尺寸效应是岩石力学试验研究中不可回避的问题,直接关系到岩石力学参数取值是否合理。在以往岩石劈裂抗拉强度的尺寸效应研究中,主要考虑了岩样厚径比的影响,较少考虑岩样直径的影响。基于此,在前期研究的基础上,设计进行了25,30,50,100,150 mm 5种直径岩样的巴西劈裂试验。研究结果表明:①在厚径比一定的情况下,岩样直径从25 mm增大到150 mm,对应抗拉强度呈现先陡后缓的降低趋势,在岩样直径>50 mm后,抗拉强度趋于稳定,变化趋势总体可以用指数函数较好地表达;②岩石的劈裂抗拉强度尺寸效应,不仅与岩样的厚径比有关,而且与岩样的直径有关,综合以往研究经验,建议控制岩样的厚径比为0.3左右、直径在50 mm以上,这样可以较好地消除尺寸效应对劈裂抗拉强度的影响。相关研究结果可为岩石劈裂抗拉强度的尺寸效应分析提供较好的依据。
Abstract
Size effect is an unavoidable problem in rock mechanics experiment, and is directly related to the rationality of rock mechanics parameters. In previous studies on the size effect of rock splitting tensile strength, the influence of thickness-to-diameter ratio of rock specimen was mostly considered rather than the influence of rock sample diameter. In view of this, we performed Brazilian splitting tensile strength tests on specimens of five different diameters (25, 30, 50, 100, 150 mm). Results unveiled that: 1) at given thickness-to-diameter ratio, the tensile strength of rock sample declined from being sharply towards gently as the diameter augmented from 25 mm to 150 mm. When the diameter exceeded 50 mm, tensile strength tended to be stable. Such variation trend can be well fitted by exponential function. 2) The size effect of splitting tensile strength of rock is not only related to the thickness-to-diameter ratio, but also related to the diameter of rock specimen. According to previous research experience, we suggest that the thickness-to-diameter ratio around 0.3, and diameter more than 50 mm, in which case the size effect on splitting tensile strength can be well eliminated.
关键词
砂岩 /
巴西劈裂 /
抗拉强度 /
直径 /
尺寸效应
Key words
sandstone /
Brazilian splitting /
tensile strength /
diameter /
size effect
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 刘宝琛,张寄生,杜奇中,等.岩石抗压强度的尺寸效应.岩石力学与工程学报,1998,17(6):611-614.
[2] 杨圣奇,苏承东,徐卫亚.岩石材料尺寸效应的试验和理论研究[J].工程力学,2005,22(4):112-118.
[3] POULSEN B A, ADHIKARY D P. A Numerical Study of the Scale Effect in Coal Strength. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2013, 63: 62-71.
[4] 吕龙龙,宋 丽,廖红建,等.红层软岩单轴抗压强度的尺寸效应.长江科学院院报,2016,33(9):78-82.
[5] ZHANG Q,ZHU H H,ZHANG L Y,et al. Study of Scale Effect on Intact Rock Strength Using Particle Flow Modeling. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2011, 48(8): 1320-1328.
[6] 王创业,杜晓娅.岩石尺寸效应试验与RFPA3D数值模拟对比分析.化工矿物与加工,2018,47(2):28-30.
[7] GUO H,AZIZ N I,SHMIDT L C. Rock Fracture Toughness Determination by the Brazilian Test. Engineering Geology,1993,33(3):177-178.
[8] 王启智,吴礼舟.用平台巴西圆盘试样确定脆性岩石的弹性模量、拉伸强度和断裂韧度——第二部分:试验结果. 岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(2):199-204.
[9] 赵 明,姚 池.含预制裂隙的均质岩石巴西劈裂过程数值模拟.水电能源科学,2018,36(7):87-91.
[10]王 亚.基于巴西劈裂试验的茅口灰岩抗拉强度研究.湘潭:湖南科技大学,2016.
[11]张 盛,梁亚磊,李大伟.圆盘厚度对岩石抗拉强度公式的影响性研究.采矿与安全工程学报,2009,26(4):450-454.
[12]喻 勇,陈 平.岩石巴西圆盘试验中的空间拉应力分布.岩土力学,2005,26(12):1913-1916.
[13]朱腾华,杨圣奇,苏承东.大理岩抗拉强度的离散性及与厚度的关系.焦作工学院学报(自然科学版),2003,22(6):469-471.
[14]邓华锋,李建林,朱 敏,等.圆盘厚径比对岩石劈裂抗拉强度影响的试验研究.岩石力学与工程学报,2012,31(4):792-798.
[15]徐燕飞,赵伏军,王国举,等.不同岩石巴西劈裂强度的尺寸效应.矿业工程研究,2012,27(4):7-12.
[16]苏海健,靖洪文,赵洪辉,等.高温处理后红砂岩抗拉强度及其尺寸效应研究.岩石力学与工程学报,2015,34(增刊1):2879-2887.
[17]GB/T 50266—2013,工程岩体试验方法标准. 北京:中国计划出版社, 2013.
[18]邓华锋,李建林,邓成进,等.岩石力学试验中试样选择和抗压强度预测方法研究.岩土力学,2011,32(11):3399-3403.
基金
国家自然科学基金项目(51679127);国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFC0400200);国家自然科学基金重点项目(51439003)
PDF(1322 KB)
