陕西省不同地貌类型区植被覆盖度时空变化特征及其影响因素

doi:10.11988/ckyyb.201915132021

长江科学院院报 ›› 2021, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (3): 51-58.DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.201915132021

陕西省不同地貌类型区植被覆盖度时空变化特征及其影响因素

庞国伟^1,2,3, 山琳昕^1,2,3, 杨勤科^1,2,3, 土祥^1,2,3

1.西北大学城市与环境学院,西安 710127;
2.西北大学陕西省地表系统与环境承载力重点实验室,西安 710127;
3.旱区生态水文与灾害防治国家林业和草原局重点实验室,西安 710127

收稿日期:2019-12-09 修回日期:2020-03-04 发布日期:2021-03-17
通讯作者: 杨勤科(1962-),男,陕西陇县人,教授,博士,主要从事GIS与数字地形分析研究。E-mail:qkyang@nwu.edu.cn
作者简介:庞国伟(1982-),男,山西天镇人,副教授,博士,主要从事GIS与区域水土保持研究。E-mail:gwpang@nwu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41601290);国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC1502506);陕西省教育厅基础研究计划项目(15JK1725)

Vegetation Coverage in Different Landforms of Shaanxi Province: Spatial and Temporal Variations and Influencing Factors

PANG Guo-wei^1,2,3, SHAN Lin-xin^1,2,3, YANG Qin-ke^1,2,3, TU Xiang^1,2,3

1. College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Northwest University, Xi'an 710127, China;
2. Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Earth Surface System and Environmental Carrying Capacity, Northwest University, Xi'an 710127, China;
3. Key Laboratory of Ecological Hydrology and Disaster Prevention in Arid Regions, State Forestry and Grassland Administration, Xi'an 710127, China

Received:2019-12-09 Revised:2020-03-04 Published:2021-03-17

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了评价“退耕还林(草)”等生态工程实施以来陕西省不同地貌类型区的植被覆盖变化,基于2000—2017年MODIS数据,采用像元二分模型估算了陕西省植被覆盖度,研究了不同地貌分区植被覆盖度时空变化及其影响因素。结果表明:①18 a来,陕西省植被覆盖度整体呈增加趋势,其中风沙过渡区、黄土高原区增加幅度较大,秦岭山地、汉江盆地与大巴山地增幅较小,关中平原则呈减少趋势。②全省38.88%的区域植被显著改善, 8.49%的区域植被显著退化,黄土高原区为主要改善区,关中平原区及其它地貌类型区的城市周围植被退化。③降水与气温对植被覆盖的影响存在空间差异,黄土高原区植被覆盖度与降水和气温分别以正相关和负相关为主,秦巴山地高海拔地区则均以负相关为主。④相对于地势低缓区域,地势高陡区域植被覆盖度更高,阴坡植被覆盖度较其它坡向高。研究结果将为陕西省生态环境保护分区实施提供科学依据。

关键词: 陕西省, 植被覆盖度, 气象因子, 地形因子, 人类活动

Abstract: The aim of this study is to evaluate the changes of vegetation coverage in different landform types in Shaanxi Province since the implementation of ecological projects such as returning farmland to forest or grass. The vegetation coverage of Shaanxi Province was estimated by using the pixel binary model based on the MODIS data from 2000 to 2017. According to the geomorphic division, the spatial and temporal variation of vegetation coverage and its influencing factors were analyzed. Results showed that: 1) Over the past 18 years, the vegetation coverage in Shaanxi Province had an overall increasing trend. The coverage was lower in the wind and sand transition zone and the loess Plateau yet presenting a significant upward trend, while high and stable in the Qinling mountains, Hanjiang Basin and Daba Mountains. The coverage had a downward trend in the Guanzhong Plain. 2) Vegetation coverage in 38.88% of the province boosted significantly, mainly in the Loess Plateau, whereas decreased significantly in 8.49% of the province, mainly around the cities in the Guanzhong Plain and other landform types. 3) The effects of precipitation and temperature on vegetation coverage vary in different landform types. Vegetation coverage in the Loess Plateau was mainly positively and negatively correlated with precipitation and temperature, respectively, while negatively correlated in high altitude areas of Qinling-Daba Mountains. 4) The vegetation coverage was lower in the area with elevation less than 500 m and slope less than 8°, and the vegetation coverage was higher in the area with elevation above 1 500 m and slope above 15°. The research results will offer scientific basis for partition implementation of ecological and environmental protection in Shaanxi Province.

Key words: Shaanxi Province, vegetation coverage, meteorological factors, topographic factors, human activities

中图分类号:

庞国伟, 山琳昕, 杨勤科, 土祥. 陕西省不同地貌类型区植被覆盖度时空变化特征及其影响因素[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2021, 38(3): 51-58.

PANG Guo-wei, SHAN Lin-xin, YANG Qin-ke, TU Xiang. Vegetation Coverage in Different Landforms of Shaanxi Province: Spatial and Temporal Variations and Influencing Factors[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2021, 38(3): 51-58.

[1]	张晓莹, 何毅, 翁学先, 邵祎婷. 秦巴山区堵河流域径流变化归因分析[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2024, 41(2): 44-51.
[2]	张艳娇, 李巧, 宿彦鹏, 陶洪飞, 姜有为, 马合木江·艾合买提, 魏建群, 杨文新. 基于遥感监测的2000—2020年三屯河流域植被覆盖时空演化分析[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2023, 40(6): 93-99.
[3]	陈四宾, 霍艾迪, 陈思名, 赵志欣, 陈建. 土壤侵蚀时空分布规律及侵蚀热点分析——以陕西省王益区为例[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2022, 39(8): 50-57.
[4]	陈晨, 王义民, 黎云云, 周帅. 黄河流域1982—2015年不同气候区植被时空变化特征及其影响因素[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2022, 39(2): 56-62.
[5]	张琳, 马敬旭, 张倩, 于茹, 任蓓, 王一新, 张英豪. 近60多年洞庭湖水沙演变特征及其与人类活动的关系[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2021, 38(9): 14-20.
[6]	王志强, 曹善浩, 周宇航, 曹秀婷, 高耶, 刘贤赵. 近30年来浏阳河流域景观格局动态及稳定性时空变化特征[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2021, 38(9): 64-70.
[7]	郭振天, 黄峰, 郭利丹, 吴瑶. 鄱阳湖水文情势演变原因及对策[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2021, 38(6): 27-31.
[8]	宋立旺, 邓健, 王伟民, 戚德辉. 基于MODIS数据的浙江省植被覆盖度时空变化分析[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2021, 38(5): 40-46.
[9]	吴志广, 陈述. 长江流域水资源开发保护中的关键科学和技术问题[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2021, 38(4): 1-6.
[10]	韩昊宇, 丁文峰, 许文涛, 康靖羚. 基于GRACE卫星数据的汉江流域旱情反演及影响因素定量分析[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2021, 38(11): 44-51.
[11]	张乾柱, 邓浩俊, 卢阳, 周火明, 高强, 周裕红. 丹江口水库水化学特征现状分析[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2020, 37(9): 24-30.
[12]	刘彩虹, 陈学群, 田婵娟, 辛光明, 管清花, 李成光. 小岭村改造项目对济南泉域小岭强渗漏带的影响[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2020, 37(11): 40-45.
[13]	赵宇铭, 邱新法, 徐金勤, 化环环. 基于广义互补原理的嘉陵江流域实际蒸散发时空分布特征及影响因素[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2020, 37(1): 37-43.
[14]	李其江. 长江源径流演变及原因分析[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2018, 35(8): 1-5.
[15]	王志成, 刘新华, 贾付生, 聂艳. 近10 a阿克苏流域植被覆盖时空演变特征及影响因素[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2017, 34(9): 24-28.

陕西省不同地貌类型区植被覆盖度时空变化特征及其影响因素

Vegetation Coverage in Different Landforms of Shaanxi Province: Spatial and Temporal Variations and Influencing Factors

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价