Study on Influencing Factors and Energy Dissipation Characteristics of V-shaped Pier Stilling Basin
Received date: 2025-05-13
Revised date: 2025-10-10
Online published: 2025-11-04
[Objectives] The purpose of this study is to solve the problem of insufficient energy dissipation and flow disorder in the stilling pool with low Froude number. A new type of auxiliary energy dissipator-V-shaped pier is proposed, and the forward rate of hydraulic jump position P is introduced as a new evaluation index to quantify the effect of hydraulic jump regulation. The main purpose is to systematically study the influence of Froude number Fr, V-shaped pier angle θ, row spacing γ, first row pier position Γ, pier height ratio ξ and contraction ratio β on energy dissipation rate η and forward displacement rate of hydraulic jump position P, reveal its energy dissipation mechanism, and provide optimal design parameters for practical engineering. [Methods] The research method of combining physical model test and numerical simulation is adopted. The physical model is made of organic glass and PVC, including upstream water tank, test section, triangular water weir and backwater system. The total length of the stilling basin model is 933 mm and the width is 200 mm. The experimental design based on L18 (36) orthogonal table was used to evaluate the effects of six factors and three levels on η and P efficiently. At the same time, a three-dimensional numerical model using the RNG k-ε turbulence model was established to simulate the optimal V-shaped pier condition and the non-pier condition. The energy dissipation characteristics such as flow field structure, turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate and turbulent scale were analyzed. [Results] The orthogonal test shows that the Fr has the most significant effect on the energy dissipation rate η, and η increases significantly with the increase of Fr (2.77- 4.91). Under the optimal scheme, η reaches 95.58%. For the forward rate P of the hydraulic jump position, the first row pier position Γ and the pier height ratio ξ have the greatest influence, and the P is 49.42% under the optimal scheme. The analysis of variance verifies the significance of each factor, and determines the global optimal parameter combination at Fr=4.91. The numerical simulation reveals the flow mechanism in depth. The results show that compared with the working condition without V-shaped pier, the V-shaped pier arrangement reduces the maximum velocity of the pre-jump section from 2.69 m/s to 1.63 m/s, a decrease of 39.4%, which significantly shortens the flow field homogenization distance. The peak value of turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate ε near the first row of piers is 3.10 J/kg/s, which is 14.52% higher than that without V-shaped piers, indicating that energy dissipation is enhanced by strong shear and vortex action. The turbulence length scale LT near the pier is reduced to about 0.02 m, which effectively suppresses the development of large-scale vortices. After the second row of piers, the LT is homogenized to about 0.10 m, and the vortex scale at the apron is reduced by 81.25% to 0.03 m, reflecting the multi-stage vortex synergy energy dissipation mechanism. [Conclusions] The V-shaped pier is an efficient auxiliary energy dissipator with low Froude number stilling basin. Its unique geometric design enables a multi-stage energy dissipation mechanism that includes flow separation, guidance, and generation of synergistic multi-scale vortices. The optimal parameter combination of V-shaped pier geometry and arrangement is determined by orthogonal test and variance analysis, which provides a scientific basis for its optimal design. The optimal parameter combination realizes the collaborative optimization of energy dissipation rate (η=95.58%) and hydraulic jump position control (P=49.42%). Finally, it is determined that the V-shaped pier fundamentally optimizes the flow field, significantly improves the flow stability and energy dissipation efficiency, and reduces the downstream scour risk through the mechanisms of diversion, impact, shear and multi-stage vortex dissipation. This study can provide theoretical basis and practical guidance for the design of energy dissipator in similar water conservancy projects. The follow-up work should focus on establishing the optimal parameter combination relationship in a wider range of Froude numbers.
MU Zhen-wei , OU Wen-hui , ZHANG Hong-hong , ZHONG Yun , SUN Rong-shuang . Study on Influencing Factors and Energy Dissipation Characteristics of V-shaped Pier Stilling Basin[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2025 . DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20250415
| [1] |
杜振康, 尹进步, 朱光明, 等. 不同扩散角下单侧渐扩消力池水力特性研究[J]. 水资源水工程学报, 2022, 33(2):144-151.
(
|
| [2] |
周招, 王均星, 杨凡, 等. 角木塘水电站非完全宽尾墩联合消能试验研究[J]. 武汉大学学报(工学版), 2018, 51(9):760-765,804.
(
|
| [3] |
钱圣, 刘焕芳, 林木松, 等. T型墩消力池优化设计试验研究[J]. 水利水电技术, 2014, 45(11):37-40.
(
|
| [4] |
俞晓伟, 牧振伟, 高尚. 梯形墩-悬栅消力池水力特性数值模拟[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2025, 43(1):66-73.
(
|
| [5] |
朱银邦, 郭宇, 崔炜, 等. 玉龙喀什枢纽超高面板堆石坝的渗控方案及渗流分析[J]. 中国水利水电科学研究院学报, 2020, 18(3):170-177.
(
|
| [6] |
邢建营, 杜嘉宇, 王均星, 等. 白水水库工程溢流坝段底流消能试验研究[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2020,(11):219-226.
(
|
| [7] |
史修府, 牧振伟, 吕智, 等. 溢洪道转弯段消力池水力特性优化模拟[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2024, 41(12):91-100.
(
|
| [8] |
张宇, 刘晓平, 苏天宇, 等. 低水头枢纽消力墩位置对消能效果的影响[J]. 水运工程, 2016,(5):88-91.
(
|
| [9] |
赵乾, 牧振伟, 周凯, 等. 趾墩-梯形墩联合消能工水力特性[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2025, 42(1):120-128.
(
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
陈柏雨, 钟振宇, 聂文豪, 等. 泄洪消力池消力墩消能特性数值模拟研究[J]. 水电能源科学, 2024, 42(5):144-148.
(
|
| [15] |
孙文博, 牧振伟, 高尚. 趾墩悬栅联合消能紊动及荷载特性数值模拟[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2020, 37(1):73-78.
(
|
| [16] |
李琳, 葛旭峰, 谭义海, 等. 小石峡水电站溢洪道消能工优化试验[J]. 水利水电科技进展, 2011, 31(4):77-81.
(
|
| [17] |
陆杨, 刘焕芳, 金瑾, 等. T型墩间距对消力池效果影响的试验研究[J]. 水利水电技术, 2013, 44(11):40-43.
(
|
| [18] |
刘增文, 金瑾, 严文博, 等. T型墩消力池水力特性数值模拟及结构优化[J]. 水电能源科学, 2023, 41(9):103-106,84.
(
|
| [19] |
程刚, 曹亚南, 田兴, 等. 基于正交试验的光声池气流性能模拟及参数优化[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2023, 43(12):3899-3905.
(
|
| [20] |
谭立新, 他金城, 张杰, 等. 基于正交设计的黄池沟退水道弯道体型优化的数值模拟分析[J]. 水利水电科技进展, 2023, 43(5):82-87.
(
|
| [21] |
陶洪飞, 刘姚, 陶娟琴, 等. 基于正交结果分析的内镶贴片式滴灌带性能优化设计[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2023, 42(6): 111-118.
(
|
| [22] |
周凯, 牧振伟, 周镇, 等. 底流消力池墩栅联合消能工水力特性数值模拟研究[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2023, 34(2):142-148,156.
(
|
| [23] |
马豪, 牧振伟, 樊帆, 等. 连续弯段溢洪道糙条消能工整流特性试验研究[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2024, 41(3):71-78.
(
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |