PDF(23827 KB)
PDF(23827 KB)
PDF(23827 KB)
热-力耦合对HTCC气渗性能及孔结构的影响
Effect of Thermal-Mechanical Coupling on Gas Permeability Properties and Pore Structure of HTCC
为探究高韧性水泥基复合材料(HTCC)在热-力耦合作用下的气渗特性,试验制备HTCC并测试其轴向拉伸力学性能,根据CAES运行工况在压强10 MPa、温度150 ℃以内选取9个试验方案,对10组HTCC试件做温压同步循环加载后进行高压气体渗透及微结构试验,测试热-力耦合作用对HTCC气渗性能及孔结构的影响。试验结果表明:HTCC拉压比可以达到0.16以上,峰值拉伸应变为0.7%以上,平均裂缝宽度为41~49 μm,具有很好的抗拉韧性与裂缝控制能力;HTCC气体渗透率为10-18 m2数量级,温压同步循环加载后渗透率均有明显增长,且温度与压强对渗透率的影响效果不同,渗透率对压强的变化更加敏感;气体渗透率随进气口压力的增加而逐渐减小,但当进气口压力超过3 MPa后,渗透率基本趋于稳定;当压强<7.5 MPa、且温度<100 ℃时,温压循环后HTCC渗透率能保持在10-18 m2数量级以内,可以满足CAES抗渗性能要求。当压强达到10 MPa时,HTCC临界孔径增大,孔径粗化,抗渗性能迅速劣化。
[Objectives] Traditional concrete is prone to brittle cracking under complex thermal-mechanical coupling conditions, which significantly increases the risk of gas leakage from underground gas storage reservoirs in Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) power stations. High-toughness cementitious composites (HTCC), due to their excellent toughness and impermeability, are considered as a potential structural lining material for CAES underground gas reservoirs. This study systematically investigates the gas permeability property and the evolution mechanism of the micro-pore structure of HTCC under thermal-mechanical coupling from an experimental perspective. A quantitative relationship between operational parameters (e.g., temperature and pressure) and gas permeability property is established, providing references for material selection in energy storage infrastructure. [Methods] Five groups of HTCC test specimens with different mix proportions were prepared. Their basic mechanical properties were evaluated through uniaxial tensile tests, and the mix with the best mechanical performance was selected to prepare ten groups of test specimens. Based on typical CAES operational conditions, nine test schemes were designed under a pressure of 10 MPa and temperature of 150 ℃. A self-developed temperature and pressure synchronized cyclic loading tester was used to simulate these operational conditions, and the ten groups of HTCC test specimens were subjected to ten cycles of loading. After the cycles, high-pressure gas permeability tests and mercury intrusion porosimetry tests were conducted to evaluate the effects of thermal-mechanical coupling on the gas permeability property and pore structure of HTCC. [Results] (1) The tensile-compressive strength ratio of HTCC reached 0.16, with a peak tensile strain exceeding 0.7% and an average crack width between 41-49 μm. HTCC demonstrated excellent tensile toughness and crack control capability, making it highly suitable for use in concrete lining structures of CAES reservoirs, and with optimized mix design, may also be applicable to the sealing layer. (2) The average gas permeability of the HTCC control group was 4.09×10-18 m2, and significant increases in permeability were observed after temperature and pressure synchronized cyclic loading. Under three pressure combinations (0-5 MPa, 0-7.5 MPa, and 0-10 MPa), when temperature increased from 25-50 ℃ to 25-150 ℃, three groups of test specimens showed maximum gas permeability increases of 112.7%, 183.6%, and 508.8%, respectively, compared to the control group. Moreover, temperature and pressure had distinct effects on permeability, with permeability being more sensitive to pressure than to temperature. (3) The gas permeability gradually decreased with increasing inlet pressure but tended to stabilize when the inlet pressure exceeded 3 MPa. (4) When the reservoir pressure was within 0-7.5 MPa, and the internal temperature reached 100 ℃, although the pore structure of HTCC changed, the critical pore diameter remained stable, and the permeability stayed within the order of 10-18 m2, which generally met the impermeability requirements of CAES reservoirs. However, when the operating pressure reached 10 MPa, the critical pore diameter increased, pore coarsening occurred, and new cracks formed, resulting in rapid degradation of impermeability. Therefore, if HTCC was to be used as the lining or sealing layer under 10 MPa pressure, it was recommended that its design compressive strength should exceed 40 MPa. [Conclusions] With excellent tensile toughness and crack control capability, HTCC can be applied to concrete lining structures of underground gas reservoirs in CAES power stations. When the operating pressure reaches 10 MPa, the impermeability of HTCC deteriorates rapidly. If HTCC is used as the sealing layer, its mix design should be optimized accordingly.
高韧性水泥基复合材料 / 热-力耦合 / 气渗性能 / 渗透率 / 孔结构
high toughness cementitious composites / thermal-mechanical coupling / gas permeability property / permeability / pore structure
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
周瑜, 夏才初, 赵海斌, 等. 压气储能内衬洞室的空气泄漏率及围岩力学响应估算方法[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2017, 36(2): 297-309.
(
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
蒋中明, 李鹏, 赵海斌, 等. 压气储能浅埋地下储气库性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1):235-241,252.
(
|
| [7] |
蒋中明, 甘露, 张登祥, 等. 压气储能地下储气库衬砌裂缝分布特征及演化规律研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2024, 46(1):110-119.
(
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
叶斌, 程子睿, 彭益成. 压气储能洞室气密性影响因素分析[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 44(10):1526-1532.
(
|
| [11] |
徐世烺, 蔡新华. 超高韧性水泥基复合材料碳化与渗透性能试验研究[J]. 复合材料学报, 2010, 27(3):177-183.
(
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
桂强, 秦敏峰, 李克非. 水泥基材料气体渗透性研究进展[J]. 硅酸盐学报, 2015, 43(10): 1500-1510.
(
|
| [18] |
柳献, 袁勇, 叶光, 等. 高性能混凝土高温微观结构演化研究[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 36(11):1473-1478.
(
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
武芳文, 何岚清, 段钧淇, 等. PVA-ECC高温冷却后力学特性与微观损伤机理[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2024, 56(9): 140-149.
(
|
| [23] |
姚燕, 王玲, 王振地, 等. 荷载与服役环境作用下混凝土耐久性的研究和进展[J]. 中国材料进展, 2018, 37(11): 855-865, 879.
(
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
李庆华, 徐世烺. 超高韧性水泥基复合材料基本性能和结构应用研究进展[J]. 工程力学, 2009, 26(增刊2):23-67.
(
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |