为更方便获得高强井壁的极限承载力,基于加权双剪强度理论,考虑不同中间主应力效应,分2种情况分别求解厚壁圆筒的理想弹塑性解:①厚壁圆筒在外压p0作用下处于全弹性状态,加上轴压P后处于弹塑性状态;②厚壁圆筒仅在外压p0作用下处于弹塑性状态。得到了基于加权双剪强度理论的厚壁圆筒的弹塑性应力解公式、弹塑性极限承载力公式、塑性区半径表达式,并给出不同中间主应力的适用条件;对情况②中的极限承载力公式进行修正,给出了C70高强混凝土井壁极限承载力修正公式,用修正的极限承载力公式计算的高强井壁极限承载力与试验值相比,误差在±3%左右。修正的极限承载力公式将对井壁结构的优化设计具有重要指导意义。
Abstract
An ideal elasto-plastic solution of thick-walled cylinder is presented to acquire the ultimate bearing capacity of high-strength shaft lining based on the weighted double shear unified strength theory in consideration of different intermediate principal stress effects. In one case, under external pressure p0,thick-walled cylinder is in full elastic state, but changes to elasto-plastic state when axial compression P is applied; in another case, only under external pressure p0, thick-walled cylinder is in elasto-plastic state. Moreover, the formula of elasto-plastic stress solution, the formula of elasto-plastic ultimate bearing capacity, and the expression of the radius of plastic zone are obtained based on the weighted double shear unified strength theory, and the applicable conditions of different intermediate principal stresses are given. The aforementioned formula of ultimate bearing capacity is modified for C70 concrete shaft lining. Compared with the test value, the error of the ultimate bearing capacity calculated by the modified formula is about ±3%. In summary, the modified formula of ultimate bearing capacity is of guiding significance for the optimal design of shaft lining structure and model test results.
关键词
高强井壁 /
加权双剪强度理论 /
厚壁圆筒 /
弹塑性应力解 /
极限承载力
Key words
high-strength shaft lining /
eighted double shear strength theory /
thick-walled cylinder /
elasto-plastic stress solution /
ultimate bearing capacity
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 彭世龙,荣传新,程 桦.基于广义开尔文模型的冻结壁和井壁共同作用下冻结压力解析解.长江科学院院报,2017,34(11):84-88,95.
[2] 刘金龙,陈陆望,王吉利.立井井壁竖向附加力的反演统计分析.中国矿业,2014,23(5):142-146.
[3] HEITZER M. Plastic Limit Load of Defective Pipes under Combined Internal Pressure and Axial Tension .International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2002, 44(6): 1219-1224.
[4] STOKEY W F, PETERSON D B, WUNDER R A. Limit Load for Tubes under Internal Pressure Bending Moment, Axial Force and Torsion. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 1966, 4(2): 193 -201.
[5] 郑津洋.过程设备设计.北京:化学工业出版社,2001:52-54.
[6] 朱国民,蔡钢思,高增梁,等.厚壁圆筒在内压和轴向力复合载荷作用下的极限载荷.压力容器,2008,25(7):1-5
[7] 余同希.塑性力学.北京:高等教育出版社,1989:151-163.
[8] 侯公羽,牛晓松.基于Levy-Mises本构关系及 D-P屈服准则的轴对称圆巷理想弹塑性解.岩土力学,2009,30(6):1555-1562.
[9] 冯剑军,张俊彦,张 平,等.基于双剪统一强度理论的厚壁圆筒塑性极限载荷分析.固体力学学报,2004,25(2):208-212.
[10] 李雪梅,荣传新,程 桦.基于三参数强度准则的煤矿立井井壁流固耦合理论分析.长江科学院院报,2016,33(6):83-87,93.
[11] 俞茂宏.岩土类材料的统一强度理论及其应用.岩土工程学报,1994,16(2):1-10.
[12] 俞茂宏.对“统一强度理论”讨论的答复.岩土工程学报,1996,18(5):97-99.
[13] 朱 倩,赵均海,张常光,等.双层组合厚壁圆筒弹脆塑性极限内压统一解.工程力学,2015,32(9):68-75.
[14] 吕显州,王渭明,贾海宾,等.弱胶结地层立井井筒变形监测研究.长江科学院院报,2018,35(3):122-128.
[15] 姚直书,薛维培,宋海清,等.富水松软岩层冻结法凿井井壁结构试验研究.广西大学学报(自然科学版),2014,39(2):231-236.
[16] 薛维培,姚直书,荣传新,等.横向均布荷载下煤矿井壁结构模型试验研究.中国安全科学学报,2015,25(10):139-145.
[17] 姚直书,程 桦,杨俊杰.深表土中高强钢筋混凝土井壁力学性能的试验研究.煤炭学报,2004,29(2):167-171.
[18] 尹 健,周士琼.高性能混凝土轴心抗拉强度与劈裂抗拉强度试验研究.长沙铁道学院学报,2001,19(2):25-29.
[19] 李雪梅,荣传新,程 桦.基于三参数强度准则的高强混凝土井壁力学特性分析.广西大学学报(自然科学版),2016,41(2):308-316.
基金
国家自然科学基金面上项目(51674006);国家重点研发计划资助项目(2016YFC0600902);安徽省高校学科(专业)拔尖人才学术资助项目(gxbjZD09);安徽理工大学青年教师科学研究基金项目(QN2017211);安徽理工大学创新基金资助项目(2017CX2070);安徽省高等学校自然科学研究重点项目(KJ2018A0098)
PDF(1966 KB)
