抽水蓄能电站输水系统渗控效应及排水措施敏感性分析

李锋, 杨雨, 温立峰, 李炎隆

长江科学院院报 ›› 2024, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (12) : 109-116.

PDF(8547 KB)
PDF(8547 KB)
长江科学院院报 ›› 2024, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (12) : 109-116. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20231373
岩土工程

抽水蓄能电站输水系统渗控效应及排水措施敏感性分析

作者信息 +

Sensitivity Analysis of Seepage Control Effect and Drainage Measures in the Water Conveyance System of Pumped Storage Power Stations

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

抽水蓄能电站输水发电系统一般埋深较大,在引水系统外水内渗的作用下,厂房洞室群三维渗流场分布复杂,排水措施对控制输水发电系统的渗流场具有重要作用。采用三维渗流场有限元方法,建立张掖抽水蓄能电站输水发电系统三维渗流场数值计算模型,真实考虑输水系统、地下厂房系统、防渗排水系统。在对抽水蓄能电站输水发电系统的渗流场分布规律进行分析的基础上,讨论了压力管道下层排水系统和厂房排水系统对渗流场的影响。 结果表明: 正常运行情况下,地下厂房大部分位于浸润线以上且在设计渗控方案下渗流量控制在合理范围之内,渗流在靠近厂房洞室群的底部溢出,管道表现出内水外渗的特点,尾水系统渗流量相对较大;压力管道下层排水廊道对压力管道和厂房上游侧渗流场产生较大的影响,排水孔间距越小浸润线越低且相应区域渗流量越大,排水孔间距为3 m较为合理;厂房区域排水系统对地下厂房渗流场影响显著,随着排水孔间距的增加,排水效果减弱,集水井内流量减少,浸润线有所抬升,排水孔间距为3 m较为合理。

Abstract

The water conveyance and power generation system of pumped storage power stations is generally buried deeply,and the three-dimensional seepage field distribution of the plant’s chamber group is complex due to external seepage in the water diversion system. Drainage measures are crucial in controlling the seepage field of water transmission and power generation system. Using the three-dimensional seepage field finite element method, we constructed a numerical calculation model of Zhangye pumped storage power station’s water delivery and power generation system, integrating the water conveyance system, underground plant system, and seepage prevention and drainage systems. Based on the distribution law of seepage field within the power generation system, we analyzed the impact of the drainage system beneath the pressure pipeline and the plant’s drainage system on the seepage field. Results indicate that under normal operating conditions, most of the underground plant is above the wetting line, and seepage flow is maintained within a reasonable range under the designed seepage control plan. Seepage overflows occur near the bottom of the plant chamber group, the pipeline exhibits characteristics of internal water seepage, and the seepage flow of the tailwater system is relatively large. The lower drainage gallery of the pressure pipe significantly influences the seepage field of the pressure pipe and the upstream side of the plant. A smaller drainage hole spacing results in a lower wetting line and larger seepage flow in the corresponding area, with a drainage hole spacing of 3 m proving more reasonable. The drainage system in the plant area significantly affects the seepage field of the underground plant. As the drainage hole spacing increases, the drainage effect diminishes, the flow into the collection well decreases, the wetting line rises slightly, and a drainage hole spacing of 3 m is deemed more reasonable.

关键词

抽水蓄能电站 / 输水发电系统 / 地下厂房 / 输水系统 / 排水系统 / 渗流分析

Key words

pumped storage power station / water transmission and power generation system / underground powerhouse / water conveyance system / drainage system / seepage analysis

引用本文

导出引用
李锋, 杨雨, 温立峰, . 抽水蓄能电站输水系统渗控效应及排水措施敏感性分析[J]. 长江科学院院报. 2024, 41(12): 109-116 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20231373
LI Feng, YANG Yu, WEN Li-feng, et al. Sensitivity Analysis of Seepage Control Effect and Drainage Measures in the Water Conveyance System of Pumped Storage Power Stations[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute. 2024, 41(12): 109-116 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20231373
中图分类号: TV223.4 (水工建筑物的渗流和防渗)   

