Operation Condition of Anchoring System in Large-scale Water Conservancy and Hydropower Projects

PEI Shu-feng; HAO Wen-feng; FAN Yi-lin; CHEN Hao; LI Wen-tao

doi:10.11988/ckyyb.20220933

Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute >

2024 , Vol. 41 >Issue 2: 142 - 150

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20220933

Rock Soil Engineering

Operation Condition of Anchoring System in Large-scale Water Conservancy and Hydropower Projects

PEI Shu-feng ,
HAO Wen-feng ,
FAN Yi-lin ,
CHEN Hao ,
LI Wen-tao

Expand

1. Colleague of Geosciences and Engineering, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China;
2. Postdoctoral Research Station, China Three Gorges Corporation, Wuhan 430010, China;
3. Yangtze Ecology and Environment Co., Ltd ., Wuhan 430062,China;
4. China Three Gorges Construction Engineering Corporation, Chengdu 610000,China

Received date: 2022-08-01

Revised date: 2022-11-11

Online published: 2023-10-12

Fold

Abstract

To ensure the effective long-term operation of anchoring systems for large-scale water conservancy and hydropower projects, we conducted statistical analysis of anchoring systems monitoring data from six hydropower stations under the Three Gorges Group and clarified the time-history evolution law of anchor cable load and anchor bolt stress as well as the factors affecting these characteristic changes. Results demonstrate that the anchor cable loads and anchor bolt stresses of high slope and underground cavern are mainly within designed ranges, with significant changes occurring primarily during the construction period, gradually stabilizing after the completion of excavation and support. Anchor cable loads on slopes exhibit three distinct stages, rapid decline, followed by slow decline, and eventual stability or periodic change. Anchor cable loads in underground caverns exhibit similar characteristics, yet with more complex variation. Bolt stress demonstrates a significant negative correlation with temperature. Anchor cable load in underground cavern exhibits a diameter effect, with cavern size in direct proportion to the average cable load value and a more significant loss rate change range. Fully unloaded areas, such as intersection portals in the underground cavern group, blocks, and retained rock piers, display the largest anchor bolt stresses, and the loss rates in block section are generally higher than those in other engineering parts. Load loss rates of fractured anchor cables are relatively high. Rock mass quality negatively correlates with anchor cable load loss rates. Failure characteristics of anchor cable projects during construction include steel strand breaks, anchor cable breakage through anchor covers, and steel strand shrinkage. Long-term failures of anchor cable operation include anchor pier head corrosion and calcium carbonate precipitation.

Key words： water resources and hydropower engineering; anchoring system; anchor cable load; bolt stress; evolutionary features; influence factors

Cite this article

PEI Shu-feng , HAO Wen-feng , FAN Yi-lin , CHEN Hao , LI Wen-tao . Operation Condition of Anchoring System in Large-scale Water Conservancy and Hydropower Projects[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2024 , 41(2) : 142 -150 . DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20220933

References

[1] 高大水, 曾勇. 三峡永久船闸高边坡锚索预应力状态监测分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2001, 20(5): 653-656. (GAO Da-shui, ZENG Yong. Monitoring Analysis on Prestress State of Anchor Cable of High Slope of the TGP Permanent Shiplocks[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2001, 20(5): 653-656.(in Chinese))
[2] 袁培进,吴铭江,陆遐龄,等.长江三峡永久船闸高边坡预应力锚索监测[J].岩土力学,2003,24(增刊1):198-201.(YUAN Pei-jin,WU Ming-jiang,LU Xia-ling,et al.Monitoring of Prestressing Anchors in High Slope for Three Gorges Projects Permanent Shiplock[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2003,24(Supp.1):198-201.(in Chinese))
[3] 樊少鹏, 肖碧, 王公彬, 等. 三峡船闸高边坡锚索预应力损失监测成果分析[J]. 人民长江, 2015, 46(24): 82-87. (FAN Shao-peng, XIAO Bi, WANG Gong-bin, et al. Analysis of Monitoring Results of Pre-stress Loss in Anchorage Cables Installed at High Slope of Ship-lock of Three Gorges Project[J]. Yangtze River, 2015, 46(24): 82-87.(in Chinese))
[4] 张金龙,徐卫亚,徐飞,等.深卸荷变形拉裂岩体锚索预应力损失规律研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2009,28(增刊2):3965-3970.(ZHANG Jin-long,XU Wei-ya,XU Fei,et al. Study on Prestress Loss Law of Anchor Cables in Deep Unloading Deformed Ripped Blocks[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2009,28(Supp.2):3965-3970.(in Chinese))
[5] 邓建, 肖明, 谢冰冰. 预应力锚索受力特性与初始张拉吨位优化分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2016, 37(8): 2359-2365. (DENG Jian, XIAO Ming, XIE Bing-bing. Analysis of Mechanical Characteristic and Optimization of Initial Tensile Tonnage of Prestressed Anchor Cable[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2016, 37(8): 2359-2365.(in Chinese))
[6] 顾欣,夏元友,陈安敏.在开挖与超载过程中锚固洞室锚索预应力变化特征[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2007,26(增刊2):4238-4244.(GU Xin, XIA Yuan-you, CHEN An-min. Variation Characteristics of Anchor Cable Prestress during Underground Opening Excavation and Overloading[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2007,26(Supp.2):4238-4244.(in Chinese))
[7] 董志宏, 丁秀丽, 黄书岭, 等. 高地应力区大型洞室锚索时效受力特征及长期承载风险分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 351-362. (DONG Zhi-hong, DING Xiu-li, HUANG Shu-ling, et al. Analysis of Ageing-stress Characteristics and Long-term Bearing Risk of Anchor Cable for a Large Cavern in High Geo-stress Area[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(1): 351-362.(in Chinese))
[8] 李英勇, 张顶立, 张宏博, 等. 边坡加固中预应力锚索失效机制与失效效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2010, 31(1): 144-150, 157. (LI Ying-yong, ZHANG Ding-li, ZHANG Hong-bo, et al. Research on Failure Mechanism and Effects of Prestressed Anchor Cables for Reinforcing Slopes[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(1): 144-150, 157.(in Chinese))
[9] 高大水,吴海斌,王莉.三峡船闸高边坡预应力锚索耐久性研究[J]. 岩土力学,2005,26(增刊2):126-130,135.(GAO Da-shui, WU Hai-bin, WANG Li. Research on Endurance of Prestressed Anchorage Cables in TGP Shiplock’s High Slope[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2005, 26(Supp.2): 126-130, 135.(in Chinese))
[10]任爱武, 汪彦枢, 王玉杰, 等. 拉力集中全长黏结型锚索长期耐久性研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2011, 30(3): 493-499. (REN Ai-wu, WANG Yan-shu, WANG Yu-jie, et al. Research on Durability of Concentrated Tension and full-bonded Anchor Cables[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2011, 30(3): 493-499.(in Chinese))
[11]王玉杰, 尹韬, 孙兴松, 等. 丰满老坝加固预应力锚索服役近30年后性能评价研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2022, 41(1): 62-69. (WANG Yu-jie, YIN Tao, SUN Xing-song, et al. Performance Evaluation of Prestressed Anchors Embedded in Old Fengman Dam after nearly 30 Years Service[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2022, 41(1): 62-69.(in Chinese))
[12]江权, 陈建林, 冯夏庭, 等. 大型地下洞室对穿预应力锚索失效形式与耦合模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2013, 34(8): 2271-2279. (JIANG Quan, CHEN Jian-lin, FENG Xia-ting, et al. Failure Format and Interactive Mechanism of Prestressed Thru-anchor Cable in a Large Underground Caverns[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013, 34(8): 2271-2279.(in Chinese))
[13]裴书锋, 江权, 樊义林, 等. 高应力大直径圆筒形洞室围岩变形破坏特征与失效机制[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2023,45(1):171-180.(PEI Shu-feng, JIANG Quan, FAN Yi-lin, et al. Surrounding Rock Deformation Failure Characteristics and Failure Mechanism of High-stress Large-diameter Cylindrical Cavern[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2023,45(1):171-180.(in Chinese))
[14]洪海春, 徐卫亚. 全长粘结式预应力锚索锈胀开裂时服务年限研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2008, 29(4): 949-953. (HONG Hai-chun, XU Wei-ya. Research on Service Life of Wholly Bonded Prestressed Cable when Corrosion Expansion Cracking[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2008, 29(4): 949-953.(in Chinese))
[15]张发明, 赵维炳, 刘宁, 等. 预应力锚索锚固荷载的变化规律及预测模型[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2004, 23(1): 39-43. (ZHANG Fa-ming, ZHAO Wei-bing, LIU Ning, et al. long-term Performance and Load Prediction Model of Prestressed Cables[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2004, 23(1): 39-43.(in Chinese))
[16]陈沅江, 尹进, 胡毅夫. 软岩边坡锚索预应力定量损失规律研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2013, 32(8): 1685-1691. (CHEN Yuan-jiang, YIN Jin, HU Yi-fu. Research on Prestress Quantitative Loss Law of Soft Rock Slope Anchor Cable[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 32(8): 1685-1691.(in Chinese))
[17]冯忠居,江冠,赵瑞欣,等.基于多因素耦合效应的锚索预应力长期损失研究[J]. 岩土力学,2021,42(8):2215-2224. (FENG Zhong-ju, JIANG Guan, ZHAO Rui-xin, et al. Study on Pre-stress Long Term Loss of Anchor Cable Considering Coupled Multiple Factors[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(8): 2215-2224.(in Chinese))
[18]李英勇,王梦恕,张顶立,等.锚索预应力变化影响因素及模型研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2008,27(增刊1):3140-3146.(LI Ying-yong,WANG Meng-shu,ZHANG Ding-li,et al. Study on Influential Factors and Model for Variation of Anchor Cable Prestress[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2008,27(Supp.1):3140-3146.(in Chinese))
[19]周永江, 何思明, 杨雪莲. 预应力锚索的预应力损失机理研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2006, 27(8): 1353-1356. (ZHOU Yong-jiang, HE Si-ming, YANG Xue-lian. Study on Prestress Loss of Anchor Cables under Long-term Loading[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2006, 27(8): 1353-1356.(in Chinese))
[20]周德培,蔡伟. 锚索预应力损失的影响因素及对策[C]∥第八次全国岩石力学与工程学术大会论文集. 北京: 科学出版社, 2004: 610-613.(ZHOU De-pei, CAI Wei. Influence Factors and Countermeasures of Prestress Loss and Anchor Cable[C]∥Proceedings of the Eighth National Academic Conference on Rock Mechanics and Engineering: Rock Mechanics and Engineering Problems in the Development of Western China. Beijing: Science Press, 2004: 610-613.(in Chinese))
[21]王克忠, 吴慧, 赵宇飞. 深部地下厂房锚索预应力损失与岩体蠕变耦合分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2018, 37(6): 1481-1488. (WANG Ke-zhong, WU Hui, ZHAO Yu-fei. Coupling between Reduction of Force in Prestressed Anchor Cable and Rock Creep in Deep-buried Underground Powerhouse[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2018, 37(6): 1481-1488.(in Chinese))
[22]李建林, 邓华锋, 黄建文, 等. 卸荷岩体锚固预应力损失的影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2005, 26(增刊1): 292-295. (LI Jian-lin, DENG Hua-feng, HUANG Jian-wen, et al. Analysis of Factors Affected on Prestress Losses of Unloading Rock Mass[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2005, 26(Supp.1): 292-295.(in Chinese))
[23]张发明, 刘宁, 陈祖煜, 等. 影响大吨位预应力长锚索锚固力损失的因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2003, 24(2): 194-197. (ZHANG Fa-ming, LIU Ning, CHEN Zu-yu, et al. Analysis of Factors Affected on Load Losses of High Capacity and Long Rock Anchors[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2003, 24(2): 194-197.(in Chinese))
[24]朱焕春. 某边坡锚杆应力状态测试与分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2000, 22(4): 471-474. (ZHU Huan-chun. Measurements and Analysis on Bolt Stresses at a Slope[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2000, 22(4): 471-474.(in Chinese))
[25]邢林生. 混凝土坝坝体渗漏危害性分析及其处理[J]. 水力发电学报, 2001, 20(3): 108-116. (XING Lin-sheng. Analysis of Leakage Harmful to Concrete Dams and Its Treatment[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2001, 20(3): 108-116.(in Chinese))
[26]董志宏, 丁秀丽, 黄书岭, 等. 高地应力区大型洞室锚索时效受力特征及长期承载风险分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 351-362. (DONG Zhi-hong, DING Xiu-li, HUANG Shu-ling, et al. Analysis of Ageing-stress Characteristics and Long-term Bearing Risk of Anchor Cable for a Large Cavern in High Geo-stress Area[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(1): 351-362.(in Chinese))

Options

Outlines

模态框（Modal）标题

Abstract

Cite this article

References