南水北调西线水源区水平衡综合诊断框架及应用

  • 张又升 , 1, 2 ,
  • 魏加华 , 1, 2, 3 ,
  • 时洋 , 3 ,
  • 侯铭垒 3
展开
  • 1.黄河上游生态保护与高质量发展实验室,青海大学土木水利学院,西宁 810016
  • 2.水利部江河源区水生态治理与保护重点实验室,青海大学土木水利学院,西宁 810016
  • 3.清华大学 水圈科学与水利工程全国重点实验室,北京 100084
魏加华(1971—),男,陕西汉中人,教授,博士,研究方向为水资源与水信息。E-mail:

张又升(1998—),男,青海西宁人,硕士研究生,研究方向为水文与水资源。E-mail:

时 洋(1993—),男,安徽合肥人,助理研究员,博士,研究方向为水文与水资源。E-mail:

收稿日期: 2024-12-30

  修回日期: 2025-05-25

  网络出版日期: 2025-07-02

基金资助

国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFC3202400)

国家重点研发计划项目(2023YFC3206700)

Comprehensive Diagnostic Framework and Application of Water Balance in the Water Source Area of the Western Route of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project

  • ZHANG You-sheng , 1, 2 ,
  • WEI Jia-hua , 1, 2, 3 ,
  • SHI Yang , 3 ,
  • HOU Ming-lei 3
Expand
  • 1. Laboratory of Ecological Protection and High-Quality Development in the Upper Yellow River, School of Civil Engineering and Water Resources, Qinghai University, Xining 810016, China
  • 2. Key Laboratory of Water Ecology Remediation and Protection at Headwater Regions of Big Rivers, School of Civil Engineering and Water Resources, Qinghai University, Xining 810016, China
  • 3. State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084.

Received date: 2024-12-30

  Revised date: 2025-05-25

  Online published: 2025-07-02

摘要

本文提出了基于水资源-生态系统-经济社会三者之间状态的水平衡综合诊断方法。构建了基于水平衡原理的分析框架,以自然水收支、社会经济供需、河道内生态和社会生态竞争四大平衡为基础,量化了南水北调西线工程潜在水源区的水平衡状态。研究结果表明,2005至2020年间,西线工程水源区生态系统维持了较为稳定的水量平衡,区域内水资源、社会经济与生态系统的协调性稳步提高,耦合协调度提升,水资源管理、生态保护与社会经济发展间的协同效应显著,反映出水资源管理和生态保护成效显著。研究结果可为源区水资源综合管理和调水工程政策制定提供参考。

本文引用格式

张又升 , 魏加华 , 时洋 , 侯铭垒 . 南水北调西线水源区水平衡综合诊断框架及应用[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2025 . DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20241299

Abstract

This study aims to develop a comprehensive diagnostic method for evaluating the water balance state of water resources, ecosystems, and socio-economic systems in the context of large-scale water management projects. The focus is on the potential water source areas of the South-to-North Water Diversion West Route project, analyzing the interactions between natural water balances, socio-economic demands, and ecological considerations. The research centers on quantifying and assessing the coordination and sustainability of these systems in the West Route’s water source region from 2005 to 2020. An analytical framework based on the principles of water balance was constructed, incorporating four key components: natural water supply and demand, socio-economic water needs, ecological water consumption, and the competition between ecological and socio-economic systems within the river basin. This framework was used to quantify the water balance status by evaluating water availability, ecological functioning, and socio-economic demands over the period of study. Statistical methods and multi-dimensional analysis were applied to calculate the coupling coordination degree, which measures the extent of coordination between water resource management, ecological protection, and socio-economic development. The study relied on regional hydrological records, socio-economic data, and ecological assessments to ensure robust and reliable results. The findings reveal that from 2005 to 2020, the water balance of the West Route’s water source areas has remained relatively stable. Importantly, the region has maintained a steady equilibrium in water resources, with significant improvements in the coordination between water resources, socio-economic development, and ecological systems. The coupling coordination degree between these three systems has shown a clear upward trend, reflecting the growing harmony between water management, ecological conservation, and socio-economic growth. The research highlights that the ecological system within the water source areas has effectively adapted to changes in water availability, demonstrating resilience in sustaining water use. Moreover, there has been a substantial positive synergy between water resource management and ecological protection, which has contributed to the stability and improvement of the regional water balance.Additionally, the study shows that the competition between ecological and socio-economic water demands has become more balanced, shifting toward a more integrated approach. The region’s ecological protection strategies have become better aligned with water resource management policies, resulting in improved sustainability in both ecological and economic terms. The findings suggest that enhanced water use efficiency, combined with adaptive ecological protection measures, has played a pivotal role in achieving these positive trends. This research offers significant insights into the water balance status of the West Route’s water source areas, emphasizing the progress made in achieving coordinated development between water resources, ecological systems, and socio-economic activities. The study’s innovative approach—integrating natural water balance, socio-economic factors, and ecological needs—provides a comprehensive framework for evaluating the sustainability of water resources in large-scale inter-basin water diversion projects. The findings demonstrate that coupling water resource management with ecological protection is not only feasible but essential for ensuring the long-term sustainability of water source areas.The results indicate that the West Route’s water source areas have achieved a significant degree of ecological and socio-economic coordination, which is crucial for ensuring the effectiveness of future water diversion projects. Furthermore, the increase in coupling coordination reflects the positive outcomes of integrated management practices that simultaneously address water resource conservation, economic development, and ecological sustainability. These findings serve as a valuable reference for policymakers involved in the comprehensive management of water resources in source regions and offer a foundation for formulating policies that support the long-term sustainability of large-scale water projects like the South-to-North Water Diversion.In conclusion, this study underscores the importance of adopting an integrated approach to water resource management, one that recognizes the interdependencies between natural, economic, and ecological systems. The research highlights that coordinated water management, paired with adaptive ecological conservation strategies, is critical to achieving sustainable development and ensuring the resilience of water source areas in large-scale water transfer projects. Furthermore, the study suggests that such integrated management models can serve as a blueprint for other regions facing similar water resource and environmental challenges, ultimately supporting the global pursuit of water sustainability.

[1]
胡庆芳, 陈秀敏, 高娟, 等. 水平衡与国土空间协调发展战略研究[J]. 中国工程科学, 2022, 24(5): 63-74.

HU Qing-fang, CHEN Xiu-min, GAO Juan, et al. Research on the coordinated development strategy of water balance and land space[J]. Engineering Science of China, 2022, 24(5): 63-74. (in Chinese))

[2]
左其亭, 吴青松, 金君良, 等. 区域水平衡基本原理及理论体系[J]. 水科学进展, 2022, 33(2): 165-173.

ZUO Qi-ting, WU Qing-song, JIN Jun-liang, et al. The basic principle and theoretical system of regional water balance[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2022, 33(2): 165-173. (in Chinese))

[3]
Zhang Y, Pan M, Sheffield J, et al. A Climate Data Record (CDR) for the global terrestrial water budget: 1984-2010[J]. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2018, 22(1): 241-263.

[4]
Abolafia-Rosenzweig R, Pan M, Zeng JL, et al. Remotely sensed ensembles of the terrestrial water budget over major global river basins: An assessment of three closure techniques[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2021, 252: 112191.

[5]
Zhang Q, Singh VP, Sun P, et al. Precipitation and streamflow changes in China: Changing patterns, causes and implications[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2011, 410(3): 204-216.

[6]
Du M, Huang S, Singh VP, et al. Quantifying the effects of direct human activities and climate change on the spatial propagation of hydrological drought in the Yellow River Basin, China[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2024, 643: 131931.

[7]
田锦涛, 左其亭, 巴音吉, 等. 沁河流域经济社会与生态用水平衡计算及预测[J]. 水利水电科技进展: 1-13. (TIAN Jin-tao, ZUO Qi-ting, BA Yin-ji, et al. Calculation and prediction of economic, social and ecological water balance in Qinhe River Basin[J]. Progress of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Technology: 1-13. ) (in Chinese)

[8]
Wada Y, van Beek LPH, Bierkens MFP. Modelling global water stress of the recent past: on the relative importance of trends in water demand and climate variability[J]. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci, 2011, 15(12): 3785-3808.

[9]
Li X, Zhang Q, Liu Y, et al. Modeling social-economic water cycling and the water-land nexus: A framework and an application[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2018, 390: 40-50.

[10]
宁亚洲. 河西内陆区水资源供需平衡与模拟预测研究[D]. 西安: 陕西师范大学, 2020.

NING Ya-zhou. Study on supply and demand balance and simulation prediction of water resources in Hexi inland area[D]. Xian: Shaanxi Normal University, 2020. ) (in Chinese)

[11]
Guo X, Fang G, Zhang Z. Index system of eco-environment impact assessment for inter-basin water transfer[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2008, 39(9): 1125.

[12]
杨毅, 邵慧芳, 唐伟明. 北京城市河道生态环境需水量计算方法与应用[J]. 水利规划与设计, 2017, (12): 46-50.

( YANG Yi, SHAO Hui-fang, TANG Wei-ming. Calculation method and application of eco-environmental water requirement of urban rivers in Beijing[J]. Water Planning and Design, 2017, (12): 46-50 (in Chinese )

[13]
刘义, 史佩东, 刘淼, 等. 基于生态需水的黄河中游水平衡分析——以沁河流域为例[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2024, 51(1): 30-40.

LIU Yi, SHI Pei-dong, LIU Miao, et al. Analysis of water balance in the middle reaches of the Yellow River based on ecological water demand-Taking Qinhe River Basin as an example[J]. Hydrogeology and Engineer-ing Geology, 2024, 51(1): 30-40. (in Chinese))

[14]
马杏. 永定河流域生态需水及生态补偿机制研究[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2022.

MA Xing. Study on ecological water demand and ecological compensation mechanism in Yongding River Basin[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2022. ) (in Chinese)

[15]
左其亭, 吴青松, 纪义虎, 等. 区域水平衡及失衡程度度量方法[J]. 水利学报, 2024, 55(1): 1-12.

ZUO Qi-ting, WU Qing-song, JI Yi-hu, et al. Measurement method of regional water balance and imbalance degree[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2024, 55(1): 1-12. (in Chinese))

[16]
Yin D, Li X, Wang F, et al. Water-energy-ecosystem nexus modeling using multi-objective, non-linear programming in a regulated river: Exploring tradeoffs among environmental flows, cascaded small hydropower, and inter-basin water diversion projects[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2022, 308: 114582.

[17]
陈述, 纪勤, 颜克胜, 陈云. 长江流域水资源—经济—生态系统的耦合协调及影响因素研究[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2023, 34(3): 28-36.

CHEN Shu, JI Qin, YAN Ke-sheng, CHEN Yun. Study on coupling coordination and influencing factors of water resources-economy-ecosystem in Yangtze River Basin[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering, 2023, 34(3): 28-36. (in Chinese))

[18]
左其亭, 全志淼, 吴青松, 等. 经济社会与生态用水平衡计算规则与方法[J]. 水资源保护, 2024, 40(3): 1-10.

ZUO Qi-ting, QUAN Zhi-miao, WU Qing-song, et al. Calculation rules and methods of economic, social and ecological water balance[J]. Water Resource Protection, 2024, 40(3): 1-10. (in Chinese))

[19]
尹炜, 翟红娟, 邓志民, 等. 南水北调西线工程水源区生态需水研究[J]. 人民长江, 2023, 54(6): 41-46,65.

( YIN Wei, ZHAI Hong-juan, DENG Zhi-min, et al. Study on ecological water demand in water source area of West Route of South-to-North Water Diversion Project[J]. Yangtze River, 2023, 54(6): 41-46,65. (in Chinese )

[20]
Adams LE, Lund JR, Moyle PB, et al. Environmental hedging: A theory and method for reconciling reservoir operations for downstream ecology and water supply[J]. Water Resources Research, 2017, 53(9): 7816-7831.

[21]
邓志民, 李斐, 邓瑞, 等. 长江流域生态流量满足程度及其保障措施研究[J]. 人民长江, 2021, 52(7): 71-75.

DENG Zhi-min, LI-Fei, DENG Rui, et al. Study on the satisfaction degree of ecological flow in the Yangtze River Basin and its safeguard measures[J]. Yangtze River, 2021, 52(7): 71-75. (in Chinese))

[22]
陈昂, 隋欣, 廖文根, 等. 我国河流生态基流理论研究回顾[J]. 中国水利水电科学研究院学报, 2016, 14(6): 401-411.

CHEN Ang, SUI Xin, LIAO Wen-gen, et al. A review of river ecological base flow theory in China[J]. Journal of China Academy of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, 2016, 14(6): 401-411. (in Chinese))

[23]
Tan X, Liu B, Tan X, et al. Long-term water imbalances of watersheds resulting from biases in hydroclimatic data sets for water budget analyses[J]. Water Resources Research, 2022, 58(3): e2021WR031209.

[24]
王淑佳, 孔伟, 任亮, 等. 国内耦合协调度模型的误区及修正[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(3): 793-810.

WANG Shu-jia, KONG Wei, REN Liang, et al. Misunderstanding and correction of domestic coupling coordination degree model[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2021, 36(3): 793-810. (in Chinese))

[25]
白美霞, 王高旭, 张轩, 等. 青海省水资源-环境-社会经济系统耦合协调特征[J]. 人民黄河, 2023, 45(4): 70-75,91.

( BAI Mei-xia, WANG Gao-xu, ZHANG Xuan, et al. Coupling coordination characteristics of water resources-environment-socio-economic system in Qinghai Province[J]. Huanghe River, 2023, 45(4): 70-75,91. (in Chinese )

文章导航

/