人类活动驱动下吉泰盆地典型流域水文干旱的多要素响应特征

  • 孙可可 , 1, 2 ,
  • 姚立强 , 1, 2 ,
  • 刘雁翼 3 ,
  • 张秀平 4 ,
  • 吴涛 3
展开
  • 1 长江科学院, 武汉 430010
  • 2 流域水资源与生态环境科学湖北省重点实验室, 武汉 430010
  • 3 中铁水利水电规划设计集团有限公司, 南昌 330029
  • 4 江西省水利科学院, 南昌 330029
姚立强(1985-),男,江西宜春人,博士,正高级工程师,主要从事流域水文循环与水资源高效利用研究。E-mail:

孙可可(1988-),男,安徽阜阳人,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事干旱模拟与旱灾风险评估研究。E-mail:

收稿日期: 2025-04-29

  修回日期: 2025-08-09

  网络出版日期: 2025-10-17

基金资助

中国中铁股份有限公司科技研究开发计划(2022-重大-08)

江西省技术创新引导类计划项目(2023KSG01005)

Response Characteristics of Multiple Elements to Hydrological Drought in Typical Watersheds of the Jitai Basin Driven by Human Activities

  • SUN Ke-ke , 1, 2 ,
  • YAO Li-qiang , 1, 2 ,
  • LIU Yan-yi 3 ,
  • ZHANG Xiu-ping 4 ,
  • WU Tao 3
Expand
  • 1 Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan 430010, China
  • 2 Hubei Provincial Key Laboratory of Basin Water Resources and Ecological Environmental Sciences, Wuhan 430010, China
  • 3 China Railway Water Conservancy and Hydro Power Planning and Design Group Limited, Nanchang 330029, China
  • 4 Jiangxi Academy of Water Science and Engineering, Nanchang 330029, China

Received date: 2025-04-29

  Revised date: 2025-08-09

  Online published: 2025-10-17

摘要

在气候变化与高强度人类活动交互作用下,吉泰盆地水文干旱演变机制呈现显著阶段性差异。基于1959-2023年数据,通过Pettitt检验划分基准期、过渡期和变化期,结合改进的月水量平衡模型,剖析不同阶段干旱特征及多种驱动要素的差异化影响。结果表明:蜀水、乌江、同江典型流域在1980、2008年前后产流机制发生转折,径流系数(R/P)在过渡期显著增加后,变化期回落。过渡期干旱烈度和历时较基准期明显下降,变化期则反弹,3个典型流域平均干旱烈度较过渡期分别增加46.2%、26.9%和25.9%。夏秋高温少雨是吉泰盆地水文干旱的重要驱动因素,其与干旱烈度的敏感性较强,期间降水每减少10%,干旱烈度值增加0.14~0.23之间,存在边际递减效应。然而,与基准期相比,变化期人类活动影响占主导作用,其导致径流深和干旱烈度变化幅度超过气候变化因素。本研究构建的多阶段驱动因子量化方法,揭示了不同要素对水文干旱强度的非线性调控作用,可为吉泰盆地干旱预警及长期趋势预测提供参考。

本文引用格式

孙可可 , 姚立强 , 刘雁翼 , 张秀平 , 吴涛 . 人类活动驱动下吉泰盆地典型流域水文干旱的多要素响应特征[J]. 长江科学院院报, 0 . DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20250384

Abstract

Under the interactive influence of climate change and intensive human activities, the evolutionary mechanism of hydrological drought in the Jitai Basin exhibits significant stage-specific differences. Based on data from 1959 to 2023, the Pettitt test on the R/P sequence was employed to delineate the reference Period, transition period, and change period. By integrating the improved monthly water balance model with scenario simulations, this study analyzes the differentiated impacts of climate change and human activities on drought characteristics across different stages. The results show that the runoff coefficient in Shushui, Wujiang, and Tongjiang basins shifted around 1980 and 2008. After a significant increase in runoff effect (R/P) during the transition period, it declined in the change period. Compared to the reference Period, the drought intensity and duration in the three typical basins decreased significantly during the transition period but rebounded in the change period, with average drought intensities increasing by 46.2%, 26.9%, and 25.9% respectively compared to the transition period. High temperatures and low precipitation in summer and autumn are key drivers of hydrological drought in the Jitai Basin, demonstrating strong sensitivity to drought intensity: a 10% decrease in precipitation during this period increases drought intensity by 0.14 to 0.23, exhibiting a diminishing marginal effect. However, compared to the reference Period, human activities dominated the change period, causing variations in runoff depth and drought intensity that exceeded those from climatic factors. The multi-stage driving factor quantification method developed in this study reveals the nonlinear regulatory effects of different factors on hydrological drought intensity, providing a reference for drought early warning and long-term trend prediction in the Jitai Basin.

[1]
Ning He, Wenxian Guo, Jiaqi Lan, et al. The impact of human activities and climate change on the eco-hydrological processes in the Yangtze River basin[J]. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 2024, 53: 101753.

[2]
Ke Zhang, Zhi-lin Li, Wu-zhi Shi, et al. Spatiotemporal changes and interconnections between meteorological and hydrological droughts in China over past 34 years[J]. Water Science and Engineering, 2025, 04007.

[3]
Anzhou Zhao, Wei Zhang, Lidong Zou, et al. Characteristics of propagation from meteorological to hydrological drought under natural conditions in the Haihe River Basin of China: Time, probability, and threshold[J]. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 2025, 59:102359.

[4]
Guodong Xu, Yunlong Wu, Sulan Liu, et al. How 2022 extreme drought influences the spatiotemporal variations of terrestrial water storage in the Yangtze River Catchment: Insights from GRACE-based drought severity index and in-situ measurements[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2023, 626: 130245.

[5]
Gexia Qin, Ninglian Wang, Yuwei Wu, et al. Spatiotemporal variations in eco-environmental quality and responses to drought and human activities in the middle reaches of the Yellow River basin, China from 1990 to 2022[J]. Ecological Informatics, 2024, 81: 102641.

[6]
Ning He, Wenxian Guo, Jiaqi Lan, Zhiqian Yu, Hongxiang Wang, The impact of human activities and climate change on the eco-hydrological processes in the Yangtze River basin[J]. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 2024, 53: 101753.

[7]
Jianyong Xiao, Binggeng Xie, Kaichun Zhou, Weixiang Li, Chao Liang, Junhan Li, Jing Xie, Xuemao Zhang, Xiaofei Pang, Responses of hydrological processes to vegetation greening and climate change in subtropical watersheds[J]. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 2024, 55: 101946.

[8]
王文, 王靖淑, 陶奕源, 等. 人类活动对水文干旱形成与发展的影响研究进展[J]. 水文, 2020, 40(3):1-8.

[9]
刘雁翼, 王林强, 陈佳慧. 吉泰盆地 1990-2020年气象和农业干旱的时空演变规律[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2024, 1-12.

[10]
Yuhui Wang, Weihong Liao, Yi Ding, Xu Wang, Yunzhong Jiang, Xinshan Song, Xiaohui Lei, Water resource spatiotemporal pattern evaluation of the upstream Yangtze River corresponding to climate changes[J]. Quaternary International, 2015, 380: 187-196.

[11]
Ding Luo, Xiaoli Yang, Lingfeng Xie, et al. Propagation characteristics of meteorological drought to hydrological drought in China[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2025, 656: 133023.

[12]
Zhixin Zhang, Lin Zhang, Yanfeng Liu, et al, Responses of annual streamflow variability to annual precipitation, extreme climate events and large-scale climate phenomena in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2024, 632:130969.

[13]
朱玲慧, 关颖慧. 金沙江流域降水结构演变及非平稳性特征[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2025, 42(3):50-58.

[14]
叶许春, 袁燕萍, 刘婷婷, 等. 鄱阳湖流域气象干旱的区域性特征及干旱过程演变[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2024, 41(9):19-26.

[15]
严昌盛, 王鹏, 靳莉君, 等. 1961-2020年黄河源区降水时空变化特征研究[J]. 水文, 2024, 44(5):84-91.

[16]
杨肖丽, 张佳乐, 黄星怡, 等. 气候变化和人类活动对长江流域极端径流的影响[J]. 水资源保护, 2025, 1-13.

[17]
姜瑶, 徐宗学, 王静. 基于年径流序列的五种趋势检测方法性能对比[J]. 水利学报, 2020, 51(7):845-857.

[18]
熊立华, 郭生练, 付小平. 两参数月水量平衡模型的研制和应用[J]. 水科学进展, 1996, (S1):80-86.

[19]
孙可可, 姚立强, 许继军, 等. 基于用水效益函数的城市干旱损失评估方法[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2021, 38(11):11-17.

[20]
陆桂华, 闫桂霞, 吴志勇, 等. 基于copula函数的区域干旱分析方法[J]. 水科学进展, 2010, 21(2):188-193.

[21]
Xinyuan Jiang, Xiuqin Fang, Qiuan Zhu, et al. Time-series satellite images reveal abrupt changes in vegetation dynamics and possible determinants in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2024, 355: 110124.

[22]
Shi Hu, Xingguo Mo. Diversified evapotranspiration responses to climatic change and vegetation greening in eight global great river basins[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2022, 613:128411.

[23]
Zhenghao Li, Qiangqiang Yuan, Qianqian Yang, et al. Differentiable modeling for soil moisture retrieval by unifying deep neural networks and water cloud model[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2024, 311: 114281.

文章导航

/