Medical Journal of the Chinese People's Armed Police Forces

Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute >

0 0

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20241128

In-situ Stress Analysis and Rock Burst Risk Assessment of Liupan Shan Tunnel of Bailong River Water Diversion Project

  • DONG Zhi-hong , 1, 2 ,
  • JIANG Jian , 1 ,
  • ZHANG Xin-hui 2 ,
  • ZHOU Chao 2 ,
  • ZUO Qing-jun 1
Expand
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Mechanics and Engineering, Ministry of Water Resources, Yangtze River Science Institute, Wuhan 430010, China
  • 2. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443000, China

Received date: 2024-11-06

  Revised date: 2025-03-10

  Online published: 2025-04-22

Fold

Abstract

Under the background of deep buried and high stress, the risk of hard rock burst and large deformation of soft rock is often accompanied in underground engineering such as tunnel excavation and support. The overall buried depth along the Liupanshan tunnel of Bailongjiang water diversion project is large, and the lithology of surrounding rock is mainly hard rock such as conglomerate and limestone. Effective prediction of rockburst disaster is an important issue for the early planning of the project and the guarantee of construction safety. The test and analysis of the in-situ stress field is an important part of the tunnel rockburst prediction. In view of this practical project, the stress characteristics along the tunnel are analyzed by means of geological survey, deep hole in-situ stress test and numerical inversion of in-situ stress field, and then the rock burst risk assessment of hard rock area along the tunnel is carried out by combining various rock burst criteria. The results show that the horizontal principal stress is the main stress along the Liupanshan tunnel, and the axis orientation selected by the tunnel is reasonable, which is conducive to the stability of the surrounding rock of the tunnel. However, the stress value along the tunnel is greatly affected by fault structure, topography and geomorphology, etc., and there is stress concentration and differentiation. Most of the areas are buried deeply, mostly at medium and high ground stress levels, and have the conditions for rock burst. Through the calculation and analysis of various rock burst criteria, it can be seen that there is a large risk of strong rock burst in the high buried depth area of hard rock in the tunnel, and corresponding rock burst prevention and control measures need to be carried out.

Key words： Liupan shan tunnel; deep hole stress test; inversion analysis of stress field; rockburst prediction

Cite this article

DONG Zhi-hong , JIANG Jian , ZHANG Xin-hui , ZHOU Chao , ZUO Qing-jun . In-situ Stress Analysis and Rock Burst Risk Assessment of Liupan Shan Tunnel of Bailong River Water Diversion Project[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 0 . DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20241128

References

Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within
[1]
刘允芳. 岩体地应力与工程建设[M]. 武汉: 湖北科技技术出版社, 2000.

Liu Yun-fang. Rock mass in-situ stress and engineering construction[M]. Wuhan: Hubei Science and Technology Press, 2000. ) (in Chinese)

[2]
靳晓光, 王艳, 林志, 等. 西藏扎墨公路嘎隆拉隧道岩爆倾向性实验研究[J]. 山地学报, 2013, 31(1): 114-119.

( Jin Xiao-guang, Wang Yan, Lin Zhi, et al. Experimental study on rock burst tendency of Galongla tunnel in Zhamo highway, Tibet[J]. Journal of Mountain, 2013, 31(1) : 114-119. (in Chinese )

[3]
RUSSENES B F. Analyses of rockburst in tunnels in valley sides[M]. Trondheim: Norwegian Inst of Technology, 1974.

[4]
HOEK E, BROWN E T. Underground excavations in rock[M]. The institution of mining and metallurgy, 1980.

[5]
HOMAND F, PIGUET J P. Dynamic phenomena in mines and characteristics of rocks[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 1992, 29(1): A69.

[6]
MASTIN L G. The development of borehole breakouts in sandstone[D]. California: Stanford University, 1984.

[7]
SINGH S P. Burst energy release index: technical note[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 1989, 26(1): A19.

[8]
KIDYBINSKI. Bursting liability indices of coal[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 1981, 18(6): 121.

[9]
冯夏庭, 陈炳瑞, 张传庆.岩爆孕育过程的机制、 预警与动态调控[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2013.

