on Scales of Water Resource Zones in China[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute. 2024, 41(10): 40-47 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20240687
中图分类号: P343   

参考文献

[1]
周洪建, 王静爱, 史培军, 等. 深圳市1980—2005年河网变化对水灾的影响[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2008, 17(1):97-103.
(ZHOU Hong-jian, WANG Jing-ai, SHI Pei-jun, et al. Influence of River Network Change in 1980-2005 on Flood Hazard in Shenzhen City, China[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2008, 17(1):97-103. (in Chinese))
[2]
崔广柏, 陈星, 向龙, 等. 平原河网区水系连通改善水环境效果评估[J]. 水利学报, 2017, 48(12): 1429-1437.
(CUI Guang-bai, CHEN Xing, XIANG Long, et al. Evaluation of Water Environment Improvement by Interconnected River Network in Plain Area[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2017, 48(12): 1429-1437. (in Chinese))
[3]
王跃峰, 许有鹏, 张倩玉, 等. 太湖平原区河网结构变化对调蓄能力的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(3): 449-458.
(WANG Yue-feng, XU You-peng, ZHANG Qian-yu, et al. Influence of Stream Structure Change on Regulation Capacity of River Networks in Taihu Lake Basin[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(3): 449-458. (in Chinese))
[4]
GRILL G, LEHNER B, THIEME M, et al. Mapping the World’s Free-flowing Rivers[J]. Nature, 2019, 569: 215-221.
[5]
孟祥永, 陈星, 陈栋一, 等. 城市水系连通性评价体系研究[J]. 河海大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 42(1):24-28.
(MENG Xiang-yong, CHEN Xing, CHEN Dong-yi, et al. Evaluation System of Urban Water System Connectivity[J]. Journal of Hohai University (Natural Sciences), 2014, 42(1):24-28. (in Chinese))
[6]
WATTS D J, STROGATZ S H. Collective Dynamics of ‘Small-world’ Networks[J]. Nature, 1998, 393(6684): 440-442.
[7]
GOLDEN H E, LANE C R, AMATYA D M, et al. Hydrologic Connectivity between Geographically Isolated Wetlands and Surface Water Systems: a Review of Select Modeling Methods[J]. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2014, 53: 190-206.
[8]
张欧阳, 卜惠峰, 王翠平, 等. 长江流域水系连通性对河流健康的影响[J]. 人民长江, 2010, 41(2): 1-5, 17.
(ZHANG Ou-yang, BU Hui-feng, WANG Cuiping, et al. Impact of Drainage Connectivity on River Health in Yangtze River Basin[J]. Yangtze River, 2010, 41(2):1- 5, 17. (in Chinese))
[9]
李宗礼, 李原园, 王中根, 等. 河湖水系连通研究: 概念框架[J]. 自然资源学报, 2011, 26(3): 513-522.
(LI Zong-li, LI Yuan-yuan, WANG Zhong-gen, et al. Research on Interconnected River System Network: Conceptual Framework[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2011, 26(3): 513-522. (in Chinese)))
The remarkable growth in China’s population and economy over the past several decades has come to realize at a tremendous cost to the country’s environment, particularly around water. China’s water resources are over-allocated, inefficiently used, and grossly polluted by domestic and industrial wastes, to the point that vast stretches of rivers are dead and dying, lakes are cesspools of waste, groundwater aquifers are over-pumped and unsustainably consumed, and direct adverse impacts on both human and ecosystem health are widespread and growing. For addressing these crippling water problems, a new strategy of Interconnected River System Network (IRSN) is put forward, which is of great necessity for improving the capacity of water resources allocation, sustaining river’s heath and enhancing flood and drought control. However, up to now both the theory and technology of IRSN have still been a blank, far from the practices. Based on the further requirement of national water security and the improvement of the ecological