基于多变量变分模态分解与相关性重构的日径流预测模型

丁杰, 涂鹏飞, 冯谕, 曾怀恩

长江科学院院报 ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5) : 119-129.

PDF(8783 KB)
PDF(8783 KB)
长江科学院院报 ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5) : 119-129. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20240537
水灾害

基于多变量变分模态分解与相关性重构的日径流预测模型

作者信息 +

Daily Runoff Prediction Model Based on Multivariate Variational Mode Decomposition and Correlation Reconstruction

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

准确预测径流是预防洪涝灾害的基础。针对这一问题,提出一种基于多变量变分模态分解与皮尔逊相关性重构的日经流预测组合模型,该模型首先运用多变量变分模态分解(MVMD)方法分解日径流数据,然后,针对分解后的模态分量,运用皮尔逊相关系数法对该分量进行重构分类为波动项和随机项,运用思维进化算法(MEA)优化BP神经网络对波动项进行预测;运用灰狼优化算法(GWO)优化极限学习机算法(ELM)对随机项进行预测。最后,对两个模态分量预测融合得出最终预测结果。以汉江流域中的安康水电站与白河水电站径流数据为例进行分析,结果表明:安康站平均R2为0.87,白河站平均R2为0.93,预测模型预测效果较好、准确性较高,具有预测合理性。研究结果可为预防洪涝灾害和合理调控水资源提供依据。

Abstract

[Objective] This study took Hanjiang River Basin as the study area. To better monitor the runoff conditions in Hanjiang River Basin, the daily runoff data collected from Ankang and Baihe hydroelectric power stations were selected for prediction analysis. The original data included daily runoff from January 2005 to December 2012. [Methods] This study first employed Multivariate Variational Mode Decomposition(MVMD) to decompose the original daily runoff data from the two stations, reducing data complexity. Subsequently, the decomposed modes and the historical runoff data from the previous 7 days were reconstructed using the Pearson correlation coefficient method(used to measure inter-variable correlation). The modes with high correlation coefficients were superimposed and defined as fluctuation terms, while those with low correlation coefficients were superimposed and defined as random terms. For the prediction of fluctuation terms, the historical runoff from the previous 7 days was used as input, resulting in seven operating conditions. Then, the Microbial Enhanced Algorithm-Back Propagation(MEA-BP) model was used for multiple predictions, and the average values were taken, and evaluation indicators were employed to assess the seven operating conditions. For the prediction of random terms, the Grey Wolf Optimizer-Extreme Learning Machine(GWO-ELM) was used for multiple predictions, and the average values were taken, and evaluation indicators were also used for assessment. Finally, the predicted results were fused, and evaluation coefficients were derived using evaluation indicators, demonstrating the accuracy and stability of the model. [Results] For Ankang station, IMF1 and IMF5 showed correlation coefficients greater than 0.5 with R1-R7, indicating high correlation. Therefore, IMF1 and IMF5 were reconstructed as fluctuation terms. IMF2, IMF3, IMF4, and IMF6, with correlation coefficients all below 0.5 with R1-R7, were reconstructed as random terms. Similarly, for Baihe station, IMF1 and IMF5 had correlation coefficients exceeding 0.5 with R1-R7 and were reconstructed as fluctuation terms, while IMF2, IMF3, IMF4, and IMF6, with correlation coefficients all below 0.5 with R1-R7, were reconstructed as random terms. For the prediction of fluctuation terms, the seven operating conditions were specifically defined as: R1,R1-R2,R1-R3, R1-R4,R1-R5, R1-R6,and R1-R7. The coefficients of determination(R2) for these seven conditions of fluctuation term prediction at Ankang station were 0.54, 0.73, 0.74, 0.72, 0.81, 0.73, and 0.60, respectively, while those at Baihe station were 0.65, 0.68, 0.72, 0.77, 0.82, 0.74, and 0.77, respectively. The optimal operating condition for both stations was condition 5(R1-R5). For the prediction of random terms, the R2 for random term prediction at Ankang and Baihe stations was 0.80 and 0.74, respectively. Finally, the integrated prediction combining fluctuation and random terms under condition 5 yielded R2 of 0.87 and 0.93 for the overall prediction at Ankang and Baihe stations, respectively, demonstrating excellent model performance. [Conclusions](1) The MVMD decomposition method can control the number of decomposition layers, ensuring complete signal feature extraction without overfitting while improving processing speed.(2) Pearson correlation coefficient method enhances prediction accuracy through decomposed data classification.(3) The MEA-BP can improve signal-to-noise ratio, adapt to complex environments, enhance learning efficiency and generalization ability, and reduce computational complexity.(4) The GWO-ELM algorithm integrates grey wolf optimizer with extreme learning machine, providing a fast and adaptive solution for time-series prediction with reduced overfitting and improved efficiency.(5) The overall combined model can efficiently and stably process large amount of data while ensuring high accuracy.

关键词

多变量变分模态分解 / 相关性重构 / 思维进化算法 / BP神经网络 / 灰狼优化算法 / 极限学习机算法中图分类号:TV124 文献标志码:A文章编号:1001-5485(2025)05-0119-11

Key words

multivariate variational mode decomposition / correlation reconstruction / mind evolutionary algorithm / BP neural network / grey wolf optimizer / extreme learning machine algorithm

引用本文

导出引用
丁杰, 涂鹏飞, 冯谕, . 基于多变量变分模态分解与相关性重构的日径流预测模型[J]. 长江科学院院报. 2025, 42(5): 119-129 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20240537
DING Jie, TU Peng-fei, FENG Yu, et al. Daily Runoff Prediction Model Based on Multivariate Variational Mode Decomposition and Correlation Reconstruction[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2025, 42(5): 119-129 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20240537
中图分类号: TV124   

参考文献

[1]
钟鸣, 张鸿瑞, 王一帆, 等. 基于物理机制耦合深度学习方法的径流预测研究[J]. 云南电力技术, 2023, 51(3): 2-6, 12.
(ZHONG Ming, ZHANG Hong-rui, WANG Yi-fan, et al. Research on Runoff Prediction Based on Physical Mechanism Coupling Deep Learning Method[J]. Yunnan Electric Power, 2023, 51(3): 2-6, 12.) (in Chinese)
[2]
张建云, 王国庆, 金君良, 等. 1956—2018年中国江河径流演变及其变化特征[J]. 水科学进展, 2020, 31(2): 153-161.
(ZHANG Jian-yun, WANG Guo-qing, JIN Jun-liang, et al. Evolution and Variation Characteristics of the Recorded Runoff for the Major Rivers in China during 1956—2018[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2020, 31(2): 153-161.) (in Chinese)
[3]
王富强, 霍风霖. 中长期水文预报方法研究综述[J]. 人民黄河, 2010, 32(3): 25-28.
(WANG Fu-qiang, HUO Feng-lin. Summary of Research on Medium and Long-term Hydrological Forecasting Methods[J]. Yellow River, 2010, 32(3): 25-28.) (in Chinese)
[4]
章淹. 致洪暴雨中期预报进展[J]. 水科学进展, 1995, 6(2): 162-168.
(ZHANG Yan. Progress in Medium-term Forecast of Flood-causing Rainstorm[J]. Advances in Water Science, 1995, 6(2): 162-168.) (in Chinese)
[5]
张丽霞, 梁新平. 基于单相关系数法的中长期水文预报研究[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2008, 19(3):49-51.
(ZHANG Li-xia, LIANG Xin-ping. Study on Mid-to-long-term Hydrological Forecasting Based on Single Correlation Coefficient[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering, 2008, 19(3): 49-51.) (in Chinese)
[6]
杨旭, 栾继虹, 冯国章. 中长期水文预报研究评述与展望[J]. 西北农业大学学报, 2000, 28(6):203-207.
(YANG Xu, LUAN Ji-hong, FENG Guo-zhang. Discussion and Prospect on Mid-to-long-term Hydrological Forecasting[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University(Natural Science Edition), 2000, 28(6):203-207.) (in Chinese)
[7]
GHOSE D, DAS U, ROY P. Modeling Response of Runoff and Evapotranspiration for Predicting Water Table Depth in Arid Region Using Dynamic Recurrent Neural Network[J]. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 2018, 6: 263-269.
[8]
GAO S, ZHANG S, HUANG Y, et al. A Hydrological Process-based Neural Network Model for Hourly Runoff Forecasting[J]. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2024, 176: 106029.
[9]
