干湿循环作用下原状黄土渗透性及其对土-水特征曲线的影响

常洲; 晏长根; 安宁; 兰恒星; 石玉玲; 包含; 许江波

doi:10.11988/ckyyb.20220826

长江科学院院报 >

2024 , Vol. 41 >Issue 1: 143 - 150

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20220826

岩土工程

干湿循环作用下原状黄土渗透性及其对土-水特征曲线的影响

常洲 ,
晏长根 ,
安宁 ,
兰恒星 ,
石玉玲 ,
包含 ,
许江波

展开

1.长安大学公路学院,西安 710064;
2.中建五局投资管理公司,长沙 410116;
3.长安大学地质工程与测绘学院,西安 710054;
4.中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京 100101

常洲(1997-),男,山西晋城人,博士研究生,主要从事岩土工程研究工作。E-mail: changzhoucn@163.com

收稿日期: 2022-07-12

修回日期: 2022-11-15

网络出版日期: 2023-10-12

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(42077265,42041006)

收起

Permeability and Soil-Water Characteristic Curve of Undisturbed Loess under Wetting-drying Cycles

CHANG Zhou ,
YAN Chang-gen ,
AN Ning ,
LAN Heng-xing ,
SHI Yu-ling ,
BAO Han ,
XU Jiang-bo

Expand

1. Highway School, Chang'an University,Xi'an 710064,China;
2. Investment Management Company of China Construction Fifth Engineering Bureau,Changsha 410116,China;
3. School of Geological Engineering and Geomatics,Chang'an University,Xi'an 710054,China;
4. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100101,China

Received date: 2022-07-12

Revised date: 2022-11-15

Online published: 2023-10-12

Fold

摘要

为评估干湿循环作用对原状黄土水力特性的劣化效应,对甘肃Q₃黄土进行了4组不同干湿循环路径下的饱和渗透试验与土-水特征测试,分析土体饱和渗透系数和土-水特征曲线随干湿循环次数、循环幅度和下限含水率的变化规律。结果表明:原状黄土饱和渗透系数劣化度与干湿循环次数间关系可采用双曲线函数进行描述,6次循环后劣化度变化趋于稳定;土体饱和渗透系数劣化度随循环幅度增大而线性增大,随下限含水率增大而线性减小。V-G模型对干湿循环下黄土的土-水特征曲线拟合效果良好,模型参数θ_s、α、n变化幅度较小,而参数θ_r随循环次数增加呈指数下降趋势。依据试验结果建立了考虑干湿循环3参数的饱和渗透系数劣化模型与土-水特征曲线模型,并对土体非饱和渗透系数进行了预测分析。

关键词： 原状黄土; 干湿循环; 渗透系数; 土-水特征曲线; 劣化模型

本文引用格式

常洲 , 晏长根 , 安宁 , 兰恒星 , 石玉玲 , 包含 , 许江波 . 干湿循环作用下原状黄土渗透性及其对土-水特征曲线的影响[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2024 , 41(1) : 143 -150 . DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20220826

Abstract

To assess the impact of wetting-drying cycles on the hydraulic properties of undisturbed loess, we performed saturated permeability tests and soil-water characteristic tests on Q₃ loess from Gansu Province under four different wetting-drying cycle paths. The aim is to examine the changes in permeability and soil-water characteristic curves (SWCC) with the number of cycles, cycle amplitude, and lower bound water content. Results revealed that the deterioration of saturated permeability coefficients can be modeled using a hyperbolic function with respect to wetting-drying cycles. After six cycles, the deterioration tends to stabilize. As cycle amplitude increases, the deterioration of saturated permeability coefficients exhibits a linear increase, while a linear decrease with the rise in lower bound water content. The SWCC of loess can be represented by the V-G model; parameters θ_s, α, and n remain relatively unaffected, whereas the parameter θ_r declines exponentially with an increase in the number of cycles. Deterioration models for saturated permeability coefficients and SWCC models considering the above three parameters of wetting-drying cycles are established, enabling the prediction of unsaturated permeability coefficients of loess.

Key words： undisturbed loess; wetting-drying cycles; permeability coefficient; soil-water characteristic curve; deterioration model

参考文献

[1]LU N, LIKOS W J. Unsaturated Soil Mechanics[M]. Hoboken, New Jersy: Wiley, 2004.
[2] 兰恒星, 彭建兵, 祝艳波, 等. 黄河流域地质地表过程与重大灾害效应研究与展望[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2022, 52(2): 199-221.(LAN Heng-xing, PENG Jian-bing, ZHU Yan-bo, et al. Research and Prospect of Geological Surface Processes and Major Disaster Effects in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Scientia Sinica (Terrae), 2022, 52(2): 199-221.(in Chinese))
[3] 刘宏泰,张爱军,段涛,等. 干湿循环对重塑黄土强度和渗透性的影响[J].水利水运工程学报,2010(4): 38-42.(LIU Hong-tai, ZHANG Ai-jun, DUAN Tao, et al. The Influence of Alternate Dry-wet on the Strength and Permeability of Remolded Loess[J]. Hydro-Science and Engineering, 2010(4): 38-42.(in Chinese))
[4] 刘朋飞,殷跃平,李滨,等.非饱和黄土干湿循环土水特征曲线试验及渗透系数预测[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2015,26(4):125-129.(LIU Peng-fei,YIN Yue-ping,LI Bin,et al. The Tests of Soil-water Characteristical Curve and Permeability Coefficient Prediction of the Wetting-drying Cycles for Unsaturated Loess[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2015,26(4):125-129.(in Chinese))
[5] 景静, 孙文, 江肖鹏. 干湿循环对非饱和黄土渗透系数的影响研究[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2020, 31(6): 224-229.(JING Jing, SUN Wen, JIANG Xiao-peng. Influence of Dry-wet Cycles on the Permeability Coefficient of Unsaturated Loess[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering, 2020, 31(6): 224-229.(in Chinese))
[6] LU H,LI J,WANG W,et al.Cracking and Water Seepage of Xiashu Loess Used as Landfill Cover under Wetting-Drying Cycles[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2015, 74(11): 7441-7450.
[7] 赵茜,杨金熹,赵晋萍.冻融和干湿循环对原状黄土渗透系数的影响[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2020,31(2):119-126.(ZHAO Qian,YANG Jin-xi,ZHAO Jin-ping.Experimental Study on Permeability of Undisturbed Loess under Freezing-thawing and Drying-wetting Cycling Conditions[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,2020,31(2):119-126.(in Chinese))
[8] 李同录, 范江文, 习羽, 等. 击实黄土孔隙结构对土水特征的影响分析[J]. 工程地质学报, 2019, 27(5): 1019-1026.(LI Tong-lu, FAN Jiang-wen, XI Yu, et al. Analysis for Effect of Microstructure on SWCC of Compacted Loess[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2019, 27(5): 1019-1026.(in Chinese))
[9] 王海曼, 倪万魁, 刘魁. 延安压实黄土土-水特征曲线的快速预测方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(7): 1845-1853.(WANG Hai-man, NI Wan-kui, LIU Kui. Rapid Prediction Method of Soil-water Characteristic Curve of Yan'an Compacted Loess[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(7): 1845-1853.(in Chinese))
[10] YUAN K Z,NI W K,LÜ X F,et al. Permeability Characteristics and Structural Evolution of Compacted Loess under Different Dry Densities and Wetting-Drying Cycles[J].PLoS One,2021,16(6):e0253508.
[11] 王来才, 胡海军, 王晨, 等. 不同压实度重塑黄土持水曲线测试及模型预测[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2021, 43(增刊1): 204-208.(WANG Lai-cai, HU Hai-jun, WANG Chen, et al. Measurement and Prediction of Water Retention Curve of Remolded Loess with Different Degrees of Compaction[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(S1): 204-208.(in Chinese))
[12] 张玉伟, 宋战平, 谢永利. 孔隙变化条件下黄土土水特征曲线预测模型[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2022, 44(11): 2017-2025.(ZHANG Yu-wei, SONG Zhan-ping, XIE Yong-li. Prediction Model for Soil-water Characteristic Curve of Loess under Porosity Change[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44(11): 2017-2025.(in Chinese))
[13] 刘奉银, 张昭, 周冬, 等. 密度和干湿循环对黄土土-水特征曲线的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2011, 32(增刊2): 132-136, 142.(LIU Feng-yin, ZHANG Zhao, ZHOU Dong, et al. Effects of Initial Density and Drying-wetting Cycle on Soil Water Characteristic Curve of Unsaturated Loess[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32(S2): 132-136, 142.(in Chinese))
[14] 赵天宇,王锦芳.考虑密度与干湿循环影响的黄土土水特征曲线[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2012,43(6):2445-2453.(ZHAO Tian-yu,WANG Jin-fang.Soil-water Characteristic Curve for Unsaturated Loess Soil Considering Density and Wetting-drying Cycle Effects[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology),2012,43(6):2445-2453.(in Chinese))
[15] 康海伟,李萍,侯晓坤,等.原状黄土土水特征滞后性研究[J].水文地质工程地质,2020,47(2):76-83.(KANG Hai-wei, LI Ping, HOU Xiao-kun, et al. A Study of Hysteresis of Soil and Water Characteristics of Intact Loess[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2020, 47(2): 76-83.(in Chinese))
[16] 叶万军, 李长清, 杨更社, 等. 增湿-减湿作用下黄土裂隙演化规律研究[J]. 工程地质学报, 2017, 25(2): 376-383.(YE Wan-jun, LI Chang-qing, YANG Geng-she, et al. Evolution of Loess Crack under Action of dehumidification-humidification[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2017, 25(2): 376-383.(in Chinese))
[17] 胡长明, 袁一力, 王雪艳, 等. 干湿循环作用下压实黄土强度劣化模型试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2018, 37(12): 2804-2818.(HU Chang-ming, YUAN Yi-li, WANG Xue-yan, et al. Experimental Study on Strength Deterioration Model of Compacted Loess under Wetting-drying Cycles[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2018, 37(12): 2804-2818.(in Chinese))
[18] 王铁行,郝延周,汪朝,等.干湿循环作用下压实黄土动强度性质试验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2020,39(6):1242-1251.(WANG Tie-hang,HAO Yan-zhou,WANG Zhao,et al.Experimental Study on Dynamic Strength Properties of Compacted Loess under Wetting-drying Cycles[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2020,39(6):1242-1251.(in Chinese))
[19] 叶万军, 赵志鹏, 杨更社, 等. 土体含水状态对黄土边坡剥落病害产生的影响[J]. 中国公路学报, 2015, 28(7): 18-24.(YE Wan-jun, ZHAO Zhi-peng, YANG Geng-she, et al. Influence of Soil Moisture State on Loess Slope Spalling Hazards[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2015, 28(7): 18-24.(in Chinese))
[20] 唐朝生, 施斌, 刘春, 等. 影响黏性土表面干缩裂缝结构形态的因素及定量分析[J]. 水利学报, 2007, 38(10): 1186-1193.(TANG Chao-sheng, SHI Bin, LIU Chun, et al. Factors Affecting the Surface Cracking in Clay Due to Drying Shrinkage[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2007, 38(10): 1186-1193.(in Chinese))
[21] 潘振兴, 杨更社, 叶万军, 等. 干湿循环作用下原状黄土力学性质及细观损伤研究[J]. 工程地质学报, 2020, 28(6): 1186-1192.(PAN Zhen-xing, YANG Geng-she, YE Wan-jun, et al. Study on Mechanical Properties and Microscopic Damage of Undisturbed Loess under Dry and Wet Cycles[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2020, 28(6): 1186-1192.(in Chinese))
[22] YAN C,AN N,WANG Y,et al.Effect of Dry-Wet Cycles and Freeze-Thaw Cycles on the Antierosion Ability of Fiber-Reinforced Loess[J].Advances in Materials Science and Engineering,2021,Doi:10.1155/2021/8834598.
[23] 许健, 任畅, 高靖寓, 等. 干湿循环效应下Na₂SO₄盐渍原状黄土渗透特性与细观机制[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 52(5): 1644-1654.(XU Jian, REN Chang, GAO Jing-yu, et al. Influence of Dry-wet Cycles on Hydraulic Conductivity and Microstructure of Saline Undisturbed Loess with Sodium Sulfate[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2021, 52(5): 1644-1654.(in Chinese))
[24] 冉艳玲,王益权,张润霞,等.保水剂对土壤持水特性的作用机理研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2015,33(5):101-107.(RAN Yan-ling,WANG Yi-quan,ZHANG Run-xia,et al. Research on the Mechanism of Super Absorbent Polymer to Soil Water-holding Characteristic[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas,2015,33(5):101-107.(in Chinese))
[25] 丁新原, 周智彬, 雷加强, 等. 塔里木沙漠公路防护林土壤水分特征曲线模型分析与比较[J]. 干旱区地理, 2015, 38(5): 985-993.(DING Xin-yuan, ZHOU Zhi-bin, LEI Jia-qiang, et al. Analysis and Comparison of Models for Soil Water Characteristic Curves of Tarim Desert Highway Shelterbelt[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2015, 38(5): 985-993.(in Chinese))
[26] TARANTINO A. A Water Retention Model for Deformable Soils[J]. Géotechnique, 2009, 59(9): 751-762.
[27] 邵明安, 王全九, 黄明斌. 土壤物理学[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006.(SHAO Ming-an, WANG Quan-jiu, HUANG Ming-bin. Soil physics[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2006.(in Chinese))
[28] 叶云雪, 邹维列, 袁斐, 等. 基于土壤转换函数(PTF)预测不同初始孔隙比土的土-水特征曲线[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2018, 40(12): 2305-2311.(YE Yun-xue, ZOU Wei-lie, YUAN Fei, et al. Predicating Soil-water Characteristic Curves of Soils with Different Initial Void Ratios Based on a Pedotransfer Function[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2018,40(12):2305-2311.(in Chinese))

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献