参考文献

[1]
晏志勇, 翟国寿. 我国抽水蓄能电站发展历程及前景展望[J]. 水力发电, 2004, 30(12): 73-76.
(YAN Zhi-yong, ZHAI Guo-shou. The Experienced Development Course and Development Prospect of Chinese Pumped-storage Power Stations[J]. Water Power, 2004, 30(12): 73-76.) (in Chinese)
[2]
李苏航, 苏玉婷, 张群, 等. 黄河羊曲水电站面板堆石坝三维有限元渗流分析[J]. 西北水电, 2021(2):68-72.
(LI Su-hang, SU Yu-ting, ZHANG Qun, et al. Three-dimensional Finite Element Seepage Analysis of CFRD of Yangqu Hydropower Station on the Yellow River[J]. Northwest Hydropower, 2021(2):68-72.) (in Chinese)
[3]
张伟, 任占杰, 王孝岐, 等. 丰宁抽水蓄能电站大坝填筑新技术应用和质量控制[J]. 西北水电, 2021(3):71-78.
(ZHANG Wei, REN Zhan-jie, WANG Xiao-qi, et al. Application of New Technology and Quality Control Method for Dam Filling of Fengning Pumped Storage Power Station[J]. Northwest Hydropower, 2021(3):71-78.) (in Chinese)
[4]
孙超伟, 柴军瑞, 许增光, 等. 金川水电站地下厂房裂隙围岩渗控效应数值模拟与评价[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2016, 38(5): 786-797.
(SUN Chao-wei, CHAI Jun-rui, XU Zeng-guang, et al. Numerical Simulation and Assessment of Seepage Control Effects on Surrounding Fractured Rocks of Underground Powerhouse in Jinchuan Hydropower Station[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(5): 786-797.) (in Chinese)
[5]
朱国胜, 崔皓东, 张家发, 等. 乌东德水电站坝基及右岸地下厂房区渗控措施研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2012, 34(9): 1722-1727.
(ZHU Guo-sheng, CUI Hao-dong, ZHANG Jia-fa, et al. Seepage Control Measures for Dam Foundation and Underground Powerhouse Caverns at Right Bank of Wudongde Hydropower Station[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 34(9): 1722-1727.) (in Chinese)
[6]
段斌, 张林, 何江达, 等. 复杂裂隙岩体天然渗流场反演分析[J]. 水力发电学报, 2012, 31(3): 188-193, 198.
(DUAN Bin, ZHANG Lin, HE Jiang-da, et al. Back Analysis of Natural Seepage Field in Complicated Fractured Rock Mass[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2012, 31(3): 188-193, 198.) (in Chinese)
[7]
LI L, XIAO M. Study on Implicit Composite Element Method for Seepage Analysis in Underground Engineering[J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2015, 58(10):1617-1626.
[8]
BIAN K, XIAO M, CHEN J. Study on Coupled Seepage and Stress Fields in the Concrete Lining of the Underground Pipe with High Water Pressure[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2009, 24(3):287-295.
[9]
周斌, 刘斯宏, 姜忠见, 等. 洪屏抽水蓄能电站渗控效果数值模拟与评价[J]. 水力发电学报, 2015, 34(5):131-139.
(ZHOU Bin, LIU Si-hong, JIANG Zhong-jian, et al. Numerical Assessment of Seepage Control Effects of Hongping Pumped Storage Power Station[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2015, 34(5):131-139.) (in Chinese)
[10]
陈益峰, 周创兵, 毛新莹, 等. 水布垭地下厂房围岩渗控效应数值模拟与评价[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2010, 29(2):308-318.
(CHEN Yi-feng, ZHOU Chuang-bing, MAO Xin-ying, et al. Numerical Simulation and Assessment of Seepage Control Effects on Surrounding Rocks of Underground Powerhouse in Shuibuya Hydropower Project[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 29(2):308-318.) (in Chinese)
[11]
陈益峰, 周创兵, 胡冉, 等. 大型水电工程渗流分析的若干关键问题研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2010, 32(9):1448-1454.
(CHEN Yi-feng, ZHOU Chuang-bing, HU Ran, et al. Key Issues on Seepage Flow Analysis in Large Scale Hydropower Projects[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2010, 32(9):1448-1454.) (in Chinese)
[12]
陈益峰, 胡冉, 周嵩, 等. 高堆石坝水力耦合模型及工程应用[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2011, 33(9):1340-1347.
(CHEN Yi-feng, HU Ran, ZHOU Song, et al. Coupled Hydromechanical Model for High Concrete-faced Rockfill Dams and Its Application[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(9):1340-1347.) (in Chinese)
[13]
XU Q, CHEN J T, XIAO M. Analysis of Unsteady Seepage Field and Surrounding Rock Stability of Underground Cavern Excavation[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 97: 103239.
[14]
LI Y, CHEN Y, JIANG Q, et al. Performance Assessment and Optimization of Seepage Control System: A Numerical Case Study for Kala Underground Powerhouse[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2014,55:306-315.
[15]
CHEN Y, HU R, ZHOU C, et al. A New Classification of Seepage Control Mechanisms in Geotechnical Engineering[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2010, 2(3): 209-222.
[16]
李炎隆, 贾巍, 温立峰, 等. 抽水蓄能电站输水及地下洞室系统渗流场三维有限元分析[J]. 西北水电, 2022(5): 92-97.
(LI Yan-long, JIA Wei, WEN Li-feng, et al. Three-dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Seepage Field of Water Delivery and Underground Cavern System in Pumped Storage Power Station[J]. Northwest Hydropower, 2022(5): 92-97.) (in Chinese)

基金

国家自然科学基金重点项目(52039008)
国家自然科学基金杰出青年科学基金项目(52125904)

编辑: 刘运飞
PDF(8547 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/