非饱和导排层水分侧向导排作用模型试验验证与影响因素分析

焦卫国, 詹良通, 季永新, 贺明卫, 邓林恒

长江科学院院报 ›› 2020, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (5) : 92-98.

PDF(4961 KB)
PDF(4961 KB)
长江科学院院报 ›› 2020, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (5) : 92-98. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20180993
岩土工程

非饱和导排层水分侧向导排作用模型试验验证与影响因素分析

  • 焦卫国1, 詹良通2, 季永新3, 贺明卫1, 邓林恒2
作者信息 +

Model Test and Numerical Analysis on Lateral Drainage inCapillary-Barrier Cover with Unsaturated Drainage Layer

  • JIAO Wei-guo1, ZHAN Liang-tong2, JI Yong-xin3, HE Ming-wei1, DENG Lin-heng2
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

生活垃圾填埋场终场覆盖层的主要功能是防渗。部分湿润气候区因降雨量较多、土层储水能力不足,毛细阻滞覆盖层防渗效果不佳。在毛细阻滞覆盖层中添加非饱和导排层(unsaturated drainage layer,UDL)是改善毛细阻滞覆盖层在湿润气候区防渗性能的措施之一。开展室内模型试验对毛细阻滞覆盖层中UDL的侧向排水作用进行了实测和验证,对影响UDL侧向导排长度的因素进行了数值分析。模型试验尺寸为2.0 m×1.0 m×0.4 m(长×宽×厚),结构剖面从上至下依次为粉土层(20 cm)、砂层(10 cm)和碎石层(10 cm)。试验结果表明:累计降雨量为882.2 mm,UDL侧向导排水量为9.5 mm,占土层入渗水量的13.7%,水分侧向导排作用可观。UDL侧向导排长度影响因素数值分析结果表明:①细粒土厚度和渗透性对导排长度的影响因降雨量而异,当降雨量较小时,细粒土层越厚、渗透性越低,侧向导排长度越长;②UDL厚度对水分侧向导排长度影响不明显;③UDL进水值越低,细粒土储水能力越大,细粒土侧向导排失效时间和UDL侧向导排介入时间越晚,但持续降雨后期导排长度衰减速度更快,进水值须根据当地降雨条件和覆盖层粗、细粒土水力特性综合考虑。

Abstract

Seepage prevention is the main function of final cover of municipal solid waste landfill. Capillary barrier cover is not effective in some humid climates due to inadequate water holding capacity of soil. Adding unsaturated drainage layer (UDL) to the capillary barrier cover (CBC) is one of the measures to improve the performance of CBC in humid climate area. In this research, the lateral drainage performance of the capillary barrier cover with unsaturated drainage layer (CBC+UDL) was studied by combining indoor extreme rainfall model test and numerical analysis. Size of the cover model is 2.0 m×1.0 m× 0.4 m (length × width × thickness). The structural section from the upper to the lower is silt layer (20 cm), sand layer (10 cm), and gravel layer (10 cm) in sequence. The results of model test revealed that in the presence of 882.2 mm cumulative rainfall, the lateral drainage of UDL was 9.5 mm which accounted for 13.7% of the rainfall infiltration. Numerical simulation demonstrated that the effect of thickness and permeability of fine-grained soil on drainage length varied with rainfall amount: in the presence of small rainfall amount, a thicker fine-grained soil layer resulted in lower permeability and longer lateral drainage length. The thickness of UDL had little impact on the length of lateral drainage. A lower water entrance value of UDL would enhance the water storage capacity of fine-grained soil, and delay the failure of fine-grained soil and the effect of UDL. Nevertheless, the decay of drainage length in the late stage of continuous rainfall would accelerate. Therefore, the water entrance value of UDL must be considered comprehensively according to local rainfall conditions and hydraulic characteristics of coarse and fine grained soil covers.

关键词

毛细阻滞覆盖层 / 非饱和导排层 / 导排长度 / 渗透性 / 垃圾填埋

Key words

capillary-barrier cover / unsaturated drainage layer (UDL) / lateral drainage length / permeability / solid waste landfill

引用本文

导出引用
焦卫国, 詹良通, 季永新, 贺明卫, 邓林恒. 非饱和导排层水分侧向导排作用模型试验验证与影响因素分析[J]. 长江科学院院报. 2020, 37(5): 92-98 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20180993
JIAO Wei-guo, ZHAN Liang-tong, JI Yong-xin, HE Ming-wei, DENG Lin-heng. Model Test and Numerical Analysis on Lateral Drainage inCapillary-Barrier Cover with Unsaturated Drainage Layer[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2020, 37(5): 92-98 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20180993
中图分类号: TU42   

参考文献

[1]KHIRE M, BENSON C H, BOSSCHER P. Capillary Barriers in Semi-arid and Arid Climates: Design Variables and the Water Balance[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,ASCE,2000,126(8): 695-708.
[2] BONAPARTE R, GROSS B A, DANIEL D E, et al. Draft Technical Guidance for RCRA/CERCLA Final Covers[S]. Washington DC: Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, 2004.
[3] ROSS B. The Diversion Capacity of Capillary Barriers[J].Water Resources Research,1990,26(10):2625-2629.
[4] STORMONT J C. Unsaturated Drainage Layers for Diversion of Infiltrating Water [J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 1997, 123: 364-366.
[5] STORMONT J C. The Effectiveness of Two Capillary Barriers on a 10% Slope[J]. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 1996, 14(4): 243-267.
[6] MORRIS C E, STORMONT J C. Parametric Study of Unsaturated Drainage Layers in Capillary Barrier[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 1999, 125(12): 1057-1065.
[7] STORMONT J C, MORRIS C E. Method to Estimate Water Storage Capacity of Capillary Barriers[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 1998, 124(6): 297-303.
[8] ALBRIGHT W H, BENSON C H, GEE G W, et al. Field Water Balance of Landfill Final Covers[J]. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2004, 33(6): 2317.
[9] 赵 慧,刘川顺,王 伟,等.垃圾填埋场腾发覆盖系统控制渗滤效果的研究[J].中国给水排水,2008,24(9): 86-89.
[10]陆海军,栾茂田,张金利.垃圾填埋场传统封顶和ET封顶的比较研究[J].岩土力学,2009,30(2):509-514.
[11]焦卫国,詹良通,季永新,等.黄土-碎石毛细阻滞覆盖层储水能力实测与分析[J].岩土工程学报,2019,41(6):1149-1157.
[12]焦卫国,詹良通,孔令刚,等.黄土-碎石覆盖层毛细阻滞效应及设计厚度分析[J].浙江大学学报(工学版),2016,50(11):2128-2134.
[13]詹良通,焦卫国,孔令刚,等.黄土作为西北地区填埋场土质覆盖层材料可行性及设计厚度分析[J].岩土力学报,2014,12(3):384-389.
[14]张文杰,耿 潇.垃圾填埋场毛细阻滞型腾发封顶工作机理及性能分析[J].岩土工程学报,2016,38(3):454-459.
[15]张文杰,邱战洪,朱成仁,等.长三角地区填埋场ET封顶系统的性能评价[J].岩土工程学报,2009,31(3): 384-389.
[16]邓林恒,詹良通,陈云敏,等.含非饱和导排层的毛细阻滞型覆盖层性能模型试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,2012, 34(1):75-80.
[17]CJJ17—2004,城市生活垃圾卫生填埋技术规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2004.
[18]VAN GENUCHTEN M T. A Closed-form Equation for Predicting the Hydraulic Conductivity of Unsaturated Soils[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1980, 44(5): 892-898.
[19]BENSON C H,ALBRIGHT W H, RDESLER A C,et al. Evaluation of Final Cover Performance:Field Data from the Alternative Cover Assessment Program(ACAP)[J]. Proceedings of Waste Management,2002,2:1-15.
[20]AUBERTIN M, CIFUENTES E, APITHY S A, et al. Analyses of Water Diversion along Inclined Covers with Capillary Barrier Effects[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2009, 46: 1146-1164.

基金

贵州省科技计划基础项目(黔科合基础1079,黔科合基础1513-4);国家杰出青年科学基金项目(51625805);贵州省科技厅社发攻关项目(黔科合SY字3055);中建四局科技研发项目(CSCEC4B-2015-KT-03)

PDF(4961 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/