河流交汇区水力学特性与水安全研究进展

李典, 彭振阳, 刘国强, 魏辰宇, 李迎喜

长江科学院院报 ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1) : 11-19.

PDF(1241 KB)
PDF(1241 KB)
长江科学院院报 ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1) : 11-19. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20231083
河湖保护与治理

河流交汇区水力学特性与水安全研究进展

作者信息 +

Research Progress on Flow Characteristics and Water Safety at River Confluences

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

河流交汇区是河网系统中水、沙、污染物、生物等环境要素的突变点,也是河网行洪与污染物输移扩散的关键控制节点。从野外测量、室内试验与数值模拟方面,总结分析了河流交汇区水流结构与污染物输移的基本特征及其在不同交汇条件作用下的响应规律,以及复杂水流结构与生境对于河流交汇区水安全的重要影响。展望了未来研究重点,建议加强非恒定流条件下的交汇区水力学特性研究,进一步揭示交汇区污染物掺混输移特征与水动力条件之间的响应机制,研究通过工程布局与水力优化调控相结合的措施系统提升了交汇区防洪安全与水生态环境质量。

Abstract

River confluences are areas where environmental elements such as flow structures, sediment deposition, water quality, and organisms undergo significant changes in river networks, and are the key nodes for flooding and pollutant transport. This review summarizes the basic characteristics of flow structures and pollutant transport at river confluences and their responses to different conditions, along with the important impacts of complex flow structures and habitats on water safety issues in previous field measurements, laboratory experiments, numerical simulations, and theoretical studies. Future research should focus on enhancing the understanding of the hydraulic characteristics of river confluences under unsteady flow conditions, further clarifying the response mechanisms between pollutant transport and hydraulic parameters, and improving the flood safety and the water ecological environmental quality through the combination of engineering layout and hydraulic optimization and regulation.

关键词

河流交汇区 / 水流结构 / 污染物输移 / 水安全

Key words

river confluences / flow structures / pollutant transport / water safety

引用本文

导出引用
李典, 彭振阳, 刘国强, . 河流交汇区水力学特性与水安全研究进展[J]. 长江科学院院报. 2025, 42(1): 11-19 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20231083
LI Dian, PENG Zhen-yang, LIU Guo-qiang, et al. Research Progress on Flow Characteristics and Water Safety at River Confluences[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2025, 42(1): 11-19 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20231083
中图分类号: TV143   

参考文献

[1]
HUAI W X, LI S, KATUL G G, et al. Flow Dynamics and Sediment Transport in Vegetated Rivers: A Review[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2021, 33(3):400-420.
[2]
PALMER M, RUHI A. Linkages between Flow Regime, Biota, and Ecosystem Processes: Implications for River Restoration[J]. Science, 2019, 365(6459): eaaw2087. Doi: 10.1126/science.aaw2087.
[3]
TERUI A, ISHIYAMA N, URABE H, et al. Metapopulation Stability in Branching River Networks[J]. PNAS, 2018, 115(26): E5963-E5969.
[4]
袁雯, 杨凯, 吴建平. 城市化进程中平原河网地区河流结构特征及其分类方法探讨[J]. 地理科学, 2007, 27(3): 401-407.
摘要
平原河网地区河流结构发育受到自然条件和城市化的双重影响。依据遥感解译数据,围绕城市化水平、河流形态、河流结构和河流调蓄功能四个维度,就建成区面积比例、河流长宽分布、河系分维、河流调蓄能力等具体指标,分析了城市化水平和土地利用特征不同区域的河流空间形态、结构特征和功能状态,探讨了城市化进程中平原河网地区河流结构的可能演化轨迹,尝试建立了城市化影响下平原河网地区河流结构分类方法,提出了城市河流综合整治过程中应充分重视保护自然河流结构,注重发挥河流综合功能等观点。
(YUAN Wen, YANG Kai, WU Jian-ping. River Structure Characteristics and Classification System in River Network Plain during the Course of Urbanization[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2007, 27(3): 401-407. (in Chinese))
Stream structure development in river network regions was both affected by physical conditions and rapid urbanization.Based on remote-sensing data,four measuring dimensions including the degree of urbanization,river patterns,stream structure and river functions were brought forward to be used as tools for stream structure classification.Twelve indicators such as the percentage of urbanized area,river length and width distribution,river fractal dimension,river flood storage and control capacities were designed for explaining the four measuring dimensions and describing the characteristics of stream structure type.The characteristics of three kinds of stream structure that were defined as the mainstream type,and the "#" type and the natural type were discussed based on the classification system developed in the paper.The results showed that the mainstream type was formed mainly because of high level of urbanization and branches were engineered out for the sake of urban construction and expanded.The natural type was maintained mostly in the area with lower lever of urbanization,which always reflects the local physical features.The "#" type stream structure was a sort of result caused by intermediate level of urbanization under spatial distribution of mainstreams in a catchment.Generally,following the urbanization process,stream structure might be changed from the natural type to the "#" type and at last,to become the mainstream type.The paper further discussed the qualitative and quantitative criteria that could used to guide differentiating structure status in river network regions.The authors thought it was valuable and important to maintain natural stream structure and plan and restore multi-functions of rivers in the process of urbanization.
[5]
李莹, 赵珊珊. 2001—2020年中国洪涝灾害损失与致灾危险性研究[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2022, 18(2): 154-165.
(LI Ying, ZHAO Shan-shan. Floods Losses and Hazards in China from 2001 to 2020[J]. Advances in Climate Change Research, 2022, 18(2): 154-165. (in Chinese))
[6]
RHOADS B L, JOHNSON K K. Three-dimensional Flow Structure, Morphodynamics, Suspended Sediment, and Thermal Mixing at an Asymmetrical River Confluence of a Straight Tributary and Curving Main Channel[J]. Geomorphology, 2018, 323: 51-69.
[7]
ZHANG T, FENG M, CHEN K, et al. Spatiotemporal Distributions and Mixing Dynamics of Characteristic Contaminants at a Large Asymmetric Confluence in Northern China[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2020, 591: 125583.
[8]
AREGA F, LEE J H W, TANG H W. Hydraulic Jet Control for River Junction Design of Yuen Long Bypass Floodway, Hong Kong[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2008, 134(1): 23-33.
[9]
MIJANGOS L, ZIARRUSTA H, ROS O, et al. Occurrence of Emerging Pollutants in Estuaries of the Basque Country: Analysis of Sources and Distribution, and Assessment of the Environmental Risk[J]. Water Research, 2018, 147: 152-163.
In this study, the spatial and temporal-distribution of 41-multiclass organic compounds were assessed in three estuaries of the Basque Country, from winter 2016 to winter 2017 by grab (active) sampling methods and an extra campaign combining both, grab and passive sampling methods. Wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) effluents were also evaluated to assess their impact on the estuaries. Moreover, the physicochemical features (phosphate and nitrate concentrations, pH, etc.) of each site were measured and included in the statistical analysis. Anti-inflammatory drugs (diclofenac and acetaminophen), hypertensive drugs (irbesartan and valsartan), a stimulant (caffeine), an artificial sweetener (acesulfame) and a corrosion inhibitor (2-hydroxybenzothiazole) were the most ubiquitous compounds. Due to the stratification of the waters in the estuary of Bilbao two independent sources were identified: WWTP and harbour activities. In the case of Gernika and Plentzia, both are estuaries with a high tidal dilution, and the main sources were localized in the effluents of the WWTPs. In addition to this, the use of POCIS provides an efficient way to monitor emerging pollutants over a relatively long sampling period. Finally, risk quotient (RQ) values of each contaminant were estimated from the maximum values determined at each estuary and WWTP effluent for acute and chronic effects. In the case of acute toxicity the highest RQ values (»1) were obtained for the angiotensin II receptor blockers (telmisartan, eprosartan, etc.), diuron and diclofenac. In the case of the chronic toxicity the highest RQ values (»1) were estimated for caffeine, diclofenac, bezafibrate and sulfadiazine.Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
[10]
CHABOKPOUR J, AZAMATHULLA H M, AZHDAN Y, et al. Study of Pollution Transport through the River Confluences by Derivation of an Analytical Model[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2020, 82(10): 2062-2075.
Due to the entrance of pollutants in different branches of the river network, it is essential to study contaminant transport at the river confluences. In the present study, it was attempted to investigate the conservative pollution transport at channel confluence by operating a series of experiments in the laboratory flume. In the designed laboratory model, two branches, with different widths of 45, 25 cm, were intersected and a channel confluence was created. Five entrance discharges and three initial contaminant concentrations, introduced using a linear feeder, were chosen as experimental variables. Conservative tracer of sodium chloride solution was used, and the electrical conductivities were measured at eight locations of the main channel and upstream branches with 2 seconds interval. Junction zone was assumed as a control volume, and by applying mass equilibrium to it, a new mathematical model was extracted. It was observed that there is concentration fluctuation in the falling limbs of the experimental breakthrough curves of the junction zone; however, it was diminished by downstream motion. Moreover, the observed pollution graphs had double peak points which changed to a single point with an increase of distance from the confluence position. Operation of the presented model was investigated by variation of its parameters. It was found that the contaminant residence time parameters of the confluence zone have the most significant influence in the simulation of the analytical model. Additionally, it was observed that the values of Gaussian distribution of the upstream branches could displace the position of pulses of resultant breakthrough curves or can overlap them. Moreover, the model performance was examined using statistical goodness of fit parameters like Nash-Sutcliffe, R, and mean absolute error (MAE). Their values were calculated as 0.88, 0.91, 66.88 (ppm), respectively.
[11]
张永勇, 夏军, 王纲胜, 等. 淮河流域闸坝联合调度对河流水质影响分析[J]. 武汉大学学报(工学版), 2007, 40(4):31-35.
(ZHANG Yong-yong, XIA Jun, WANG Gang-sheng, et al. Research on Influence of Dams’ Union Dispatch on Water Quality in Huaihe River Basin[J]. Engineering Journal of Wuhan University, 2007, 40(4): 31-35. (in Chinese))
[12]
RILEY J D, RHOADS B L. Flow Structure and Channel Morphology at a Natural Confluent Meander Bend[J]. Geomorphology, 2012, 163: 84-98.
[13]
BEST J L. Flow Dynamics at River Channel Confluences: Implications for Sediment Transport and Bed Morphology[M]//ETHRIDGE F G, FLORES R M, HARVEY M D. Recent Developments in Fluvial Sedimentology, Doi:10.2110/pec.87.39.0027.
[14]
SUKHODOLOV A N, RHOADS B L. Field Investigation of Three-dimensional Flow Structure at Stream Confluences: 2. Turbulence[J]. Water Resources Research, 2001, 37(9): 2411-2424.
[15]
CONSTANTINESCU G, MIYAWAKI S, RHOADS B, et al. Numerical Analysis of the Effect of Momentum Ratio on the Dynamics and Sediment-entrainment Capacity of Coherent Flow Structures at a Stream Confluence[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research. 2012, 117:F04028.
[16]
YUAN S, TANG H, XIAO Y, et al. Turbulent Flow Structure at a 90-degree Open Channel Confluence: Accounting for the Distortion of the Shear Layer[J]. Journal of Hydro-Environment Research, 2016, 12: 130-147.
[17]
SZUPIANY R N, AMSLER M L, PARSONS D R, et al. Morphology,Flow Structure, and Suspended Bed Sediment Transport at Two Large Braid-bar Confluences[J]. Water Resources Research, 2009, 45(5):e2008wr007428.
[18]
BRADBROOK K F, LANE S N, RICHARDS K S, et al. Role of Bed Discordance at Asymmetrical River Confluences[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2001, 127(5):351-368.
[19]
RHOADS B L, SUKHODOLOV A N. Field Investigation of Three-dimensional Flow Structure at Stream Confluences: 1. Thermal Mixing and Time-averaged Velocities[J]. Water Resources Research, 2001, 37(9): 2393-2410.
[20]
LUO H, FYTANIDIS D K, SCHMIDT A R, et al. Comparative 1D and 3D Numerical Investigation of Open-channel Junction Flows and Energy Losses[J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2018, 117: 120-139.
[21]
LIN J D, SOONG H K. Junction Losses in Open Channel Flows[J]. Water Resources Research, 1979, 15(2): 414-418.
[22]
HSU C C, LEE W J, CHANG C H. Subcritical Open-channel Junction Flow[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1998, 124(8): 847-855.
[23]
RHOADS B L, SUKHODOLOV A N. Spatial and Temporal Structure of Shear Layer Turbulence at a Stream Confluence[J]. Water Resources Research, 2004, 40(6): W06304.
[24]
RHOADS B L, SUKHODOLOV A N. Lateral Momentum Flux and the Spatial Evolution of Flow within a Confluence Mixing Interface[J]. Water Resources Research, 2008, 44(8): e2007wr006634.
[25]
CHENG Z, CONSTANTINESCU G. Shallow Mixing Layers between Non-parallel Streams in a Flat-bed Wide Channel[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2021, 916: A41.
[26]
HERRERO H S, GARCÍA C M, PEDOCCHI F, et al. Flow Structure at a Confluence: Experimental Data and the Bluff Body Analogy[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2016, 54(3): 263-274.
[27]
SUKHODOLOV A N, SHUMILOVA O O, CONSTANTINESCU G S, et al. Mixing Dynamics at River Confluences Governed by Intermodal Behaviour[J]. Nature Geoscience, 2023, 16: 89-93.
[28]
BIRON P M, BUFFIN-BÉLANGER T, MARTEL N. Three-dimensional Turbulent Structures at a Medium-sized Confluence with and without an Ice Cover[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2019, 44(15): 3042-3056.
[29]
SUKHODOLOV A N, KRICK J, SUKHODOLOVA T A, et al. Turbulent Flow Structure at a Discordant River Confluence: Asymmetric Jet Dynamics with Implications for Channel Morphology[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 2017, 122(6): 1278-1293.
[30]
DE SERRES B, ROY A G, BIRON P M, et al. Three-dimensional Structure of Flow at a Confluence of River Channels with Discordant Beds[J]. Geomorphology, 1999, 26(4): 313-335.
[31]
LEWIS Q W, RHOADS B L. Rates and Patterns of Thermal Mixing at a Small Stream Confluence under Variable Incoming Flow Conditions[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2015, 29(20): 4442-4456.
[32]
HORNA-MUNOZ D, CONSTANTINESCU G, RHOADS B, et al. Density Effects at a Concordant Bed Natural River Confluence[J]. Water Resources Research, 2020, 56(4): e2019wr026217.
[33]
CHENG Z, CONSTANTINESCU G. Stratification Effects on Flow Hydrodynamics and Mixing at a Confluence with a Highly Discordant Bed and a Relatively Low Velocity Ratio[J]. Water Resources Research, 2018, 54(7): 4537-4562.
[34]
TAYLOR E H. Flow Characteristics at Rectangular Open-channel Junctions[J]. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 1944, 109(1): 893-902.
[35]
WEBBER N B, GREATED C A. An Investigation of Flow Behaviour at the Junction of Rectangular Channels[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 1966, 34(3): 321-334.
[36]
RAMAMURTHY A S, CARBALLADA L B, TRAN D M. Combining Open Channel Flow at Right Angled Junctions[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1988, 114(12): 1449-1460.
[37]
BEST J L, REID I. Separation Zone at Open-channel Junctions[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1984, 110(11): 1588-1594.
[38]
茅泽育, 赵升伟, 张磊, 等. 明渠交汇口三维水力特性试验研究[J]. 水利学报, 2004, 35(2): 1-7.
(MAO Ze-yu, ZHAO Sheng-wei, ZHANG Lei, et al. Experimental Study on 3D Flow Characteristics at the Confluence of Open Channels[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2004, 35(2): 1-7. (in Chinese))
[39]
PENNA N, DE MARCHIS M, CANELAS O, et al. Effect of the Junction Angle on Turbulent Flow at a Hydraulic Confluence[J]. Water, 2018, 10(4): 469.
[40]
ASHMORE P E, FERGUSON R I, PRESTEGAARD K L, et al. Secondary Flow in Anabranch Confluences of a Braided, Gravel-bed Stream[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 1992, 17(3): 299-311.
[41]
BIRJUKOVA CANELAS O, FERREIRA R M L, GUILLÉN-LUDEÑA S, et al. Three-dimensional Flow Structure at Fixed 70° Open-channel Confluence with Bed Discordance[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2020, 58(3): 434-446.
[42]
PARSONSD R, BEST J L, LANES N, et al. Large River Channel Confluences[M]//RICE S P, ROY A G, RHOADS B L. River Confluences, Tributaries and the Fluvial Network. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2008: 73-91.
[43]
PARSONS D R, BEST J L, LANE S N, et al. Form Roughness and the Absence of Secondary Flow in a Large Confluence-Diffluence, Rio Paraná, Argentina[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2007, 32(1): 155-162.
[44]
王协康, 周苏芬, 叶龙, 等. 长江与嘉陵江交汇区水流结构的数值模拟[J]. 水科学进展, 2015, 26(3):372-377.
(WANG Xie-kang, ZHOU Su-fen, YE Long, et al. Numerical Simulation of Confluence Flow Structure between Jialing River and Yangtze River[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2015, 26(3): 372-377. (in Chinese))
[45]
RHOADS B L, RILEY J D, MAYER D R. Response of Bed Morphology and Bed Material Texture to Hydrological Conditions at an Asymmetrical Stream Confluence[J]. Geomorphology, 2009, 109(3/4): 161-173.
[46]
ROCA M, MARTÍN-VIDE J P, MORETA P J M. Modelling a Torrential Event in a River Confluence[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2009, 364(3/4): 207-215.
[47]
LI S, MORIOKA T. Optimal Allocation of Waste Loads in a River with Probabilistic Tributary Flow under Transverse Mixing[J]. Water Environment Research, 1999, 71(2): 156-162.
[48]
SMITH R, DAISH N C. Dispersion far Downstream of a River Junction[J]. Physics of Fluids, 1991, 3(5): 1102-1109.
[49]
BOUCHEZ J, LAJEUNESSE E, GAILLARDET J, et al. Turbulent Mixing in the Amazon River: The Isotopic Memory of Confluences[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2010, 290(1/2): 37-43.
[50]
LANE S N, PARSONS D R, BEST J L, et al. Causes of Rapid Mixing at a Junction of Two Large Rivers: Río Paraná and Río Paraguay, Argentina[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 2008, 113:F02019.
[51]
GAUDET J M, ROY A G. Effect of Bed Morphology on Flow Mixing Length at River Confluences[J]. Nature, 1995, 373: 138-139.
[52]
BRADBROOK K F, LANE S N, RICHARDS K S, et al. Large Eddy Simulation of Periodic Flow Characteristics at River Channel Confluences[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2000, 38(3): 207-215.
[53]
BIRON P M, RAMAMURTHY A S, HAN S. Three-dimensional Numerical Modeling of Mixing at River Confluences[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2004, 130(3): 243-253.
[54]
魏娟, 李然, 康鹏, 等. 水流交汇区污染物输移扩散特性[J]. 水科学进展, 2012, 23(6): 822-828.
(WEI Juan, LI Ran, KANG Peng, et al. Study on Transportation and Diffusion Characteristics of Contaminants at Flow Confluence[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2012, 23(6): 822-828. (in Chinese))
[55]
顾莉, 赵欣欣, 戴波, 等. 汇流比对U形弯曲交汇河道中污染物离散系数的影响[J]. 河海大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 46(3): 189-195.
(GU Li, ZHAO Xin-xin, DAI Bo, et al. The Influence of Discharge Ratio on the Pollutant Dispersion Coefficient in the U-shaped Confluent Curved River[J]. Journal of Hohai University (Natural Sciences), 2018, 46(3): 189-195. (in Chinese))
[56]
LIU X, LI L, HUA Z, et al. Flow Dynamics and Contaminant Transport in Y-shaped River Channel Confluences[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019, Doi: 10.3390/ijerph16040572.
[57]
TANG H, ZHANG H, YUAN S. Hydrodynamics and Contaminant Transport on a Degraded Bed at a 90-degree Channel Confluence[J]. Environmental Fluid Mechanics, 2018, 18(2): 443-463.
[58]
HUA Z L, JI W, SHAN N N, et al. Pollutant Mixing and Transport Process via Diverse Transverse Release Positions in a Multi-anabranch River with Three Braid Bars[J]. Water Science and Engineering, 2013, 6(3):250-261.
[59]
RAMÓN C L, ARMENGOL J, DOLZ J, et al. Mixing Dynamics at the Confluence of Two Large Rivers Undergoing Weak Density Variations[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2014, 119(4): 2386-2402.
[60]
CONSTANTINESCU G, MIYAWAKI S, RHOADS B, et al. Influence of Planform Geometry and Momentum Ratio on Thermal Mixing at a Stream Confluence with a Concordant Bed[J]. Environmental Fluid Mechanics, 2016, 16(4): 845-873.
[61]
WANG X, YAN X, DUAN H, et al. Experimental Study on the Influence of River Flow Confluences on the Open Channel Stage-Discharge Relationship[J]. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 2019, 64(16): 2025-2039.
[62]
HUI C, LI Y, LIAO Z, et al. Confluences Characteristics Determine the Influence Scope of Microbial Community from Confluence Hydrodynamic Zone on River Network[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2022, 612: 128288.
[63]
GUALTIERI C, IANNIRUBERTO M, FILIZOLA N, et al. Hydraulic Complexity at a Large River Confluence in the Amazon Basin[J]. Ecohydrology, 2017, 10(7): e1863.
[64]
RICE S P, FERGUSON R I, HOEY T B. Tributary Control of Physical Heterogeneity and Biological Diversity at River Confluences[J]. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 2006, 63(11): 2553-2566.
[65]
LEE B, POFF N L, MILLER D, et al. The Network Dynamics Hypothesis: How Channel Networks Structure Riverine Habitats[J]. BioScience, 2004, 54(5): 413.
[66]
HUI C, LI Y, ZHANG W, et al. Coupling Genomics and Hydraulic Information to Predict the Nitrogen Dynamics in a Channel Confluence[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2021, 55(8): 4616-4628.
[67]
于新平, 陈宇炜, 刘金福, 等. 鄱阳湖典型河湖交汇区浮游植物现状分析[J]. 环境科学, 2023, 44(9): 4954-4964.
(YU Xin-ping, CHEN Yu-wei, LIU Jin-fu, et al. Analysis on the Current Situation of Phytoplankton in the Typical River- Lake Ecotone of Lake Poyang[J]. Environmental Science, 2023, 44(9): 4954-4964. (in Chinese))
[68]
GUALTIERI C, ABDI R, IANNIRUBERTO M, et al. A 3D Analysis of Spatial Habitat Metrics about the Confluence of Negro and Solimões Rivers, Brazil[J]. Ecohydrology, 2020, 13(1):e2166.
[69]
BLETTLER M C M, AMSLER M L, ESPINOLA L A, et al. Ecological Relevance of Anabranch Confluences: Hydrological and Morphological Effects[J]. Ecohydrology, 2019, 12(2):2068.
[70]
BLETTLER M C M, AMSLER M L, EZCURRA DE DRAGO I, et al. The Impact of Significant Input of Fine Sediment on Benthic Fauna at Tributary Junctions: a Case Study of the Bermejo-Paraguay River Confluence, Argentina[J]. Ecohydrology, 2015, 8(2): 340-352.
[71]
曾明, 穆青青, 童冰星, 等. 长江来水对汉江中下游水位影响的量化分析[J]. 人民长江, 2023, 54(增刊1): 45-49, 67.
(ZENG Ming, MU Qing-qing, TONG Bing-xing, et al. Quantitative Analysis of the Influence of Water from the Yangtze River on the Water Level in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Han River[J]. Yangtze River, 2023, 54(Supp. 1): 45-49, 67. (in Chinese))
[72]
周舟, 曾诚, 周婕, 等. 等宽明渠交汇口壅水特性数值模拟[J]. 河海大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 48(4): 347-353.
(ZHOU Zhou, ZENG Cheng, ZHOU Jie, et al. Numerical Simulation of Backwater Characteristics at Equal-width Open-channel Confluences[J]. Journal of Hohai University (Natural Sciences), 2020, 48(4): 347-353. (in Chinese))
[73]
孙东坡, 张晓雷, 陈丹, 等. 基于错峰型洪水的伊洛河交汇区水动力特性[J]. 水科学进展, 2013, 24(6): 801-809.
(SUN Dong-po, ZHANG Xiao-lei, CHEN Dan, et al. Hydrodynamic Characteristics of Staggering Peak Flows at the Confluence Section of Yiluo River[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2013, 24(6): 801-809. (in Chinese))
