工程安全与灾害防治

一种新型的组合赋权方法及在水闸安全评价中的应用

  • 闫滨 ,
  • 孙友良 ,
  • 闫胜利 ,
  • 郭超 ,
  • 刘桐渤
展开
  • 1.沈阳农业大学 水利学院,沈阳 110866;
    2.辽宁水利职业学院,沈阳 110122;
    3.辽宁省朝阳县水利水保局,辽宁 朝阳 122000;
    4.辽宁省防汛抗旱指挥部,沈阳 110003;
    5.大连庄河市水务局,辽宁 庄河 116400
闫滨(1972-), 女, 辽宁朝阳人, 副教授, 博士, 主要从事水工建筑物安全监控及评价和生态水工结构方面的研究, (电话)024-88487134(电子信箱)yanb2002@163.com。

收稿日期: 2013-07-15

  修回日期: 2014-10-17

  网络出版日期: 2014-10-20

基金资助

辽宁省重大科技计划基金资助项目(2012212001)

A Novel Combination Weighing Method and Its Application in Sluice Safety Evaluation

  • YAN Bin ,
  • SUN You-liang ,
  • YAN Sheng-li ,
  • GUO Chao ,
  • LIU Tong-bo
Expand
  • 1.School of Water Conservancy,Shenyang Agricultural University,Shenyang 110866,China;
    2.Liaoning Water Conservancy Vocational College,Shenyang 110122,China;
    3.Bureau of Soil and Water Conservancy of Chaoyang County, Chaoyang 122000,China;
    4.Liaoning Provincial Headquarters of Flood Mitigation and Drought Relief,Shenyang 110003,China;
    5.Zhuanghe Water Resources Bureau, Zhuanghe 116400,China

Received date: 2013-07-15

  Revised date: 2014-10-17

  Online published: 2014-10-20

摘要

为提高水闸安全评价中指标权重计算的准确性与合理性,克服常用权重计算方法赋权方式单一、主观性较强和计算粗糙等弊端,引入三标度层次分析法作为主观赋权方式;提出基于改进白化权函数的离差最大化法,并以此方法作为水闸评价的客观赋权方式。在此基础上,提出了一种融合主、客观权重的新型组合赋权方法,并应用于水闸安全评价的指标权重计算。工程实例表明:该方法可操作性强,能有效利用专家经验和数据信息,减小主观因素和不确定信息的干扰,为水闸安全评价指标权重确定提供了新思路。

本文引用格式

闫滨 , 孙友良 , 闫胜利 , 郭超 , 刘桐渤 . 一种新型的组合赋权方法及在水闸安全评价中的应用[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2014 , 31(10) : 108 -113 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5485.2014.10.016

Abstract

In order to improve the accuracy and rationality in calculating the index weights of sluice safety assessment, and to overcome such drawbacks as single weighing manner, strong subjectivity and rough calculation of commonly-used weights calculation method, three-scale analytic hierarchy process is introduced as a subjective weighing method. The method of maximizing deviations based on the improved whitenization weight function is proposed as an objective weighing method. On this basis, a novel combination weighing method which integrates subjective and objective weights is put forward and is applied to the index weights calculation in sluice safety assessment. Engineering examples indicate that this method is reasonably practicable with strong operability, and could effectively make use of the expertise experience and data information to eliminate the interference of subjective factors and uncertain information. It offers a new idea in determining index weights for sluice safety assessment.

参考文献

[1] 闫 滨,孙友良,高真伟.水闸安全综合评价研究综述[J].水电能源科学,2013,31(2):171-173. (YAN Bin, SUN You-liang, GAO Zhen-wei. Review of Study on Sluice Safety Comprehensive Evaluation [J]. Water Resources and Power, 2013, 31(2): 171-173. (in Chinese))
[2] 徐兴中,张龙天.基于群决策和变权赋权法在水闸老化模糊综合评判中的应用研究[J].科技进步与对策,2009,26(21):148-152. (XU Xing-zhong, ZHANG Long-tian. Application of Group Weight Decision-making and Variable Weight to Fuzzy Integrated Evaluation on Sluice Aging Deterioration [J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2009, 26(21):148-152. (in Chinese))
[3] 朱 琳,王仁超,孙颖环,等.水闸老化评判中的群决策和变权赋权法[J].水利水电技术,2005,36 (4):98-101. (ZHU Lin, WANG Ren-chao, SUN Ying-huan, et al. Application of Group Weight Decision-making and Variable Weight to Synthetic Evaluation on Sluice Aging Deterioration[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2005,36(4):98-101. (in Chinese))
[4] 何鲜峰.水闸系统可靠性评价理论及其应用[D].郑州:郑州大学,2005. (HE Xian-feng. The Reliability Evaluation Theory of Sluice System and Application[D]. Zhengzhou: Zhengzhou University, 2005. (in Chinese))
[5] 曹邱林,吴中如.水闸健康综合诊断的权重系数确定方法[J].河海大学学报(自然科学版), 2008,36(5):646-649. (CAO Qiu-lin, WU Zhong-ru. Method for Determining Weight Coefficients of Sluice Health Comprehensive Diagnosis[J]. Journal of Hohai University (Natural Sciences), 2008, 36(5):646-649. (in Chinese))
[6] 何艳霞.山东黄河水闸安全评价方法研究[D].济南:山东大学,2010. (HE Yan-xia. The Study of Sluices Safety Assessment Method of the Shandong Yellow River [D]. Jinan: Shandong University, 2010. (in Chinese))
[7] 田 丰.基于层次熵变权法的水闸模糊综合评价研究[D].天津:天津大学,2008. (TIAN Feng. Study on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation of Sluice Based on AHP, Entropy Endowing and Variable Weight Method[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2008. (in Chinese))
[8] 孔楠楠.多层次模糊识别理论在水闸安全评估中的应用[J].水利与建筑工程学报,2012,10(3): 71-75. (KONG Nan-nan. Application of Multistage Fuzzy Diagnosis Theory in Safety Assessment for Sluice[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, 2012,10(3): 71-75. (in Chinese))
[9] 宋小波,蔡 新,杨 杰.基于改进AHP法的水闸安全性模糊综合评价[J].水电能源科学,2013,31(2):174-176. (SONG Xiao-bo, CAI Xin, YANG Jie. Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation of Sluice Safety Based on Improved AHP Method[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2013,31(2):174-176. (in Chinese))
[10]马农乐, 赵中极. 基于层次分析法及其改进对确定权重系数的分析[J].水利科技与经济, 2006,12(11):732-733. (MA Nong-le, ZHAO Zhong-ji. The Analyses of Calculating the Proportion Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process and the Improved AHP [J]. Water Conservancy Science and Technology and Economy, 2006,12(11):732-733. (in Chinese))
[11]董一哲,党耀国.基于离差最大化法的灰色聚类方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2009,29(9): 141-146. (DONG Yi-zhe, DANG Yao-guo. Grey Clustering Method Based on Maximizing Deviations [J]. Systems Engineering: Theory & Practice, 2009,29(9): 141-146. (in Chinese))
[12]刘思峰,谢乃明.基于改进三角白化权函数的灰评估新方法[J].系统工程学报,2011,26(2): 244-249. (LIU Si-feng, XIE Nai-ming. New Grey Evaluation Method Based on Reformative Triangular Whitenization Weight Function [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2011,26(2):244-249. (in Chinese))
[13]陈华友.多属性决策中基于离差最大化的组合赋权方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2004,26(2): 194-197. (CHEN Hua-you. Combination Determining Weights Method for Multiple Attribute Decision Making Based on Maximizing Deviations [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2004, 26(2): 194-197. (in Chinese))
[14]陈 伟,夏建华.综合主、客观权重信息的最优组合赋权方法[J].数学的实践与认识,2007,37(1): 17-21. (CHEN Wei, XIA Jian-hua. An Optimal Weights Combination Method Considering Both Subjective and Objective Weight Information[J]. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2007,37(1): 17-21. (in Chinese))
文章导航

/