土体长期变形的预测与控制是大量工程建设的关键性问题。常规方法是结合蠕变试验来预测土体变形,其存在耗时长、难以考虑复杂应力路径以及不便用于复杂有限元计算分析等缺点。考虑土体的率敏性特征,通过对饱和超固结土以及人工制备结构性土分别开展3种不同加载速率下的三轴剪切试验,获得了土体强度、变形以及率敏性指标,从而得到了基于上下负荷面的弹黏塑性本构模型参数,并利用该模型成功预测了土体的率敏性和蠕变变形行为。结果表明:①结合土体率敏性试验来预测土体长期变形,仅较常规土三轴试验增加了几组不同加载速率的剪切试验,而不需增加额外的试验条件,试验效率高;②由土体率敏性试验确定的本构模型参数能正确预测土体的蠕变变形,试验结果与模型预测结果吻合良好;③基于上下负荷面的弹黏塑性本构模型可用于复杂边值问题的有限元计算。结果表明提出的结合土体率敏性来预测土体长期变形的新方法将具有很好的工程应用价值。
Abstract
The prediction and control of the long-term deformation of clay is a crucial problem in the construction of a large quantity of projects. Predicting clay deformation conventionally via creep test is time-consuming, challenging in considering complex stress path, and also unsuitable for complicated finite element analysis. In this paper, the strength, deformation and rate sensitivity of saturated over-consolidated clay and artificial structural clay were obtained via triaxial shear tests under three different loading rates. On this basis, parameters of an elastic-viscoplastic constitutive model based on super-subloading surface were obtained, and the rate sensitivity and creep deformation of clay were estimated by the model. Results revealed that: 1) compared with conventional triaxial test, predicting the long-term deformation of clay in association with rate sensitivity test is highly efficient with only several shear test at different loading rates added yet no additional test conditions; 2) the parameters of the constitutive model determined by rate sensitivity test can be used to predict the creep deformation of clay correctly, and the prediction results are in good agreement with test results; 3) the elastic-viscoplastic constitutive model based on super-subloading surface can be embedded in finite element program to calculate the complex boundary value problems. In conclusion, the presented method of long-term deformation prediction of clay is of sound value in engineering application.
关键词
土体变形 /
率敏性 /
弹黏塑性 /
本构模型 /
蠕变 /
上下负荷面
Key words
soil deformation /
rate sensitivity /
elastic-viscoplastic /
constitutive model /
creep /
super-subloading surface
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 殷建华, CLARK J I. 土体与时间相关的一维应力-应变性状、弹粘塑性模型和固结分析(I) . 岩土力学, 1994, 15(3):65-80.
[2] BUISMAN A S. Results of Long Duration Settlement Tests∥Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Clay Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. Delft, the Netherlands, June 22-26, 1936: 103-107.
[3] LEROUEIL S, THVENAS F. Preconsolidation Pressure of Champlain Clays, Part Ⅱ: Laboratory Determination. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1983, 20(4): 803-816.
[4] ADACHI T, OKA F. Constitutive Equations for Normally Consolidated Clay Based on Elasto-viscoplasticity. Clays and Foundation, 1982, 22(4):57-70.
[5] 陈铁林, 周 成. 结构性粘土压缩和剪切特性试验研究. 岩土工程学报, 2004, 26(1):31-35.
[6] 但汉波, 王立忠. K0固结软粘土的应变率效应研究. 岩土工程学报, 2008, 30(5):718-725.
[7] 吕宾林, 王金文, 蔡德钩. 剪切速率对粘土不排水强度影响的试验研究. 铁道建筑, 2013, 39(1):73-75.
[8] PERZYNA P. The Constitutive Equations for Rate Sensitive Plastic Materials. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, 1963, 20: 321-332.
[9] FREITAS T M B, POTTS D M, ZDRAVKOVIC L. Implications of the Definition of the Function in Elastic-viscoplastic Models. Geotechnique, 2012, 62(7): 643-648.
[10] 王智超, 蒋明镜, 陈双林,等. 基于上下负荷面的弹黏塑性本构模型及应力积分算法实现. 岩土力学, 2016, 37(2):357-366.
[11] HASHIGUCHI K, CHEN Z P. Elastoplastic Constitutive Equation of Soils with the Subloading Surface and the Rotational Hardening. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 1998, 22(3): 197-227.
[12] ASAOKA A, NAKANO M, NODA T. Superloading Yield Surface Concept for Highly Structured Soil Behavior. Soils and Foundations, 2000, 40(2): 99-110.
基金
国家自然科学基金项目(51308485);湖南省自然科学基金资助项目(2016JJ2133);湖南省教育厅优秀青年项目(17B260)
PDF(3107 KB)
