水利水电洞室具有规模大、尺寸大的特点,如果开挖隧洞发育大型不良地质(断层破碎带、溶腔、突水突泥等),则更容易引发大型的安全生产事故,而水电隧洞超前地质预报工作相对薄弱,因此开展水电洞室超前地质工作是一种新的应用和研究。首先介绍了TSP技术的发展现状和基本原理,探讨了影响TSP数据采集的几点关键因素;之后,将TSP方法应用到乌东德水电站的泄洪洞和导流洞中,获得了大尺寸工作面水工洞室超前地质预报结果,并绘制出不良地质体3D空间分布成果。该结果与随后施工开挖揭露出的溶洞以及工作面前方存在的导流洞水体分布基本一致,验证了TSP技术在水电水利地下工程中应用的可行性和有效性,具有一定的应用推广意义。
Abstract
Large-scale safety accidents are prone to be triggered by large geological defectives (broken fault zone, cave, and water gushing and mud) in large hydropower caverns. Advanced geological prediction for hydroelectric tunnel is relatively weak. In this research, the development status and basic principle of TSP (tunnel seismic prediction) technology are firstly introduced, and some key factors that affect TSP data acquisition are discussed. Furthermore, TSP technology is applied to the geological prediction for the discharge tunnels and diversion tunnels of Wudongde Hydropower Station. The geological prediction result of large working face is obtained, and the 3D spatial distribution of the geological defectives is given. The forecast results are basically in accordance with the excavation results which exposed karst caves and water distribution in front of excavation face. The prediction results verify the feasibility and effectiveness of the application of TSP technology in underground engineering of water conservancy and hydropower projects.
关键词
TSP /
隧道地质超前预报 /
3D成果 /
乌东德水电站 /
数据采集
Key words
TSP /
advanced tunnel geological prediction /
3D result /
Wudongde hydropower station /
data acquisition
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 赵永贵,刘 浩,孙 宇,等. 隧道地质超前预报研究进展[J].地球物理学进展,2003,18(3):460-464.
[2] GROV E, BLINDHEIM O T. Risks in Adjustable Fixed Price Contracts[J].Tunnels and Tunnelling International, 2003, 35: 45-47.
[3] 周黎明,尹健民,侯炳绅,等. 弹性波反射法在地质超前预报中的应用[J].长江科学院院报,2008,25(1):61-64.
[4] 林志军,牛建军,张晓培,等. HSP声波反射法在地质超前预报中的应用[J].公路交通技术, 2008,(2):102-104.
[5] 沈鸿雁,李庆春,冯 宏,等. 隧道反射地震法超前探测研究[J].铁道学报,2008,30(6):75-81.
[6] 胡 兴. 隧洞施工期地质超前预报方法现状[J].贵州工业大学学报(自然科学版),2008,37(5): 264-267.
[7] 李文新. 隧道物探法预报进展及回顾[J].山西建筑,2007,33(7):316 -318.
[8] PETRONIO L, POLETTO F, SCHLEIFER A. Interface Prediction Ahead of the Excavation Front by the Tunnel-seismic-while-drilling(TSWD) Method[J]. Geophysics, 2007, 72(4): 39-44.
[9] RICHARD O, EDWARD B, HELFRIED B, et al. The Application of TRT-True Reflection Tomography at the Unterwald Tunnel[J]. Geophysics, 2002, 67(2):51-56.
[10]ZHAO Yong-gui, JIANG Hui, ZHAO Xiao-peng. Tunnel Seismic Tomography Method for Geological Prediction and Its Application[J]. Applied Geophysics, 2006, 3(2): 69-74.
[11]SHIMIZU N,KATO T,MURAYAMA H. Development and Application of Seismic Reflection Survey in a Tunnel Using Hydraulic Impactor or Vibrato[C]∥the 7th SEGJ International Symposiumon Imaging Technology.Sendai,Japan, November 24-26, 2004: 236 -246.
[12]陈 松,周黎明,罗士新. 基于隧道超前预报的GPR正演模拟及应用分析[J].长江科学院院报,2015,32(9):128-133.
[13]Amberg Measuring Technique Ltd.. Operation Manual l961[K]. Germany: Amberg Measuring Technique Ltd., 2001.
[14]Amberg Measuring Technique Ltd.. Software Manual 1962[K]. Germany: Amberg Measuring Technique Ltd., 2001.
[15]Norwegian Public Roads Administration. Road Tunnels(021)[R]. Oslo: NPRA Service Bureau, 2004.
[16]Dickmann T,SANDETER B K. Drivage-concurrent Tunnel Seismic Prediction(TSP): Result from Vereina North Tunnel Mega-project and Priora Pilot Gallery[J]. Felsbau Magazin,1996,14(6):406-411.
[17]吕乔森,徐 颖,胡志强. 提高隧道地震波地质预报(TSP)精度方法研究[J].长江科学院院报,2012,29(12):41-45.
[18]杨天春,吴燕清,王齐仁. TSP原始数据文件的读取及与国产地震仪数据之间的转换[J].物探化探计算技术,2007,29(3):269-272.
[19]许振浩,李术才,张庆松,等. 组合爆破法TSP超前地质预报研究[J].山东大学学报(工学版),2009, 39(4):45-49.
[20]刘秀峰,李 忠. TSP探测数据采集和处理中应注意的几个问题[J].石家庄铁道学院学报,2002, 15(2):56-59.
[21]刘秀峰,刘志刚. TSP解译及其功能扩展时应注意几个问题的探讨[J].石家庄铁道学院学报, 2003,16(1):91-94.
[22]丁万涛,李术才,张庆松. TSP预报倾斜岩层分界面误差规律性探讨[J].山东大学学报(工学版),2009,39(4):57-60.
基金
国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(41202223);中央级公益性财政项目长江科学院院所基金(CKSF2013043/YT)
PDF(3413 KB)
