岩土工程

两种软基沉降预测方法的应用及对比分析

  • 闫飞亚 ,
  • 陈志波
展开
  • 福州大学 环境与资源学院, 福州 350116
闫飞亚(1988-),男,河南太康人,硕士研究生,研究方向为地质工程,(电话)15171482229(电子信箱)yanfeiya1988@163.com。

收稿日期: 2014-05-27

  网络出版日期: 2016-01-20

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(41102167);福州大学科技发展基金(2011XQ12)

Application and Comparison of Two Methods of Settlement Predictionfor Foundation in Soil

  • YAN Fei-ya ,
  • CHEN Zhi-bo
Expand
  • School of Environment and Resources, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350116, China

Received date: 2014-05-27

  Online published: 2016-01-20

摘要

运用沉降预测方法中的双曲线法、指数曲线法对堆载预压处理的某道路软土地基进行沉降预测,并研究了初始时间起点、采用数据时间长短、时间间隔对2种方法推算精度的影响。研究表明初始时间起点对双曲线法的推算精度影响较大,对指数曲线法的推算精度影响较小;采用数据时间的长短对2种方法的影响精度都很大,采用较长时间的沉降资料,能提高推算精度;时间间隔对2种方法的影响都较小。

本文引用格式

闫飞亚 , 陈志波 . 两种软基沉降预测方法的应用及对比分析[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2016 , 33(1) : 106 -110 . DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20140437

Abstract

Based on methods such as hyperbolic method and exponential curve method, we carried out settlement prediction for soft-soil foundation of a highway, which was treated by surcharge preloading. Influences of starting time, time length from the moment of full loading and time interval were studied for the two methods above. Results show that, as for prediction accuracy, hyperbolic method is more influenced by starting time than exponential curve method. Then, time length from the moment of full loading has great influence on the two methods, and prediction accuracy can be improved with the increase of time length. Finally, two methods are less affected by time interval.

参考文献

[1] 王 伟,卢廷浩,王晓妮. 软土路基线性加载沉降曲线的研究[J].岩土力学,2006,27(5):791-794.
[2] 赵明华,刘 煜,曹文贵.软土路基沉降发展规律及其预测[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2004,35(1):157-161.
[3] JTJ017—96, 公路软土地基路堤设计与施工技术规范[S].北京:人民交通出版社,1997.
[4] 潘林有,谢新宇.用曲线拟合的的方法预测软土地基沉降[J].岩土力学,2004,25(7):1053-1058.
[5] 吕秀杰.软土地基工后沉降预测模型的研究[J].岩土力学,2009,30(7):2091-2096.
[6] 杨 晶,楼晓明,黄江枫,等.常用沉降预测方法在软基堆载预压实例中的应用比较[J].工程勘察,2011,(3):18-23.
[7] 孙昊月.堆载预压法处理软土地基沉降量预测方法[D].长春:吉林大学,2010.
文章导航

/