长江科学院院报 ›› 2017, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (4): 111-116.DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20160098

• 岩土工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

螺旋型埋管能源桩传热模型的适用性及其试验验证

赵海丰1,2,桂树强2,唐荣彬3,杜金龙2   

  1. 1.中国地质大学武汉 工程学院,武汉 430074;
    2.长江勘测规划设计研究院,武汉 430010;
    3.武汉科技大学 资源与环境工程学院,武汉 430080
  • 收稿日期:2016-01-29 出版日期:2017-04-01 发布日期:2017-04-10
  • 通讯作者: 唐荣彬(1992-),女,土家族,湖北恩施人,硕士研究生,主要从事土地资源管理及浅层地热能开发利用工作, (电话) 15527286351 (电子信箱) 237664585@qq.com。
  • 作者简介:赵海丰(1983-),男,湖北武汉人,高级工程师,博士,主要从事浅层地热能开发利用及岩土工程设计、科研工作,(电话) 027-87531540 (电子信箱) zhaohaifeng83@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41502238);中央高校杰出人才培育基金项目(CUGL150819)

Applicability of Heat Transfer Model of Energy Pile with BuriedSpiral Pipe and Its Experimental Verification

ZHAO Hai-feng1,2,GUI Shu-qiang2,TANG Rong-bin3,DU Jin-long2   

  1. 1.Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China;
    2.Changjiang Instituteof Survey, Planning, Design and Research, Wuhan 430010, China;
    3.School of Resource and EnvironmentalEngineering, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430080,China
  • Received:2016-01-29 Published:2017-04-01 Online:2017-04-10

摘要: 传热模型的精确性直接关系到能源桩换热效率的计算精度,进而影响能源桩设计。以螺旋型埋管能源桩为研究对象,在信阳地区开展了一项现场原位试验,实测获得了螺旋型埋管能源桩换热过程中的桩周温度场数据,并分别与圆柱面热源模型和线圈热源模型的计算成果进行了对比分析。研究成果显示有限长热源模型较无限长热源模型具有更高的计算精度,有限长线圈热源模型较有限长圆柱面热源模型具有更高的计算精度,采用有限长线圈热源模型计算的桩壁温度误差<1.5%,桩周温度场计算误差<2.5%,地埋管进出口水温计算误差<2.2%,故将其推荐为螺旋型埋管能源桩桩周温度场的计算模型。最后,探索了不同传热模型针对螺旋型埋管能源桩的适用性,为指导螺旋型埋管能源桩设计提供了科学依据。

关键词: 螺旋型埋管能源桩, 圆柱面热源模型, 线圈热源模型, 桩周温度场, 试验验证

Abstract: Accuracy of heat transfer model is directly related to the computational accuracy of heat transfer efficiency of energy pile, which influences the design of energy piles. Taken energy pile with buried spiral pipe as the research object, an in-situ test was conducted in Xinyang area, Henan province. Then, measured data such as temperature field around the pile was acquired, and calculation results of the cylindrical heat source model and the coil heat source model are respectively compared with measured data. Research results show that the computational accuracy of heat source model with finite length is higher than that of heat source model with infinite length. Coil heat source model with finite length is more accurate than cylindrical surface heat source model with finite length. The calculation error of tube wall temperature in coil heat source model with finite length is less than 1.5%, the calculation error of temperature field around the pile is less than 2.5%, and the water temperature at inlet and outlet of buried pipe less than 2.2%, respectively. In view of this, coil heat source model with finite length is recommended for calculating temperature field in energy pile with spiral buried tube. The applicability of different heat transfer models for the spiral pipe pile was explored, and can be taken as reference for the design of energy pile with buried spiral tube.

Key words: energy pile with buried spiral pipe, cylindrical heat source model, coil heat source model, temperature field around pile, temperature field around the energy pile, experimental verification

中图分类号: