为实现土壤湿度连续准确的时空刻画,在不同气候条件下进行多源遥感土壤湿度产品(SMOS、ASCAT、ESA CCI、SMAP)与分布式降雨径流模型模拟土壤湿度时空对比研究。考虑到遥感数据与模型模拟数据时空匹配度上的差异性,将遥感原始表层土壤湿度(Surface Soil Moisture, SSM)和预处理后的剖面土壤湿度(Profile Soil Moisture, PSM)与分布式水文模型模拟的PSM分别进行对比。对比所用时间尺度为日尺度,空间尺度为流域尺度和栅格尺度。研究区域为湿润气候条件下的渠江流域和半干旱气候条件下的伊洛河流域。结果表明,在同一流域内当分布式水文模型土壤湿度模拟能力较高时,SMAP反演PSM与模型模拟值一致性较高,相关系数达到0.8,相对其他遥感产品其准确度较高。研究成果对获取高准确度土壤湿度时空信息具有一定的指导意义和实践价值。
Abstract
To acquire accurate soil moisture information in time and space, soil moisture information (surface soil moisture SSM and profile soil moisture PSM) from multiple satellites (SMOS, ASCAT, ESA CCI and SMAP) is compared with PSM simulations from a distributed hydrological model. The comparison is developed at daily scale and catchment/grid scale in a humid catchment (Qujiang catchment) and a semiarid catchment (Yiluohe catchment) in China. Results indicate that SMAP PSM show higher consistency with simulated PSM when the performance of simulated PSM is high in a catchment, with the correlation coefficient reaching 0.8. Thus, the accuracy of SMAP is regarded to be relatively higher compared to other satellite products. The research offers guidance and practical values for acquiring accurate soil moisture information in time and space.
关键词
表层土壤湿度 /
剖面土壤湿度 /
多源遥感 /
分布式水文模型 /
时空对比
Key words
surface soil moisture /
profile soil moisture /
satellite products /
distributed hydrological model /
spatial and temporal comparison
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] WAGNER W. Evaluation of the Agreement between the First Global Remotely Sensed Soil Moisture Data with Model and Precipitation Data[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2003, 108(D19): 4611.
[2] TAYFUR G, BROCCA L. Fuzzy Logic for Rainfall-Runoff Modelling Considering Soil Moisture[J]. Water Resources Management, 2015, 29(10): 3519-3533.
[3] SRIVASTAVA P K. Satellite Soil Moisture: Review of Theory and Applications in Water Resources[J]. Water Resources Management, 2017, 31(10): 3161-3176.
[4] ENTEKHABI D, NJOKU E G, O’NEILL P E, et al. The Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) Mission[J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2010, 98(5): 704-716.
[5] WANDERS N,BIERKENS M F P,DE JONG S M,et al. The Benefits of Using Remotely Sensed Soil Moisture in Parameter Identification of Large-Scale Hydrological Models[J]. Water Resources Research,2014,50(8):6874-6891.
[6] XIONG L,YANG H,ZENG L,et al. Evaluating Consistency between the Remotely Sensed Soil Moisture and the Hydrological Model-Simulated Soil Moisture in the Qujiang Catchment of China[J].Water,2018,10(3): 291.
[7] PAN M,CAI X,CHANEY N W,et al. An Initial Assessment of SMAP Soil Moisture Retrievals Using High-Resolution Model Simulations and in Situ Observations[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2016, 43(18): 9662-9668.
[8] 熊立华,郭生练,田向荣.基于DEM的分布式流域水文模型及应用[J].水科学进展,2004,15(4):517-520.
[9] WAGNER W, LEMOINE G, ROTT H. A Method for Estimating Soil Moisture from ERS Scatterometer and Soil Data[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment,1999,70(2): 191-207.
[10] 刘绿柳, 王秀杰, 张鹏飞. 基于SWAT模型的气候变化和人类活动对伊洛河径流影响分析[J]. 人民珠江, 2020, 41(1): 1-6, 75.
[11] CHO E, CHOI M, WAGNER W. An Assessment of Remotely Sensed Surface and Root Zone Soil Moisture through Active and Passive Sensors in Northeast Asia[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2015, 160: 166-179.
[12] KIM H,PARINUSSA R,KONINGS A G,et al. Global-Scale Assessment and Combination of SMAP with ASCAT (Active) and AMSR2 (Passive) Soil Moisture Products[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment,2018,204:260-275.
[13] HAIN C R, CROW W T, MECIKALSKI J R, et al. An Intercomparison of Available Soil Moisture Estimates from Thermal Infrared and Passive Microwave Remote Sensing and Land Surface Modeling[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2011, 116(D15): D15107.
[14] BROCCA L,HASENAUER S,LACAVA T,et al. Soil Moisture Estimation through ASCAT and AMSR-E Sensors: an Intercomparison and Validation Study across Europe[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2011, 115(12): 3390-3408.
基金
国家自然科学基金项目(52209007,52109003);国家自然科学基金重大项目(41890822)
PDF(8395 KB)
