荆江河段与洞庭湖水系的采砂量计算分析

李志威,符蔚,胡旭跃,黄草,钟一丹

长江科学院院报 ›› 2019, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2) : 8-12.

PDF(1447 KB)
PDF(1447 KB)
长江科学院院报 ›› 2019, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2) : 8-12. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20170861
江湖泥沙与治理

荆江河段与洞庭湖水系的采砂量计算分析

  • 李志威1,2,符蔚1,胡旭跃1,2,黄草1,2,钟一丹3
作者信息 +

Calculation and Analysis of Sand Excavation Quantity in Jingjiang River Reach and Dongting Lake’s River Network

  • LI Zhi-wei1,2, FU Wei1, HU Xu-yue1,2, HUANG Cao1,2, ZHONG Yi-dan3
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

针对当前荆江河段和洞庭湖水系严峻的采砂形势,根据遥感影像和本地区历年水泥产量,采用体积计算公式、水泥产量估算法、采砂船只估算法这3种方法计算荆江河段和洞庭湖水系的年采砂量,并对3种计算结果的误差进行分析。结果表明:2015年荆江河段年采砂量约(2.6~3.0)×107 t,近5 a的采砂量变化较小;洞庭湖区及湘资沅澧四水水系的年采砂量约1.3×108 t,近3 a的采砂量变化较小。本计算结果对于定量估算荆江河段和洞庭湖水系的采砂量,加强采砂管理具有参考价值。

Abstract

In view of the severe situation of sand excavation in Jingjiang River reach (middle of the Yangtze River) and Dongting Lake’s river network, we estimate the annual sand excavation quantity of Jingjiang River reach and Dongting Lake’s river network(mainstream of Xiangjiang River, Zijiang River, Yuanjiang River, and Lishui River) using three methods, namely, volumetric formula, conversion of cement production, and sand mining ships based on remote sensing images in this region. We also analyzed the errors of these three methods as well. Results demonstrate that the annual quantity of sand excavation in the Jingjiang River reach is around (2.6-3.0)×107 t in 2015 with slight changes in the last five years; the annual quantity of sand excavation in the Dongting Lake’s river network is around 1.3×108 t in 2015 with slight changes in the last three years. The estimation above is of importance to the evaluation and management of sand excavation in Jingjiang River reach and Dongting Lake region.

关键词

荆江河段 / 洞庭湖水系 / 采砂量 / 遥感影像 / 误差分析

Key words

Jingjiang River Reach / Dongting Lake’s river network / sand excavation quantity / remote sensing images / error analysis

引用本文

导出引用
李志威,符蔚,胡旭跃,黄草,钟一丹. 荆江河段与洞庭湖水系的采砂量计算分析[J]. 长江科学院院报. 2019, 36(2): 8-12 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20170861
LI Zhi-wei, FU Wei, HU Xu-yue, HUANG Cao, ZHONG Yi-dan. Calculation and Analysis of Sand Excavation Quantity in Jingjiang River Reach and Dongting Lake’s River Network[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2019, 36(2): 8-12 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20170861
中图分类号: TV147   

参考文献

[1] 张庆宁. 牡丹江干流采砂的影响分析及管理对策[J] .黑龙江水利科技, 2013, 41(6): 203-204.
[2] 郑小康. 黄河干流河道采砂对生态环境的影响及对策[N].黄河报, 2016-05-31(3).
[3] 唐造造, 江 洧, 侯 玉. 东江河床下切原因探讨[J].人民长江, 2007, 38(8): 136-138.
[4] 刘 蓉, 钱兆燕, 赵志舟. 采砂对河道的影响分析及治理措施研究[J].重庆交通学院学报, 2006, 25(2): 146-149.
[5] 曾慧俊,谈广鸣,吕 平.采砂河道数值模拟研究进展[J] .南水北调与水利科技,2008,6(2):80-83,89.
[6] 毛 野, 张志军. 初析长江河道采砂的利弊得失[J].河海大学学报(自然科学版), 2001, 29(6): 68-72.
[7] 王国栋, 杨文俊. 河道采砂对河道及涉水建筑物的影响研究[J].人民长江, 2013, 44(15): 69-72.
[8] FREDSOE J. Sedimentation of River Navigation Channels[J].Journal of the Hydraulics Division, 1978, 104(2):223-236.
[9] KORNIS S, LACZAY T A. Effect of Extensive Dredging on the River Regime[C] ∥WHITE C R. Proceedings of the International Conference on River Regime. Wallingford, England, May 18-20. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 1988: 385-394.
[10] BONTA J V. Runoff Energy Factors for MUSLE Sediment Yield Model for Surface Mines[J].International Journal of Sediment Research, 2000, 15(2):162-181.
[11] LANZONI S, LUCHI R, PITTALUGA M B, et al. Modeling the Morphodynamic Equilibrium of an Intermediate Reach of the Po River (Italy)[J].Advance in Water Resources, 2015, 81: 95-102.
[12] 毛 野,黄才安. 采砂对河床变形影响的试验研究[J].水利学报, 2004, (5): 64-69.
[13] 中国产业信息网. 2016年我国水泥行业发展现状分析[EB/OL] .(2016-12-05)[2017-06-02] .http://www.chyxx.com/industry/201612/474095.html.
[14] 徐建华, 高亚军, 李晓宇. 用水泥产量估算黄河上中游河道采砂量[J].人民黄河, 2016, 38(9):17-18,23.
[15] 元 媛,张小峰,段光磊. 输沙量法计算长江宜昌至监利河段河道冲淤量的修正研究[J].水力发电学报, 2014, 33(4): 163-169.
[16] 段光磊. 冲积河流冲淤量计算模式研究[D].武汉:武汉大学, 2012.
[17] 黄政宇, 赵俭英. 混凝土配合比速查手册[M].北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2001:52-96.
[18] 柳德新. 年采砂控制总量1.2亿吨[N].湖南日报, 2012-06-27(3).

基金

湖南省科技重大专项(2018SK1010);湖南省教育厅优秀青年项目(16B010);河南省自然科学基金青年项目(2018JJ3547)

PDF(1447 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/