ZOUNEMAT-KERMANI M, KISI O, RAJAEE T. Performance of Radial Basis and LM-feed Forward Artificial Neural Networks for Predicting Daily Watershed Runoff[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2013, 13(12):4633-4644.
[10]
XU D M, HU X X, WANG W C, et al. A New Hybrid Model for Monthly Runoff Prediction Using ELMAN Neural Network Based on Decomposition-integration Structure with Local Error Correction Method[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2024, 238: 121719.
[11]
ZHANG J, YAN H. A Long Short-term Components Neural Network Model with Data Augmentation for Daily Runoff Forecasting[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2023, 617: 128853.
[12]
SONG C M. Data Construction Methodology for Convolution Neural Network Based Daily Runoff Prediction and Assessment of Its Applicability[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2022, 605: 127324.
[13]
郝丽娜, 粟晓玲, 黄巧玲. 基于小波广义回归神经网络耦合模型的月径流预测[J]. 水力发电学报, 2016, 35(5): 47-54.
(HAO Li-na, SU Xiao-ling, HUANG Qiao-ling. Monthly Runoff Prediction Using Wavelet Transform and Generalized Regression Neural Network Model[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2016, 35(5): 47-54.) (in Chinese)
[14]
李文武, 石强, 王凯, 等. 基于变分模态分解和深度门控网络的径流预测[J]. 水力发电学报, 2020, 39(3):34-44.
(LI Wen-wu, SHI Qiang, WANG Kai, et al. Runoff Prediction Based on Variational Mode Decomposition and Deep Gated Network[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2020, 39(3): 34-44.) (in Chinese)
[15]
赵莹玉, 彭慧春, 李继清. 融合改进灰狼算法的机器学习月径流预测方法[J]. 水力发电学报, 2023, 42(9):34-45.
(ZHAO Ying-yu, PENG Hui-chun, LI Ji-qing. Machine Learning Method for Monthly Runoff Prediction Based on Improved Grey Wolf Algorithm[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2023, 42(9):34-45.) (in Chinese)
[16]
岳兆新, 艾萍, 熊传圣, 等. 基于改进深度信念网络模型的中长期径流预测[J]. 水力发电学报, 2020, 39(10):33-46.
(YUE Zhao-xin, AI Ping, XIONG Chuan-sheng, et al. Mid-and Long-term Runoff Forecasting Based on Improved Deep Belief Networks Model[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2020, 39(10):33-46.) (in Chinese)
[17]
张璐, 刘真, 李磊, 等. 基于VMD-PSR-BNN模型的月径流预测方法研究[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2023(4):105-113.
摘要
径流过程是地球上水文循环中的关键一环,科学准确地预测月径流的来水量对于流域的水量调度、水资源规划及管理具有十分重要的意义。然而由于径流过程的复杂性以及人类活动的影响,在变化环境中精准捕捉月径流时间序列的变化规律变得十分困难。针对月径流时间序列预测中存在的对于样本数据中先验信息识别不够彻底以及对时间步长嵌入维度难以有效地自适应选取这两点问题,设计了基于VMD-PSR-BNN的月径流时间序列预测模型。基于变分模态分解(VMD)算法对噪声良好的鲁棒性和对时序信号精确分解的特性,将月径流时间序列视为一种时序信号,利用VMD方法将月径流时间序列分解为多个相对平稳的固有模态函数(IMF),再基于相空间重构(PSR)理论对各个IMF分别进行重构,对各个重构后的IMF分别采用基于变分推理的贝叶斯神经网络(BNN)进行预测,最后将各个BNN的预测结果进行聚合重构得到月径流时间序列的最终预测结果。选取渭河流域咸阳和华县两个水文站1953-2018年的月径流时间序列进行实例分析。结果表明:VMD对月径流时间序列具有很好的分解效果,两个水文站基于VMD-PSR-BNN模型的月径流预测结果均可达到水文预报的甲级标准,并且对于样本中的极端值具有较好的拟合效果,为月径流时间序列的预测提供了新的方法参考。
(ZHANG Lu, LIU Zhen, LI Lei, et al. Research on the Monthly Runoff Prediction Method Based on VMD-PSR-BNN Model[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2023(4): 105-113.) (in Chinese)

The runoff process is a vital part of the earth’s hydrological cycle. Scientific and accurate prediction of monthly runoff inflow is of great significance for water flow scheduling, water resources planning and management in the basin. However, due to the complexity of the runoff process and the influence of human activities, it is very difficult to accurately capture the variation law of the monthly runoff time series in a changing environment. Because of the two problems in the prediction of monthly runoff time series, the prior information identification in the sample data is not thorough enough, and the time step embedding dimension is difficult to be effectively and adaptively selected. This paper designs a model for monthly runoff time series based on VMD-PSR-BNN. Based on the good robustness of variational mode decomposition (VMD) algorithm to noise and the characteristics of accurate decomposition of time series signals, the monthly runoff time series is regarded as a time series signal, and the VMD method is used to decompose the monthly runoff time series into multiple relatively stationary intrinsic mode function (IMF). Then, each IMF is reconstructed based on the phase space reconstruction (PSR) theory, and the Bayesian neural network (BNN) based on variational inference is used to predict each reconstructed IMF. Finally, the prediction results of each BNN are aggregated and reconstructed to obtain the final prediction result. The monthly runoff time series from 1953 to 2018 of two hydrological stations in Xianyang and Huaxian in the Weihe River Basin are selected for case analysis. The results show that the prediction results of the two hydrological stations based on the VMD-PSR-BNN model can reach the first-class standard of hydrological forecasting, and have a good fitting effect for the extreme values ??in the sample, which provides a new method reference for the prediction of monthly runoff time series.

[18]
刀海娅, 程刚, 崔东文. 多极小波包变换与改进浣熊算法优化的混合核极限学习机径流预测[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2024(6): 1-9, 20.
摘要
为提高日径流多步预测精度,减少模型计算规模,同时提升浣熊优化(COA)算法和混合核极限学习机(HKELM)性能,提出多极小波包变换(MWPT)-改进COA算法(ICOA)-HKELM日径流时间序列预测模型。首先,利用MWPT将日径流时序数据分解为1个低频分量和2个高频分量,并构建局部高斯径向基核函数和全局多项式核函数相混合的HKELM;其次,简要介绍COA算法原理,基于Circle映射等策略对COA进行改进,提出ICOA算法,通过8个典型函数对ICOA算法进行仿真验证,并与基本COA算法、鲸鱼优化算法(WOA)、灰狼优化算法(GWO)作对比,旨在验证ICOA算法的优化性能;最后,利用ICOA优化HKELM超参数(正则化参数、核参数、权重系数),建立MWPT-ICOA-HKELM模型,并构建MWPT-COA-HKELM、MWPT-WOA-HKELM、MWPT-GWO-HKELM、小波包变换(WPT)-ICOA-HKELM、小波变换(WT)-ICOA-HKELM、MWPT-ICOA-BP模型作对比分析,通过云南省景东、把边水文站2016-2020年日径流时间序列多步预测实例对各模型进行验证。结果表明:①ICOA具有较好的改进效果,仿真精度优于COA、WOA、GWO算法。②MWPT-ICOA-HKELM模型预测效果优于其他对比模型,其对实例单步预测效果“最好”,超前3步和超前5步“较好”,超前7步“较差”,预测精度随预测步长的增加而降低。③利用ICOA优化HKELM超参数,可显著提高HKELM预测性能,超参数优化效果优于COA、WOA、GWO算法。
(DAO Hai-ya, CHENG Gang, CUI Dong-wen. Multipole Wavelet Packet Transform and Improved Raccoon Algorithm Optimized Hybrid Kernel LimitLearning Machine for Runoff Prediction[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2024(6): 1-9, 20.) (in Chinese)

To improve the accuracy of multi-step prediction of daily runoff, reduce the computational scale of the model, and enhance the performance of the Coati Optimization Algorithm (COA) and Hybrid Kernel Extreme Learning Machine (HKELM), a Multi Pole Wavelet Packet Transform (MWPT) - Improved COA(ICOA) algorithm - HKELM daily runoff time series prediction model is proposed. Firstly, using MWPT, the daily runoff time series data is decomposed into 1 low-frequency component and 2 high-frequency components, and a HKELM is constructed by combining local Gaussian radial basis function kernel and global polynomial kernel function; Secondly, the principle of COA algorithm is briefly introduced, and by improving COA based on strategies such as Circle mapping, we propose the ICOA algorithm. The ICOA algorithm is simulated and verified through 8 typical functions, and is compared with the basic COA algorithm, Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA), and Grey Wolf Optimization Algorithm (GWO) to verify the optimization performance of the ICOA algorithm; Finally, using ICOA to optimize HKELM hyperparameters (regularization parameters, kernel parameters, weight coefficients), a MWPT-ICOA-HKELM model is established, and MWPT-COA-HKELM, MWPT-WOA-HKELM, MWPT-GWO-HKELM, Wavelet Packet Transform (WPT) - ICOA-HKELM, Wavelet Transform (WT) - ICOA-HKELM, and MWPT-ICOA-BP models are compared and analyzed. The models are validated through multi-step prediction examples of daily runoff time series from Jingdong and Baobian hydrological stations in Yunnan Province from 2016 to 2020. The results show that: ① ICOA has a good improvement effect, and the simulation accuracy is better than COA, WOA, and GWO algorithms. ② The MWPT-ICOA-HKELM model has better prediction performance than other comparative models, with the best single step prediction performance for instances, better results with 3 and 5 steps ahead, and worse results with 7 steps ahead. The prediction accuracy decreases with the increase of prediction step size. ③ Optimizing HKELM hyperparameters using ICOA can significantly improve HKELM prediction performance, and the hyperparameter optimization effect is better than COA, WOA, and GWO algorithms.

[19]
刘扬, 赵丽. 基于CEEMDAN-QPSO-BLS模型的径流预测研究[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2024(1):101-108.
摘要
准确的径流预测是水资源优化配置和高效利用的前提,是制定防洪减灾决策的基础,然而受到人类活动、环境、气候等因素的影响,径流序列呈现出非线性、非稳态、多尺度变化的特点,这为径流的精准预测增加了难度。为提高径流预测的精准度和可信度,结合自适应噪声完备集合经验模态分解(Complete Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition with Adaptive Noise,CEEMDAN)方法,量子粒子群优化算法(Quantum Particle Swarm Optimization,QPSO)、宽度学习系统(Broad Learning System, BLS)模型, 提出了一种基于CEEMDAN-QPSO-BLS组合式的径流预测模型。该组合模型首先使用CEEMDAN方法对原始径流信号进行分解,得到若干相对平稳的本征模态分量。其次利用QPSO算法对BLS模型的特征层节点组数、增强层节点组数和组内节点数进行寻优,得到最优的宽度学习网络拓扑结构,进而使用最优的QPSO-BLS对多个稳态分量进行预测,并对预测分量进行重构,从而获得更高的预测精度。以黄河流域小浪底水库的日径流值为实验数据,将EMD-QPSO-BLS、QPSO-BLS作为CEEMDAN-QPSO-BLS的对比模型,并采用纳什效率系数(NSE)、均方根误差(RMSE)、平均绝对误差(MAE)和平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)作为模型预测可信度和精准度的评价指标。实验表明,在预见期4天内,与QPSO-BLS、EMD-QPSO-BLS模型相比,CEEMDAN-QPSO-BLS的预测精准度分别提高了79.87%、19.80%,可信度分别提高了131.2%、10.98%,径流预测精度的提高,可为防洪抗旱保护人民生命财产和可持续发展提供决策支持。
(LIU Yang, ZHAO Li. Runoff Prediction and Analysis Based on CEEMDAN-QPSO-BLS Method[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2024(1):101-108.) (in Chinese)

An accurate runoff prediction is the prerequisite for the optimal allocation and efficient utilization of water resources, and the basis for making flood control and disaster reduction decisions. However, due to the influence of human activities, environment, climate and other factors, runoff series show nonlinear, unsteady and multi-scale changes, which increases the difficulty of accurate runoff prediction. In order to improve the accuracy and credibility of runoff prediction, this paper combines the Complete Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition with Adaptive Noise (CEEMDAN) method. Quantum Particle Swarm Optimization (QPSO), Broad Learning System (BLS) model, a combined runoff prediction model based on CEEEDAN-QPSO-BLS is proposed. Firstly, CEEMDAN method is used to decompose the original runoff signal to obtain several relatively stationary intrinsic mode components. Secondly, the QPSO algorithm is used to optimize the number of node groups in the feature layer, the number of node groups in the enhancement layer and the number of nodes in the group of BLS model, and the optimal topology structure of the width learning network is obtained. Then, the optimal QPSO-BLS is used to predict multiple steady-state components, and the prediction components are reconstructed so as to obtain higher prediction accuracy. In this model, the daily runoff value of Xiaolangdi Reservoir in the Yellow River Basin is used as the experimental data, and EMD-QPSO-BLS and QPSO-BLS are used as the comparison model of CEEMDAN-QPSO-BLS. Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) are used to evaluate the reliability and accuracy of the model prediction. The experimental results show that, compared with QPSO-BLS with EMD-QPSO-BLS models, the prediction accuracy of CEEMDAN-QPSO-BLS is improved by 79.87% and 19.80%, and the credibility is improved by 131.2% and 10.98%, respectively. This paper provides decision-making support for flood control and drought relief to protect people’s lives and property and sustainable development.

[20]
胡乐怡, 蒋晓蕾, 周嘉慧, 等. 考虑记忆时间的LSTM模型在赣江流域径流预报中的应用[J]. 湖泊科学, 2024, 36(4):1241-1252.
(HU Le-yi, JIANG Xiao-lei, ZHOU Jia-hui, et al. Application of LSTM Considering Time Steps in Runoff Prediction of Ganjiang River Basin[J]. Lake Science, 2024, 36(4):1241-1251.) (in Chinese)
[21]
李广, 郑豪豪, 蔡红柱, 等. 基于深度残差网络与MVMD的多通道地磁信号处理[J]. 地球物理学报, 2023, 66(8):3540-3556.
(LI Guang, ZHENG Hao-hao, CAI Hong-zhu, et al. Multi-channel Geomagnetic Signal Processing Based on Deep Residual Network and MVMD[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2023, 66(8): 3540-3556.) (in Chinese)
[22]
LUO S, WEI B, CHEN L. Multi-point Deformation Monitoring Model of Concrete Arch Dam Based on MVMD and 3D-CNN[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2024, 125: 812-826.
[23]
王仪, 许枫, 杨娟. 低信噪比下基于多元变分模态分解的水下蛙人特征提取[J]. 声学学报, 2024, 49(2): 318-326.
(WANG Yi, XU Feng, YANG Juan. Acoustic Feature Extraction of Divers Based on Multivariate Variational Mode Decomposition with Low Signal-to-noise Ratio[J]. Acta Acustica, 2024, 49(2): 318-326.) (in Chinese)
[24]
赵鹏, 姜彤, 苏布达, 等. 基于SSA-BP神经网络模型的全球入海径流量未来变化趋势[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2024, 20(2): 182-192.
(ZHAO Peng, JIANG Tong, SU Bu-da, et al. Research on the Future Change Trend of Global Runoff into the Sea Based on SSA-BP Neural Network Model[J]. Climate Change Research, 2024, 20(2): 182-192.) (in Chinese)
[25]
温会. BP神经网络在柏叶口水库中长期径流预报中的应用[J]. 内蒙古水利, 2022(9):9-11.
(WEN Hui. Application of BP Neural Network in Medium- and Long-term Runoff Prediction of Baiyekou Reservoir[J]. Inner Mongolia Water Resources, 2022(9):9-11.) (in Chinese)
[26]
高兴培. 基于结构熵权法和MEA-BP神经网络的MOOC学习效果评价[J]. 科技风, 2023(28): 16-18.
(GAO Xing-pei. Evaluation of MOOC Learning Effect Based on Structure Entropy Weight Method and MEA-BP Neural Network[J]. Technology Wind, 2023(28): 16-18.) (in Chinese)
[27]
SUBUDHI U, DASH S. Detection and Classification of Power Quality Disturbances Using GWO ELM[J]. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 2021, 22: 100204.
[28]
YANG H, ZHANG Z, LIU X, et al. Monthly-scale Hydro-climatic Forecasting and Climate Change Impact Evaluation Based on a Novel DCNN-transformer Network[J]. Environmental Research, 2023,236:116821.
[29]
李菊, 崔东文. 基于数据分解与斑马算法优化的混合核极限学习机月径流预测[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2024, 41(6):42-50.
摘要
为提高月径流预测精度,改进混合核极限学习机(HKELM)预测性能,提出小波包分解(WPT)-斑马优化算法(ZOA)-HKELM组合模型。利用WPT处理月径流时序数据,构建局部高斯径向基核函数和全局多项式核函数相混合的HKELM;通过ZOA优化HKELM超参数(正则化参数、核参数、权重系数),建立WPT-ZOA-HKELM组合模型,并构建WPT-遗传算法(GA)-HKELM、WPT-灰狼优化(GWO)算法-HKELM、WPT-鲸鱼优化算法(WOA)-HKELM、WPT-ZOA-极限学习机(ELM)、WPT-ZOA-最小二乘支持向量机(LSSVM)、ZOA-HKELM作对比模型,通过黑河流域莺落峡、讨赖河水文站月径流时间序列预测实例对各模型进行检验。结果表明:①莺落峡、讨赖河水文站月径流时间序列WPT-ZOA-HKELM模型预测的平均绝对百分比误差分别为1.054%、0.761%,决定系数均达0.999 9,优于其他对比模型,具有更高的预测精度,预测效果更好。②利用ZOA优化HKELM超参数,可提高HKELM预测性能,优化效果优于GWO、WOA、GA。③预测模型能充分发挥WPT、ZOA和HKELM优势,提高月径流预测精度;在相同分解和优化情形下,HKELM的预测性能优于ELM、LSSVM。
(LI Ju, CUI Dong-wen. Monthly Runoff Prediction of Hybrid Kernel Extreme Learning Machine Based on Data Decomposition and Zebra Algorithm Optimization[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2024, 41(6):42-50.) (in Chinese)
[30]
许建伟, 崔东文. WPT-HPO-ELM径流多步预报模型研究[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2022, 33(6): 69-76.
(XU Jian-wei, CUI Dong-wen. WPT-HPO-ELM Multi-step Runoff Forecast Model[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering, 2022, 33(6): 69-76.) (in Chinese)
[31]
黄康杰, 熊斌, 崔刚, 等. 基于Pearson相关性分析的双V型永磁电机失磁故障动态识别方法研究[J]. 电工技术学报, 2024, 39(22):7111-7125.
(HUANG Kang-jie, XIONG Bin, CUI Gang, et al. Research on Dynamic Identification Method of Loss-of-excitation Fault of Double V Permanent Magnet Motor Based on Pearson Correlation Analysis[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2024, 39(22):7111-7125.) (in Chinese)

基金

国家自然科学基金项目(42074005)

编辑: 罗玉兰
PDF(8783 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/