湖泊底泥典型持久性有机污染物控制指标

罗希, 谢晓靓, 徐成剑, 张露, 颜丹, 唐强

长江科学院院报 ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5) : 26-33.

PDF(6740 KB)
PDF(6740 KB)
长江科学院院报 ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5) : 26-33. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20240105
河湖保护与治理

湖泊底泥典型持久性有机污染物控制指标

作者信息 +

Control Indicators for Typical Persistent Organic Pollutants in Lake Sediments

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

环保疏浚是治理湖泊污染底泥,消减内源污染的重要手段,而科学合理确定疏浚范围的控制指标是保证治理效果和工程经济性的关键,但现阶段相关技术标准对底泥中持久性有机污染物(POPs)的控制指标并未予以明确。研究结合相关技术指南和规程,以长江流域鸭儿湖复合污染底泥为研究对象,通过收集梳理国内外相关学者的研究成果,对底泥中的二噁英、甲基汞及短链氯化石蜡(SCCPs)等持久性有机污染物(POPs)进行分析。分析结果表明:对于不具备渔业功能的湖泊,建议二噁英总毒性质量比和SCCPs质量比控制指标分别为5~10 ng/kg和900 ng/g;对于具备渔业功能的湖泊,建议参考地区背景值提高控制指标标准;对于底泥表层甲基汞质量比>5 ng/g的区域,应限制渔业养殖功能。根据湖泊功能提出的技术建议,为复合污染底泥修复补充了理论依据,也为今后同类湖泊治理项目的实施提供了一定的经验和借鉴。

Abstract

[Objective] Focusing on the composite-polluted sediments of Ya’er Lake in the Yangtze River Basin, this study aims to address the lack of control indicators for persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in environmental dredging projects. [Methods] A systematic analysis was conducted on the distribution characteristics and ecological risks of three typical pollutants: dioxins, methylmercury, and short-chain chlorinated paraffins (SCCPs). Based on the functional zoning of the lake, differentiated control indicators were proposed. The research methodology integrated comparative analysis of domestic and international standards (including China’s GB 36600—2018, Beijing’s DB11T 811—2011, and standards from Germany and Netherlands), analysis of pollutant migration and transformation mechanisms, and ecological risk assessment models. [Results]The concentration distributions of POPs in Ya’er Lake sediments were measured (dioxins: 1-50 ng/kg, methylmercury: 2-8 342 ng/g, SCCPs: 300-2 000 ng/g). Combined with the co-distribution patterns of heavy metal pollution, the response relationship between pollutant concentrations and lake functions was established. The results showed that control indicators for dioxins should be strictly graded according to lake functions: 10 ng/kg for lakes of landscape and storage functions (aligned with China’s Class I construction land standards), 5 ng/kg for lakes used for agricultural irrigation (referencing German agricultural land standards), and 1 ng/kg for lakes used for fishery purposes (based on background values and Dutch standards). For methylmercury control, the limitations of existing total mercury standards needed to be overcome. It was proposed that when the surface sediment methylmercury concentrations exceeded 5 ng/g, fishery activities should be restricted, with dry excavation identified as the preferred dredging method to minimize secondary pollution risks. For SCCPs control, a threshold of 900 ng/g was first proposed for non-fishery lakes (derived from ecological risk thresholds), while lakes used for fishery purposes required dynamic adjustments based on surrounding agricultural land data. The research demonstrated three breakthroughs: (1) it established for the first time China’s control indicator system for POPs in lake sediments, filling technical gaps in standards like GB 36600—2018 for dredging projects. (2) It revealed a high spatial correlation (R2>0.85) between POPs and heavy metal pollution in Ya’er Lake, proving that dredging according to existing heavy metal standards could simultaneously control POPs risks, thereby significantly reducing remediation costs. (3) It proposed a “function-pollutant-process” integrated control theory, offering a new paradigm for composite pollution remediation. [Conclusion] The conclusions indicate that differentiated control indicators can balance remediation costs and ecological safety. Dioxin standards for fishery water use must be an order of magnitude stricter than current soil standards, methylmercury risk control should be decoupled from total mercury metrics, and SCCPs thresholds must account for water solubility. The study provides critical scientific basis for the revision of standards such as the Technical Specifications for Environmental Dredging of Polluted Lake Sediments, and its methodology can be extended to remediation practices for other composite-polluted lakes globally.

关键词

湖泊底泥 / 持久性有机污染物 / 控制指标 / 二噁英 / 甲基汞 / 短链氯化石蜡

Key words

lake sediments / persistent organic pollutants / control indicator / dioxins / methylmercury / short-chain chlorinated paraffin

引用本文

导出引用
罗希, 谢晓靓, 徐成剑, . 湖泊底泥典型持久性有机污染物控制指标[J]. 长江科学院院报. 2025, 42(5): 26-33 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20240105
LUO Xi, XIE Xiao-jing, XU Cheng-jian, et al. Control Indicators for Typical Persistent Organic Pollutants in Lake Sediments[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2025, 42(5): 26-33 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20240105
中图分类号: TV851 (疏浚(河床整理))   

参考文献

[1]
范成新, 钟继承, 张路, 等. 湖泊底泥环保疏浚决策研究进展与展望[J]. 湖泊科学, 2020, 32(5):1254-1277.
(FAN Cheng-xin, ZHONG Ji-cheng, ZHANG Lu, et al. Research Progress and Prospect of Environmental Dredging Decision-making of Lake Sediment[J]. Journal of Lake Sciences, 2020, 32(5):1254-1277.) (in Chinese)
[2]
VIKELSONE J. Dioxin in Danish Soil: A Field Study of Selected Urban and Rural Locations: the Danish Dioxin Monitoring Programm[M]. Copenhagen: National Environmental Research Institute, 2004.
[3]
WU W Z, SCHRAMM K W, XU Y, et al. Contamination and Distribution of Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins and Dibenzofurans (PCDD/F) in Agriculture Fields in Ya-er Lake Area, China[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2002, 53(1): 141-147.
The contamination and distribution of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs) from two agricultural fields of a heavily polluted lake area in China (Ya-Er Lake) are presented. The vertical distribution pattern of total PCDD/Fs in soil cores reveals that the maximum concentration was in the layer of 20-30 cm. The concentrations in the top layer of soil at the two sites were similar (17.48 ng/kg at Site 1 and 18.10 ng/kg at Site 2), but the maximum concentration of Site 1 (120.8 ng/kg) was two times higher than that of Site 2 (64.39 ng/kg). The maximum concentration of PCDD/Fs in mud cores in rice fields (0-50 cm) at Sites 1 and 2 was in the layer of 0-10 cm. The maximum PCDD/F concentration in the top layer in mud at Site 1 (203.1 ng/kg) was higher than that at Site 2 (143.3 ng/kg). Significant correlations were found between the mud PCDD/Fs and the organic carbon content (R = 0.9743, P < 0.05 at Site 1; R = 0.9821, P < 0.05 at Site 2), the two variables being highly correlated (R = 0.9049, P < 0.05, at Site 1; R = 0.9916, P < 0.05 at Site 2). All correlation coefficients were significant at the 95% level. Concentrations were highly correlated with organic carbon, indicating that sorption to organic carbon was the dominant mechanism. Using principal component analysis, the homologue profiles of soil, mud, and plants (rice and radish) were compared. The PCDD/F patterns in plants were found not to be correlated to those in soil and mud. This suggests that atmospheric deposition may be the main source of PCDD/Fs in rice grain. However, mixed exposure involving uptake mechanisms and atmospheric deposition is considered main the source of PCDD/F pollution in radishes.
[4]
潘鲁生, 刘秀伟, 石春梅, 等. 乌江流域东风水库沉积物中汞及甲基汞的时空分布特征[J]. 地球与环境, 2012, 40(2): 201-207.
(PAN Lu-sheng, LIU Xiu-wei, SHI Chun-mei, et al. Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Mercury and Methylmercury in Sediments of the Dongfeng Reservoir, Guizhou Province[J]. Earth and Environment, 2012, 40(2): 201-207.) (in Chinese)
[5]
《湖泊河流环保疏浚工程技术指南(征求意见稿)》[S]. 北京: 中华人民共和国生态环境部, 2014.
