土的压实特性是水利工程中非常令人关注的特性之一。为研究细粒土压实特性与颗粒组成的相关性,结合2017年以来实施的8个水利工程勘察项目,在试验要求统一的前提下,收集了123组击实试验、颗粒分析试验数据,试验样品主要集中在安徽省内长江与淮河之间的200余公里范围内。对细粒土的最大干密度、最优含水率与黏粒、粉粒和砂粒数据之间的相关性开展了一元和二元线性回归分析。在剔除了黏粒含量>37%的7组数据后,得到了以黏粒、粉粒含量为自变量,以最大干密度、最优含水率为因变量的二元线性回归分析结果。研究结果表明:影响细粒土压实特性的主要因素是颗粒组成,但土中的水和气等因素也对压实特性产生一定影响;当细粒土黏粒含量在10%~37%时,最大干密度、最优含水率与颗粒组成有较好的相关性; 目前工程中常用的击实试验和颗粒分析试验方法存在精度较差、人为因素影响大等缺陷。研究成果可为进一步明确细粒土压实特性提供参考。
Abstract
The compactability of soil plays a very important role in water conservancy project. In order to study the correlation between fine-grained soil’s compactability and particle composition , according to eight water conservancy projects since 2017, we collected data of compaction test and grain size test. Most test samples are collected from a range of about 200 km between Yangtze river and Huaihe river in Anhui province. The correlation between maximum dry density, optimum water content of fine-grained soil and sand-silt-clay data was examined by simple linear regression and binary linear regression. A binary linear regression result was obtained by using clay-silt content as independent variable and maximum dry density and optimum water content as dependent variable while excluding the data of clay content larger than 37%. Results suggest that particle composition is the major factor affecting the compactability of fine-grained soil, while water and gas in soil also have some effects on the compactability at the same time. A good correlation was found between maximum dry density and optimum water content and soil composition while fine-grained soil content is in the range from 10% to 37%. This study will help us to understand the compactability of fine-grained soil meanwhile avoid poor accuracy and artificial factor during compaction test and grain size test.
关键词
细粒土 /
压实特性 /
颗粒组成 /
二元线性回归 /
相关性分析 /
最大干密度 /
最优含水量
Key words
fine-grained soil /
compactability /
particle composition /
binary linear regression /
correlation analysis /
maximum dry density /
optimum water content
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 文飞国. 过湿土处治技术研究[D]. 西安:长安大学, 2004.
[2] 张志权,王志勇. 最大干密度和最优含水率的准确性探讨[J]. 长安大学学报(建筑与环境科学版), 2004, 21(2):7-10.
[3] 王 刚. 粗粒土干燥状态下压实研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐:新疆农业大学, 2011.
[4] 刘小翠,边晓明. 大粒径粗粒土压实性研究[J]. 内蒙古水利, 2013(5):18-20.
[5] 饶云康,丁 瑜,许文年,等. 应用GA-BP神经网络预估砾类土的最大干密度[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2019, 36(4): 88-92.
[6] 杨 斌,赖国泉. 铁路路基戈壁土填料级配及压实特性分析[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2011,32(1):7-11.
[7] 白兰兰,马文宁. 人工配制不同含砂率粉土性质研究[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2018, 35(2): 95-97.
[8] 邓志坤,宁金成. 南阳膨胀土击实特性试验分析[J]. 公路, 2011(10):44-47.
[9] GB/T 50123—2019,土工试验方法标准[S]. 北京:中国计划出版社,2019.
[10]谭晓慧,沈梦芬,张 强.用激光粒度仪进行粘土的颗粒分析[J]. 土木建筑与环境工程,2011,33(6):96-100.