重大工程场地岩溶地面塌陷静力学分析及危险性评价

欧阳辉, 徐光黎, 张新杰, 李勇峰, 董家兴

长江科学院院报 ›› 2016, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5) : 88-93.

PDF(1466 KB)
PDF(1466 KB)
长江科学院院报 ›› 2016, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5) : 88-93. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20140954
岩土工程

重大工程场地岩溶地面塌陷静力学分析及危险性评价

  • 欧阳辉1, 徐光黎1, 张新杰1, 李勇峰2, 董家兴3
作者信息 +

Static Analysis and Hazard Assessment of Karst Ground Collapse in Vital Project

  • OUYANG Hui1, XU Guang-li1, ZHANG Xin-jie1, LI Yong-feng2, DONG Jia-xing3
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

深圳大运中心桩基施工过程中产生大面积塌陷,其建筑重要性、场地复杂程度、地基复杂程度均为一级,需对场地岩溶地面塌陷危险性进行评价,减少工程施工事故。采用高密度电法、地质雷达、层析成像、钻探等勘察方法查明土洞、溶洞发育特征,然后进行工程地质分析、建立土(溶)洞塌陷的静力学分析模型;分析影响岩溶塌陷的因素,建立包括岩溶基础条件、覆盖层特征、建筑物属性、水文地质条件4个一级指标及8个二级指标的岩溶塌陷危险性评价指标体系;基于MapGIS的数据管理系统,利用PLS Path Model(偏最小二乘通径模型)对场地岩溶地面塌陷危险性进行评价分区,并将地面塌陷危险性等级分为高、较高、较低和低4个等级,分别占场地总面积的1.05%,10.71%,19.39%和68.85%。评价结果客观、合理,其方法可为类似工程提供借鉴。

Abstract

Collapse of large area occurred in Shenzhen universiade sports center during its pile foundation construction. Because the project is very important, and the ground and foundation are very complicated, we need to assess the hazard of karst ground collapse in order to reduce accidents. Firstly, we employed exploration methods inclusive of high-density electrical method, geologic radar, CT tomography, and drilling to investigate the development of soil holes and karst caves. On this basis, we built the statics model of the ground collapse through engineering geological analysis. Furthermore, we summarized the factors affecting the karst ground collapse and established a risk assessment index system based on the analysis of space distribution regularity of karst development and formation mechanism. The index system includes 4 first-level indicators (karst foundation condition, cover layer characteristics, building attributes and hydrogeological condition) and 8 secondary level indicators. At last, we adopted MapGIS and PLS (Partial Least Squares) Path Model to assess the hazard of karst ground collapse, and divided the ground collapse hazard into four levels: high, relatively high, relatively low and low, accounting for 1.05%, 10.71%, 19.39%, and 68.85% of the whole site respectively. The assessment and prediction results are objective and reasonable, and the proposed system can be used in similar projects.

关键词

深圳大运中心 / 岩溶发育特征 / 地面塌陷 / 力学分析 / 危险性评价

Key words

Shenzhen universiade center / karst development / ground collapse / mechanics analysis / hazard assessment

引用本文

导出引用
欧阳辉, 徐光黎, 张新杰, 李勇峰, 董家兴. 重大工程场地岩溶地面塌陷静力学分析及危险性评价[J]. 长江科学院院报. 2016, 33(5): 88-93 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20140954
OUYANG Hui, XU Guang-li, ZHANG Xin-jie, LI Yong-feng, DONG Jia-xing. Static Analysis and Hazard Assessment of Karst Ground Collapse in Vital Project[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2016, 33(5): 88-93 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20140954
中图分类号: TU443   

参考文献

[1] SONG L H, ZHANG Y G, FANG J F, et al. Karst Development and the Distribution of Karst Drainage System in Dejiang, Guizhou Province, China[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 1983, 61(1/3): 3-17.
[2] 张丽霞,熊大军,王集宁,等.莱芜市岩溶塌陷原因分析与评价[J].山东地质,2002,18(2):32-35.
[3]辛宝东. 北京市奥林匹克公园岩溶塌陷危险性评价[D].长春:吉林大学,2005.
[4] 程惠红,乔利国,李日运.大连海上休闲广场岩溶塌陷危险性模糊评价[J]. 华北水利水电学院学报,2009,30(2):95-97.
[5] 赵增玉,潘 懋,梁 河. 二值证据权(Wofe)模型岩溶塌陷区划研究[J].北京大学学报,2010,46(4):594-600.
[6] 魏爱华,马凤山,邓清海,等. 广东省某隧道区岩溶塌陷危险性评价[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2011,22(1):57-62.
[7] 冯 永. 基于偏最小二乘通径模型的武汉市岩溶塌陷危险性预测[J]. 西北地震学报, 2008, 30(2): 128-131.
[8] 雷明堂,蒋小珍,李 瑜,等. 城市岩溶塌陷地质灾害风险评估——以贵州六盘水市为例[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2000, 11(4): 23-27.
[9] 陈学军,陈植华,陈先化,等. 桂林市西城区岩溶塌陷模糊层次综合预测[J]. 桂林工学院学报, 2000, 20(2): 112-116.
[10]胡 成, 陈植华, 陈学军. 基于ANN与GIS技术的区域岩溶塌陷稳定性预测——以桂林西城区为例[J]. 地球科学, 2003, 28(5): 557-562.
[11]王惠文,吴载斌,孟 洁.偏最小二乘回归的线性与非线性方法[M].北京:国防工业出版社,2006.
[12]刘江龙,刘文剑,吴湘滨,等.基于GIS广州市主城区地面塌陷危险性评价[J]. 工程地质学报, 2007,15(5): 630-635.
[13]李雪平,徐光黎,吴 强,等.基于GIS的Logistic模型在深圳大运中心岩溶空间发育规律评价中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2010,31(增2): 276-280.

PDF(1466 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/