坝后式水电站厂房不同支座方案减震对比研究

景月岭, 王洋洋

长江科学院院报 ›› 2018, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (11) : 112-116.

PDF(4309 KB)
PDF(4309 KB)
长江科学院院报 ›› 2018, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (11) : 112-116. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20170331
水工结构与材料

坝后式水电站厂房不同支座方案减震对比研究

  • 景月岭, 王洋洋
作者信息 +

Comparative Study of Different Bearing Solutions on Shock Absorption of Power Station at Dam Toe

  • JING Yue-ling, WANG Yang-yang
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

通过建立某坝后式水电站主体结构的三维有限元模型,包括大坝、基础、坝后式厂房、厂房顶网架和支座简化模型,对比分析了在地震作用下带锚栓的板式橡胶支座、铅芯橡胶支座和铰支座3个方案对厂房上部结构的减震影响。研究结果表明:铰支座方案自振周期最短,支座节点的地震响应最大,其中厂房上、下游侧节点对最大层间位移比铅芯橡胶支座方案分别高31.74%和44.5%;铅芯橡胶支座方案由于具有较好的吸能效果,在地震作用下其本身适应剪切变形能力强,能很好地释放支座处支反力,厂房上、下游排架柱的第一主应力也是3个方案中最小的。由此可得,坝后式水电站厂房铅芯橡胶支座为推荐的支座选型方案。

Abstract

A three-dimension finite element model of a power station at dam toe is built in this paper. The main structures include dam, foundation, powerhouse at dam toe, roof net, and simplified bearing model. Three kinds of bearings, namely, laminated rubber bearing supported with anchor bolt, lead rubber bearing, and hinge support, are compared to find their influence on the upper structure under earthquake action. Result reveals that hinge support is unfavorable for seismic reduction with the shortest natural vibration period and the largest seismic response; also, the maximum displacement of node pairs on the upstream and downstream side of powerhouse are higher than that in the case of lead rubber bearing by 31.74% and 44.5%, respectively. Lead rubber bearing has good ability of releasing support force under earthquake due to good energy absorption effect and better adaptation to shear deformation; moreover, the first principal stress of node pairs on upstream and downstream side of the powerhouse under earthquake is the lowest among the three cases. In conclusion, the lead rubber bearing is recommended.

关键词

带锚栓的板式橡胶支座 / 铅芯橡胶支座 / 铰支座 / 坝后式厂房 / 有限元法 / 减震影响

Key words

laminated rubber bearing supported with anchor bolt / lead rubber bearing / hinge support / power station at dam toe / finite element method / seismic alleviation

引用本文

导出引用
景月岭, 王洋洋. 坝后式水电站厂房不同支座方案减震对比研究[J]. 长江科学院院报. 2018, 35(11): 112-116 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20170331
JING Yue-ling, WANG Yang-yang. Comparative Study of Different Bearing Solutions on Shock Absorption of Power Station at Dam Toe[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2018, 35(11): 112-116 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20170331
中图分类号: TV31   

参考文献

[1] 郝军刚,胡蕾,伍鹤皋,等.罕遇地震作用下水电站厂房上部结构破坏模式研究[J].振动与冲击,2016,35(3):55-61.
[2] 黑灿,伍鹤皋,傅丹,等.基于不同网架模拟方式的水电站厂房振动特性研究[J].三峡大学学报(自然科学版),2016,38(1):26-30.
[3] 霍学平,马震岳,陈婧,等.水电站地面厂房上部结构抗振分析[J].人民黄河,2016,38(8):95-98.
[4] 邹磊堂. 水电站厂房上部结构型式研究[D].大连:大连理工大学,2007.
[5] 于瑞艳,梁兴文,刘小军.考虑竖向地震作用的排架柱抗震设计[J].工程抗震与加固改造,2008,30(3):53-57.
[6] 程恒,张燎军,林斌,等.水电站厂房钢管混凝土排架结构抗震性能[J].河海大学学报(自然科学版),2009,37(5):586-590.
[7] 张汉云,张燎军,李龙仲,等.水电站地面厂房鞭梢效应及抗震分析[J].水电能源科学,2012,30(1):88-92.
[8] 郭鸿儒. 水电站端部厂房段动力特性及抗震性能分析研究[D].西安:西安理工大学,2008.
[9] 王常峰. 桥梁结构非线性地震反应研究(支座摩擦·限位装置·基础非线性)[D].兰州:兰州交通大学,2010.
[10] 肖建春,聂建国,夏绍全.带锚栓的加劲板式橡胶支座使用阶段的水平刚度[J].建筑结构学报,2003,24(3):70-75.
[11] NB 35047—2015,水电工程水工建筑物抗震设计规范[S]B 35047—2015,水电工程水工建筑物抗震设计规范[S].北京:中国电力出版社,2015.

基金

国家自然科学基金项目(51409074); 中国博士后科学基金项目(2014M550341); 中央高校基本科研业务费专项(JZ2014HGQC0118,2013HGBH0052); 合肥工业大学博士学位专项(JZ2014HGBZ0022)

PDF(4309 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/