PDF(8377 KB)
PDF(8377 KB)
PDF(8377 KB)
陶家湖沉积物重金属来源解析及生态风险评价
Source Analysis and Ecological Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Sediments of Taojia Lake
对采自松滋市陶家湖不同部位的3根沉积物柱状样品进行了重金属(Cu、Zn、Cr、Ni、Pb、As)含量和粒度测定,利用潜在生态风险指数法和地累积指数法评价重金属潜在风险,并利用相关性分析和正交矩阵分解(PMF)模型进行来源解析。结果表明:陶家湖沉积物重金属污染整体上表现为湖心>湖岸>消落带,湖岸污染程度随深度增加而降低,湖心和消落带沉积物污染程度随深度增加而上升;其中,潜在生态风险评价结果显示6种重金属均为轻微生态危害水平,地累积指数评价结果表明Cr为偏中度风险,As、Cu、Pb、Zn和Ni主要表现为轻度风险。相关分析和PMF模型结果表明,沉积物中重金属来源包括矿业源、自然来源,以及农业和工业的复合源,贡献分别为18.8%、52.4%和28.8%,其中Cu主要受到矿业的影响,Pb主要受到自然来源的影响,As主要受到工业和农业活动的影响,Zn、Ni和Cr受到3种来源的影响;水动力条件和人类活动造成陶家湖重金属分布呈现空间差异,消落带水动力较强导致沉积物中重金属含量低于湖岸和湖心,水动力条件改变导致Pb、Ni垂向分布发生改变,矿业发展是造成Cu、Zn分布变化的主要原因,农业活动导致As逐年增加。
Core sediment samples collected from three distinct areas of Taojia Lake in Songzi County, Hubei Province, were tested for heavy metals including copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), chromium (Cr), nickel (Ni), lead (Pb), and arsenic (As), as well as grain size. The contamination status was assessed using the potential ecological risk index (RI), enrichment factor (EF), and geo-accumulation index (Igeo). Sources of these contaminants were traced through correlation analysis and positive matrix factorization (PMF) modeling. Results indicated that 1) Heavy metal contamination was most severe in the central area of the lake, followed by those in lakeshore and riparian zone in descending order. As depth increased, the contamination at lakeshore alleviated, but aggravated in the central area and the riparian zone. 2) Among the tested heavy metals, arsenic (As) and chromium (Cr) showed the most severe contamination, with As of light contamination and Cr mild-to-moderate contamination. Copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), nickel (Ni), and lead (Pb) exhibited less pollution. 3) Correlation analysis and PMF modeling revealed that heavy metals in the sediments primarily originated from mining activities (18.8%), natural sources (52.4%), and agricultural and industrial activities (28.8%). Specifically, Cu was mainly derived from mining activities, Pb from natural sources, and As from agricultural and industrial activities. Zinc (Zn), nickel (Ni), and Cr were influenced by all three sources. 4) Hydrodynamic conditions and human activities have led to spatial variations in heavy metal distribution in Taojia Lake. The strong hydrodynamics in the riparian zone have diluted heavy metal concentrations, resulting in lower heavy metal levels compared to the lakeshore and the central area. Changes in hydrodynamic conditions affected the vertical distribution of Pb and Ni. Variations in the distribution of Cu and Zn are primarily attributed to mining industrial activities, while annual increases in As levels were linked to agricultural activities.
沉积物 / 重金属 / 污染评价 / 生态风险 / 来源解析
sediment / heavy metals / pollution assessment / ecological risk / source analysis
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
Concentrations of Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, Zn and Hg in Xijiu Lake sediment from the Taihu Lake catchment, China, were analyzed. Their contamination state was investigated based on the geoaccumulation index and enrichment factors. Statistical analysis was used to differentiate the anthropogenic versus natural sources of heavy metals (HMs), and the anthropogenic accumulation fluxes were calculated to quantify anthropogenic contribution to HMs. The results indicated that the lake sediment had been heavily contaminated by Cd, enrichment of Zn and Hg was at a relatively high level, while that of Cu and Pb was in the lower-to-moderate level and Cr was in the low enrichment level. Sources of Cr in the sediment were mainly from natural inputs, while other metals, especially Cd, were predominantly derived from anthropogenic sources. In the past century, anthropogenic accumulation fluxes of Pb, Zn and Hg increased by 0.1-47.3 mg/(cm2 x yr), 2.4-398.1 mg/(cm2 x yr), and 3.7-110.3 ng/(m2 x yr), respectively, accounting for most inputs of HMs entering the sediment. The contamination state of HMs varied with industrial development of the catchment, which demonstrated that contamination started in the early 20th century, reached the maximal level between the mid-1970s and mid-1990s, and decreased a little after the implementation of constraints on high contamination industries, although the contamination of some HMs, such as Cd, Zn and Hg, is still at high levels.
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
王宇彤. 沉积物中重金属迁移释放规律研究[D]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2021.
(
|
| [6] |
袁汝华, 臧艳秋. 长江经济带经济发展与水资源环境耦合协调性实证分析[J]. 水利经济, 2021, 39(2): 1-8, 95.
|
| [7] |
郭杰, 王珂, 于琪, 等. 长江中游近岸表层沉积物重金属污染特征分析及风险评估[J]. 环境科学学报, 2021, 41(11): 4625-4636.
|
| [8] |
唐聪, 钱宝, 李炜钦, 等. 洞庭湖区表层沉积物重金属污染特征与风险评价[J]. 人民长江, 2020, 51(6):49-56,62.
|
| [9] |
刘佳伟, 杨明生. 鄱阳湖流域重金属污染评价与分析[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2022, 44(1): 99-103.
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
Lakes in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River form a shallow lake group unique in the World that is becoming increasingly polluted by heavy metals. Previous studies have largely focused on individual lakes, with limited exploration of the regional pattern of heavy metal pollution of the lake group in this area. This paper explores the sources, intensity and spatial patterns of heavy metal pollution of lake sediments. A total of 45 sample lakes were selected and the concentrations of key metal elements in the sediments of each lake were measured. The cluster analysis (CA), principal component analysis (PCA) and Geo-accumulation index (I(g)) analysis permitted analysis of the source and pollution intensity of the target lakes. Results suggested a notable spatial variation amongst the sample lakes. Lakes in the upper part of the lower reach of the Yangtze River surrounded by typical urban landscapes were strongly or extremely polluted, with high concentrations of Pb, Zn, Cu and Cd in their sediments. This was attributed to large amount of untreated industrial discharges and municipal sewage produced within the lake catchments. In contrast, the heavy-metal pollution of lakes in the Taihu Delta area was notably lower due to industrial restructuring and implementation of effective environmental protection measures. Lakes along the middle reach of Yangtze River surrounded by agricultural areas were unpolluted to moderately polluted by heavy metals overall. Our results suggested that lakes in the central part of China require immediate attention and efforts should be made to implement management plans to prevent further degradation of water quality in these lakes.
|
| [12] |
松滋市生态环境保护委员会办公室. 全市生态环境保护工作情况通报[R]. 松滋: 松滋市生态环境保护委员会办公室, 2022.
(
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
赵晓亮, 李响, 卢洪斌, 等. 东江湖表层沉积物重金属污染特征与潜在生态风险评价[J]. 环境科学, 2022, 43(6): 3048-3057.
|
| [16] |
周峰, 李朋, 翁茂芝, 等. 武汉龙阳湖、墨水湖沉积物重金属生态风险评价[J]. 中国环境科学, 2023, 43(10): 5533-5543.
|
| [17] |
中国环境监测总站. 中国土壤元素背景值[M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 1990.
( China National Environmental Monitoring Centre. Background Contents on Elements of Soil in China[M]. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 1990. (in Chinese))
|
| [18] |
苏鑫. 小清河表层沉积物营养元素和重金属分布特征及风险评价研究[D]. 济南: 济南大学, 2021.
(
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
李泽, 刘韬, 李亭亭, 等. 鄂西七姊妹山泥炭藓湿地沉积物粒度特征及其环境意义探讨[J]. 华中师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 51(5): 680-689.
|
| [22] |
卞宏辰, 张文强, 白少元, 等. 北方典型浅水湖泊沉积物有机碳沉积特征研究: 以白洋淀为例[J]. 环境科学学报, 2022, 42(9): 172-181.
|
| [23] |
孟红明, 张振克, 田海涛. 石梁河水库表层沉积物重金属含量与污染研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2008, 27(2):721-725.
|
| [24] |
赵玉庭, 孙珊, 由丽萍, 等. 莱州湾沉积物粒度与重金属分布特征[J]. 海洋科学, 2021, 45(3): 43-50.
|
| [25] |
程继雄, 范俊楠, 张钰, 等. 大冶湖及周边港渠水-沉积物重金属污染评价分析[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2023, 46(4):183-194.
|
| [26] |
李忠武, 王磊, 冉凤维, 等. 基于APCS-MLR模型的西洞庭湖沉积物重金属来源解析[J]. 长沙理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 19(2): 1-14.
|
| [27] |
何军, 李福林, 陶良, 等. 典型内陆湖泊沉积物氮、磷和重金属分布特征及生态风险评价:以武汉市武湖为例[J]. 中国地质调查, 2022, 9(2):110-118.
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
卢洪斌, 卢少勇, 李响, 等. 长江中游典型湖泊沉积物重金属分布特征、生态风险评估及溯源[J]. 环境科学, 2024, 45(3): 1402-1414.
|
| [30] |
涂春霖, 和成忠, 马一奇, 等. 珠江流域沉积物重金属污染特征、生态风险及来源解析[J]. 地学前缘, 2024, 31(3): 410-419.
沉积物中重金属的富集威胁着珠江流域水环境的安全。研究珠江流域沉积物中重金属污染状况可以为流域沉积物重金属污染防治和水环境科学管理提供支撑。收集了2009—2022 年发表的珠江流域沉积物中重金属(As、Cd、Pb、Cr、Cu和Zn)含量的数据,运用数理统计分析、相关性分析和正交矩阵分解模型(PMF)探讨了珠江流域沉积物中重金属的分布特征和污染来源,采用地累积指数和潜在生态风险指数法对重金属污染程度和生态风险进行了评价。结果表明,珠江流域沉积物中As、Cd、Pb、Cr、Cu和Zn平均含量分别为49.29、2.76、63.97、67.44、48.72和186.60 mg·kg<sup>-1</sup>,其中As、Cd、Pb和Zn超过了中国南方水系沉积物均值,而Cu和Cr接近中国南方水系沉积物均值。珠江流域沉积物中Cd和As污染最为严重,其中Cd主要为偏中度-中度污染,As主要为轻度-偏中度污染,其余重金属主要为轻度-无污染。沉积物重金属单因子危害指数排序为:Cd>As>Pb>Cu>Zn>Cr。Cd在整个珠江流域内都表现出较为严重的危害程度,贡献了生态风险指数的70.73%~93.73%;As在西江、南北盘江和珠江三角洲危害程度均为中等;其余重金属Pb、Cr、Cu和Zn危害程度均为轻微。PMF解析结果表明,沉积物中重金属主要来源为矿业活动和农业活动的复合污染源、燃煤和工业活动污染源、大气沉降和交通污染源以及自然源,贡献分别为21%、17%、35%和27%,其中前三者均属于人为来源,贡献累计可达73%。Cd和As主要受到矿业活动、工业活动和农业活动的影响,Pb主要来源于交通污染和矿业活动,Cr主要为自然源,而Cu和Zn来源比较复杂,受到4种来源的综合影响。
The enrichment of heavy metals in sediments poses a serious threat to the aquatic environment of the Pearl River Basin. Exploring heavy metal pollution in the sediments of the Pearl River Basin is crucial for preventing and controlling such pollution and for supporting the scientific management of the aquatic environment. Data on the contents of heavy metals (As, Cd, Pb, Cr, Cu, and Zn) in the sediments of the Pearl River Basin published from 2009 to 2022 were collected. Through mathematical statistical analysis, correlation analysis, and positive matrix factorization (PMF) modeling, we discussed the distribution characteristics and pollution sources of heavy metals in the sediments of the Pearl River Basin. We also evaluated the pollution degree and ecological risk of heavy metals based on the geo-accumulation index and potential ecological risk index. The results revealed that the average content of As, Cd, Pb, Cr, Cu, and Zn in the sediments of the Pearl River Basin were 49.29, 2.76, 63.97, 67.44, 48.72, and 186.60 mg·kg-1, respectively. Among them, As, Cd, Pb, and Zn exceeded the average values of stream sediments in southern China, while Cu and Cr were close to the average values of stream sediments in southern China. The pollution of Cd and As in the sediments of the Pearl River Basin is the most serious, with Cd classified as mild to moderate degree and As mainly at a slight degree, while the other four heavy metals showed no pollution. The order of single-factor hazard index of heavy metals in sediments was: Cd>As>Pb>Cu>Zn>Cr, with Cd showing a serious damage level throughout the Pearl River Basin, contributing 70.73% to 93.73% of the ecological risk index. The damage level of As in the Xijiang River, Nanbeipan River, and Pearl River Delta was moderate, while the damage level of other heavy metals such as Pb, Cr, Cu, and Zn was slight. The results of the PMF analysis indicated that the main sources of heavy metals in sediments were the combined pollution sources of mining activities and agricultural activities, coal and industrial activities, atmospheric deposition and traffic pollution sources, and natural sources, with contributions of 21%, 17%, 35%, and 27%, respectively. The first three were all anthropogenic sources, with a cumulative contribution of 73%. Cd and As were mainly derived from mining activities, industrial activities, and agricultural activities. Pb was primarily derived from traffic pollution and mining activities. Cr mainly originated from natural sources, while Cu and Zn were influenced by all four sources. |
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
Heavy metal contamination is an essential indicator of environmental health. In this work, one sediment core was used for the analysis of the speciation of heavy metals (Cr, Mn, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Cd, and Pb) in Jiaozhou Bay sediments with different grain sizes. The bioavailability, sources and ecological risk of heavy metals were also assessed on a centennial timescale. Heavy metals were enriched in grain sizes of < 63µm and were predominantly present in residual phases. Moreover, the mobility sequence based on the sum of the first three phases (for grain sizes of < 63µm) was Mn > Pb > Cd > Zn > Cu >Ni > Cr > As. Enrichment factors (EF) indicated that heavy metals in Jiaozhou Bay presented from no enrichment to minor enrichment. The potential ecological risk index (RI) indicated that Jiaozhou Bay had been suffering from a low ecological risk and presented an increasing trend since 1940s owing to the increase of anthropogenic activities. The source analysis indicated that natural sources were primary sources of heavy metals in Jiaozhou Bay and anthropogenic sources of heavy metals presented an increasing trend since 1940s. The principal component analysis (PCA) indicated that Cr, Mn, Ni, Cu and Pb were primarily derived from natural sources and that Zn and Cd were influenced by shipbuilding industry. Mn, Cu, Zn and Pb may originate from both natural and anthropogenic sources. As may be influenced by agricultural activities. Moreover, heavy metals in sediments of Jiaozhou Bay were clearly influenced by atmospheric deposition and river input.Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc.
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
李宁, 张威, 苏世兵. 辽东半岛碧流河口潮间带表层沉积物中重金属分布规律、环境评价及溯源研究[J]. 河南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 50(6):60-70.
|
| [35] |
曹胜伟, 刘春雷, 李亚松, 等. 福建泉州湾近岸海域沉积物重金属来源分析与生态风险评价[J]. 中国地质, 2022, 49(5): 1481-1496.
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
汪峰, 黄言欢, 李如忠, 等. 有色金属矿业城市典型村镇土壤重金属污染评价及来源解析[J]. 环境科学, 2022, 43(9): 4800-4809.
|
| [38] |
朱恺彧, 仝浩玉, 张大海, 等. 基于PMF模型的胶州湾地区主要河流表层沉积物中重金属污染特征及来源解析[J]. 环境化学, 2023, 42(3): 743-756.
|
| [39] |
易雨君, 王文君, 宋劼. 长江中下游底泥重金属污染特征、潜在生态风险评价及来源分析[J]. 水利水电技术, 2019, 50(2): 1-7.
|
| [40] |
蔡於杞, 毛龙江, 邹春辉, 等. 盐城新洋港河表层沉积物重金属污染评价与源解析[J]. 海洋地质前沿. 2023, 39(5): 33-42.
|
| [41] |
丁平, 张丽娟, 吴庆瑶, 等. 淮河江苏段沉积物重金属的分布特征、来源解析及其生态风险[J]. 环境化学, 2023, 42(2):425-434.
|
| [42] |
金院, 汪勇, 胡洁, 等. 升金湖重金属污染历史、来源解析及其生态风险评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2023, 32(5): 1005-1017.
|
| [43] |
松滋市生态环境保护委员会办公室. 2022年上半年全市生态环境保护“五位一体”整改情况通报[R]. 松滋: 松滋市生态环境保护委员会办公室, 2022.
(
|
| [44] |
周慧, 吴立, 朱诚, 等. 长江中游荆州―公安段洪水滞流沉积物特征分析[J]. 地层学杂志, 2020, 44(1):56-63.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |