为研究齿桩的抗拔承载特性,开展了缩尺模型试验,针对齿部结构的层数与长度变量进行了11组试验研究。结果表明:齿桩相比光面桩表现出更优异的抗拔性能,齿距、齿长与模型桩的抗拉拔承载力都呈现正相关;在一定的弹性承载阶段,模型桩的抗拔承载力随着齿层数的增加呈线性增大;齿长相比于齿层数对模型桩的抗拔承载力和抗拔侧摩阻力均具有较大的影响。试验及分析结果对小改截面桩的研究运用具有一定的借鉴意义。
Abstract
To investigate the pull-out load-bearing characteristics of multi-tooth pile, we conducted scale model test of the tooth structure with varied number of tooth layer and tooth length. Our findings reveal that multi-tooth structure exhibits superior pull-out performance compared with smooth pile. Tooth pitch and tooth length are positively correlated with the pull-out bearing capacity of the model pile. At a certain elastic load-bearing stage, the pull-out bearing capacity of the model pile grows linearly with the increase of the number of teeth. Tooth length has a greater influence on the pull-out bearing capacity and the uplift side frictional resistance of the model pile than the number of teeth. The findings offer reference for the research and application of piles with small modified section.
关键词
桩基础 /
齿桩 /
抗拔特性 /
模型试验 /
小截面桩
Key words
pile foundation /
multi-tooth pile /
pullout resistance /
model test /
pile with small section
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 张忠苗. 桩基工程[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2007: 225-241.
[2] 牟玉玮,王日中,牟彦艳.用改变桩形的方法提高灌注桩承载力[J].岩土工程学报,1998(3):118-121.
[3] YIN Ya-jun, XU Guang-han, QIAN Yong-mei. Numerical Analysis and Experimental Study on Consolidation of the Squeezed Branch Pile[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2014, 889/890: 1393-1397.
[4] KONG G Q, YANG Q, LIU H L, et al. Numerical Study of a New Belled Wedge Pile Type under Different Loading Modes[J]. European Journal of Environmental & Civil Engineering, 2013, 17(Supp.1): 65-82.
[5] LIU J, HE J, WU Y P,et al. Load Transfer Behaviour of a Tapered Rigid Pile[J]. Géotechnique, 2012, 62(7): 649-652.
[6] HONDA T, HIRAI Y, SATO E. Uplift Capacity of Belled and Multi-belled Piles in Dense Sand[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2011, 51(3): 483-496.
[7] 邵光辉,赵志峰,吴正余.托底抗拔桩承载特性的模型试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,2016,38(6):1140-1146.
[8] 钱建固,王 斌,陈宏伟,等.注浆螺纹抗拔桩室内模型试验与承载机理分析[J].建筑结构学报, 2015,36(10):146-152.
[9] 王 斌,钱建固,陈宏伟,等.注浆成型螺纹桩抗拔承载特性的数值分析[J].岩土力学,2014,35(增刊2):572-578.
[10]陈仁朋,张革强,孔令刚,等.饱和及非饱和粉土中扩底桩极限上拔承载力大尺寸模型试验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2010,29(5):1068-1074.
[11]雍 君,陆晓敏,刘汉龙.X形混凝土桩抗拔特性试验研究[J].岩土力学,2010,31(11):3430-3434.
[12]陈 新.推挤式支桩承载特性试验研究[D].海口:海南大学,2019.
[13]符羽佳, 李光范, 丁庆磊,等. 一种伸臂式桩侧成齿装置: 中国, CN206887958U[P].2018-01-16.
[14]符羽佳,张仰福,李光范,等.砂土中齿桩竖向承载性状试验研究[J].人民长江,2020,51(5):184-190.
[15]周佳锦,龚晓南,王奎华,等.静钻根植竹节桩抗拔承载性能试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,2015,37(3):570-576.
[16]阮永芬,王熙冬,李志伟,等.砂衬齿形桩竖向承载力的小孔扩展理论研究[J].岩土力学,2017,38(9):2567-2573.
[17]高笑娟. 挤扩支盘桩承载性状试验和数值模拟分析[D].杭州:浙江大学,2007.
[18]JGJ 106—2014,建筑桩基检测技术规范[S]北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2014.
基金
海南省自然科学基金项目(520QN283);长沙理工大学公路养护技术国家工程实验室开放基金资助项目(kfj190109);海口经济学院校级科学研究课题(HJKY(YB)19-08)
PDF(1573 KB)
