基于Copula函数的汉江生态流量定值及水华调控风险

农翕智, 赖程, 靖争, 叶晔

长江科学院院报 ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5) : 34-42.

PDF(6983 KB)
PDF(6983 KB)
长江科学院院报 ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5) : 34-42. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20231281
河湖保护与治理

基于Copula函数的汉江生态流量定值及水华调控风险

作者信息 +

A Copula-based Method for River Ecological Flow Quantification and Algal Bloom Risk Assessment in the Hanjiang River

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

生态流量定值研究对于维持河流生态健康与稳定十分重要,然而目前的生态流量定值方法尚有对水文、生态的多条件联合对比以及计算情景单一的不足。基于Copula函数与贝叶斯理论构建了2018年汉江水华暴发期间流量与藻密度的联合风险模型,并在多情景中对不同藻密度概率下的生态流量进行了定值计算,所得结果与Tennant法、水文拐点法等传统生态流量计算方法进行比较。结果表明:2018年汉江水华暴发期间,当流量高于728.00 m3/s和1 096.30 m3/s时,藻密度分别有超过80%的概率>2 561.10×104 cells/L和902.93×104 cells/L;与Copula模型相比,Tennant法和水文拐点法往往忽视了变量间的相依性结构,从而导致对整体风险低估。研究成果为研究河流水文、生态因子间相关关系以及多情景生态流量定值的系统分析提供参考,对河流水华风险预警与调控提供依据。

Abstract

[Objective] Riverine ecological flow quantification is essential for maintaining riverine ecological health. Traditional methods often overlook the joint risks of hydrological and ecological factors and tend to rely on single-scenario calculations. This study aims to establish a joint risk model based on Copula functions and Bayesian theory to quantify the interdependence between hydrological (flow) and ecological (algal density) factors in the middle and lower reaches of Hanjiang River, thereby achieving scientific quantification of ecological flow under multiple scenarios and providing a basis for early warning and regulation of algal bloom risks in rivers. [Methods] Using flow data from Xiantao station and algal density data from Yuekou cross-section during the 2018 algal bloom outbreak in Hanjiang River,this study first determined the marginal distributions of flow and algal density using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) test and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). The optimal Copula functions were then selected using maximum likelihood estimation and goodness-of-fit test. Finally, a joint distribution model of flow and algal density was established, and the Bayesian conditional probability formula was applied to analyze the probability of algal density exceeding the threshold of algal bloom occurrence under different flow scenarios. The results from Copula functions were compared with those from the Tennant method and Hydrological Inflection-Point (HIP) analysis for validation. [Results] (1) The joint distribution model based on Gaussian Copula function passed the K-S test and effectively captured the significant negative dependence structure between flow and algal density.(2) During the 2018 algal bloom outbreak in Hanjiang River, when the flow exceeded 728.00 m3/s and 1 096.30 m3/s, there was over an 80% probability that algal density would exceed 2 561.10×104 cells/L and 902.93×104 cells/L, respectively. (3) The hydrological inflection point method calculated the initial flow of algal bloom with an error within 100 m3/s, demonstrating higher accuracy than the Tennant method. However, both methods underestimated the overall risk due to their neglect of variable dependency. Through bivariate analysis, the Copula model revealed risk details that traditional methods failed to capture. [Conclusions] (1) The joint risk model based on Copula functions can quantitatively capture the complex dependency between hydrological and ecological factors, overcoming limitations of traditional methods that depend on long-term data and neglect multi-factor interactions. It provides an efficient tool for analyzing ecological flow during a single algal bloom outbreak.(2) The multi-scenario conditional probability analysis demonstrates that risk probabilities of algal density differed significantly across different flow ranges, offering refined flow thresholds for reservoir operations and bloom prevention.(3) In complex hydro-ecological systems, it is necessary to integrate multi-factor models like Copula to avoid risk underestimation. This study provides a new method for multi-factor joint risk evaluation and ecological flow quantification in rivers. Future research can further incorporate multiple variables such as water quality and temperature to establish more complex Copula models, improving prediction accuracy and scenario simulation capabilities.

关键词

生态流量 / Copula函数 / 水华暴发 / 多情景水文分析 / 水文生态因子 / 汉江

Key words

ecological flow / Copula functions / algal bloom outbreak / multi-scenario hydrological analysis / hydro-ecological factors / Hanjiang River

引用本文

导出引用
农翕智, 赖程, 靖争, . 基于Copula函数的汉江生态流量定值及水华调控风险[J]. 长江科学院院报. 2025, 42(5): 34-42 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20231281
NONG Xi-zhi, LAI Cheng, JING Zheng, et al. A Copula-based Method for River Ecological Flow Quantification and Algal Bloom Risk Assessment in the Hanjiang River[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2025, 42(5): 34-42 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20231281
中图分类号: TV213 (水资源开发)    X522 (河流)   

参考文献

[1]
VÖRÖSMARTY C J, MCINTYRE P B, GESSNER M O, et al. Global Threats to Human Water Security and River Biodiversity[J]. Nature, 2010, 467(7315): 555-561.
[2]
PALMER M, RUHI A. Linkages between Flow Regime, Biota, and Ecosystem Processes: Implications for River Restoration[J]. Science, 2019, 365(6459): eaaw2087.
[3]
AGUILAR C, POLO M J. Assessing Minimum Environmental Flows in Nonpermanent Rivers: The Choice of Thresholds[J]. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2016, 79: 120-134.
[4]
OPERACZ A, WAŁEsGA A, CUPAK A, et al. The Comparison of Environmental Flow Assessment - the Barrier for Investment in Poland or River Protection?[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 193: 575-592.
[5]
ARTHINGTON A H, BHADURI A, BUNN S E, et al. The Brisbane Declaration and Global Action Agenda on Environmental Flows (2018)[J]. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2018, 6: 45.
[6]
WU Z, LAI X, LI K. Water Quality Assessment of Rivers in Lake Chaohu Basin (China) Using Water Quality Index[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 121: 107021.
[7]
徐志侠, 王浩, 董增川, 等. 河道与湖泊生态需水理论与实践[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2005.
(XU Zhi-xia, WANG Hao, DONG Zeng-chuan, et al. Theory and Practice of Ecological Water Demand for Rivers and Lakes[M]. Beijing: China Water & Power Press, 2005.) (in Chinese)
[8]
GOPAL B. A Conceptual Framework for Environmental Flows Assessment Based on Ecosystem Services and Their Economic Valuation[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2016, 21: 53-58.
[9]
KURIQI A, PINHEIRO A N, SORDO-WARD A, et al. Influence of Hydrologically Based Environmental Flow Methods on Flow Alteration and Energy Production in a Run-of-river Hydropower Plant[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 232: 1028-1042.
[10]
TENNANT D L. Instream Flow Regimens for Fish,Wildlife,Recreation and Related Environmental Resources[J]. Fisheries, 1976, 1(4):6-10.
[11]
WEI X, DONG Z, HAO Z, et al. Ecological Flow Regime and Its Satisfactory DegreeAssessment Based on an Integrated Method[J]. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 2019, 28(5): 3959-3970.
[12]
ZOLFAGHARPOUR F, SAGHAFIAN B, DELAVAR M. Adapting Reservoir Operation Rules to Hydrological Drought State and Environmental Flow Requirements[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2021, 600: 126581.
[13]
JIA W, DONG Z, DUAN C, et al. Ecological Reservoir Operation Based on DFM and Improved PA-DDS Algorithm: A Case Study in Jinsha River, China[J]. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 2020, 26(7): 1723-1741.
[14]
HAO Z, RALLINGS A M, ESPINOZA V, et al. Flowing from East to West: A Bibliometric Analysis of Recent Advances in Environmental Flow Science in China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 125: 107358.
[15]
BERTHOT L, ST-HILAIRE A, CAISSIE D, et al. The Use of Wetted Perimeter as Habitat Proxy to Assess Environmental Flows in Southern Quebec Rivers(Canada)[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021,132:108283.
[16]
ZHAO C S, YANG Y, YANG S T, et al. Effects of Spatial Variation in Water Quality and Hydrological Factors on Environmental Flows[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 728: 138695.
[17]
ARMOUR C L, TAYLOR J G. Evaluation of the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Field Users[J]. Fisheries, 1991, 16(5): 36-43.
[18]
THARME R E. AGlobal Perspective on Environmental Flow Assessment: Emerging Trends in the Development and Application of Environmental Flow Methodologies for Rivers[J]. River Research and Applications, 2003, 19(5/6): 397-441.
[19]
BANNER A. Thecalculus Lifesaver: All the Tools You Need to Excel at Calculus[M]. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 2007.
[20]
崔宝山, 赵翔, 杨志峰, 等. 基于生态水文学原理的湖泊最小生态需水量计算[J]. 生态学报, 2005(7): 1788-95.
(CUI Bao-shan, ZHAO Xiang, YANG Zhi-feng, et al. Eco-hydrology-based Calculation of the Minimum Ecological Water Requirement[J]. Acta Ecological Sinica, 2005(7): 1788-1795.) (in Chinese)
[21]
杨志峰, 崔宝山, 刘静玲, 等. 生态环境需水量理论、方法与实践[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2003.
(YANG Zhi-feng, CUI Bao-shan, LIU Jing-ling, et al.Theory, Method and Practice of Eco-environmental Water Demand[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2003.) (in Chinese)
[22]
陶洁, 李行, 左其亭, 等. 湖泊生态需水计算方法比较及实例应用[J]. 南水北调与水利科技, 2022, 20(2):365-374.
(TAO Jie, LI Xing, ZUO Qi-ting, et al. Comparison and Application of Calculation Methods for Ecological Water Demand of Lakes[J]. South-to-North Water Transfers and Water Science & Technology, 2022, 20(2): 365-374.) (in Chinese)
[23]
NELSEN R B. An Introduction to Copulas[M]. New York: Springer New York, 1999.
[24]
BHATTI M I, DO H Q. Recent Development in Copula and Its Applications to the Energy, Forestry and Environmental Sciences[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(36): 19453-19473.
[25]
QIAN L, WANG X, WANG Z. Modeling the Dependence Pattern between Two Precipitation Variables Using a Coupled Copula[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2020, 79(21): 486.
[26]
DEHGHANI M, ZARGAR M, RIAHI-MADVAR H, et al. A Novel Approach for Longitudinal Dispersion Coefficient Estimation via Tri-variate Archimedean Copulas[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2020, 584: 124662.
[27]
XU P, WANG D, SINGH V P, et al. Copula-based Seasonal Rainfall Simulation Considering Nonstationarity[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2020, 590: 125439.
[28]
LIU Y, WANG J, CAO S, et al. Copula-based Framework for Integrated Evaluation of Water Quality and Quantity: A Case Study of Yihe River, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 804: 150075.
[29]
LATIF S, MUSTAFA F. Copula-based Multivariate Flood Probability Construction: a Review[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2020, 13(3): 132.
[30]
FREUND J E, MILLER M, JOHN E. Freund’s Mathematical Statistics with Applications[M]. London, United Kingdom: Prentice Hall, 2013.
[31]
WEN Y, YANG A, KONG X, et al. A Bayesian-model-averaging Copula Method for Bivariate Hydrologic Correlation Analysis[J]. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2022, 9: 744462.
[32]
ZHANG R, CHEN X, CHENG Q, et al. Joint Probability of Precipitation and Reservoir Storage for Drought Estimation in the Headwater Basin of the Huaihe River,China[J]. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2016, 30(6):1641-1657.
[33]
DUPUIS D J. Using Copulas in Hydrology: Benefits, Cautions, and Issues[J]. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2007, 12(4): 381-393.
[34]
SALVADORI G, DE MICHELE C, KOTTEGODA N T, et al. Extremes in Nature: An Approach Using Copulas[M]. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2007.
[35]
MING X, LIANG Q, DAWSON R, et al. A Quantitative Multi-hazard Risk Assessment Framework for Compound Flooding Considering Hazard Inter-dependencies and Interactions[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2022, 607: 127477.
[36]
GENEST C, RÉMILLARD B, BEAUDOIN D. Goodness-of-fit Tests for Copulas:A Review and a Power Study[J]. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 2009, 44(2): 199-213.
[37]
SHEMYAKIN A, KNIAZEV A. Introduction to Bayesian Estimation and Copula Models of Dependence[M]. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley, 2017.
[38]
REDDY M J, GANGULI P. Bivariate Flood Frequency Analysis of Upper Godavari River Flows Using Archimedean Copulas[J]. Water Resources Management, 2012, 26(14): 3995-4018.
[39]
LIU Z, GUO S, XIONG L, et al. Hydrological Uncertainty Processor Based on a Copula Function[J]. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 2018, 63(1): 74-86.
[40]
殷大聪, 尹正杰, 杨春花, 等. 控制汉江中下游春季硅藻水华的关键水文阈值及调度策略[J]. 中国水利, 2017(9): 31-34.
(YIN Da-cong, YIN Zheng-jie, YANG Chun-hua, et al. Key Hydrological Thresholds Related to Algae Bloom in Middle and Lower Reaches of Hanjiang River and Studies on Mitigation Measures[J]. China Water Resources, 2017(9): 31-34.) (in Chinese)
[41]
WANG X, HAO G, YANG Z, et al. Variation Analysis of Streamflow and Ecological Flow for the Twin Rivers of the Miyun Reservoir Basin in Northern China from 1963 to 2011[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2015, 536: 739-749.
[42]
CHEN L, SINGH V P, GUO S, et al. Copula-based Method for Multisite Monthly and Daily Streamflow Simulation[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2015, 528: 369-384.
[43]
WANG X, ZANG N, LIANG P, et al. Identifying Priority Management Intervals of Discharge and TN/TP Concentration with Copula Analysis for Miyun Reservoir Inflows, North China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 609: 1258-1269.
[44]
XU P, WANG D, WANG Y, et al. Time-varying Copula and Average Annual Reliability-based Nonstationary Hazard Assessment of Extreme Rainfall Events[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2021, 603: 126792.
[45]
李昱燃, 李欣悦, 林莉. 2018年汉江中下游水华现象的思考与建议[J]. 人民长江, 2020, 51(8): 62-66.
(LI Yu-ran, LI Xin-yue, LIN Li. Thoughts and Suggestions on Water Blooms Phenomenon in Middle and Lower Reaches of Hanjiang River in 2018[J]. Yangtze River, 2020, 51(8): 62-66.) (in Chinese)
[46]
梁媛媛, 孙鹏, 张强. 基于Copula函数的1977—2014年广东省年最大洪峰特征分析[J]. 水利水电技术(中英文), 2022, 53(2): 1-17.
(LIANG Yuan-yuan, SUN Peng, ZHANG Qiang. Copula Function-based Analysis on Characteristics of Annual Maximum Flood Peak in Guangdong Province from 1977 to 2014[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2022, 53(2): 1-17.) (in Chinese)
[47]
HUANG K, YE L, CHEN L, et al. Risk Analysis of Flood Control Reservoir Operation Considering Multiple Uncertainties[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2018, 565: 672-684.
[48]
马晓晓. 基于Copula函数的不完全降水序列频率计算方法研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2017.
(MA Xiao-xiao. Study on Frequency Calculation Method of Incomplete Precipitation Series Based on Copula Function[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2017.) (in Chinese)
[49]
ACREMAN M C, DUNBAR M J. DefiningEnvironmental River Flow Requirements:A Review[J]. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2004, 8(5): 861-876.
[50]
NIKGHALB S, SHOKOOHI A, SINGH V P, et al. Ecological Regime Versus Minimum Environmental Flow: Comparison of Results for a River in a Semi Mediterranean Region[J]. Water Resources Management, 2016, 30(13): 4969-4984.
[51]
王西琴. 河流生态需水理论、方法与应用[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2007.
(WANG Xi-qin. River Environmental Water Requirements[M]. Beijing: China Water & Power Press, 2007.) (in Chinese)
[52]
郭利丹, 夏自强, 林虹, 等. 生态径流评价中的Tennant法应用[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(4): 1787-1792.
(GUO Li-dan, XIA Zi-qiang, LIN Hong, et al. Researches on Application of the Tennant Method in Ecological Flow Evaluention[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(4): 1787-1792.) (in Chinese)
[53]
马川惠, 黄强, 郭爱军. 泾河流域水沙联合分布特征分析及其不确定性评估[J]. 水利学报, 2019, 50(2):273-282.
(MA Chuan-hui, HUANG Qiang, GUO Ai-jun. Characteristic Analysis and Uncertainty Assessment of Joint Distribution of Flow and Sand in Jinghe River Basin[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2019, 50(2): 273-282.) (in Chinese)
[54]
李建, 尹炜, 贾海燕, 等. 汉江中下游硅藻水华研究进展与展望[J]. 水生态学杂志, 2020, 41(5):136-144.
(LI Jian, YIN Wei, JIA Hai-yan, et al. Research Progress on Diatom Blooms in the Middle and Lower Hanjing River: Review and Advances[J]. Journal of Hydroecology, 2020, 41(5):136-144.) (in Chinese)

基金

广西科技基地和人才专项(桂科AD22035185)
广西自然科学基金青年基金项目(2023GXNSFBA026296)
国家自然科学基金项目(52309016)
“一带一路”水与可持续发展科技基金面上项目(2022nkms06)

编辑: 罗娟
PDF(6983 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/