civilization, with the new idea of human-water harmony and water resources livelihood, this paper presents a concept of IRSN, which can be defined as a river system network formed by constructing the hydraulic connection of water bodies of rivers, lakes and wetlands with various kinds of water projects, characterized by proper diversion and drainage,reasonable storage and discharge, adjustment of low and high runoff, complementary water multisource, controllable capacity, and the river system network appears to be complex, systematic, dynamic, temporal and spatial. Then the general thoughts of IRSN is proposed on the basis of the river system connection goal, the study of the IRSN can be carried out at four steps: 1) mechanism analysis, the theoretical basis of the whole study; 2) system identification and assessment, the analysis of the current status of IRSN in the researched region/basin, and the construction of Safety Evaluation Model with the complete indicators; 3) IRSN project plan, the make-out of the programmers with the requirement and problems of the society, and choosing the optimal decision from the solutions set; and 4) river system optimization and adjustment, the river system network will be reevaluated with the information of the monitoring system, and adjusted according to the principle of realizing the goal of sustainable development. According to the general thought of IRSN, some key problems worth specially concerning in the study are discussed, including different scales of IRSN, the process of river network connection, the pattern matching, the function of IRSN and the control methods.
[10]
符传君, 陈成豪, 李龙兵, 等. 河湖水系连通内涵及评价指标体系研究[J]. 水力发电, 2016, 42(7): 2-7.
(FU Chuan-jun, CHEN Cheng-hao, LI Long-bing, et al. Research on the Connotation and Evaluation Index System of Interconnected River System Network[J]. Water Power, 2016, 42(7): 2-7. (in Chinese))
[11]
梁霄, 巨文慧, 孙博闻, 等. 基于AHP-熵权法的平原城市河网水系连通性评价: 以廊坊市为例[J]. 南水北调与水利科技(中英文), 2022, 20(2): 352-364.
(LIANG Xiao, JU Wen-hui, SUN Bo-wen, et al. Water System Connectivity Evaluation in Plain Urban River Network Based on AHP-entropy Weight Method: A Case Study of Langfang City[J]. South-to-North Water Transfers and Water Science & Technology, 2022, 20(2): 352-364. (in Chinese))
[12]
林晓云. 基于熵权TOPSIS组合模型的河湖水系连通性评价[J]. 水利技术监督, 2024, 32(3): 98-101.
(LIN Xiao-yun. Evaluation of River and Lake Water System Connectivity Based on Entropy Weighted TOPSIS Combination Model[J]. Technical Supervision in Water Resources, 2024, 32(3): 98-101. (in Chinese)))
[13]
窦明, 余佳琦, 关健, 等. 基于水资源分区的中国水系发育度与连通度相关性[J]. 水科学进展, 2023, 34(6): 877-886.
(DOU Ming, YU Jia-qi, GUAN Jian, et al. Study on Relationship between Water System Development and Connectivity in China Based on Water Resource Zoning[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2023, 34(6): 877-886. (in Chinese))
[14]
王易初, 王海珍, 刘丹露. 塔里木流域内陆河水系连通性特征[J]. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 2023, 31(2):257-267.
(WANG Yi-chu, WANG Hai-zhen, LIU Dan-lu. Intermittency of Endorheic Rivers in the Tarim River Basin[J]. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 2023, 31(2):257-267. (in Chinese))
[15]
门宝辉, 刘菁苹. 联系数-图论耦合的城市河网水系连通性评价[J]. 水力发电学报, 2023, 42(1): 65-76.
(MEN Bao-hui, LIU Jing-ping. Evaluation of Urban River Network Connectivity by Coupling Connection Number and Graph Theory[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2023, 42(1): 65-76. (in Chinese))
[16]
高学平, 胡泽, 闫晨丹, 等. 考虑水力连通性的水系连通评价指标体系构建与应用[J]. 水资源保护, 2022, 38(2): 41-47.
(GAO Xue-ping, HU Ze, YAN Chen-dan, et al. Construction and Application of Water System Connectivity Evaluation Index System Considering Hydraulic Connectivity[J]. Water Resources Protection, 2022, 38(2): 41-47. (in Chinese))
[17]
傅伯杰. 景观生态学原理及应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2001.
(FU Bo-Jie. Principle and Application of Landscape Ecology[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2001. (in Chinese))
[18]
马爽爽. 基于河流健康的水系格局与连通性研究[D]. 南京: 南京大学, 2013.
(MA Shuang-shuang. Study on Water System Pattern and Connectivity based on River Health[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University, 2013. (in Chinese))
[19]
高玉琴, 肖璇, 丁鸣鸣, 等. 基于改进图论法的平原河网水系连通性评价[J]. 水资源保护, 2018, 34(1): 18-23.
(GAO Yu-qin, XIAO Xuan, DING Ming-ming, et al. Evaluation of Plain River Network Hydrologic Connectivity Based on Improved Graph Theory[J]. Water Resources Protection, 2018, 34(1): 18-23. (in Chinese))
[20]
徐光来, 许有鹏, 王柳艳. 基于水流阻力与图论的河网连通性评价[J]. 水科学进展, 2012, 23(6): 776-781.
(XU Guang-lai, XU You-peng, WANG Liu-yan. Evaluation of River Network Connectivity Based on Hydraulic Resistance and Graph Theory[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2012, 23(6): 776-781. (in Chinese))
[21]
李秋梅, 杨建英, 吴海龙, 等. 大清河流域水系分形及连通性研究[J]. 武汉大学学报(工学版), 2023, 56(3):296-303.
(LI Qiu-mei, YANG Jian-ying, WU Hai-long, et al. Study on Fractal and Connectivity of Water System in Daqing River Basin[J]. Engineering Journal of Wuhan University, 2023, 56(3):296-303. (in Chinese))
[22]
王延贵, 陈吟, 陈康. 水系连通性的指标体系及其应用[J]. 水利学报, 2020, 51(9):1080-1088,1100.
(WANG Yan-gui, CHEN Yin, CHEN Kang. Index System of Water System Connectivity and Its Application[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2020, 51(9):1080- 1088,1100. (in Chinese))
[23]
左其亭, 崔国韬. 河湖水系连通理论体系框架研究[J]. 水电能源科学, 2012, 30(1): 1-5.
(ZUO Qi-ting, CUI Guo-tao. Study on Theoretical System and Framework of Interconnected River System Network[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2012, 30(1): 1-5. (in Chinese))
[24]
宋炳坤, 刘俊, 尹文昊, 等. 基于AHP-熵权法的鄞西平原河网水环境改善效果综合评价[J]. 水电能源科学, 2024, 42(3): 68-72.
(SONG Bing-kun, LIU Jun, YIN Wen-hao, et al. Evaluation of Water Environment Improvement in Yinxi Plain River Network Area Based on AHP-entropy Weight Method[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2024, 42(3): 68-72. (in Chinese))
[25]
PEKEL J F, COTTAM A, GORELICK N, et al. High-resolution Mapping of Global Surface Water and Its Long-term Changes[J]. Nature, 2016, 540(7633): 418-422.
[26]
YAMAZAKI D, IKESHIMA D, SOSA J, et al. MERIT Hydro: A High-resolution Global Hydrography Map Based on Latest Topography Dataset[J]. Water Resources Research, 2019, 55(6): 5053-5073.
[27]
SONG C, FAN C, ZHU J, et al. A Comprehensive Geospatial Database of nearly 100 000 Reservoirs in China[J]. Earth System Science Data, 2022, 14(9):4017-4034.
[28]
孟宪萌, 黄檬, 黄杰, 等. 流域地貌与河网结构影响机制及其演化模型的研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2023, 38(8): 780-789.
摘要
流域地貌和河网结构是地球内外营力长期综合作用的结果,是一个地区构造、气候、植被和生物等因素相互作用的最终表现。由于各地区构造、岩性以及气候等条件的不同导致流域地貌和河网结构存在显著差异,进而对流域水文响应机制与特点产生影响。首先,对定量描述流域地貌和河网形态的特征参数进行了梳理与总结,并详述了构造、岩性以及气候等因素对流域地貌和河网结构影响的研究历程;其次,指出如何再现流域地貌演化过程以及定量研究流域地貌形态的主控因素是当前面临的主要问题;第三,对地貌演化模型的诞生、发展及应用进行了回顾与评述;最后,指出将传统地貌学研究方法与地貌演化模型相结合开展流域地貌及河网结构影响机制的研究是未来的主要发展方向。
(MENG Xian-meng, HUANG Meng, HUANG Jie, et al. Recent Advances in Influencing Mechanisms and Evolution Models of Watershed Geomorphology and River Network Structure[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2023, 38(8): 780-789. (in Chinese))

Watershed geomorphology and river network structure controlled by tectonic frameworks, regional climate, vegetation, and biological factors are the combined results of the long-term internal and external forces of the Earth. Owing to the different tectonic, lithological, and climatic conditions in various regions, different watersheds have different geomorphic and river network structural characteristics that influence hydrological response mechanisms. In this study, the characteristic parameters for a quantitative description of the watershed geomorphic system and river network morphology are presented, and the impacts of tectonics, lithology, climate, and other factors on watershed geomorphology and river network structures are reviewed. Based on this, it is emphasized that reproducing the evolution of watershed geomorphology and quantifying its main controlling factors is the main problem. Subsequently, the birth, development, and application of the geomorphic evolution model are expounded. Finally, it is suggested that the main future development direction should involve combining traditional geomorphological research methods and geomorphic evolution models to study the influencing mechanisms of watershed geomorphology and river network structure.

[29]
陈夏彬, 王易初, 倪晋仁. 长江与黄河流域因子对河网结构特征的影响[J]. 中国科学: 技术科学, 2019, 49(11): 1383-1384.
(CHEN Xia-bin, WANG Yi-chu, NI Jin-ren. Structural Characteristics of River Networks and Their Relations to Basin Factors in the Yangtze and Yellow River Basins[J]. Scientia Sinica (Technologica), 2019, 49(11): 1383-1384. (in Chinese))
[30]
ZHANG W, ZHANG Z, WEI X, et al. Long-term Spatiotemporal Changes of Surface Water and Its Influencing Factors in the Mainstream of Han River, China[J]. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 2022, 40: 101009.
[31]
夏文文, 王晨波, 邓宇, 等. 基于河网水动力模型的水系连通性对水环境质量的影响分析研究[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2024(3): 96-104.
摘要
平原河网地区地势平坦流速较缓,水体抗污染能力弱,改善水系连通性对水环境质量提升至关重要。以水系连通性较差的盛泽镇跃进联圩为研究对象,通过开展引调水试验,构建圩区河网水动力模型,探索圩区水利工作调度运行规则、河网水系连通方法以及相应的水环境变化规律。研究以水龄作为水系连通性的一种时间尺度参量,建立了跃进联圩水动力-水质-水龄的河网水环境模型,模拟了5种引调水方案下,圩内水系连通性及水质改善情况,并构建了压力、状态与响应的引调水连通效果评估体系,实现了对水系连通性变化与水环境改善水平的定量分析。结果表明:从水体交换时长来看,研究区域主要河道水体交换时间在5天以内,水体连通性越好的河道,水龄越短;从水质指标变化来看,调水实验中圩内的水环境氨氮变化最为明显,对引调水响应度高,模拟结果显示水龄与氨氮浓度变化趋势基本一致,水体连通性越好,水龄越短,有利于氨氮的削减;从引调水方案来看,单一调度方式对圩内水系连通性改善能力有限,特别是在河网内水体流动性弱的区域,同时使得圩区内水体流动性差异增大,更容易造成河网内水系连通性以及水质的空间分布差异,形成局部的滞水区或死水区。因此,采用多源引水与多区域排水相配合的调度方式,可以加强水系连通性,改善水环境质量。
(XIA Wen-wen, WANG Chen-bo, DENG Yu, et al. An Analysis of the Influence of Water System Connectivity on Water Environment Quality Based on River Network Hydrodynamic Model[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2024(3):96-104. (in Chinese))

The plain river network area has a flat terrain and slow flow velocity, resulting in a limited ability to resist pollution. Therefore, enhancing the connectivity of the water system is crucial for improving the quality of the water environment. This article focuses on the Yuejin polders which has poor water system connectivity in Shengze Town as the subject of research. By conducting water diversion experiments and constructing a hydrodynamic model of the river network in the polders area, the study explores the scheduling and operation rules of water conservancy work, methods of connecting the river network, and the corresponding changes in the water environment. The study utilizes water age as a time scale parameter to measure the connectivity of the water system. It establishes a river network model for hydrodynamics, water quality, and water age in the Yuejin polders. The simulation evaluates the connectivity and water quality improvement in the polders area under five water diversion schemes. Additionally, an evaluation system of pressure, state and response is constructed to quantitatively analyze changes in water system connectivity and the level of water environmental improvement resulting from water diversion. The results reveal that from the perspective of the length of water exchange, the exchange time of water bodies in the main river channels of the research area is within 5 days. The greater the connectivity of these water bodies, the shorter the water age becomes. From the perspective of changes in water quality indicators, during the water diversion experiment, the most noticeable change in the water environment inside the polders is the level of ammonia nitrogen. It shows a strong response to water diversion, and simulation results indicate that water age generally aligns with the concentration of ammonia nitrogen. Enhanced connectivity of water bodies leads to a shorter water age, which aids in reducing ammonia nitrogen levels. From the perspective of water diversion scheme, the uni-source water diversion and uni-region drainage scheme has limited effectiveness in improving the connectivity of the water system within polders, especially in areas with weak water flow in the river network. This scheme also increases variations in water flow within the polders, resulting in spatial differences in connectivity and water quality in the river network. Consequently, local stagnant water areas or dead water areas may be formed. Therefore, the combination of multiple sources of water diversion and multi-regional drainage scheme can enhance the connectivity of the water system and improve water environmental quality.

[32]
XU Z, CHENG L, LIU P, et al. Investigating the Spatial Variability of Water Security Risk and Its Driving Mechanisms in China Using Machine Learning[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 362: 132303.
[33]
XU Y, XU Y, WU L. Changes in River Networks and Their Storage and Regulation Capacities in the Rapidly Urbanized Taihu Basin, China[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2018, 32(22): 3341-3351.
[34]
SOGNO P, KLEIN I, KUENZER C. Remote Sensing of Surface Water Dynamics in the Context of Global Change—A Review[J]. Remote Sensing, 2022, 14(10): 2475.
[35]
ALLEN G H, PAVELSKY T M. Global Extent of Rivers and Streams[J]. Science, 2018, 361(6402): 585-588.
The turbulent surfaces of rivers and streams are natural hotspots of biogeochemical exchange with the atmosphere. At the global scale, the total river-atmosphere flux of trace gasses such as carbon dioxide depends on the proportion of Earth's surface that is covered by the fluvial network, yet the total surface area of rivers and streams is poorly constrained. We used a global database of planform river hydromorphology and a statistical approach to show that global river and stream surface area at mean annual discharge is 773,000 ± 79,000 square kilometers (0.58 ± 0.06%) of Earth's nonglaciated land surface, an area 44 ± 15% larger than previous spatial estimates. We found that rivers and streams likely play a greater role in controlling land-atmosphere fluxes than is currently represented in global carbon budgets.Copyright © 2018, American Association for the Advancement of Science.

基金

国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFC3202601)
国家重点研发计划项目(2023YFC3209500)
国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(52309003)
中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费项目(CKSF2024508/HL)
中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费项目(CKSF2024326/HL)

编辑: 黄玲
PDF(8594 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/