坡面土层底部透水性和坡度对径流产沙特征的影响

刘纪根, 路良伟, 童晓霞, 陈锦阳, 郭雨辉

长江科学院院报 ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2) : 62-68.

PDF(7206 KB)
PDF(7206 KB)
长江科学院院报 ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2) : 62-68. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20231235
水土保持与生态修复

坡面土层底部透水性和坡度对径流产沙特征的影响

作者信息 +

Influence of Bottom Soil Layer Permeability and Slope Gradient on Runoff and Sediment Yield Characteristics

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

坡面径流产沙过程作为山区暴雨洪水过程的重要组成部分,其变化规律及特征对完善山区暴雨洪水过程研究有重要意义。为明确山区坡面土层底部透水性和坡度对径流产沙特征的影响,采用室内人工模拟连续降雨试验方法,设计了坡顶薄坡底厚的试验土槽,选取官山河流域土壤作为试验用土,研究并总结了不同坡度条件下土质坡面的径流变化规律及土壤侵蚀规律。结果表明:①土槽坡度为5°和25°时,地表径流产流率随雨强增大而增大,且均呈现底部不透水侧产流量大于底部透水侧的规律;坡度为15°时,地表径流产流率呈现波动上升趋势,不同底部透水性土槽的地表径流产流量差异不大。②单场降雨条件下壤中流产流率随产流时间增加呈现增加趋势,各坡度之间壤中流产流率变化规律差异较大,但基本呈现出底部不透水土槽的壤中流产流量大于底部透水侧的;坡度为5°时壤中流产流率与地表径流产流率呈负相关关系,坡度为25°时则为正相关关系。③坡面地表流速随降雨强度增大而增大,坡度为5°和15°时不透水侧流速明显大于透水侧,坡度25°时流速差异不大。④不同坡度条件下,坡面侵蚀主要在第2场降雨和第3场降雨产生;坡度为5°和25°时不透水侧坡面侵蚀速率远大于透水侧,15°时呈现交替波动趋势。

Abstract

Understanding the runoff and sediment yield processes on slopes are of crucial significance in enhancing the research on rainstorm and flood dynamics in mountainous areas. To examine the effects of slope soil permeability and gradient on runoff and sediment yield characteristics in mountainous terrain, an indoor artificial simulated continuous rainfall experiment was conducted. The experiment was conducted on a soil trough with shallow upper section and deep lower section using soil samples from the Guanshan River Basin. The study aimed to investigate and summarize the variations in runoff and soil erosion with different slope gradients. Findings reveal that 1) At 5° and 25° slopes, surface runoff rates increased with escalating rainfall intensity, with higher rates observed on slopes featuring impermeable bottom layers compared to those with permeable layers. At a 15° slope, however, runoff increased with notable fluctuations, and differences in runoff rates between impermeable and permeable bottom layers were not statistically significant. 2) Interflow rates escalated over time during each rainfall simulation, displaying significant variations across different slope gradients. Generally, interflow rates were higher on slopes with impermeable bottom layers than on those with permeable layers. Notably, the relationship between interflow rate and surface runoff rate was negatively correlated at 5° slopes and positively correlated at 25° slopes. 3) Surface runoff velocities increased with rising rainfall intensity. At 5° and 15° slopes, velocities were significantly higher on impermeable bottom layers compared to permeable ones, whereas at 25°, no significant differences were observed. 4) Soil erosion was most pronounced during the second and third rainfall simulations across different slope gradients. Erosion rates were higher on impermeable bottom layers compared to permeable ones at 5° and 25° slopes, but showed fluctuations at 15° slopes.

关键词

雨强 / 坡度 / 基岩渗透性 / 产流产沙 / 连续降雨

Key words

rainfall intensity / slope gradient / bedrock permeability / runoff and sediment yield / continuous rainfall

引用本文

导出引用
刘纪根, 路良伟, 童晓霞, . 坡面土层底部透水性和坡度对径流产沙特征的影响[J]. 长江科学院院报. 2025, 42(2): 62-68 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20231235
LIU Ji-gen, LU Liang-wei, TONG Xiao-xia, et al. Influence of Bottom Soil Layer Permeability and Slope Gradient on Runoff and Sediment Yield Characteristics[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2025, 42(2): 62-68 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20231235
中图分类号: S157.1   

参考文献

[1]
《中国水旱灾害防御公报》编写组. 《中国水旱灾害防御公报2021》概要[J]. 中国防汛抗旱, 2022, 32(9):38-45.
Compilation Group of China Flood and Drought Disaster Prevention Bulletin. Summary of China Flood and Drought Disaster Prevention Bulletin 2021[J]. China Flood & Drought Management, 2022, 32(9): 38-45. (in Chinese))
[2]
孙厚才, 沙耘, 黄志鹏. 山洪灾害研究现状综述[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2004, 21(6): 77-80.
摘要
山洪灾害不仅是山丘区生态环境破坏的重要因素之一,也是生态环境退化的重要标志,而且是长期困扰山丘区经济运行系统的一大环境障碍。对我国近年来发生山洪灾害的特征、危害、成因、空间预报、风险度评估和防治措施等进行了概括、总结和分析,为全国山洪灾害防治规划的制定提供参考。
SUN Hou-cai, SHA Yun, HUANG Zhi-peng. Review of Present Situation in Studying Mountain Torrent Disaster[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2004, 21(6):77-80. (in Chinese))
[3]
丁文峰, 张平仓, 王一峰. 紫色土坡面壤中流形成与坡面侵蚀产沙关系试验研究[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2008, 25(3): 14-17.
DING Wen-feng, ZHANG Ping-cang, WANG Yi-feng. Experimental Study on Runoff and Sediment Yield Characteristics on Purple Soil Slope[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2008, 25(3): 14-17. (in Chinese))
For studying the runoff characteristics of purple soil slopes in Three Gorges reservior region, a series of simulated rainfall experiments under the different gradients(10°,15°,20°,25°,30°,35°)and the different rainfall intensities(1.0 mm/min,1.5 mm/min,1.8 mm/min) were conducted on a test zone plot with 5.0 meters long and ?1.5 ?meters width. The erosion characteristics, sediment yield mode, runoff generation process and the percentages of the surface runoff and the subsurface runoff accounting for the total precipitation are discussed in this paper. The results show as follows: The runoff generation mode belongs to saturated runoff. The percentages of the surface runoff and the subsurface runoff holding the total precipitation rainfall vary with the different rainfall intensities and the gradients. Under the same slope gradient, the percentage of the subsurface runoff possessing the total precipitation increases with the rainfall intensity decrease; under the similar rainfall intensity, the percentage of the subsurface runoff occupying the total precipitation rainfall increases with the slope gradient increase. The subsurface runoff is not only the dynamical erosion force but also takes a considerable effect in the progress of the slope erosion by analyzing the sediment yielding in various experiments, especially in the steeper slope, the erosion? forming a debris flow so as to lead to gravity erosion because of the abundant subsurface runoff. The amount of erosion caused by the subsurface runoff is larger than that caused by sheet erosion and rill erosion on slope. This result is different from that gained by previous, so account should be taken much into the erosion caused by subsurface flow in the harnessing the slope erosion.
[4]
MA K, LIU Y, WANG M. The Impact of Rainfall Intensity and Slope Gradient on Runoff and Sediment Yield of Uncultivated Sloping Lands[J]. Catena, 2016(144): 67-74.
[5]
WU J, ZHANG H, LI C, et al. Influence of Slope and Rainfall Intensity on Soil Erosion and Its Quantification in a Red Soil Region of Southern China[J]. Catena, 2019(173):492-499.
[6]
FU Z Y, LI Z X, CAI C F, et al. Soil Thickness Effect on Hydrological and Erosion Characteristics under Sloping Lands:A Hydropedological Perspective[J]. Geoderma, 2011, 167/168:41-53.
[7]
ZHANG J, WANG S, FU Z Y, et al. Soil Thickness Controls the Rainfall-Runoff Relationship at the Karst Hillslope Critical in Southwest China[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2022, 609: 127-779.
