山西典型黄土崩塌破坏模式及其早期辨识

刘向御

长江科学院院报 ›› 2019, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (11) : 69-75.

PDF(1853 KB)
PDF(1853 KB)
长江科学院院报 ›› 2019, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (11) : 69-75. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20181280
岩土工程

山西典型黄土崩塌破坏模式及其早期辨识

  • 刘向御1,2
作者信息 +

Failure Modes and Early Identification of Typical Loess Collapse in Shanxi

  • LIU Xiang-yu1,2
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

针对黄土崩塌隐蔽性、突发性的特点,旨在实现黄土崩塌的早期辨识及预判,并提出相应的应急防治措施。通过对山西典型黄土崩塌破坏模式进行分类总结,归纳了黄土崩塌不稳定界面及相应的诱发因素,提取了黄土崩塌早期辨识特征因子;通过综合指数法对崩塌危险性进行了半定量分析;按照量化评价标准,对黄土崩塌危险性进行分级;根据不同的危险性级别,采取相应的应急防治措施;突出变形迹象对黄土崩塌的贡献,实现优先判别。研究表明:①黄土崩塌的变形破坏主要集中于4种岩土体结构组合、5个典型破坏接触面;②黄土崩塌危险性可划分为高、中、较低、低4个级别,对应应急避让、临灾监测、应急调查、勘查、治理等防治措施;③变形迹象评分结果达到判定级别“危险性高”时,可直接介入地质灾害预警预报措施。

Abstract

In view of the concealment and abruptness of loess collapse, the early identification and prediction of loess collapse were investigated, and corresponding emergency prevention measures were proposed. The characteristic factors for early identification of loess collapse were first of all extracted based upon summary on the inducing factors of loess instability via classifying the failure modes of loess in Shanxi Province. Subsequently, the risk of loess collapse was analyzed semi-quantitatively by using comprehensive index method, and on the basis of the quantitative result, the criterion for rating the risk of loess collapse was proposed, and emergency prevention measures were presented corresponding to different risk levels. Research result showed that: (1)the deformation and destruction of loess collapse mainly happened in four kinds of rock and soil structure combination and five typical damage contact surfaces;(2)the risk of loess collapse can be divided into four levels, namely, high level, medium level, relatively low level, and low level, each should be followed with corresponding emergency response measures such as emergency avoidance, disaster monitoring, emergency investigation, exploration and treatment;(3)early warning and forecasting measures for geological hazards can be directly taken when the deformation indication score reaches “high risk” of the judgment level.

关键词

黄土崩塌 / 地质灾害 / 破坏模式 / 早期辨识 / 危险性识别因子

Key words

loess collapse / geological disaster / failure modes / early identification / factors of hazard identification

引用本文

导出引用
刘向御. 山西典型黄土崩塌破坏模式及其早期辨识[J]. 长江科学院院报. 2019, 36(11): 69-75 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20181280
LIU Xiang-yu. Failure Modes and Early Identification of Typical Loess Collapse in Shanxi[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2019, 36(11): 69-75 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20181280
中图分类号: P64    P694   

参考文献

[1] 刘祖典.黄土力学与工程[M].西安:陕西科学技术出版社,1997:58-61.
[2] 李秉成,孙建忠.中国黄土与环境[M].西安:陕西科学技术出版社,2005: 9-12.
[3] 荆和平,马克生.山西黄土的分布特征与滑坡(崩塌)灾害[J].工程勘察,2011(增刊1):169-176.
[4] 辛存林,杨国林,赵志鹏,等.天水市北山黄土崩塌灾害特征、成因及防治[J].水土保持通报,2013,33(1):120-123.
[5] 刘 飞,李同录.延安地区不同黄土崩塌类型对崩塌贡献率的研究[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2013,33(4):435-440.
[6] 彭 军,李翔宇,闫蕊鑫.陕北地区黄土崩塌破坏模式分类及防控对策研究[J].长江科学院院报,2015,32(10):11-16.
[7] 王根龙,张茂省,苏天明,等.黄土崩塌破坏模式及离散元数值模拟分析[J].工程地质学报,2011,19(4):541-549.
[8] 刘 超.黄土高边坡抗剪强度参数反演研究[D].西安:长安大学,2014.
[9] 叶万军,杨更社,张慧梅.拉裂-滑移式黄土崩塌的形成机制及其稳定性研究[J].岩土力学,2014,35(12):3564-3567.
[10]叶万军,董西好,杨更社,等.倾倒型黄土崩塌稳定性判据及其影响范围研究[J].岩土力学,2013,34(增刊2):242-251.
[11]朱兴华,彭建兵,同 霄,等.黄土地区地质灾害链研究初探[J].工程地质学报,2017,25(1):117-122.
[12]彭建兵,林鸿州,王启耀,等.黄土地质灾害研究中的关键问题与创新思路[J].工程地质学报,2014,22(4):684-691.
[13]黄强兵,康孝森,王启耀,等.山西吕梁黄土崩滑类型及发育规律[J].工程地质学报,2016,24(1):64-72.
[14]董 震,巨玉文.山西黄土地质灾害的特性及治理研究[J].科学技术与工程,2015,15(7):138-141.
[15]王建斌.离石黄土渗透规律试验研究[J].地下水,2014,36(1):18-20.
[16]罗 扬,金 鑫,徐 慧,等.垂直节理对黄土渗透性的影响研究[C]∥地下空间开发与历史文化名城保护研讨会论文集. 西安:中国土木工程学会,2015:102-109.
[17]唐亚明,薛 强,李 清.黄土滑塌灾害风险分级系统研究[J].工程地质学报,2012,20(3):378-386.

基金

山西省隰县地质灾害详细调查项目([2015-0406]G204-C57)

PDF(1853 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/