局部超载作用下的支挡结构土压力问题是制约高密度城区发展的常见问题之一。为了探讨局部超载对邻近支挡结构土压力的影响规律,以及现有计算理论的合理性与适用性,通过模型试验针对支挡结构不同位移模式下局部超载对其土压力的影响进行研究,分析支挡结构土压力分布、大小与位移模式的关系,并将试验结果与现有理论计算结果进行对比。研究表明:对于无黏性土,在邻近局部超载影响下,支挡结构的土压力分布形态及大小与各点位置处的位移量有关,随着位移量的增加呈指数函数降低;局部超载对土压力的主要影响范围与规范算法相一致,但规范与现有简化土压力计算法在某些区域范围内存在不适宜性,且不适宜区域与支挡结构的位移模式有关;弹性法土压力计算值能够包络邻近局部超载支挡结构各种位移模式下的土压力,其分布形态与实测值相一致,偏于安全,但在局部超载主要影响范围以外偏大,可进行修正折减。
Abstract
The earth pressure of retaining structure adjacent to the action of local overload is one of the common problems in the development of high-density urban area. The influence of local overloading on the earth pressure of adjacent retaining structures under different displacement modes was investigated via model test, and the rationality and applicability of existing calculation theories were analyzed. The relations of scale and distribution of earth pressure against displacement mode of retaining structure was acquired, and the test results were compared with the existing theoretical calculation results. Conclusions were obtained as follows: for cohesionless soil, the distribution form and scale of earth pressure of retaining structure under local overload are related to the displacement at each point, declining exponentially with the growth of displacement. The main influence range of local overload on earth pressure obtained by the present method was consistent with that by standard method, but the standard method and the proposed simplified method are not suitable in some areas, which is related to the displacement mode of retaining structure. The earth pressure calculated with elastic method can cover all kinds of displacement modes of the adjacent retaining structure under local overload. Its distribution pattern is consistent with the measured value, which is safe, but can be modified and reduced when it is larger than the main influence range of local overload.
关键词
支挡结构 /
局部超载 /
土压力 /
模型试验 /
理论计算
Key words
retaining structure /
local overload /
earth pressure /
model test /
theoretical calculation
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 李巨文, 王 翀, 梁永朵, 等. 挡土墙后粘性填土的主动土压力计算[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2006, 28(5): 650-652.
[2] FARZANEH O,ASKARI F,FATEMI J. Active Earth Pressure Inducedby Strip Loads on a Backfill[J]. International Journal of Civil Engineering,2014,12(4):281-291.
[3] 应宏伟, 蒋 波, 谢康和. 条形荷载下挡土墙主动土压力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2007, 28(增刊1): 183-186.
[4] 柯才桐, 陈奕柏, 高洪波, 等. 条形荷载不同分布模式下挡墙主动土压力研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(10): 1922-1927.
[5] 蒋峻峰, 赵其华, 喻 小, 等. 挡土结构墙后黏土主动土压力改进计算[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2021, 38(2): 80-85, 91.
[6] 陈建旭, 郭 宁, 虞佳颖, 等. 刚性挡墙非极限被动土压力计算方法[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2020, 37(11): 107-113, 135.
[7] MISRA B. Lateral Pressureson Retaining Walls Due to Loads on Surface of Granular Backfill[J]. Soils and foundations, 1980, 20(2): 31-44.
[8] JARQUIO R. Total Lateral Surcharge PressureDue to Strip Load[J]. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 1981, 107(10): 1424-1428.
[9] 刘国彬, 王卫东. 基坑工程手册[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2009.
[10]JGJ 120—2012,建筑基坑支护技术规程[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2012.
[11]BETON K. Beitrag zur Berechung von Bohlwerken unter Beruchsichtigung der Wandverformung[J]. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 1983, 18(4): 255-261.
[12]GEORGIADIS M, ANAGNOSTOPOULOS C. Lateral Pressure on Sheet Pile Walls Due to Strip Load[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 1998, 124(1): 95-98.
[13]JGJ 340—2015,建筑地基检测技术规范[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2015.
[14]HIROSHI M, HEMANTA H. Analyses of Active Earth Pressure Against Rigid Retaining Wall Subjected to Different Modes of Movement[J]. Soils and Foundations, 1996, 36(3): 51-65.
基金
国家自然科学基金项目(51508520);河南省住房城乡建设科技计划项目(K1818);河南省高等学校重点科研项目(20B560011)