江西省是洪涝灾害发生较频繁的区域,特别是受上游洪水和鄱阳湖水顶托双重作用的赣抚尾闾河段。分析其洪水风险,对于提高江西省防洪减灾能力、减轻或避免生命财产损失是非常必要和迫切的。以抚东堤防洪保护区为例,利用MIKE软件建立一维、二维耦合模型,分析不同溃口在标准内(20 a一遇)和标准外(50 a一遇)洪水叠加鄱阳湖1954年型设计洪水条件下的洪水演进过程、淹没范围和淹没损失等。研究结果表明,由于抚东堤防洪保护区内地形起伏较大,不同河段的溃口溃决后的风险大小不同,其中上段李家渡水文站下侧溃口发生溃决时,洪水影响最大。研究结果对于类似区域洪水风险分析具有一定的参考价值。
Abstract
Flood disaster is the most frequently and most widely distributed natural disaster in Jiangxi province, particularly in the tail channel of Ganjiang River and Fuhe River influenced by flood coming from the upstream and backwatering effect of the Poyang Lake. Thus, studying flood risk is imperative for improving flood control and disaster reduction capacity, as well as relieving and refraining from loss of life and property. With the flood control area of Fudong dike as a case study, we built 1D-and-2D coupled model in MIKE software to analyze the flood routing process, submerged area and submergence loss under the condition of floods above (50-year event) and below (20-year event) standard together with the backwatering effect of Poyang Lake in different breaches. Results implied that flood risk at different breaches varied due to topographic relief. The flood risk of downstream side breach at Lijiadu hydrometric station is the largest.
关键词
洪水风险分析 /
抚河尾闾 /
堤防 /
防洪保护区 /
溃口
Key words
flood risk analysis /
tail of Fuhe River /
river dike /
flood control area /
breach
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 张 旭,谭徐明,姚文广,等.洪水风险图编制导则(试行)摘登[J]. 中国水利, 2005,(17):38-39.
[2] 付成威, 苑希民, 杨 敏. 实时动态耦合模型及其在洪水风险图中的应用[J]. 水利水运工程学报, 2013,(5):32-38.
[3] 周 洁, 董增川, 朱振业. 洪泽湖周边滞洪区洪水风险分析[J]. 水电能源科学, 2017,(4):63-66.
[4] 果 鹏, 夏军强, 陈 倩,等. 基于力学过程的蓄滞洪区洪水风险评估模型及应用[J]. 水科学进展, 2017, 28(6):858-867.
[5] 向立云. 洪水风险图编制与应用概述[J]. 中国水利, 2017,(5):9-13.
[6] 陈俊鸿, 刘小龙, 王 岗,等. 基于一、二维耦合水动力模型的赣西联圩溃堤洪水风险分析[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2017,(6):43-47.
[7] 柴朝晖,申 康,雷文韬,等. 江西省2015年洪水风险图标段二编制项目[R]. 武汉:长江科学院,2016.
[8] 马小杰, 马 强,高 力,等 江西省红旗联圩防洪保护区洪水风险图报告[R]. 武汉:长江勘测规划设计研究有限责任公司,2015.
基金
国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFC0402307);国家自然科学基金项目(51609012,51339001, 51579015)