(Technical Guide for Environmental Dredging Projects of Lakes and Rivers (Draft for Comment)[S]. Beijing: Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China, 2014. ) (in Chinese)
[6]
王静. 持久性有机污染物在中国的环境监测现状[J]. 资源节约与环保, 2021(2):54-55.
(WANG Jing. Environmental Monitoring Status of Persistent Organic Pollutants in China[J]. Resources Economization & Environmental Protection, 2021(2):54-55.) (in Chinese)
[7]
吴宇澄, 骆永明, 滕应, 等. 土壤中二噁英的污染现状及其控制与修复研究进展[J]. 土壤, 2006, 38(5): 509-516.
(WU Yu-cheng, LUO Yong-ming, TENG Ying, et al. Advances in Pollution Status, Control and Remediation of Soil Contaminated with Dioxins[J]. Soils, 2006, 38(5): 509-516.) (in Chinese)
[8]
武亚凤, 陈建华, 张国宁, 等. 二噁英的污染现状及健康效应[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2016, 6(3): 229-238.
(WU Ya-feng, CHEN Jian-hua, ZHANG Guo-ning, et al. Pollution Situation and Health Effect of Dioxins[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2016, 6(3): 229-238.) (in Chinese)
[9]
迭庆杞, 聂志强, 黄启飞, 等. 珠江三角洲地区土壤中二噁英污染水平及其分布特征研究[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2014, 36(11): 67-71.
(DIE Qing-qi, NIE Zhi-qiang, HUANG Qi-fei, et al. Pollution Levels and Distribution Characteristics of PCDD/Fs in Soil Samples from Pearl River Delta[J]. Environmental Pollution & Control, 2014, 36(11): 67-71.) (in Chinese)
[10]
UNEP Chemicals. Dioxin and Furan Inventories: National and Regional Emissions of PCDD/PCDE[R]. Geneva: UNEP Chemicals,1999:22-23.
[11]
BUCKLAND S J, ELLIS H K, SALTER R T. Organochlorines in New Zealand: Ambient Concentrations of Selected Organochlorines in Air[R]. Wellington: Ministry for the Environment of New Zealand. 1998:24-4l.
[12]
Ministry of the Environment of Japan. The Especially Method of Dioxins(Legal 105)[R]. Tokyo: Ministry of the Environment of Japan, 1999.
[13]
邓芸芸, 贾丽娟, 殷浩文.上海地区土壤二噁英类物质背景和污染水平初探[C]//《湖泊河流环保疏浚工程技术指南(征求意见稿)》论坛2008暨第三届持久性有机污染物全国学术研讨会.2008:42-44.
(DENG Yun-yun, JIA Li-juan, YIN Hao-wen. Preliminary Study on the Background and Pollution Levels of Dioxins in Soils in Shanghai Region[C]//Proceedings of 2008 the 3rd National Symposium on Persistent Organic Pollutants. 2008: 42-44. ) (in Chinese)
[14]
周志广, 田洪海, 李楠, 等. 北京市部分地区土壤中二噁英类物质污染水平初探[J]. 环境科学研究, 2006, 19(6): 54-58.
(ZHOU Zhi-guang, TIAN Hong-hai, LI Nan, et al. Preliminary Study on Level and Pattern of PCDD/PCDFS in Soil in Part of Beijing City[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2006, 19(6): 54-58.) (in Chinese)
[15]
刘劲松. 浙江省典型地区环境中持久性有机污染物污染现状、分布规律和来源解析[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2008.
(LIU Jin-song. Pollution Status, Distribution and Source Analysis of Persistent Organic Pollutants in Typical Areas of Zhejiang Province[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2008.) (in Chinese)
[16]
苏海磊, 郭飞, 魏源, 等. 中国保护水生生物的甲基汞水质标准制订初探[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2020, 10(3): 512-516.
(SU Hai-lei, GUO Fei, WEI Yuan, et al. Study on Methylmercury Water Quality Standards for Aquatic Life Protection in China[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2020, 10(3): 512-516.) (in Chinese)
[17]
王青峰, 樊磊磊, 王丹, 等. 贵州典型城市河流表层沉积物汞生态风险研究[J]. 环境工程, 2020, 38(8):249-254.
(WANG Qing-feng, FAN Lei-lei, WANG Dan, et al. Ecological Risk of Mercury in Surface Sediments of Typical Urban Stream in Guizhou Province[J]. Environmental Engineering, 2020, 38(8):249-254.) (in Chinese)
[18]
王立军, 刘亮, 马新东, 等. 大连湾表层沉积物中总汞和甲基汞的分布及影响因素[J]. 环境科学研究, 2019, 32(6):1026-1032.
