长江科学院院报

长江科学院院报 >

2015 , Vol. 32 >Issue 8: 103 - 109

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-5485.2015.08.019

岩土工程

万州孙家荆竹屋基滑坡滑动模型研究

  • 姜 波 ,
  • 柴 波 ,
  • 方 恒 ,
  • 王佳佳 ,
  • 黄发明
展开
  • 中国地质大学（武汉） a.环境学院;
    b.工程学院;
    c.地质调查研究院, 武汉 430074
姜 波(1990-),男,湖北枣阳人,硕士研究生,主要从事工程地质方面的研究,(电话)13986095133 (电子信箱)jbo1101@163.com。

收稿日期: 2014-03-31

  网络出版日期: 2015-08-18

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(41202247);中国地质调查局项目(121201122017);中央高校优秀青年教师基金项目(2012049018)

收起

Sliding Model of Jingzhuwuji Landslide in Sunjia Town, Wanzhou District

  • JIANG Bo ,
  • CHAI Bo ,
  • FANG Heng ,
  • WANG Jia-jia ,
  • HUANG Fa-ming
Expand
  • 1.School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China;
    2.Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China;
    3.Geological Survey Institute, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China

Received date: 2014-03-31

  Online published: 2015-08-18

Fold

摘要

荆竹屋基滑坡的滑动过程存在多种解体模式,为了研究该类顺层岩质滑坡的滑动模型,在对滑坡后滑体结构和地面破裂现象系统调查的基础上,根据解体特征对滑坡进行了分区,并通过建立的滑坡作用强度评价模型,探讨了滑坡滑距、运动解体模式和建筑物易损性等问题。研究结果表明①前缘采石场的切坡使潜在不稳定的斜坡临空,抗滑力降低,诱发了中部浅层顺层软弱页岩层及后部风化接触带的整体滑动;②主滑体滑移距离约29.5 m,主滑方向为5°,滑体厚度约15 m;③受滑体风化层厚度变化和前地形条件限制,在整体滑动后分区解体现象明显。滑体上各区对建筑物易损性的作用强度从大到小依次为前缘堆积区(Ⅵ)>后缘拉槽破坏区(Ⅱ)>中部推覆区(Ⅳ)和破碎区(Ⅶ)>局部分块滑移区(Ⅴ)>中部逆冲区(Ⅳ)>顺层整体滑移区(Ⅲ1、Ⅲ2)>后缘拉裂影响区(Ⅰ)。研究绘制出的滑坡解体破碎分区图,对分析滑坡风险分布规律具有参考价值。

关键词： 顺层岩质滑坡; 滑距; 运动模式; 解体; 作用强度

本文引用格式

姜 波 , 柴 波 , 方 恒 , 王佳佳 , 黄发明 . 万州孙家荆竹屋基滑坡滑动模型研究[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2015 , 32(8) : 103 -109 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5485.2015.08.019

Abstract

A large bedded landslide occurred in Sunjia Town, Wanzhou District of Chongqing. There were multiple disintegration modes in the sliding process. In order to study the slip model of such bedded rock landslide, the slip structure and ground rupture were investigated. Furthermore on this basis, the landslide was partitioned and the sliding distance, movement patterns and building’s vulnerability were analysed. Results reveal that 1) potentially unstable slopes were made free by slope cutting of the leading edge of the quarry, and the anti-sliding force decreased, which triggered the sliding of shallow bedded weak shale in the middle and weathered contact zone in the back; 2) the primary slip body slid about 29.5m, the main slide direction was 5° and the thickness of slip body was about 15m; 3) affected by the change of weathered layer thickness and the previous topographical conditions, the partitioned disintegration was obvious after the sliding. The intensity of each partition’s effect on building’s vulnerability can be ranged as: front accumulation zone (Ⅵ) > groove damaging zone in the back edge (Ⅱ) > central nappe zone (Ⅳ), crushing zone (Ⅶ) > local block sliding zone (Ⅴ) > central thrust zone (Ⅳ) > integral sliding zone (Ⅲ1, Ⅲ2 )> affected zone in the back edge (Ⅰ). Moreover, the zoning map of landslide’s crushing and disintegration is given, and it has reference value for analyzing landslide risk distribution.

Key words： bedded rock landslide; sliding distance; movement pattern; disintegration; intensity of effect

参考文献

KILBURN C R J, PASUTO A. Major Risk from Rapid, Large-volume Landslides in Europe (EU Project RUNOUT). Geomorphology, 2003, 54(1): 3-9.
殷跃平. 斜倾厚层山体滑坡视向滑动机制研究——以重庆武隆鸡尾山滑坡为例. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2010, 29(2): 217-226. (YIN Yue-ping. Mechanism of Apparent Dip Slide of Inclined Bedding Rockslide: A Case Study of Jiweishan Rockslide in Wulong, Chongqing. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 29(2): 217-226.(in Chinese))
冯 振, 殷跃平, 李 滨, 等. 鸡尾山特大型岩质滑坡的物理模型试验. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 44(7): 2827-2835. (FENG Zhen, YIN Yue-ping, LI Bin, et al. Physical Modeling of Jiweishan Landslide from Massive Rock Slope Failure. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2013, 44(7): 2827-2835. (in Chinese))
孙广忠.岩体结构力学. 北京: 科学出版社,1988: 6-9. (SUN Guang-zhong. Rock Mass Structure Mechanics. Beijing: Science Press, 1988: 6-9. (in Chinese))
柴 波, 殷坤龙, 陈丽霞, 等. 岩体结构控制下的斜坡变形特征. 岩土力学, 2009, 30(2):521-525. (CHAI Bo, YIN Kun-long, CHEN Li-xia, et al. Analysis of Slope Deformation under Control of Rock Mass Structure. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2009, 30(2): 521-525. (in Chinese))
黄波林, 陈立德, 刘广宁, 等. 岩体结构对三峡库区岸坡变形失稳模式的影响. 人民长江, 2010, 41(19): 41-44. (HUANG Bo-lin, CHEN Li-de, LIU Guang-ning, et al. Effect of Rock Structure on Deformation and Instability Mode of High Steep Slope in Three Gorges Reservoir Area. Yangtze River, 2010, 41(19): 41- 44. (in Chinese))
李守定, 李 晓, 吴 疆, 等. 大型基岩顺层滑坡滑带形成化工程与模式. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2007, 26(12): 2473-2480. (LI Shou-ding, LI Xiao, WU Jiang, et al. Evolution Process and Pattern of Sliding Zone in Large Consequent Bedding Rock Landslide. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 26(12): 2473-2480.(in Chinese))
DAVIES T R H, MCSAVENEY M J, HODGSON K A. A Fragmentation-spreading Model for Long-runout Rock Avalanches. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1999, 36(6): 1096-1110.
MCDOUGALL S, BOULTBEE N, HUNGR O, et al. The Zymoetz River Landslide, British Columbia, Canada: Description and Dynamic Analysis of a Rock Slide-debris Flow. Landslides, 2006, 3(3): 195-204.
简文星, 殷坤龙, 闫天俊, 等.重庆万州区民国场滑坡基本特征及形成机制. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2005, 16(4):20-23.(JIAN Wen-xing, YIN Kun-long, YAN Tian-jun, et al. Characteristics and Formation Mechanism of Minguochang Landslide in Wanzhou District, Chongqing. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2005, 16(4): 20-23. (in Chinese))
HUNGR O, FELL R, COUTURE R, et al. Landslide Risk Management∥International Conference on Landslide Risk Management. Vancouver, Canada, Taylor & Francis. May 31-June 3, 2005: 776.
CRUDEN D M, VARNES D J. Landslide Types and Processes∥Landslide Investigation and Mitigation. Washington: National Academy Press, 1996: 36-75.
RAGOZIN A L, TIKHVINSKY I O. Landslide Hazard, Vulnerability and Risk Assessment∥BROMHEAD E, DIXON N, IBSEN M L. Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Landslides, Cardiff, June 26-30, 2000: 1257-1262.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉

*严禁使用本系统存储、处理、传输涉密信息*
版权所有 © 《长江科学院院报》编辑部
技术支持：北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司