渗流应力耦合问题是目前数值分析的热点之一,渗流对应力的影响主要体现在渗透荷载上,然而不同学者应用ABAQUS进行渗流应力耦合分析建模时,在水荷载边界条件施加方面出现2种个问题:定义了孔压边界后,是否还有必要施加静水压力;考虑了坝基的渗流作用,是否还需要在坝底面定义扬压力荷载。通过竖向应力平衡和孔隙静水压力平衡理论及算例对这2个问题进行分析,结果表明:在应用ABAQUS进行渗流应力耦合分析时应同时考虑静水压力和孔压边界;当不考虑坝体渗透性时,应施加扬压力,而考虑坝体渗透性时,则无需再单独施加扬压力。分析成果可为研究ABAQUS进行混凝土重力坝渗流应力耦合分析时渗流荷载和水边界条件的施加问题提供参考。
Abstract
Coupling analysis of seepage and stress has attracted considerable attention in numerical simulation. The influence of seepage on stress is reflected in the seepage load. Nevertheless, there are two decided differences listed below when scholars deal with the water pressure and boundary conditions with ABAQUS software: whether it is necessary to apply hydrostatic pressure when pore pressure boundary is defined; and whether it is essential to define uplift pressure on dam foundation if the seepage field of foundation rock is considered. In view of this, we analyzed the two problems based on vertical stress balance and pore hydrostatic pressure balance theories as well as numerical examples, and conclude that both hydrostatic pressure and pore pressure boundary should be considered when submitting coupled process of seepage and stress with ABAQUS software. Moreover, uplift pressure should be applied when the permeability of dam body is not considered; but when the permeability of dam body is taken into consideration, uplift pressure is not required anymore. The results offer reference for the application of ABAQUS software to seepage-stress coupling analysis of concrete gravity dam.
关键词
渗流应力耦合模型 /
ABAQUS /
坝体渗透性 /
水荷载边界条件 /
坝基扬压力
Key words
coupled model of seepage and stress /
ABAQUS /
permeability of dam /
water pressure boundary condition /
uplift pressure of dam foundation
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 杨天鸿, 唐春安, 梁正召, 等. 脆性岩石破裂过程损伤与渗流耦合数值模型研究[J]. 力学学报, 2003, 35(5): 533-541.
[2] 梁 通, 金 峰. 基于广义有效应力原理的混凝土坝分析[J]. 水力发电学报, 2007, 28(2): 47-51.
[3] 柴军瑞, 仵彦卿. 碾压混凝土坝渗流场与应力场耦合分析的数学模型[J]. 水利学报, 2000, (9): 33-35.
[4] 沈振中, 陈小虎, 徐力群. 重力坝应力-渗流相互作用的无单元耦合分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2008, 29(增): 74-79.
[5] HIBBETT D, KARLSSON B, SORENSEN P. ABAQUS/Standard: User’s Manual[K]. U.S.: Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorenson, 1998.
[6] 陈卫忠, 伍国军, 贾善坡. ABAQUS在隧道及地下工程中的应用[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2010.
[7] 庄 茁, 由小川, 廖剑晖, 等.基于ABAQUS的有限元分析和应用[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2009.
[8] 常晓林, 袁 曦. 基于流-固耦合的强度折减法在重力坝抗滑稳定分析中的应用[J]. 武汉大学学报(工学版), 2012, 45(5): 545-550.
[9] 柴军瑞. 混凝土坝水荷载讨论[J]. 水电能源科学, 2000, 18(2): 18-21.
[10]张晓咏, 戴自航. 应用ABAQUS程序进行渗流作用下边坡稳定分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2010, 29(增): 292-294.
[11]林凯生, 李宗利. 高渗透孔隙水压作用下混凝土损伤破坏过程数值分析[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2010.
[12]王 媛, 速宝玉. 坝基应力计算中的水荷载组合形式[J]. 勘察科学技术, 1995, (3): 3-7.
[13]黄耀英, 沈振中, 田 斌. 地基水荷载对混凝土坝位移影响研究[J]. 水利水运工程学报, 2010, (1): 42-49.
[14]范书立, 陈建云, 林 皋. 渗透压力对重力坝有限元分析的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2007, 28(增): 575-581.
基金
国家自然科学基金面上项目(51379178);中央高校基本科研业务费专项(ZD2012015)