[8]
HORTON R E. Erosional Development of Streams and Their Drainage Basins: Hydrophysical Approach to Quantitative Morphology[J]. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, Doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(1945)56[275:edosat]2.0.co;2.
[9]
AKSOY H, UNAL N E, COKGOR S, et al. Laboratory Experiments of Sediment Transport from Bare Soil with a Rill[J]. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 2013, 58(7): 1505-1518.
[10]
顾金普. 华北土石山区典型小流域土壤水文特征研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2017.
GU Jin-pu. Study on Soil Hydrological Characteristics in Rocky Mountain Areas of North China[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2017. (in Chinese)
[11]
LE BORGNE T, BOUR O, PAILLET F L, et al. Assessment of Preferential Flow Path Connectivity, and Hydraulic Properties at Single-borehole and Cross-borehole Scales in a Fractured Aquifer[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2006, 328(1/2): 347-359.
[12]
ST CLAIR J, MOON S, HOLBROOK W S, et al. Geophysical Imaging Reveals Topographic Stress Control of Bedrock Weathering[J]. Science, 2015, 350(6260): 534-538.
Bedrock fracture systems facilitate weathering, allowing fresh mineral surfaces to interact with corrosive waters and biota from Earth's surface, while simultaneously promoting drainage of chemically equilibrated fluids. We show that topographic perturbations to regional stress fields explain bedrock fracture distributions, as revealed by seismic velocity and electrical resistivity surveys from three landscapes. The base of the fracture-rich zone mirrors surface topography where the ratio of horizontal compressive tectonic stresses to near-surface gravitational stresses is relatively large, and it parallels the surface topography where the ratio is relatively small. Three-dimensional stress calculations predict these results, suggesting that tectonic stresses interact with topography to influence bedrock disaggregation, groundwater flow, chemical weathering, and the depth of the "critical zone" in which many biogeochemical processes occur. Copyright © 2015, American Association for the Advancement of Science.
[13]
苏远逸, 李鹏, 任宗萍, 等. 坡度对黄土坡面产流产沙过程及水沙关系的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2020, 27(2): 118-122.
SU Yuan-yi, LI Peng, REN Zong-ping, et al. Effect of Slope Gradient on the Process of Runoff and Sediment Yield and Water-sediment Relation on the Loess Slope[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 27(2): 118-122. (in Chinese))
[14]
童晓霞, 丁文峰, 唐文坚, 等. 一种考虑土壤厚度分布和基岩渗透性差异性的径流收集装置:中国,ZL 2023 2 2003228.3[P].2024-02-20.
TONG Xiao-xia, DING Wen-feng, TANG Wen-jian, et al. A Runoff Collection Device in Consideration of Soil Depth Distribution and Rock Permeability: China, ZL 2023 2 2003228.3[P].2024-02-20. (in Chinese)
[15]
韩培, 任洪玉, 王思腾, 等. 小尺度山洪灾害区下垫面特征分析:以官山河流域为例[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2020, 37(7):68-74.
摘要
为响应国家加强小区域山洪灾害建设和防范预警要求,给小尺度山洪灾害区域建设和预警提供基础数据支撑,以官山河流域为例,采用地学统计、植被指数计算、面向对象与人机交互解译、空间叠加分析、野外调查等方法,获取流域地形、坡度、植被覆盖度、土地利用类型等下垫面特征,分析潜在受灾村落和人口。结果表明:官山河流域地势中间低、边缘高,最低点为流域出水口,平均历史受灾海拔、坡度分别为415 m和21°;平均植被覆盖度为71%,主要土地利用类型为林(草)地,历史受灾主要在低植被的沿河、沟、道路周边;居民房屋为山洪灾害重点承灾体,占总面积的1%,裸地、坡耕地占总面积的2%;潜在受灾房屋主要集中在官山河、袁家河、吕家河、西河两侧地势低的位置,受灾总人口为8 106人,2 023户。官山河流域出口处的弯曲、窄河段、上下游卡口区条件,不利于快速泄洪,易引发山洪灾害。在强降雨下,裸地、低植被陡坡地易产生山洪,沿河、道路周边低植被覆盖的村落易遭受山洪灾害。官山河流域共有12个村存在潜在受灾威胁,需做好山洪灾害预警和防范建设;五龙庄、大河湾、赵家坪、吕家河、马蹄山、西河、官亭村是山洪灾害防御建设的重点。
HAN Pei, REN Hong-yu, WANG Si-teng, et al. Characteristics of Underlying Surface in Small-scale Mountain Flood Disaster Area: Case Study on Guanshan River Basin[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2020, 37(7): 68-74. (in Chinese))
[16]
FOSTER G R, LANE L J, ROBINSON G A. The Hillslope Hydrology Effect[M]. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 1986.
[17]
CERDÀ A, JURGENSEN M F. The Influence of Ants on Soil Hydrological and Erodibility Characteristics. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2008, 72(1), 146-152.
[18]
RIBOLZI O, PATIN J, BRESSON L M, et al. Impact of Slope Gradient on Soil Surface Features and Infiltration on Steep Slopes in Northern Laos[J]. Geomorphology, 2011, 127(1/2): 53-63.
[19]
WANG Y J, LI Y, WANG Q J. Effects of Slope Gradient on Soil Infiltration Characteristics on Slope Farmland in Hilly Loess Region of China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2017, 33(2), 198-203.
[20]
梁爱民, 邵龙潭. 土壤中空气对土结构和入渗过程的影响[J]. 水科学进展, 2009, 20(4):502-506.
LIANG Ai-min, SHAO Long-tan. Experimental Study of the Air Entrapment Effects on Soil Structure and Infiltration[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2009, 20(4): 502-506. (in Chinese))
[21]
DENG L, ZHANG L, FAN X, et al. Effects of Rainfall Intensity and Slope Gradient on Runoff and Sediment Yield from Hillslopes with Weathered Granite[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019, 26(31): 32559-32573.
[22]
于国强, 李占斌, 李鹏, 等. 不同植被类型的坡面径流侵蚀产沙试验研究[J]. 水科学进展, 2010, 21(5): 593-599.
YU Guo-qiang, LI Zhan-bin, LI Peng, et al. Effects of Vegetation Types on Hillslope Runoff-erosion and Sediment Yield[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2010, 21(5): 593-599. (in Chinese))
[23]
李光录, 吴发启, 庞小明, 等. 泥沙输移与坡面降雨和径流能量的关系[J]. 水科学进展, 2008, 19(6):868-874.
LI Guang-lu, WU Fa-qi, PANG Xiao-ming, et al. Relationship between Sediment Transport with Surface Rainfall and Runoff Energies on Sloping[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2008, 19(6): 868-874. (in Chinese))
[24]
DONG S, XUE S, ZHANG X, et al. Effects of Rainfall Intensity and Slope Gradient on Soil Erosion on Steep Slopes: a Case Study in China’s Three Gorges Reservoir Area[J]. Catena, 2015(125):18-24.
[25]
CHENH, ZHANGQ, GUO Z, et al. Effect of Rainfall Intensity and Slope Gradient on The Erosion Resistance of Soil Crusts in the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Solid Earth, 2016, 7(6), 1509-1524.
[26]
李桂芳. 典型黑土区坡面土壤侵蚀影响因素与动力学机理研究[D]. 陕西杨凌: 中国科学院研究生院(教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心), 2016.
( LI Gui-fang. Affecting Factors and Mechanisms of Hillslope Soil Erosion Processes in the Mollisol Region[D]. Yangling: Research Center for Eco-environments and Soil and Water Conservation,Chinese Academy of Sciences & Ministry of Education, 2016. (in Chinese))
[27]
杨兴, 张家喜, 彭培好, 等. 模拟降雨条件下不同砾石含量工程边坡土壤侵蚀及水动力学特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019, 39(6):9-15.
YANG Xing, ZHANG Jia-xi, PENG Pei-hao, et al. Effects of Gravel Content on Soil Erosion and Water Flow Mechanics of Engineering Slope under Simulated Rainfall Conditions[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 39(6):9-15. (in Chinese))
[28]
杨玉梅, 郑子成, 李廷轩. 不同土地利用方式下土壤抗冲性动态变化特征及其影响因素[J]. 水土保持学报, 2010, 24(4):64-68.
YANG Yu-mei, ZHENG Zi-cheng, LI Ting-xuan. Soil Anti-scourability Dynamic Variation Characteristics and Its Influencing Factors under Different Land Use Types[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2010, 24(4): 64-68. (in Chinese))

基金

国家重点研发计划项目(2021YFE0111900)
国家自然科学基金项目(42377330)

编辑: 刘运飞
PDF(7206 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/