Feng Xia-ting, Chen Bing-rui, Zhang Chuan-qing. Mechanism, early warning and dynamic regulation of rockburst[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2013. ) (in Chinese)

[10]
陶振宇. 高地应力区的岩爆及其判别[J]. 人民长江, 1987(5): 25-32. (Tao Zhen-yu. Rockburst in high geostress area and its discrimination

[ J . People's Yangtze, 1987(5): 25-32. ) ]

[11]
文志杰, 姜青林, 蒋宇静, 等. 川西地区高地应力岩爆风险动态评估方法与应用研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2024, 43(2): 308-321.

Wen Zhi-jie, Jiang Qing-lin, Jiang Yu-jing, et al. Research on dynamic risk assessment method and application of high geostress rockburst in western Sichuan[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2024, 43(2): 308-321. (in Chinese))

[12]
侯奎奎, 吴钦正, 张凤鹏, 等. 不同地应力测试方法在三山岛金矿2 005 m竖井建井区域的应用及其地应力分布规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 1093-1102.

Hou Kui-kui, Wu Qin-zheng, Zhang Feng-peng et al.[J]. Application of different in-situ stress test methods in 2 005 m shaft construction area of Sanshandao Gold Mine and study on in-situ stress distribution law[J]. Geotechnics, 2022, 43(4): 1093-1102. (in Chinese))

[13]
李鹏翔, 陈炳瑞, 周扬一, 等. 硬岩岩爆预测预警研究进展[J]. 煤炭学报, 2019, 44(S2): 447-465.

( Li Peng-xiang, Chen Bing-rui, Zhou Yang-yi, et al. Research progress on prediction and early warning of hard rock burst[J]. Coal Journal, 2019, 44(S2): 447-465. (in Chinese ) : 447-465. (in Chinese))

[14]
徐林生. 地下工程岩爆发生条件研究[J]. 重庆交通学院学报, 2005(3): 31-34.

Xu Lin-sheng. Study on the occurrence conditions of rockburst in underground engineering[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2005(3): 31-34. (in Chinese))

[15]
严健, 何川, 汪波, 等. 雅鲁藏布江缝合带深埋长大隧道群岩爆孕育及特征[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2019, 38(4): 769-781.

Yan Jian, He Chuan, Wang Bo, et al. Gestation and characteristics of rock burst in deep buried long tunnel group in Yarlung Zangbo River suture zone[J]. Journal of rock mechanics and engineering, 2019, 38(4): 769-781. (in Chinese))

[16]
李永松, 陈建平, 尹健民. 抢风岭隧道围岩地应力场研究及岩爆预测分析[J]. 人民长江, 2011, 42(7): 15-18.

Li Yong-song, Chen Jian-ping, Yin Jian-min. Study on in-situ stress field of surrounding rock and prediction analysis of rock burst in Qiangfengling tunnel[J]. People's Yangtze, 2011, 42(7): 15-18. (in Chinese))

[17]
张文东, 马天辉, 唐春安, 等. 锦屏二级水电站引水隧洞岩爆特征及微震监测规律研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2014, 33(2): 339-348.

Zhang Wen-dong, Ma Tian-hui, Tang Chun-an, et al. Characteristics of rockbursts and microseismic monitoring of diversion tunnels of Jinping II Hydropower Station[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 33(2): 339-348. (in Chinese))

[18]
宋章, 袁传保, 杜宇本, 等. 成兰铁路某长大深埋隧道岩爆特征及成因机制[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2017, 34(10): 66-72.

Song Zhang, Yuan Chuan-bao, Du Yu-ben, et al. Characteristics and causal mechanism of rockburst in a long and deeply buried tunnel of Chenglan Railway[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering, 2017, 34(10): 66-72. (in Chinese))

[19]
王开洋, 肖鸿, 尚彦军, 等. 西南地区某隧道围岩岩爆预测研究[J]. 工程地质学报, 2014, 22(5): 903-914.

Wang Kai-yang, Xiao Hong, Shang Yan-jun, et al. Prediction of rockburst in the surrounding rock of a tunnel in Southwest China[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2014, 22(5): 903-914. (in Chinese))

[20]
徐昌茂, 吴立, 赖云, 等. 深埋长大高速铁路隧道地应力测试及岩爆预测分析[J]. 中外公路, 2013, 33(2): 207-211.

Xu Chang-mao, Wu Li, Lai Yun, et al. Ground stress test and rock burst prediction analysis of deep-buried high-speed railroad tunnels[J]. Chinese and Foreign Highways, 2013, 33(2): 207-211. (in Chinese))

[21]
贺睿兴, 尹健民, 张新辉, 等. 某深埋长隧洞初始应力场研究及岩爆预测分析[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2018, 14(S1): 390-394.

( He Rui-xing, Yin Jian-min, Zhang Xin-hui, et al. Study on initial stress field and rock burst prediction analysis of a deeply buried long tunnel[J]. Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2018, 14(S1): 390-394. (in Chinese ) : 390-394. (in Chinese))

[22]
郑宝平. 六盘山深埋长隧洞工程地质问题初步分析[J]. 水利规划与设计, 2019(6): 102-105.

Zheng Bao-ping. Preliminary analysis of engineering geological problems of deeply buried long tunnels in Liupanshan Mountain[J]. Water Resources Planning and Design, 2019(6): 102-105. (in Chinese))

[23]
向宏发, 虢顺民, 张秉良, 等. 六盘山东麓地区活动构造研究[J]. 国际地震动态, 1998(7): 24-27.

Xiang Hong-fa, Guo Shun-min, Zhang Bing-liang, et al. Study on active tectonics in Liupanshan Donglu area[J]. International Earthquake Dynamics, 1998(7): 24-27. (in Chinese))

[24]
刘兴旺, 袁道阳, 史志刚, 等. 六盘山断裂带构造活动特征及流域盆地地貌响应[J]. 地震工程学报, 2015, 37(1): 168-174,195.

( Liu Xing-wang, Yuan Dao-yang, Shi Zhi-gang, et al. Characteristics of tectonic activity in the Liupanshan fault zone and geomorphologic response of the basin[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2015, 37(1): 168-174,195. (in Chinese )

[25]
刘伟. 深埋高地应力隧洞岩爆倾向性数值模拟分析[D]. 武汉: 长江科学院, 2021.

Liu Wei. Numerical simulation analysis of rockburst propensity in deeply buried high geostress tunnels[D]. Wuhan: Changjiang Academy of Sciences, 2021. ) (in Chinese)

[26]
岑成汉. 地下厂房区初始地应力反演回归分析[D]. 南京: 河海大学, 2007.

Cen Cheng-Han. Regression analysis of initial geostress inversion in underground plant area[D]. Nanjing: Hohai University, 2007. ) (in Chinese)

[27]
黄书岭, 丁秀丽, 廖成刚, 等. 深切河谷区水电站厂址初始应力场规律研究及对地下厂房布置的思考[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2014, 33(11): 2210-2224.

Huang Shu-ling, Ding Xiu-li, Liao Cheng-gang, et al. Study on the initial stress field law of hydropower plant site in deep-cut valley area and thoughts on the arrangement of underground plant[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 33(11): 2210-2224. (in Chinese))

[28]
段淑倩, 孙远达, 熊杰程, 等. 高地应力判据及其影响因素研究综述[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2023, 19(3): 1038-1050.

Duan Shu-qian, Sun Yuan-da, Xiong Ji-cheng, et al. A review of high geostress criterion and its influencing factors[J]. Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2023, 19(3): 1038-1050. (in Chinese))

[29]
张镜剑, 傅冰骏. 岩爆及其判据和防治[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2008(10): 2034-2042.

Zhang Jing-jian, Fu Bing-jun. Rockbursts, their criteria and prevention[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2008(10): 2034-2042. (in Chinese))

[30]
C.D. MARTIN, P.K. KAISER, D.R. MCCREATH. Hoek-Brown parameters for predicting the depth of brittle failure around tunnels[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1999, 36(1): 136-151.

[31]
田朝阳, 兰恒星, 张宁, 等. 某交通线路色季拉山隧道高地应力岩爆风险定量预测研究[J]. 工程地质学报, 2022, 30(3): 621-634.

Tian Chao-yang, Lan Heng-xing, Zhang Ning, et al. Quantitative prediction of the risk of high geostress rockbursts in the Sedera Tunnel of a transportation line[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2022, 30(3): 621-634. (in Chinese))

[32]
刘道胜. 西康二线秦岭翠华山特长隧道岩爆预测[J]. 铁道勘察, 2009, 35(3): 52-54.

Liu Dao-sheng. Prediction of rock explosion in Cuihua Mountain tunnel of Qinling Mountain, Xikang Second Line[J]. Railway Survey, 2009, 35(3): 52-54. (in Chinese))

Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉

Copyright © Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, All Rights Reserved.
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd.