锦屏一级水电站左岸高陡边坡卸荷岩体采用压力分散型无黏结预应力锚索作为主要支护方式,由于锚索吨位大、间距小,卸荷岩体在锚固力作用下出现较大压缩变形,相邻锚索相互影响导致锚固预应力损失,群锚效应显著。为研究卸荷岩体中的群锚效应,根据相似理论制作了卸荷岩体相似材料模型,进行了群锚加固物理模型试验,结合试验数据和Mindlin解分析了岩体的位移、变形、锚固力叠加效应及锚索预应力损失。研究结果表明卸荷岩体中的群锚效应主要包括:①锚索引起的应力叠加对卸荷岩体具有显著的压缩效应;②锚索张拉造成邻近锚索的预应力损失。最后通过试验分析和理论推导得出了群锚作用下岩体的位移及锚索预应力损失率的计算方法。研究认为,合理设置锚索间距和适当增加锚索长度能有效地减小群锚效应造成的锚索预应力损失,并在实际工程中得到了验证。
Abstract
Pressure-distributed unbonded prestressing anchor cable is the major support for the strongly unloading rock mass in the left-bank high and steep slope of Jinping Hydropower Station. Large anchoring force and small spacing of the anchorage gave rise to notable compressional deformation of the rock mass; the mutual influence of anchor cables led to massive prestress loss. A physical model test on the anchoring of unloading rock mass was carried out to examine the displacement and deformation of rock mass as well as the superposition of anchoring force and prestress loss in association with Mindlin’s solution. The anchor group effect mainly includes 1) the compression of unloading rock mass posed by stress superposition; 2) the prestress loss of anchor cable caused by tensions on adjacent ones. Furthermore, the calculation methods of rock mass displacement and prestress loss rate were obtained via experimental analysis and theoretical derivation. Reasonable spacing of anchor cables and appropriate increase of anchor cable length can effectively reduce the prestress loss caused by group anchor effect.
关键词
高陡边坡 /
卸荷岩体 /
预应力锚索 /
群锚效应 /
物理模型试验
Key words
high and steep slope /
unloading rock mass /
pre-stressed anchor cable /
group anchor effect /
physical model test
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 黄润秋.岩石高边坡稳定性工程地质分析[J].工程地质学报,2013,21(6):870.
[2] 李英勇,王梦恕,张顶立,等.锚索预应力变化影响因素及模型研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2008,27(增刊1):3140-146.
[3] 李正兵. 强卸荷、倾倒拉裂破碎岩体条件下高边坡岩锚破坏性试验研究[J]. 水利水电技术,2009,40(2):22-26.
[4] 程良奎,李象范.岩土锚固·土钉·喷射混凝土:原理、设计与应用[M]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2008:1-136.
[5] 洪 亮. 压力分散型锚索锚固机理及承载板合理间距的研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2013.
[6] 顾金才,沈 俊,陈安敏,等.锚索预应力在岩体内引起的应变状态模型试验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2000,19(增刊1):917-921.
[7] 曾祥勇,唐树名,邓安福. 锚索加固边坡破裂结构岩体模型试验[J]. 重庆大学学报(自然科学版),2004, 27(8):128-135.
[8] 刘 明. 锦屏一级水电站左岸边坡大规模开挖的地质力学响应研究[D]. 成都:成都理工大学,2014.
[9] 王 胜. 锦屏一级水电站左岸抗力体地质缺陷及加固处理技术研究[D].成都:成都理工大学,2010.
[10]程良奎,胡建林.摩擦式锚杆作用原理及其工程应用[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1989,8(2):119-126.
[11]孟刘鸿,周德培.压力分散型锚索内力变化规律试验研究[J].岩土力学,2012,33(4):1040-1044,1050.
[12]孙学毅.边坡加固机理探讨[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(16):2818-2823.
[13]陆锡铭,朱晗迓.破碎岩质边坡中群锚效应试验研究[J].公路交通科技,2005(增刊1):66-68,80.
[14]张发明,刘 宁,赵维炳.岩质边坡预应力锚固的力学行为及群锚效应[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2000,19(增刊1):1077-1080.
[15]尤春安,战玉宝.预应力锚索锚固段的应力分布规律及分析[J].岩土工程学报,2004,24(6): 925-28.
[16]MINDLIN R D. Force at a Point in the Interior of a Semi-infinite Solid[J]. Physics, 1936, 7(5): 195-202.