长江科学院院报 ›› 2016, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 67-70.DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20140819

• 岩土工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同施工方法下锦屏大理岩隧洞松弛范围及微观破裂方式

吉锋, 陈中华   

  1. 成都理工大学 地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室, 成都 610059
  • 收稿日期:2014-09-23 出版日期:2016-02-01 发布日期:2016-02-17
  • 作者简介:吉 锋(1980-),男,山西临汾人,副教授,博士,主要从事重大地质灾害稳定性预测评价方面的研究,(电话)13551291972(电子信箱)jeifeng@cdut.edu.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(51308082);四川省教育厅基金项目(15ZA0075)

Stress-relaxation Depth and Microscopic Failure Mode of Marble Tunnel by Using Different Construction Methods at JinpingⅡ Hydropower Station

JI Feng, CHEN Zhong-hua   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059 , China
  • Received:2014-09-23 Online:2016-02-01 Published:2016-02-17

摘要: TBM(Tunnel Boring Machine全断面隧道掘进机)法和钻爆法是地下工程开挖的2种主要方法,不同施工方法导致围岩的扰动程度、变形破坏、自稳性、加固措施均不相同,要准确把握这些宏观特征,必须从微观上分析岩石的力学特征。以最大埋深2 525 m的锦屏二级水电站引水隧洞为研究对象,对不同开挖条件下的大理岩进行了电镜扫描测试、松弛深度检测,分析不同开挖条件下岩石的破坏方式和松弛范围。试验结果表明:在岩石破坏断面形貌上,TBM开挖条件下的岩石断口多为沿晶面擦花和切晶擦花,破坏机理以剪切为主,而钻爆法以拉断破坏为主;在松弛深度方面,钻爆法开挖下的围岩松弛深度大于TBM开挖下的围岩松弛深度40~100 cm。以上试验成果为相似地质条件下的岩石破坏机理和加固措施提供借鉴。

关键词: TBM, 钻爆法, 扫描电镜, 松弛深度, 破裂机制, 加固措施

Abstract: TBM (Tunnel Boring Machine) method and drilling and blasting method are two main methods in the excavation of underground projects. As for the two methods, disturbance range of surrounding rock, deformation and destruction characteristics, self-stability, and treatment measures are different. In order to accurately understand macroscopic mechanical characteristics of surrounding rock, we should analyze it at microscopic level. Diversion tunnel in JinpingⅡhydropower station ,with maximum embedded depth of 2 525 m, is taken as an example. We carry out tests of scanning electron microscope (SEM) and detect the depth of stress relaxation for marble tunnel under different excavation methods. The test results show that, 1) fracture surfaces of rock by scanning electron microscope in TBM method show pattern of wiping along crystal face and pattern of cutting crystal face, with shear failure as the main failure mechanism, whereas tensile failure for drilling and blasting method; 2) in the aspect of relaxation depth, stress-relaxation depths of surrounding rock excavated by drilling and blasting method are larger than those by TBM method, which vary from 40 cm to 100 cm. The research findings provide reference for failure mechanism of rock and reinforcement measures in projects with similar geological conditions.

Key words: TBM, drilling and blasting method, scanning electron microscope, depth of stress relaxation, failure mechanism, reinforcement measures

中图分类号: