含原生隐性节理工程岩体分级方法

邬爱清, 蒋昱州, 石安池, 李林, 王贤彪, 肖国强, 胡伟

长江科学院院报 ›› 2018, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (12) : 74-82.

PDF(2440 KB)
PDF(2440 KB)
长江科学院院报 ›› 2018, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (12) : 74-82. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20180164
岩土工程

含原生隐性节理工程岩体分级方法

  • 邬爱清1, 蒋昱州1, 石安池2, 李林3, 王贤彪2, 肖国强1, 胡伟1
作者信息 +

Classification Method for Engineering Rock Mass Containing Primary Implicit Joint

  • WU Ai-qing1, JIANG Yu-zhou1, SHI An-chi2, LI Lin3, WANG Xian-biao2, XIAO Guo-qiang1, HU Wei1
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

白鹤滩水电站柱状节理玄武岩体内原生微裂隙发育,分布有宏观肉眼不易辨认的隐性节理,节理面较平整,多呈闭合状,为断续镶嵌结构,但岩石强度大,纵波波速高,岩体本身质量及其实际结构特征与测试得到的物理力学性质不相匹配。以白鹤滩水电站坝基柱状节理玄武岩作为含原生隐性节理的代表性岩体,基于其特殊性状,开展现场钻孔取芯、声波测试与点荷载试验,采用目前较为常用的几种工程岩体分级方法对其开展分级研究,对比分析岩体分级的结果与工程实际情况是否具有一致性;并以BQ分级方法为基础,在特定条件下引入RQD来修正岩体完整性系数Kv值,建立了一种适用含有原生隐性节理的工程岩体分级方法;将该方法用于白鹤滩柱状节理玄武岩的工程分级,分级结果与工程实际具有较好的一致性;最后,通过现场原位岩体变形试验对改进的分级方法进行验证可知,测试得到的柱状节理玄武岩变形参数与改进后BQ法的分级结果具有较好的匹配性。

Abstract

Primary microfractures develop in the columnar jointed basaltic rock mass of Baihetan hydropower station, with implicit joints that can hardly be observed by naked eye. The joints are flat and closed in an intermittent mosaic structure; but the rock strength is high with large longitudinal wave velocity, resulting in the inconsistency between the tested physical and mechanical properties and the mass of rock mass as well as its actual structural characteristics. In view of this, in-situ core drilling, sound wave test, and point load test were conducted on columnar jointed basalt as a representative rock mass containing primary implicit joints. Several commonly used methods were employed to classify the quality of the rock mass, and the results were compared with actual engineering results.Furthermore, an improved classification method for engineering rock mass with primary implicit joints was proposed based on the BQ classification method to modify the Kv value by incorporating RQD under specific conditions.The proposed method was applied to the engineering classification of columnar jointed basaltic rock mass at Baihetan hydropower station, and the classification result agreed well with engineering practice.Finally, the method was verified through in-situ rock deformation test, and the results demonstrated that the classification result of the improved BQ method consisted well with the measured deformation parameters.

关键词

岩石力学 / 原生节理 / 隐性节理 / 岩体质量分级 / 分级方法

Key words

rock mechanics / primary joint / implicit joint / quality classification of rock mass / classification method

引用本文

导出引用
邬爱清, 蒋昱州, 石安池, 李林, 王贤彪, 肖国强, 胡伟. 含原生隐性节理工程岩体分级方法[J]. 长江科学院院报. 2018, 35(12): 74-82 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20180164
WU Ai-qing, JIANG Yu-zhou, SHI An-chi, LI Lin, WANG Xian-biao, XIAO Guo-qiang, HU Wei. Classification Method for Engineering Rock Mass Containing Primary Implicit Joint[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2018, 35(12): 74-82 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20180164
中图分类号: TU452   

参考文献

[1] 董学晟. 工程岩体分级标准的研究[J] . 长江科学院院报,1992,9(4):1-9.
[2] 林韵梅. 岩石分级的理论与实践[M] . 北京:冶金工业出版社,1996.
[3] BIENIAWSKI Z T. Engineering Rock Mass Classifications: A Complete Manual for Engineers and Geologists in Mining, Civil and Petroleum Engineering[J] . Petroleum,1989,251(3):357-365.
[4] BIENIAWSKI Z T. Engineering Classification of Jointed Rock Masses[J] . Civil Engineer in South Africa,1973,15(12):335-343.
[5] BARTON N,LIEN R,LUNDE J. Engineering Classification of Rock Masses for the Design of Tunnel Support[J] . Rock Mechanics,1974,6(4):189-236.
[6] BARTON N. Review of the Shear Strength of Filled Discontinuities in Rock[J] . Norwegian Geotechnical Institute Publication, 1974, 105: 1974.
[7] MILLER R P. Engineering Classification and Index Properties for Intact Rock[R] . New Mexico: Air Force Weapons Laboratory, 1966.
[8] 刘馗荣. 介绍日本坝基岩体分级标准和分级方法[J] . 水力发电,1986(1):56-63.
[9] CANO M,TOMAS R. Characterization of the Instability Mechanisms Affecting Slopes on Carbonatic Flyach: Alicante (SE Spain), Case Study[J] . Engineering Geology, 2013, 156: 68-91.
[10] TZAMOS S,SOFIANOS A I. A Correlation of Four Rock Mass Classification Systems Through Their Fabric Indices[J] . International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences,2007,44(4):477-495.
[11] PALMSTROM A. Characterizing Rock Masses by the RMi for Use in Practical Rock Engineering. Part 1: The Development of the Rock Mass Index (RMi)[J] . Tunnelling & Underground Space Technology,1996, 11(2): 175-188.
[12] ROMANA M. SMR Classification[C] ∥Proceedings of the 7th ISRM International Congress on Rock Mechanics. ISRM. Aachen, September 16-20, 1991: 955-960.
[13] 谷德振. 岩体工程地质力学基础[M] . 北京:科学出版社,1979.
[14] 陈德基. 三峡工程地质研究[M] . 武汉:湖北科学技术出版社,1997.
[15] 孙广忠. 岩体结构力学[J] . 地球科学进展,1992,(1):91-93.
[16] 任自民,马代馨,田 野. 三峡工程坝基岩体工程研究[M] . 武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1998.
[17] 董学晟,邬爱清,郭熙灵. 三峡工程岩石力学研究50年[J] . 岩石力学与工程学报,2008,27(10):1945-1958.
[18] 林韵梅. 岩体基本质量定量分级标准BQ公式的研究[J] . 岩土工程学报,1999,21(4):481-485.
[19] 胡卸文,黄润秋. 水利水电工程中的岩体质量分类探讨[J] . 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),1996,(3):64-68.
[20] 聂德新. 岩体结构、岩体质量及可利用性研究[M] . 北京:地质出版社,2008.
[21] 蔡 斌,喻 勇,吴晓铭. 《工程岩体分级标准》与Q分类法、RMR分类法的关系及变形参数估算[J] . 岩石力学与工程学报,2001,20(增1):1677-1679.
[22] 蔡 斌. 国标《工程岩体分级标准》应用中的几个问题[J] . 岩土力学,2003(增1):74-76.
[23] 徐卫亚,赵立永,梁永平. 工程岩体结构类型定量划分问题研究[J] . 武汉大学学报(工学版),1999(2):8-11.
[24] 许宏发,周建民,吴华杰. 国标岩体质量分级的简化方法[J] . 岩土力学,2005(增2):88-90.
[25] GB 50487—2008,水利水电工程地质勘察规范[S] .北京:中国计划出版社,2009.
[26] GB 50218—2014,工程岩体分级标准[S] .北京:中国计划出版社,2015.
[27] 邬爱清,柳赋铮. 国标《工程岩体分级标准》的应用与进展[J] . 岩石力学与工程学报,2012,31(8):1513-1523.
[28] 邬爱清,汪 斌. 基于岩体质量指标BQ的岩质边坡工程岩体分级方法[J] . 岩石力学与工程学报,2014,33(4):699-706.

基金

国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFC0407002,2016YFC0401801);国家自然科学基金项目(51579017,51579016,51479102,41672320);长江科学院基本科研业务费项目(CKSF2016008/YT,CKSF2017066/YT)

PDF(2440 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/