针对常规的等向固结剪切试验不能反映实际工程中复杂应力路径对土体力学特性的影响,采用GDS应力路径三轴仪,对华南地区广泛分布的花岗岩残积土进行了不同固结条件下的不排水剪切试验,探讨不同初始平均有效主应力p′c与初始应力比ηc对其不排水特性的影响。结果表明在初始应力比相同的情况下,初始平均有效主应力越大,花岗岩残积土的不排水剪切强度越大,破坏时的孔压也越大;在初始平均有效主应力相同的情况下,初始应力比越大,花岗岩残积土的不排水剪切强度越大,而破坏时的孔压越小。然而,e-p′-q三维空间中的临界状态线是唯一的,不受初始平均有效主应力和初始应力比影响。
Abstract
In engineering practice, conventional triaxial tests under isotropically consolidated conditions cannot reflect the effects of various stress paths on the mechanical behavior of granite residual soil which is widely distributed in south China. To investigate the influence of the initial mean effective stress p′c and the initial stress ratio ηc on the undrained shear behavior of reconstituted granite residual soil, a series of triaxial tests under different consolidated conditions were conducted on the GDS triaxial apparatus. The test results revealed that both the initial mean effective stress and the initial stress ratio have effects on the undrained shear behavior. It was found that, for the granite residual soil in this study, under the same initial stress ratio, there would be an increase of undrained shear strength and excess pore water pressure with a higher initial mean effective stress. Besides, under the same initial mean effective stress, the higher the initial stress ratio is, the higher the undrained shear strength and the lower the excess pore water pressure would be. However, a unique critical state line can be postulated in e-p′-q space, regardless of the various initial mean effective stress and initial stress ratio.
关键词
花岗岩残积土 /
三轴试验 /
应力路径 /
临界状态线 /
三维空间
Key words
granite residual soil /
triaxial test /
stress path /
critical state line /
3-D space
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] YAN W M, LI X S. Mechanical Response of a Medium-fine-grained Decomposed Granite in Hong Kong [J]. Engineering Geology, 2012, 129-130: 1-8.
[2] 戴 继, 王铁宏, 高广运, 等. 由压缩试验分析砾质花岗岩残积土的结构特性[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2009, 5(4): 675-679.
[3] 汤连生, 桑海涛, 宋 晶, 等. 非饱和花岗岩残积土粒间联合作用与脆弹塑性胶结损伤模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2013, 34(10): 2877-2888.
[4] 吴能森. 结构性花岗岩残积土的特性及工程问题研究[D]. 南京:南京林业大学, 2005.
[5] 赵建军, 王思敬, 尚彦军, 等. 全风化花岗岩抗剪强度影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2005, 26(4): 624-628.
[6] 曲永新, 吴宏伟, 尚彦军. 华南花岗岩残积土红土化程度的地带性与香港该类土不发育的原因[J]. 工程地质学报, 2000, 8(1): 16-20.
[7] LEE I K. Mechanical Behaviour of Compacted Decomposed Granite Soil [D]. London: City University, 1991.
[8] LEE I K, COOP M R. The Intrinsic Behaviour of a Decomposed Granite Soil [J]. Géotechnique, 1995, 45(1): 117-130.
[9] WANG Y H, YAN W M. Laboratory Studies of Two Common Saprolitic Soils in Hong Kong [J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2006, 132(7): 923-930.
[10]NG C W W, CHIU A C F. Laboratory Study of Loose Saturated and Unsaturated Decomposed Granitic Soil [J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2003, 129(6): 550-559.
[11]庞小朝. 深圳原状全风化花岗岩的试验和本构模型研究[D]. 北京:中国铁道科学研究院, 2011.
[12]栾茂田, 罗锦添, 李焯芬, 等. 不排水条件下全风化花岗岩残积土工程特性与本构模型[J]. 大连理工大学学报, 2000, 40(增1): 83-89.
[13]陈晓平, 周秋娟, 蔡晓英. 高液限花岗岩残积土的物理特性和剪切特性[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2011, 33(6): 901-908.
[14]GB50021—2001,岩土工程勘察规范[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2001.
基金
国家自然科学基金项目(51109083);华南理工大学亚热带建筑科学国家重点实验室自主课题 (2013ZC04)
PDF(2459 KB)
