为了探讨排水剪切条件下结构性对湿地湖泊相黏土力学特性的影响,对湿地湖泊相黏土原状样和重塑样进行三轴排水剪切试验,将试验后的原状样进行微观定性和定量分析,研究不同围压下结构性对土体剪切强度和变形特性的影响。结果表明:在土体结构屈服破坏前,结构性会提高原状土抗剪强度,减小剪切变形;当土体结构屈服破坏后,结构性会降低原状土抗剪强度,增大剪切变形。原状土的峰值结构强度随围压增大近似呈线性增加,而峰值结构体积应变随围压增大呈指数型趋势减小。在围压小于结构屈服应力时,剪切阶段由胶结联结和结构骨架承担荷载,孔隙压缩较小,颗粒和孔隙的形状和排列变化较小;当围压超过结构屈服应力后,在剪切阶段胶结联结和结构骨架逐渐破坏,孔隙受到压缩,颗粒和孔隙的形状趋向圆形,并向荷载优势方向调整排列。研究成果对于揭示湿地湖泊相黏土的结构破损机理及指导湖泊湿地地区的工程建设具有重要意义。
Abstract
Triaxial drainage shear tests are conducted on undisturbed and remolded samples of marshy and lacustrine clay to explore the mechanism of structure affecting shear strength and deformation. The undisturbed soil samples after the triaxial drainage shear test are photographed by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and the SEM photos are qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed by IPP program. In addition, the effects of soil structure on shear strength and deformation and the change of microstructure of marshy and lacustrine clay are examined under different consolidation pressures. Results demonstrate that before the yield failure of soil structure, the soil structure of the undisturbed soil could enhance shear strength and reduce shear deformation, while after the yield failure of soil structure, the soil structure of undisturbed soil reduces shear strength and instigates shear deformation which is similar to the remolded soil. Moreover, the peak structural strength of undisturbed soil increases linearly and the peak structural volumetric strain decreases exponentially with the growth of confining pressure. When consolidation pressure is smaller than structural yield stress, the soil structure damages slightly in consolidation stage, and the shear load is bore by the bonding and fabric of the undisturbed soil in shearing stage. Meanwhile, the pores are almost uncompressed and the shape and arrangement of particles and pores have changed slightly. However, when consolidation pressure exceeds the structural yield stress, the soil structure damages significantly in consolidation stage and the bonding and fabric gradually degrades in shearing stage. As a result, the pores are compressed, the shape of particles and pores gradually becomes circular, and the arrangement orientation of particles and pores adjust with the direction of load.
关键词
湿地湖泊相黏土 /
三轴排水剪切试验 /
结构性 /
微观结构 /
原状土 /
重塑土
Key words
marshy and lacustrine clay /
triaxial drained shear test /
soil structure /
microstructure /
undisturbed soil /
remoulded soil
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 刘春原, 王向会. 衡水湖湿地湖泊相软土研究[M]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2016.
[2] 龚晓南, 熊传祥, 项可祥, 等. 粘土结构性对其力学性质的影响及形成原因分析[J]. 水利学报, 2000 (10): 43-47.
[3] 胡瑞林. 粘性土微结构定量模型及其工程地质特征研究[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1995.
[4] BURLAND J B. On the Compressibility and Shear Strength of Natural Clays[J]. Géotechnique, 1990, 40(3): 329-378.
[5] CALLISTO L, CALABRESI G. Mechanical Behaviour of a Natural Soft Clay[J]. Géotechnique, 1998, 48(4): 495-513.
[6] HONG Z S, LIU S Y, SHEN S Y, et al. Comparison in Undrained Shear Strength between Undisturbed and Remolded Ariake Clays[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 2006, 132(2): 272-275.
[7] HONG Z S, ZHENG L L, CUI Y J, et al. Compression Behaviour of Natural and Reconstituted Clays[J]. Géotechnique, 2012, 62(4): 291-301.
[8] 王国欣, 肖树芳, 黄宏伟. 杭州海积软土应力–应变特征与结构强度损伤规律研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2005, 24(9): 1555-1560.
[9] 张 宏, 柳艳华, 杜东菊. 基于孔隙特征的天津滨海软粘土微观结构研究[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 38(10): 1444-1449.
[10]陈晓平. 海陆交互相沉积软土固结效应[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2011, 33(4): 520-528.
[11]张先伟, 孔令伟, 郭爱国, 等. 不同固结压力下强结构性黏土孔隙分布试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2014, 35(10): 2794-2800.
[12]周 建, 邓以亮, 曹 洋, 等. 杭州饱和软土固结过程微观结构试验研究[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 45(6): 1998-2005.
[13]龙 凡, 王立忠, 李 凯, 等. 舟山黏土和温州黏土灵敏度差别成因[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2015, 49(2): 218-224.
[14]陈 波, 孙德安, 高 游, 等. 弱胶结结构性软黏土力学特性的试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2017, 39(12): 2296-2303.
[15]刘勇健, 李彰明, 郭凌峰, 等. 基于核磁共振技术的软土三轴剪切微观孔隙特征研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2018, 37(8): 1924-1932.
[16]朱 楠, 刘春原, 赵献辉, 等. 湿地湖泊相黏土一维固结压缩特性宏微观试验研究[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2020,37(2): 93-99.
[17]朱 楠, 刘春原, 赵献辉, 等. 结构性对湿地湖泊相软土不排水剪切强度特性的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2019, 38(3): 858-864,871.
[18]GB/T 50123—1999,土工试验方法标准[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 1999.
[19]张季如, 祝 杰, 黄 丽, 等. 土壤微观结构定量分析的IPP图像技术研究[J]. 武汉理工大学学报, 2008, 30(4): 80-83.
[20]张先伟, 王常明. 一维压缩蠕变前后软土的微观结构变化[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2010, 32(11): 1688-1694.
[21]施 斌. 粘性土击实过程中微观结构的定量评价[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1996, 18(4): 57-62.
基金
河北省交通运输厅科技计划项目(Y-2012004);河北省科技计划项目(15273802D)
PDF(6862 KB)
