碱激发地聚物胶凝材料能够有效固化硫酸盐渍土的根本机理在于改善固化土的微观结构。通过对比试验研究水玻璃、石灰粉煤灰和水玻璃石灰粉煤灰固化盐渍土的无侧限抗压强度和微观结构,阐述了水玻璃碱激发粉煤灰地聚物固化盐渍土微观结构效应。试验结果表明:石灰粉煤灰能够改善盐渍土颗粒级配,缩小孔径范围,降低孔隙体积,进而提高抗压强度;水玻璃能够胶结土颗粒成为团聚体,减小孔隙率和孔隙体积,其抗压强度受浓度影响较大;水玻璃石灰粉煤灰的孔隙特征不是最佳,但由于碱激发地聚物生成的水化凝胶物质填充了粒间孔隙,改善了颗粒胶结状况,抗压强度最高;碱激发地聚物固化盐渍土效果受碱激发反应程度的影响,反应程度越高,固化效果越好。
Abstract
The fundamental mechanism by which alkali-excited geopolymer gelling material can effectively cure the sulfated soil lies in the improvement of the microstructure of the solidified soil. By comparing the unconfined compressive strength and microstructure of saline soil specimens solidified by water glass, lime-fly ash and water glass-lime fly ash, we examined the microstructure of saline soil solidified by water-glass alkali-activated fly ash geopolymer. Test results evinced that lime and fly ash together improved the particle gradation of saline soil, cut the pore size range, reduced the pore volume, and thus enhanced the compressive strength; water glass cemented the soil particles into agglomerates, reduced porosity and pore volume, and its compressive strength was markedly affected by concentration. The pore characteristics of saline soil solidified by water glass-lime fly ash were not optimal; but the compressive strength was the highest because hydration gel material formed by alkali-excited geopolymer filled the intergranular pores and improved the particle cementation condition. The solidification effect of alkali-excited geopolymer is affected by the degree of alkali-induced reaction. The higher the degree of reaction, the better the curing effect.
关键词
固化盐渍土 /
微观结构 /
地聚物 /
水玻璃 /
石灰粉煤灰 /
压汞
Key words
solidified saline soil /
microstructure /
geopolymer /
water glass /
lime and fly ash /
mercury injection
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 张晓智.盐渍土和盐渍土地区公路勘测设计方法研究[J].四川水泥,2017(11):93.
[2] YIN Jian-hua, GRAHAM J. Viscous-elastic-plastic Modelling of One-dimensional Time-dependent Behaviour of Clays[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1989, 26(2): 199-209.
[3] KANIRAJ S R, HAVANAGI V G. Behavior of Cement-stabilized Fiber-reinforced Fly Ash-Soil Mixtures[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2001, 127(7): 574-584.
[4] 覃银辉,何 玮,柴寿喜,等.滨海盐渍土固化后物理力学性能试验研究[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2007,39(3): 408-413.
[5] 柴寿喜,王晓燕,魏 丽,等. 五种固化滨海盐渍土强度与工程适用性评价[J].辽宁工程技术大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 28(1): 59-62.
[6] PURDON A O. The Action of Alkalis on Blast-Furnace Slag[J]. Society of Chemical Industry, 1940, 59: 191-202.
[7] 吕擎峰,申 贝,王生新,等.水玻璃固化硫酸盐渍土强度特性及固化机制研究[J].岩土力学,2016,37(3):687- 693,727.
[8] 吕擎峰,贾梦雪,王生新,等.含盐量对固化硫酸盐渍土抗压强度的影响[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2018,49(3):718-724.
[9] 吴朱敏,吕擎峰,王生新.复合改性水玻璃加固黄土微观特征研究[J].岩土力学,2016,37(增刊2):301-308.
[10]林天干,何 华,许东风,等.地聚合物加固软土力学性能及微观试验研究[J].长江科学院院报,2018,35(10):104-108.
[11]王 清,王剑平.土孔隙的分形几何研究[J].岩土工程学报,2000, 22(4):496-498.
[12]GB/T 50123—1999,土工试验方法标准[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1999.
[13]张先伟,孔令伟,郭爱国,等.基于SEM和MIP试验结构性黏土压缩过程中微观孔隙的变化规律[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2012,31(2):406-412
[14]熊承仁,唐辉明,刘宝琛,等.利用SEM照片获取土的孔隙结构参数[J].地球科学(中国地质大学学报),2007, 32(3): 415-419.
[15]杨晓松,刘井强,党进谦.粉煤灰改良氯盐渍土工程特性试验研究[J].长江科学院院报,2012,29(11):82-86.
[16]杨西锋,尤哲敏,牛富俊,等.固化剂对盐渍土物理力学性质的固化效果研究进展[J].冰川冻土,2014,36(2):376-385.
[17]李书进,厉见芬.碱激发大掺量粉煤灰胶凝材料的试验研究[J].粉煤灰,2010,22(6):10-11,14.
基金
国家自然科学基金项目(51878322);甘肃省重点研发计划项目(18YF1FA112)
PDF(1599 KB)
