湖泊护岸香根草的种植方案及其效应评估

刘川顺,鲁晓义,王书法,陈曦濛,华成普

长江科学院院报 ›› 2017, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (11) : 148-152.

PDF(1365 KB)
PDF(1365 KB)
长江科学院院报 ›› 2017, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (11) : 148-152. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20170725
第九届全国河湖治理与水生态文明发展论坛专栏

湖泊护岸香根草的种植方案及其效应评估

  • 刘川顺,鲁晓义,王书法,陈曦濛,华成普
作者信息 +

Vetiver-Planting for Protecting Lakeshore from Wave Erosion: Patterns and Effectiveness Assessment

  • LIU Chuan-shun, LU Xiao-yi, WANG Shu-fa, CHEN Xi-meng, HUA Cheng-pu
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

风浪侵蚀导致湖岸崩塌和岸线后退,造成沿岸财产和土地资源损失,目前生态护岸已经成为一种趋势。香根草因其发达的根系、卓越的植物力学特性和强大的抗逆性,特别适合湖泊防浪护岸。为了研究香根草在湖泊护岸工程中的效果,结合监利县东港湖崩岸防治,介绍了湖岸香根草的种植方案和种植技术,采用水岸侧侵蚀模型计算了裸土湖岸和香根草生长湖岸在风浪作用下的侵蚀速率。结果表明,种植香根草可使湖岸的侵蚀速率减小90%以上。相对传统的刚性护岸,香根草护岸更加节省工程费用、更为环境友好。

Abstract

Lakeshore slumping and recession resulting from wave erosion usually causes heavy loss of waterfront property and land resources. Ecological revetment has become the new trend of lakeshore erosion control. In this paper, vetiver is adopted to protect lakeshore against wave attack because of its well-developed root system, phytomechanical properties and adaptability to adverse environment. With the shore-protection works of Donggang Lake as a case study, the patterns and techniques of planting vetiver are introduced. Furthermore, the erosion rates of bare soil lakeshore and vetiver lakeshore were computed and compared using lateral erosion model. Results show that vetiver planting on lakeshore could reduce the shore erosion rate by over 90%. Compared with rigid revetment, ecological revetment is more economic and more environmentally friendly.

关键词

湖岸侵蚀 / 风浪 / 生态护岸 / 香根草 / 侧向侵蚀模型

Key words

lakeshore erosion / wave / ecological revetment / vetiver / lateral erosion model

引用本文

导出引用
刘川顺,鲁晓义,王书法,陈曦濛,华成普. 湖泊护岸香根草的种植方案及其效应评估[J]. 长江科学院院报. 2017, 34(11): 148-152 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20170725
LIU Chuan-shun, LU Xiao-yi, WANG Shu-fa, CHEN Xi-meng, HUA Cheng-pu. Vetiver-Planting for Protecting Lakeshore from Wave Erosion: Patterns and Effectiveness Assessment[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2017, 34(11): 148-152 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20170725
中图分类号: TV861   

参考文献

[1] 杨梦云,张根喜,朱永辉.上荆江河段南五洲崩岸整治工程护岸形式选择[J].长江科学院院报,2012,29(12):10-14.
[2] NORRIS J A. Causes and Effects of Streambank Erosion and Mass-Wasting Along Stevens Creek in Northeast Lancaster County, Nebraska: A Photographic Qualitative Case Study[D]. Lincoln: University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 2013.
[3] BEESON C E,DOYLE P F. Comparison of Bank Erosion at Vegetated and Non-Vegetated Channel Bends[J]. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2007, 31(6):983-990
[4] TRUONG P, VAN T T, PINNERS E. VETIVER SYSTEM APPLICATIONS Technical Reference Manual[M/OL].[2017-06-26]. http://vnvn.org.vn/img/uploads/VNVN/Gioi_thieu/Gioi_thieu_co_vetiver/TVN-Manual_Vf_3.pdf.
[5] GB 50286—2013,堤防工程设计规范[S]. 北京:中国计划出版社,2013.
[6] OSMAN A M, THORNE C R. Riverbank Stability Analysis. I: Theory[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering,1988,114(2):134-150.
[7] TEMPLE D M, ROBINSON K M, AHRING R M, et al. Stability Design of Grass-lined Channels[M]. Washington, D C:U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1987:46-48.
[8] PARCHURE T M, MCANALLY J W H, TEETER A M. Desktop Method for Estimating Vessel-induced Sediment Suspension[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2001,127(7): 577-587.
[9] SOULSBY R. Dynamics of Marine Sands: A Manual for Practical Applications[M]. London: Thomas Telford, 1997:47-48.
[10]SEIJFFERT J W, VERHEIJ H J. Grass Covers and Reinforcement Measures[R]. Netherlands: Balkema, 1998.

基金

中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(2042016kf1070)

PDF(1365 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/