试验采用3种粘结剂对3种混凝土进行粘结,以劈拉强度作为评价指标,将这3种粘结剂对混凝土的粘结效果进行对比,旨在找出3种混凝土中最适宜使用粘结剂的混凝土。另外首次提出了新老混凝土粘结强度新的评价指标——粘结强度等效系数β(某种混凝土粘结劈拉强度与同种混凝土基准试件劈拉强度的比值),并以β值作为指标对这3种混凝土进行对比。通过对粘结强度等效系数的对比可得3种界面粘结剂用于普通硅酸盐水泥配制的混凝土的粘结效果均优于其它2种水泥配制的混凝土的粘结效果,普通硅酸盐水泥配制的混凝土在新老混凝土粘结试验中对界面粘结剂的适用性最强,其28 d的粘结强度最大值可以达到混凝土基准试件劈拉强度的0.86,粘结效果最佳。
Abstract
In the purpose of selecting a concrete most suitable for bonding, three kinds of concrete (ordinary Portland cement, slag cement, and composite Portland cement) were bonded by three binders respectively, and the bonding effect were compared with split tensile strength as the evaluation indicator. Furthermore, the equivalent coefficient β of bonding strength, which is an index of evaluation the strength of bonding between new and old concrete, is proposed for the first time. It is the ratio of splitting tensile strength of a bonded concrete to splitting tensile strength of standard specimen of the concrete. Comparison of β among the three concretes revealed that the bonding effect of three binders on ordinary Portland cement is better than that of the other two, with the 28 d bonding strength reaching 86% of the tensile strength of standard specimen, which suggest that ordinary Portland cement is the most suitable for bonding among the three concretes.
关键词
新老混凝土粘结 /
短龄期 /
粘结剂 /
粘结强度 /
等效系数
Key words
bonding between new and old concrete /
short age /
binder /
bonding strength /
equivalent coefficient
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 袁 群,刘 健.新老混凝土粘结的剪切强度研究[J] .建筑结构学报,2001,22(2):46-50.
[2] 赵志方,赵国藩,黄承逵.新老混凝土粘结的拉剪性能研究[J] .建筑结构学报,1999,20(6):26-31.
[3] 赵志方,赵国藩,黄承逵.新老混凝土粘结的劈拉性能研究[J] .工业建筑,1999,29(11):56-59.
[4] 马朝运,袁 群,李宗坤,等.混凝土冷缝劈裂抗拉强度试验研究[J] .人民黄河,2008,30(6):79-82.
[5] 乔艳静,费治华,田 倩,等.矿渣、粉煤灰掺量对混凝土收缩、开裂性能的研究[J] .长江科学院院报,2008,25(4):90-96.
[6] 黄仕超,彭 刚,邹三兵,等不同龄期混凝土动态力学性能研究[J] .长江科学院院报,2015,32(12):129-133.
[7] 赵志方,赵国藩,刘 健,等.新老混凝土粘结抗拉性能的实验研究[J] .建筑结构学报,2001,22(2):51-56.
[8] 刘 健,赵国藩,新老混凝土粘结收缩性能研究[J] .大连理工大学学报,2001,41(3):339-342.
[9] 李平先,张雷顺,赵国藩.新老混凝土粘结面的抗冻剪切性能试验研究[J] .水利学报,2005,36(3):339-344.
[10] 宋玉普,魏春明.混凝土施工缝接缝面劈拉强度试验研究[J] .沈阳建筑大学学报,2006,22(4):596-599.
[11] 史长城,王大辉,袁 群.短龄期老混凝土与新混凝土粘结的劈拉强度研究[J] .混凝土与水泥制品,2015,5(5):15-18.
[12] SL 352—2006,水工混凝土试验规程[S] .北京:中国水利水电出版社,2006.
[13] JGJ 55—2011,普通混凝土配合比设计规程[S] .北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2011.
[14] 赵志方,周厚贵.新老混凝土粘结机理研究与工程应用[M] .北京:中国水利水电出版社,2003.
[15] WELLS J A, STARK R D, POLYZOIS D. Getting Better Bond in Concrete Overlays[J] . Concrete International, 1999, 21(3): 49-52.
[16] 丁俊杰.固结剂对水泥稳定强度的影响[D] .大连:大连理工大学,2014.
PDF(1267 KB)