[74]
刘玉, 李景保, 李欢, 等. 三峡水库调洪调度对江湖汇流区洪水相互顶托的影响[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2019, 30(2): 114-121, 129.
(LIU Yu, LI Jing-bao, LI Huan, et al. Effect of the Three Gorges Reservoir Operation on Flood Inter-jacking in the Confluence Section of Rivers and Lakes[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering, 2019, 30(2): 114-121, 129. (in Chinese))
[75]
王冰洁, 周苏芬, 王海周, 等. 明渠干支河流直角交汇区整流方法探讨[J]. 四川大学学报(工程科学版), 2015, 47(增刊1): 7-12.
(WANG Bing-jie, ZHOU Su-fen, WANG Hai-zhou, et al. Regulation Method in Right-angled River Confluence[J]. Advanced Engineering Sciences, 2015, 47(Supp. 1): 7-12. (in Chinese))
[76]
李强. 人造洪峰对浐灞交汇口流态改善研究[D]. 西安: 西安理工大学, 2016.
(LI Qiang. Study on Improvement of Flow Pattern at Chanba Intersection by Artificial Flood Peak[D]. Xi’an: Xi’an University of Technology, 2016. (in Chinese))
[77]
CAMPODONICO V A, GARCÍA M G, PASQUINI A I. The Dissolved Chemical and Isotopic Signature Downflow the Confluence of Two Large Rivers: The Case of the Parana and Paraguay Rivers[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2015, 528: 161-176.
[78]
LI Y, XU C, ZHANG W, et al. Response of Bacterial Community in Composition and Function to the Various DOM at River Confluences in the Urban Area[J]. Water Research, 2020, 169: 115293.
[79]
YUAN S, TANG H, XIAO Y, et al. Phosphorus Contamination of the Surface Sediment at a River Confluence[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2019, 573: 568-580.
River confluences are key features of a river network, and their effects on contaminant transport and transformation need to be understood to control the contamination of a river network. This paper investigates the dynamic characteristics of phosphorus (P) contamination on the surface sediment at a river confluence of the Huai River, China, where water and sediment contamination is severe. The results highlight that P contamination of the surface sediment at a river confluence is more severe than that of the main stream of the river network to which the river confluence belongs. Floods have critical impact on the transport of sediment and its surface texture. In the annual water cycle the initial small flood can convey much more contaminated sediment and pollute the downstream river, whereas the subsequent large flood leads to the coarsening of the surface sediment and decrease of the total P (TP) content on the surface sediment (TPS). Water temperature is one of the most important factors affecting the temporal variability of the TPS at the river confluence. Higher P amounts are adsorbed on the surface sediment during lower water temperatures in winter and spring. Calcium bound P (Ca-P) is a relatively stable fraction of the sedimentary P during the dynamic processes of contamination of the surface sediment, and the nonapatite P gets released from the surface sediment during the summer. Effects of P concentration of the surface water and that of pH on TPS variability are not discernable in the current study. These results will be useful for controlling phosphorus contamination at river confluences and in river networks.
[80]
RHOADS B L, CAHILL R A. Geomorphological Assessment of Sediment Contamination in an Urban Stream System[J]. Applied Geochemistry, 1999, 14(4): 459-483.
[81]
TERNES T, JOSS A, OEHLMANN J. Occurrence, Fate, Removal and Assessment of Emerging Contaminants in Water in the Water Cycle (from Wastewater to Drinking Water)[J]. Water Research, 2015, 72: 1-2.
[82]
RIBEIRO M LLEITE RIBEIRO M, BLANCKAERT K, SCHLEISS A J. Local Tributary Widening for River Rehabilitation[J]. Ecohydrology, 2016, 9(2): 204-217.
[83]
夏军, 程绪水, 张翔, 等. 淮河流域水质—水量—水生态联合调度[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2022: 86-172.
(XIA Jun, CHENG Xu-shui, ZHANG Xiang, et al. Combined Regulation of Water Quality, Water Quantity and Water Ecology in Huaihe River Basin[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2022: 86-172. (in Chinese))

基金

国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFC3202603)
中国博士后科学基金面上项目(2023M740367)

编辑: 罗玉兰
PDF(1241 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/