(WANG Li-jun, LIU Liang, MA Xin-dong, et al. Total Mercury and Methylmercury Distributions in Surface Sediment in Dalian Bay and the Factors Driving the Distributions[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2019, 32(6): 1026-1032.) (in Chinese)
[19]
刘志全, 石利利, 刘济宁. 英国的土壤污染指导性标准[J]. 环境保护, 2006, 34(17): 74-78.
(LIU Zhi-quan, SHI Li-li, LIU Ji-ning. Guiding Standards of Soil Pollution in Britain[J]. Environmental Protection, 2006, 34(17): 74-78.) (in Chinese)
[20]
陈平. 日本土壤环境质量标准体系现状及启示[J]. 环境与可持续发展, 2014, 39(6): 154-159.
(CHEN Ping. Overview on the Formation Process and Current Situation of Soil Environmental Quality Standard System of Japan[J]. Environment and Sustainable Development, 2014, 39(6): 154-159.) (in Chinese)
[21]
刘永懋, 翟平阳. 甲基汞在水生生物体内富集倍数的研究[J]. 水资源保护, 1996, 12(3): 1-9.
(LIU Yong-mao, ZHAI Ping-yang. Study on Enrichment Multiple of Methylmercury in Aquatic Organisms[J]. Water Resources Protection, 1996, 12(3): 1-9.) (in Chinese)
[22]
任家盈, 姜霞, 陈春霄, 等. 太湖营养状态对沉积物中总汞和甲基汞分布特征的影响[J]. 中国环境科学, 2013, 33(7):1290-1297.
(REN Jia-ying, JIANG Xia, CHEN Chun-xiao, et al. The Effect of Nutrition Status on Sediments Distribution Characteristics of Total Mercury and Methylmercury in Lake Taihu[J]. China Environmental Science, 2013, 33(7): 1290-1297.) (in Chinese)
[23]
何天容, 冯新斌, 郭艳娜, 等. 红枫湖沉积物中汞的环境地球化学循环[J]. 环境科学, 2008, 29(7): 1768-1774.
(HE Tian-rong, FENG Xin-bin, GUO Yan-na, et al. Geochemical Cycling of Mercury in the Sediment of Hongfeng Reservior[J]. Environmental Science, 2008, 29(7): 1768-1774.) (in Chinese)
[24]
白薇扬, 冯新斌, 何天容, 等. 阿哈水库沉积物总汞及甲基汞分布特征[J]. 生态学杂志, 2011, 30(5):976-980.
(BAI Wei-yang, FENG Xin-bin, HE Tian-rong, et al. Distribution Patterns of Total Mercury and Methyl Mercury in Aha Reservoir Sediment[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2011, 30(5): 976-980.) (in Chinese)
[25]
YAN H, FENG X, SHANG L, et al. The Variations of Mercury in Sediment Profiles from a Historically Mercury-contaminated Reservoir, Guizhou Province, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2008, 407(1): 497-506.
Baihua Reservoir in Guizhou Province, China, experienced serious Hg contamination from Guizhou Organic Chemical Plant (GOCP) between 1971 and 1997. However, the biogeochemical cycling of Hg in this reservoir is not well studied. Sediment cores were collected in fall 2002, spring 2003 and in spring and fall 2004. THg and MeHg concentrations in all sediment profiles ranged from 0.26 to 38.9 mg/kg and from 0.5 to 27.5 microg/kg (d.w.), respectively. The distribution of THg in sediment cores was characterized by a few peaks, which may correspond to the Hg-containing wastewater discharge history of the GOCP. The average THg concentrations in sediments cores decreased from upstream to downstream due to the deposition of particulate Hg, which is the major form of Hg in water. THg and MeHg concentrations in pore water varied from 6.1 to 5860 ng/L and from 0.3 to 15.4 ng/L, respectively, which were significantly higher than levels in the overlying water column. Average diffusive flux from sediment to water is 1642 and 36 ng/m2/day for THg and MeHg. The spatial distribution of THg in pore water from upstream to downstream showed the same trend as the sediment, but MeHg in pore water did not show a declining pattern with distance from the GOCP. These results suggested that sediments experienced serious contamination of Hg, and the contaminated sediment is an important Hg contamination source to the overlying water.
[26]
朱金山, 高润霞, 王永敏, 等. 三峡库区消落带沉积物-水界面汞的扩散特征[J]. 地球与环境, 2018, 46(2):164-172.
(ZHU Jin-shan, GAO Run-xia, WANG Yong-min, et al. The Diffusion of Mercury at Water/Sediment Interface in Water-Level-Fluctuating Zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir[J]. Earth and Environment, 2018, 46(2): 164-172.) (in Chinese)
[27]
陈吉, 李秋华, 李仲根, 等. 河北省衡水湖沉积物中汞的分布特征及生态风险[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2014, 9(5): 908-915.
(CHEN Ji, LI Qiu-hua, LI Zhong-gen, et al. Distribution and Risk Assessment of Mercury in the Sediments of Hengshuihu Lake, Hebei Province[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2014, 9(5): 908-915.) (in Chinese)
[28]
张贝贝, 徐晨烨, 周泉, 等. 短链及中链氯化石蜡在上海市松江区农田土壤中的污染渗透及生态风险[J]. 环境科学研究, 2021, 34(11): 2757-2768.
(ZHANG Bei-bei, XU Chen-ye, ZHOU Quan, et al. Contamination, Penetration and Ecological Risk Assessment of Short and Medium-chain Chlorinated Paraffins in Agricultural Soils in Songjiang District, Shanghai[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2021, 34(11): 2757-2768.) (in Chinese)
[29]
刘宇轩, 凌欣, 闫振华. 环境中短链氯化石蜡的分布和蓄积及毒理效应研究进展[J]. 环境与健康杂志, 2019, 36(3): 272-277.
(LIU Yu-xuan, LING Xin, YAN Zhen-hua. Distribution, Bioaccumulation and Toxicological Effects of Short Chain Chlorinated Paraffins in Environment: A Review of Recent Studies[J]. Journal of Environment and Health, 2019, 36(3): 272-277.) (in Chinese)
[30]
陈露露. 中国二恶英大气网格化排放清单、归趋模拟及人群暴露风险[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2021.
(CHEN Lu-lu. Grid Emission Inventory,Fate Simulation and Population Exposure Risk of Dioxins in China[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2021.) (in Chinese)
[31]
张佩萱, 高丽荣, 宋世杰, 等. 环境中短链和中链氯化石蜡的来源、污染特征及环境行为研究进展[J]. 环境化学, 2021, 40(2): 371-383.
(ZHANG Pei-xuan, GAO Li-rong, SONG Shi-jie, et al. Chlorinated Paraffins in the Environment: A Review on Their Sources, Levels and Fate[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2021, 40(2): 371-383.) (in Chinese)
[32]
CHEN M Y, LUO X J, ZHANG X L, et al. Chlorinated Paraffins in Sediments from the Pearl River Delta, South China: Spatial and Temporal Distributions and Implication for Processes[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 45(23): 9936-9943.
[33]
徐驰, 高丽荣, 郑明辉. 台州地区沉积物中短链和中链氯化石蜡的污染特征和风险评估[C]// 持久性有机污染物论坛2018暨化学品环境安全大会论文集. 成都, 2018: 63-64.
(XU Chi, GAO Li-rong, ZHENG Ming-hui. Pollution Characteristics and Risk Assessment of Short-Chain and Medium-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins in Sediments from Taizhou Region[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 Persistent Organic Pollutants Forum and the Conference on Chemical Environmental Safety. Chengdu, Sichuan, 2018: 63-64. ) (in Chinese)
[34]
孙乾航, 郑欣, 闫振广, 等. 淡水环境中短链氯化石蜡的预测无效应浓度及生态风险评估[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2020, 15(1): 256-264.
(SUN Qian-hang, ZHENG Xin, YAN Zhen-guang, et al. Predicted no Effect Concentration and Ecological Risk Assessment of SCCPS in Freshwater Environments[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2020, 15(1): 256-264.) (in Chinese)
[35]
马新东, 陈晨, 吕景才, 等. 海洋环境中短链氯化石蜡的研究综述[J]. 海洋环境科学, 2014, 33(2):331-336.
(MA Xin-dong, CHEN Chen, Jing-cai, et al. Review on Short-chain Chlorinated Paraffins in Marine Environment[J]. Marine Environmental Science, 2014, 33(2): 331-336.) (in Chinese)

编辑: 王慰
PDF(6740 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/